This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
How should multiple CAS numbers (for cis and trans stereoisomers and the mixture of both stereoisomers) be presented in the article? The Chembox template allows only for one CAS number. Icek (talk) 01:19, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is another field "CASOther" which I added. --Ed (Edgar181) 02:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Great article, really good work. I only take exception to the inclusion of the 5th reference "Old Lady Smell" - it is the polar opposite of what you've done here. The site linked is juvenile, decidedly non-scientific and generally degrading to the elderly. To me, that is about 180 degrees from what you've done on this page. I'd highly recommend you all delete that Reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfrench518 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure what to do for this. A whole bunch of websites are misspelling this term as "Noneal" which turns up unreliable search results. The misspelling is probably not intentional but due to word-of-mouth repetition by people unfamiliar with the topic seeing the wrong spelling initially.
But if there's tens of thousands of web search results for Noneal, then perhaps it should be mentioned as a somewhat frequent misspelling in the article lead, if only to help lead people to know the correct spelling in this article.