Talk:Alvarelhão

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Would be quite useful to work out if this grape is the same as Brancelho - it would certainly explain the lack of information about it :-), but I'm wary of some of the German sources. I suspect that only a few people in Portugal know the real story, and even then it could still be waiting for more DNA data. Is there another synonym for it in the Douro - I was surprised to find nothing on the IVDP list. FlagSteward 23:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been thinking about this more - if it's not even one of the 11 grapes listed by the IVDP, then it doesn't count as a significant member of the port blend, and it's hard to argue that it even deserves to be a Mid class. I guess if it was the same as Brancelho, which is one of more important of the 40-odd grapes allowed in Vinho Verde, then it would probably deserve a Mid, but for now I think it deserves to be at Low.FlagSteward 14:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 19:14, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alvarelhão. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:24, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]