Talk:Bangkok Marriott Hotel The Surawongse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 11:30, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that a Thai hotel restaurant serves "Chicken Volcano", a dish containing whiskey? Source: Wichiantanon, Kankanok. "Praya Kitchen. This hotel Thai restaurant aims to bring back a forgotten kitchen classic". BK Magazine. Archived from the original on 2024-04-06. Retrieved 2024-04-06.

    When loaded, the page is on the "At a Glance" tab. Click the "Review" tab to get to the review that verifies this source. The review notes: "Take, for example, the Gai Ob Phu Kao Fai, or “Chicken Volcano” (B298). This whole spit-roast chicken gets doused in Mekhong whiskey and set alight tableside in a display that’ll be familiar to anyone who remembers Thai fine dining of yesteryear."

Created by Cunard (talk).

Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 72 past nominations.

Post-promotion hook changes will be logged on the talk page; consider watching the nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.

Cunard (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good article, passes Earwig (the finds are quotes), long enough, and fully sourced. I was sceptical about neutrality, but nothing jumps out - the article follows the sources. User:Cunard, could you confirm you have no conflict of interest here? Onceinawhile (talk) 15:12, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review, Onceinawhile (talk · contribs)! I do not have a conflict of interest with the subject. Cunard (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Cunard, thank you and well done on a great article. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 16:18, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]