Talk:Carcassonne (board game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Strategy[edit]

The strategy section advocates judicious "farmer" placement, but the article gives no clue what a farmer is. JoDu987 (talk) 22:33, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. — Aldaron • T/C 22:49, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring and Different Editions[edit]

I have tried my best to state things as I understand them and in a clear manner. Basically, Hans im Glück has released three editions of the game, each with slightly different scoring rules, primarily in the area of farmers. Rio Grande Games has chosen not to implement the latter editions. There's a statement by Jay Tummelson on the link I gave to a page explaining the three editions of scoring stating that they prefer the first edition scoring and asked Hans im Glück for permission, which was granted.

When I first learned of the changes proposed by Hans im Glück, I tested them and found I (and my test groups) preferred the original. Therefore, I asked Hans im Glück if I could keep mine and was told they were happy with both, but were changing theirs as they felt the new rules were easier to understand.

Since most of my customers are unaware of German rule changes, I felt it was best to keep the original as having two versions only adds confusion (as seem by those of you who ARE aware of the German rules).

My policy is to not make changes (I WILL make corrections when mistakes were made in the original rules) when I simply reprint games.

Jay


Rio Grande Games

I was introduced to the third edition rules (albeit with four points per completed city and without the four point two-tile city) when I started and didn't realize the difference until the board gaming group at work I play with sat down and actually read the rules rather than take my word for it. Therefore, I feel it is important to mention the different editions of rules even though they don't appear in the English language version. -Fuzzy 15:14, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Re: versions - agreed. I did some tidying up of the layout of that section, and added a clarification as to which version is which. I imagine the "changes" would indeed be confusing to anyone with the RG English-language version only. Matt Lodder 21:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm really confused about scoring. I just purchased the game in Canada and the rules not only seem to follow the 3rd Edition rules set here, but also adds modifications to the end game like counting partially completed roads and cloisters and farm-touched castles as 4 points each. Any ideas? aechris 12:36, 2 January 2008 (EST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.152.35 (talk)

I'm not clear on what's confusing you. The 3rd edition rules are as presented in the table here (which also count partially completed roads and cloisters at the end of the game), and they're the ones that you should use. — Aldaron • T/C 18:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think the point this user is making is that it is 4 points per farm not 3 points as stated in the article. I can confirm that it is 4 points, per completed city, in my 3rd edition rules —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.193.137 (talk) 03:47, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scoring[edit]

Made some changes to the Gameplay section regarding scoring:

  • Changed scoring table to better reflect removal of 2 city exception in the 3rd edition.
  • Changed scoring table to reflect consistency of cloister scoring.
  • Changed scoring table titles to reflect rules (the headings Turn and Final more accurately reflect the distinctions between types of scoring)
  • Added Fields to the scoring table.
  • Cleaned up description of basic scoring procedures.

AmbientArchitecture 03:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Carcassonne : The City[edit]

Article currently states:

A further significant change is that a meeple may no longer be placed on the final tile that completes a structure, requiring that players plan ahead.

Is that really the case? I have Carcasonne and C:TC here and can't see this mentioned... Matt Lodder 21:18, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Meepo"[edit]

Have removed "(or meepo in Australia)" for the second time, because Google returns no results for meepo+carcassonne, and I've never heard this while playing in Australia. If it's a colloquialism, it seems a very minor one. --McGeddon 23:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it is a colloquialism and is important to those of us who play in Australia. I am not sure how it started but it is common. I could create a a webpage for Australia, but it seems simpler to have it in Wikipedia. Even for just those Aussies who love and play the game you could leave it in...I really don't think that this will affect others who read this entry.

I've removed it again, more because it makes the parenthesised section too long than for reasons of non-notability. I think it would be an appropriate note in an article on Meeples, or (perhaps) Australian slang... but probably not in the main Carc article Percy Snoodle 12:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked with my club members and we are happy with the note above - but alas there is no article on meeples to link it to...

How about on Australian English#Diminutives in the -o section - you could add something like:
This construction is even applied to [[neologism]]s, as in ''meepo'' ([[Meeple]])
Percy Snoodle 10:58, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Setup Time[edit]

Under the games template, it states that it takes 10 minutes setup time. What does setup involve? I was under the impression (from the dozens of times that I've played it) that it's simply shuffling the tiles, each player selecting their follower colours and piece, and then putting out the starting tile. I don't see how this would take anywhere near 10 minutes.Maeve 17:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC) (edited to sign my comment, sorry!)[reply]

Fixed. Val42 04:34, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think <1 minute is optimistic. I'd say 1-5 minutes, depending on familiarity and on how long it takes to put all the tiles face down (the basic set doesn't come with a bag). Percy Snoodle 12:13, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have all the expansions for the game, and if you play with all of the expansions the game can easily take 5 minutes to setup and two and a half hours to play. This should be noted somewhere, since it makes a big deal about easy setup and fast playing times (without any expansions). bob rulz 06:03, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting changes[edit]

Please don't bullet the expansions and spinoffs - doing so prevents them from flowing around the images. Percy Snoodle 08:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Miniature people[edit]

The article states that meeple is a portmanteau of 'miniature people', but the link given in the footnote states that meeple is truly a portmanteau of 'my people'. Why does the article directly contradict its reference? -- 134.173.200.104 22:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. fixed.

Unofficial Figure Taxonomy[edit]

Unofficial categorization of figures from the Carcassonne series

I have removed my figure (at right) presenting an unofficial taxonomy of Carcassonne game figures bacause it appears (based on the latest official rules from HiG) that it is no longer accurate. AmbientArchitecture 00:15, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had missed this amusing taxonomy. It looks right to me (although I've never actually played the Count edition although I own it). What were the rules that ruled it out? -Fuzzy (talk) 16:53, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Best geek board games?[edit]

This doesn't appear to be a authoritative source, i.e. it's just someone's blog post about the games he likes and considers geek-friendly. I think this link should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.42.178 (talk • contribs)

Agreed. Done. Percy Snoodle 09:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Combinatorial Analysis[edit]

In the basic game without rivers, there would be 81 possible tiles (each edge can be a city, road or farm; hence 3^4= 81). In the box there are 72 tiles. 25 of these are duplicates (all pure road and city pieces), so there are 47 distinct tiles. This means there are 81-47 = 34 tiles which are possible but are not in the game. I have a list of exactly what they are if anyone is interested. (Most of them are tiles with 1 road with 1 or 2 cities).

There are 81 possible ways the four sides might be oriented, but because the tiles can be rotated, there really are only 25 combinations, of which 19 could be played in four ways and another 3 could be played in two ways. Richard K. Carson (talk) 07:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

X-Box Live Arcade[edit]

A console version of Carcassonne for the X-Box Live Arcade was announced at the same time as the adaption of Settlers of Catan for marketplace at Leipzig, along with an adaption of Alhambra. Unfortunately, while Catan has been officially announced as coming soon and is building buzz, nothing has been seen of the other two. Is is worthy of mention in this article? 204.69.40.13 13:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expansions[edit]

"Games Quarterly also published expansion tiles for Carcassonne in its Winter 2006 edition." As far as I know, this expansion is formerly called "The Mini-Expansion" and consists on 12 tiles. Some are not new tiles but versions of other expansion tiles where the special marks have been removed. I think it should be shown as the other expansions, not just commented. (Cathars expansion came also with a magazine)

Agreed, and done. --70.71.207.107 04:17, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Big Box: only one cathedral?[edit]

"It is equivalent to own and play either the Big Box or the base game plus the four expansions, except that the former lacks the cloth bag from Inns and Cathedrals and one of the two cathedrals tile from Inns and Cathedrals."
Can someone confirm this? The German article does not mention it. Is this for the Rio Grande version only? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.104.242 (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I thought the cloth bag was part of Traders and Builders? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.105.202 (talk) 14:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have the Big Box. It does have multiple Cathederal tiles marked as Inns & Cathedral tiles. Not sure what expansion the bag came in but the bag is not in the big box box. Presumably this is because the use of the bag is superceded by the tower from the tower expansion which is in the box. In understand the English version of the Big Box, just like for the base version, is the same as the German except the English also includes the river expansion. - Waza (talk) 23:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Carcassonne-game.jpg[edit]

Image:Carcassonne-game.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rationale added. Travisl (talk) 23:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Carcassonne1.jpg[edit]

The image Image:Carcassonne1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:17, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listing of tiles[edit]

The text says the base game consist of 72 tiles, but the numbers in the listing just add up to 69 (without the river tiles). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim81 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I uploaded a new version with the error corrected--Efa (talk) 20:26, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dice Game[edit]

http://www.riograndegames.com/games.html?id=387

Someone needs to add a section on the new Carcassonne dice game — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.229.78.155 (talk) 04:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meeple: symbol of European board gaming?[edit]

In the header it is stated that the "meeples have become a symbol of European board gaming". But when you follow the reference link, this fact is not mentioned. I think this remark should be removed. --Antheii (talk) 13:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Carcassonne (board game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:12, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Carcassonne (board game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New external link proposition[edit]

Hello, I have tried to add new external link to Wikicarpedia.com yesterday, but got "undone" in 20 minutes. Fair enough, I guess I need to backup my edit with few words.

While BGG is definitive source of information for games in general, in case of Carcassonne WikiCarpedia will be much more comprehensive and reliable source of informations. WikiCarpedia and CAR document (which is one of the main sources) is an effort of many CarcassonneCentral forum members, including Hans im Gluck employees. One can find in there informations and rules clarifications coming directly from designers, hard or even impossible to find anywhere else. That said, it is made with respect to publishers copyrights. It is created by authorized users only, people coming from Carcassonne hobby society.

So I kindly ask Wikipedia community to review my my proposal to add WikiCarpedia to external links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.78.116.244 (talk) 18:43, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • As a link to an external source for more information or specific rules, I have no concern. It appears to be the Carcassonne Complete Annotated Rules (CAR) in a wiki format, which I find informative and useful. It would be different if being used as a reference within the article, but in this case it's not. Harris Seldon (talk) 11:42, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for your answer. While CAR is main source and stimulus, WikiCarpedia is more then that. This is not only reformatted for new media. We already have added some expansions missing from latest CAR. Also there will new edition manuals and all spinoffs and variants. I would like to underline that editing is restricted to authorized users only and we have a workflow set up to ensure that everything is correct. So in the end, can I add it or not, because, I admit I have problem understanding your answer as "yes or no". 89.78.116.244 (talk) 16:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as external source (apologies for not being clear). I suggest waiting a few days to see if there are any other opinions before adding the link again. Harris Seldon (talk) 17:46, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you for support. I will add link to WikiCarpedia now.89.78.116.244 (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Carcassonne (board game" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Carcassonne (board game and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Carcassonne (board game until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 20:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Parity problem[edit]

http://norvig.com/carcassonne.html describes the mathematical problem of arranging the tiles in a standard game into a rectangle satisfying assorted criteria. Is this worth mentioning?

Cheers, cmɢʟee⎆τaʟκ 11:08, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New compilation[edit]

There should be a new compilation that isn't named there, the 20th anniversary pack that was released in 2021. RuduskaMuduska (talk) 21:45, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Carcassonne_(board_game)&oldid=1208525035"