Talk:China–Cornell–Oxford Project

China Mid‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Animal rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animal rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of animal rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Animal rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Animal rightsTemplate:WikiProject Animal rightsAnimal rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

University of Oxford Mid‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Cornell University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornell University, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Food and drink Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Veganism and Vegetarianism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Improving this Article[edit]

I recently watched the documentary "Forks Over Knives" and became inspired to adopt a vegan lifestyle. What really convinced me to take the plunge, though, was this specific study. I would love to make information about this study accessible on Wikipedia so that others may also learn more about the findings of this study. I posted on the following three WikiProject talk pages requesting assistance: Wikiproject china, WikiProject Animal rights, and WikiProject Cornell University. I hope that if you are visiting this talk page that you will assist me in transforming this page into a great article! Thanks, Stephanie3460 (talk) 19:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Organization[edit]

Intro/Min findings
Background/hsitroy of the study
1. Involved parties
2. Reasons/Motivations behind the study
Note about the Quality/Comprehensiveness
Findings
Skepticism/Criticism
Conclusion

Please feel free to alter the sections/sub-sections Stephanie3460 (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I started this page, and yes it does still look a bit minimal. Have only read part of the study on line. Glad to help, if you let me know what I can do. Not a popular article, but I agree with you it has huge importance.

TonyClarke (talk) 20:44, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to get it in shape, Stephanie. I have it on my watchlist and I'll help out if I can. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 22:00, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on China–Cornell–Oxford Project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please merge this article[edit]

Merge this article with the Wikipedia article The China Study which is a much longer article.Knox490 (talk) 01:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Merge~~. Should be merged. Or both articles should be expanded with links to other article. BrikDuk (talk) 16:38, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't merge. The China Study is an article about a book that devotes one chapter to this study. The study itself is the largest epidemiological study every conducted, and it makes sense to have a separate page to discuss the science. It certainly meets the Wikipedia standards for notability, and could be expanded considerably. RockMagnetist(talk) 18:24, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't merge. I change my vote to agree with RockMagnetist. The pages need to be better connected with internal links, references, and explanation of how the book and epidemiological study being related but separate BrikDuk (talk) 18:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]