Talk:Christopher Merret

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

T for 2?[edit]

I know spelling was fairly erratic back then, but Merret with one t seems to be the version most commonly used, and is used by eg this paper published by the Royal Society in 2000, and Ridgeview in their eponymous wine, so I've moved from Merrett to Merret. FlagSteward (talk) 12:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having rewritten this, I'm even more confused, but 'tt' seems to be the traditional spelling, used for instance as the primary spelling by the Royal Society, whereas modern usage seems to be 't', and that seems to be the version used on his original papers. I don't think you can be definitive on this, but most Wikipedians are likely to see him mentioned in reference to sparkling wine, a context in which the 't' spelling seems most common. FlagSteward (talk) 15:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of facts/reference?[edit]

This article makes erroneous claims about what dosage is and the role of Dom Perignon in Champagne history, which begs the question: is the role of Christopher Merret correctly described? Tomas e (talk) 02:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christopher Merret. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]