Talk:Clafoutis

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Spelling and pronunciation[edit]

The French original doesn't give this uneducated spelling "clafouti", which is just anglophone people getting it wrong, and indeed even most of the anglophone links given below spell it "clafoutis." That would certainly contradict the claim that it is "sometimes" spelled properly. As far as I know, the "s" is sounded. In the interest of Wikipedia's mandate to educate the masses rather than pander to their delusions, I'm requesting that the entry be headed "clafoutis" and redirect from "clafouti." Sartoresartus (talk) 00:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When it comes to spelling, we use what is most common in English, not what the original French spelling may be. Clafouti(s) is a loanword, like "pork" (from French "porc") or "dance" (from French "danse") and doesn't have to be an exact cognate to be "correct" in English. To this end, Merriam-Webster gives "clafouti" as the main spelling, with "clafoutis" as a variant. So do the Random House and American Heritage dictionaries. I think this is pretty strong evidence that "clafouti" is the more common spelling, at least in American English. Not sure about British English, Canadian English, or other varieties; I'll see if I can find a copy of OED around.

Also, the "s" doesn't appear to be sounded, at least judging by those three dictionaries I linked above. I guess that part, at least, is true to the original French. -kotra (talk) 01:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can confirm that the final "s" is not sounded, according to the online Larousse French dictionary, which includes a native French speaker pronouncing the word. [1]. The words "clafoutis" or "clafouti" do not appear in the 1971 print edition of the OED, which I believe indicates that the OED editors felt that the word is French only, and I agree with them. Clafoutis is a French dish which until recently was found only in France. I would therefore argue that "clafouti" is not a loanword and that "clafoutis" should always be spelled with the final "s."--Ailemadrah (talk) 22:39, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cherry pits[edit]

The active ingredient in cherry pits and almond extract that give it that almond flavour is Benzaldehyde, not Amygdalin.

Amygdalin is what metabolizes into cyanide and kills you. Heating/baking cherry pits deactivates amygdalin and renders it safe to eat. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.40.194.136 (talk) 00:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. That's why we're not supposed to use blogs and self-published work as sources. I made adjustments. MartinezMD (talk) 01:47, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]