Talk:Comparison of video converters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why just these four?[edit]

Useful, thanks! When I google free video converters, without even cracking the results page I see at least four others. Why just these four?

For example, Cnet seems to show hundreds?
--68.127.87.28 (talk) 00:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Doug Bashford[reply]

Why not to add things that really differ — like, manual tuning codec settings, available filters and operations (crop, auto-crop, resize, resample, deinterlace, colour boost, et cetera)? --31.162.103.27 (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added Thoera .ogv Ogg to output table[edit]

I found the feature listed on their sites and wikipedia articles. Two I added '?' because I couldn't find info on the format.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? What exactly did you mean to add? Theora or Ogg? Just for the record, Ogg is container format but Theora is a video compression format and must not be added to the list of container formats. Fleet Command (talk) 00:00, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oops, sorry. I just thought it should be added because .ogv (the newer accepted name for .ogg?) is one of the few allowed for upload to the commons. I can correct if you wish, or have someone more knowledgable do so?--Canoe1967 (talk) 00:19, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, as long as it is correct, I do not have anything to complain, right? So, yes you can add "Ogg" (whose file extensions are .ogg, .ogv, .ogm and a couple of others). I just wanted to make sure you did not go looking for the wrong piece of info. Oh, and sorry for that edit collision. Cheers. Fleet Command (talk) 01:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added just as 'Ogg' not 'Theora OGV' as I had it before. I also wikilinked container in the input/output tables to the comparision page, that may be easier to follow. I added a 'see also' section to link to two container pages.--Canoe1967 (talk) 05:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good. I complemented your edit with the info that I have and fixed the formatting of the See Also section. Fleet Command (talk) 10:02, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trying to have website un-sensored[edit]

squared5.com was blacklisted. I can't find a reason why, but the instructions to find out why seem very complex to me.

If there is a valid reason for it to be on the list, just remove my request. I wouldn't want admin to waste time reviewing it again.--Canoe1967 (talk) 14:26, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is on the whitelist now.--Canoe1967 (talk) 21:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What are menu templates?[edit]

I see none of them have the feature. Should we remove it from the table?--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting into chapters[edit]

As far as I can see Freemake cannot split DVD into chapters. This is acknowledged in their facebook page http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=284932398200080 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.162.19.98 (talk) 19:13, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Transcode defunct?[edit]

I'm not 100% certain, but the Transcode project may be defunct. This is a shame, because the utility programs like 'tccat' and 'avimerge' are quite valuable. Some very exciting plugins were developed for Transcode, like 'stabilize': http://public.hronopik.de/vid.stab/features.php?lang=en — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 20:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More programs[edit]

I think the following programs should be included too:

This review talks about the following video converters: http://www.techradar.com/news/software/applications/best-free-video-converter-12-on-test-1059245

  • Internet Video Converter HD
  • KoyoteSoft Free Video Converter
  • Miro Video Converter 2.5
  • Quick Media Converter HD

 Ark25  (talk) 20:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Online video converters[edit]

Top 9 Free Online Video Converter - http://www.isoftwarereviews.com/online-video-converter-free/

 Ark25  (talk) 19:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Virtualdub[edit]

This isn't a converter, as far as I'm aware. There are some 15 or so 'converters' listed in the first table, with only nine converters actually compared in the rest of the article. --98.122.20.56 (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Features list comparison table[edit]

Features list comparison table, is overloaded, and should be split to two parts:

1. Essential. 2. Extra.

Some features are major: such as "convert without transcoding" (did they mean encoding?).

Some features are far less important, such as: upload to youtube.

How about CLI? - command line interface? Why isn't it mentioned in the table?

(It is not the same feature as batch convert).

 Volibon  (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Comparison of video converters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]