Talk:Crystal Pepsi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Revival Speculation[edit]

I thin it would be worth a mention of the #BringBackCrystalPEPSI hashtag started by L.A. Beast in the Revival Speculation section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.46.195 (talk) 09:45, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Pepsi coming back?[edit]

This has been added, but with no citation. Any idea as to whether it's true or not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.60.167.105 (talk) 16:47, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons[edit]

there is another simpsons episode to mention crystal cola. In the episode, a character reminises about the product. I cannot rememeber the episode though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.229.181.173 (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Parodies[edit]

I expanded the bullet about Human Giant in the Parodies section. Technically, though, those aren't all parodies. Just because Crystal Pepsi appears in a TV show, that doesn't necessarily make it a parody. Perhaps the "Parodies" section should be renamed. --scott

Agreed and done. Renamed "Pop Culture References" (pun intended). --BizMgr (talk) 13:52, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clear versus clear-colored[edit]

I just changed "clear-colored" to simply "clear." Perhaps I'm being a bit too picky, but clear isn't a color where I come from. Maybe someone could do further research which may warrant a description such as transparent or translucent or whatever.Gabenowicki 02:46, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Clear" on its own is a bit ambiguous. "Clear-colored" doesn't sound right either. Somewhere in the article is a reference to "color-less" sodas - how about that? Rd232 talk 08:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Water-looking. Another description.

118.209.111.128 (talk) 01:44, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Market failure[edit]

Just a note on why this failed, from my experience (on a short detour from working on New Coke). I remember shortly after rollout, a lot of the supermarket chains started putting their own clear colas out (it couldn't have been that hard to just leave the caramel coloring out of the syrup). Not all of these tasted so good (I remember in upstate New York, the word got out pretty quickly to avoid Wegman's Diet Clear Cola). Crystal Pepsi had all the brand awareness, however, and took the flack for these tasteless imitations. Any research out there on this question? Daniel Case 17:11, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's my experience: Crystal Pepsi was priced as a premium brand, never on sale for the price I could get regular Pepsi at. Anyone else experience that? Any research that could be worth including in the article? --Keeves 03:33, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just remember going to Smiths to buy a box of it & being peeved (for years) when it wasn't there & continued not to be....followed by Cactus Cooler (fruit soda sold only in rural areas of like, 2 states), Pineapple Fanta (their orange is so nasty), & Chocolate Cherry cola, which never made it to any shelf in any store I ever shopped at.

Another Clear product[edit]

Does anyone remember Crystal Clear Amaco Ultimate (Gasoline)????

  • I do. It came out around the same time Crystal Pepsi came out. Clear was the hip thing during those times, it seems. 161.225.129.111 15:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was indeed, actually starting with Ivory's reformulation and marketing in 1991. As best as I can tell, Pepsi was the first company to take that extension further than consumers could follow, but because of the amount of marketing they put into it, many others followed suit in 92 and 93 (including Coke's Tab Clear and the aforementioned Amaco Ultimate). The problem being that clear still meant "mild" and "clean" to Ivory customers, but meant "mild" and "tasteless" to many Pepsi consumers. I've added some referential links about that era in marketing to the article for those who want to read a little more. It's definitely a case of someone at Pepsi convinced everyone to buy into a very faulty concept. I'd love to know what the total marketing expenditure from all the combined "clear" products was during that time, vainly trying to convince consumers that clearer was better. --BizMgr (talk) 04:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Remember...[edit]

The first and only time I had this was when I was about 9 sneaking into the Faulkner Hospital's vending machine room with my friends (this is what we did for fun and adventure) and then in a sugar crazed frenzy we would proceed to the parking garage and jump off the back of it. This was especially fun when it snowed and they would plow all the snow form the top most level over the edge and create large snow piles to land in on the ground.

Another more funny (less relevant, but funny nonetheless) aspect of this memory is seeing the many many home made bongs made of small plastic bottles with a hole punched in the side, a straw inserted in said hole, and some foil on the opening on the top to act as a screen and not knowing what it was at such an age. Ahhhhhhhhhhhh, "Rejoice O young man in thy youth..." (and ignorance)

The Faulkner Hospital, as I remember it (before the renovations), may be viewed in the movie Southie featuring Mark Walberg for those who are interested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.60.17.221 (talk) 03:17, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Pepsi cap contest[edit]

I vividly remember flipping bottles over myself looking for winning caps. I cannot seem to find any media coverage of it, though. Which seems strange. Anybody else have any luck?

On the up side, I've pretty much got everything else referenced now. --BizMgr (talk) 04:02, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like a "duh" concept since any clear soft drink in a clear bottle would show anything under the label. With Sprite, they use green-colored plastic to cover it over. But this is just logical and I don't think it would actually need to have some sort of media coverage. But I guess the Wiki-rules apply to all or they apply to none.

--Kulturvultur (talk) 00:30, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Infobox[edit]

If you're into this sort of thing (and CP didn't make you gag): {{User:UBX/Crystal Pepsi}}

PEPSIThis user misses Crystal Pepsi.

So we can use this on our pages? 118.209.111.128 (talk) 01:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

David Novak[edit]

David Novak (CEO of YUM! brands) wrote a book in 2007 called "The Eductation of an accidental CEO". He was the creator of Crystal Pepsi, and in his book talks about how he went through with idea despite "warning signs", specifically negative feedback from Don Kendall (founder of PepsiCo)and the Pepsi-Cola Bottling Association. In Dec., 2007 Novak was interviewed by Judann Pollack in Advertising Age. In the interview he says that Crystal Pepsi was his worst marketing mistake. He also says that Crystal Pepsi was ahead of it's time and that it could have been sucessful if managed properly. This is my first time to participate in Wikipedia so I'm not really sure how it works. Any advice would be helpful! If anyone wants to use this info. feel free. (Morganghost (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 23:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mexico availability[edit]

Pepsi Clear was sold in some mexican cities for some months in 2008 but it's hard to find now. It didn't taste a lot like the original Pepsi, it had a rather citric flavor added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.169.152.83 (talk) 22:29, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Pop Culture[edit]

This is a pop culture icon for being pure 90's. Mentioned by the Simpsons, I Love The 90's, the Cinema Snob and more makes this big enough to warrant one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.241.202.234 (talk) 21:31, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And the majority of Youtube videos where people bought old bottles of Crystal Pepsi's apparently some guy found in a warehouse and sold on Ebay, don't forget that.

118.209.111.128 (talk) 01:42, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Low shelf life[edit]

I have been told by a Pepsi employee about the short shelf life of this product. Anyone knows if this is true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brunofvalli (talkcontribs) 19:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Stanford paper[edit]

The statement "Initial sales were good but quickly fell" would need a different source entirely, not just an additional source. The paper in question has only one statement about Crystal Pepsi: "On the other hand, despite extensive market research that suggested likely success as well as Pepsi’s large marketing budget, consumers evidently had a strong preference against a caffeine-free, clear cola (known as “Crystal Pepsi”)." Not only is the source of this information not given in the paper, but it doesn't even imply the sentence that was in the article.
Ulmanor (talk) 18:10, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 June 2015[edit]

Revival Speculation The first Facebook like page to bring back Crystal Pepsi was created on July 23, 2011. https://www.facebook.com/BringbackCrystalClearPepsi by Neal Enright. Then in September 2014 The Coca-Cola Company re-introduced the soft drink Surge, leading to speculation in the public and amongst media about the return of Crystal Pepsi.[10] Then the Bring back Crystal Clear Pepsi page reached out to LA Beast in April of 2015. He responded with a video directing his fans to the Facebook page. Offering a t-shirt giveaway to all that supported. Afterwards the following of supporters reached into the tens of thousands. LA Beast himself raising money on a gofundme page for 15 billboards erected around the Los Angeles area, and a commitment to ride a mobile billboard truck at Pepsi's Purchase, New York headquarters on June 15 & 16, 2015.[12][13][14][15] The interest from this campaign led to an official response by Pepsi Co. on June 8, 2015, which indicated that Crystal Pepsi would be making a comeback.[16][17] Thespaceninja (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Looks like you wish to add in something about the "first Facebook page". Need reliable sources to comment on this first. Cannolis (talk) 20:45, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Crystal Pepsi[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Crystal Pepsi which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • https://www.change.org/p/pepsico-bring-back-crystal-pepsi-11
    Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Crystal Pepsi[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Crystal Pepsi which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • https://www.change.org/p/pepsico-bring-back-crystal-pepsi-11
    Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How much sugar?[edit]

What is its sugar content? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Q48dado (talkcontribs) 22:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Pepsi is back[edit]

If anyone was wondering if Crystal Pepsi made a return, yes it did. I just bought one from a mini mart here in Oregon. Here is a picture for proof: http://i.imgur.com/miDgzLU.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:1C1:8A01:4BC0:9158:A7C5:8C25:53D1 (talk) 21:53, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources required[edit]

To back up the claims that Crystal Pepsi is back, and in what territories - reliable sources are required. Please provide these before adding content again, thanks.

What defines a reliable source can be identified in this article. Chaheel Riens (talk) 15:49, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image[edit]

TAC PlazaMaster, with regard to the proposed infobox images, I would personally say that neither are the best - the original image has excessive lens flare that disguises the actual crystal clear aspect, and the new image has condensation that does the same thing - you cannot see the crystal clear contents.

The infobox should be the best image to represent the article subject, and of the two, I'd say that the original is just - and only just - the best option as it does show the clarity. But I'd be on the look out for an alternative to both.

Finally, I think that Smuckola needs to moderate their edit summaries - frustration aside, the image certainly is not "garbage". Chaheel Riens (talk) 07:47, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]