Talk:Frangelico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alcohol Content[edit]

We have a 375 mL bottle that is 20% alcohol (40 proof) by volume. It appears to be exactly the same as the pictured bottle, rather than being some sort of a knock-off. The official website does not appear to have information on the alcohol content. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.111.148.6 (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have also have 750 ML bottle of Frangelico that also 20 alcohol(40 proof) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.183.78.202 (talk) 6 April 2009
I have had several bottles of 24% alcohol by volume in the past. However, I just received two bottles as a Christmas gift, and both are labeled as 20% alcohol by volume. The labels visible on the web site also say 20% alcohol by volume (on the landing page; and on the FAQ.) This seems to be a recent change. --kundor (talk) 00:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My 700ml bottle (note, not 750), featuring an Australian importer's marque, is also 20% alcohol according to the label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.86.216 (talk) 19 December 2011

Sense[edit]

Currently the wiki text reads "The origins of Frangelico date back more than 300 years to the existence of early Christian monks living in the hills". Since 300 years ago the historical period was the 18th Century – any monks alive at that time would most certainly not be described as "early Christian" (Early Christianity is generally considered as Christianity before 325).

The source for this mistake appears to be a misreading of the marketing blurb on the product label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.181.86.216 (talk) 19 December 2011

Currently the article says: "The brand was created in 1978." There is no previous history, which seems doubtful. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Frangelico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]