Talk:Frank D'Angelo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Grammar[edit]

The quality of writing in this article is not up to Wikipedia standards.

Could you give an example? I'd like to clean it up. Alexthepuffin (talk) 02:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Editing[edit]

June 6, 2021
Attn: User:Webfanwriter
I'm not sure if you are aware of the general rules related to how to edit wiki pages.
Can you please explain:
- Why you are reverting sections of this article which have been sourced. Do you have alternate sources, or reason to believe these sources are incorrect, or require more sources?
- Why you are giving "adding facts" as a reason for your edits, without adding footnotes/links
- Why you are continuing to post "dead links" as support for your preferred edits.
Can you please find active, reputable sources for what you are posting? And again, can you also please explain why you have been deleting all of my sourced edits?
— Preceding Sxygrl2k1 (talk) 18:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 11, 2021
Is it possible to get Wiki admin help in some way to edit this page? Perhaps lock the page and approve future edits made to it?
User:Webfanwriter continues to re-post the same unsourced material, calling it simply "factual information".
Repeated requests for explanations or to open dialogue on the talk page, both here and on the user's page, have been ignored.
I have done nothing but fix this page's formatting and add reliably sourced information from reputable sources, such as the Toronto Star, The Globe & Mail, Vanity Fair, Variety etc. My entries were all deleted by this person with no reason given, whether they could be said to present Mr. D'Angelo in a negative light or not.
I've left Webfanwriter's edits to stand at present, aside from this latest entry in an attempt to get them to simply learn how to properly edit a page with sourced information, but they simply keep re-posting the same unsourced material, and are now - for reasons that mystify me - calling me a "vandal"...
So, to sum it up... "Little help?"Sxygrl2k1 (talk) 22:53, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 24, 2021
Still waiting for any help by more experienced editors. This user, User:Webfanwriter - in my opinion likely Frank D'Angelo himself - continually removes anything he does not like, regardless of sources, and puts in anything positive he wants, without any sources at all... there must be some policy or protocol concerning this, no? Sxygrl2k1 (talk) 02:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


2022-03-26 Where Are The Editors? A lot of properly sourced info was removed by this article by WebFanWriter - and it couldn't be more obvious that he is the subject of this article himself. Also, WebFanWriter has ADDED a ton of spurious information, giving zero sources and simply tagging it as "adding factual information". Wikipedia editors, where are you? This is the kind of thing that makes Wikipedia look like nonsense. Editors need to look back at all previous edits, bring back sourced, verifiable information, and delete the shameless self-promotion WebFanWriter is posting, much of which seems to have zero credible sources or any basis in reality. Charles — Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just chiming in to support your statement. It seems blatantly obvious that Webfanwriter is Frank D'Angelo and is using this wiki article for self-promotion. Static11 (talk) 06:39, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WebFanWriter is either Frank D'Angelo himself, or a friend/family member of his, or has been hired to make these changes. Wikipedia admins need to step in, delete unsourced/self promotional items, reinstate relevant and sourced article items, and watch this article in the future... Does anyone know if these people are even reading these notes? SpaceXfantom (talk) 22:25, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]