Talk:iPad (1st generation)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleIPad (1st generation) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 31, 2013Good article nomineeListed
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 3, 2023.


Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved all as proposed. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


– There has been quite some discussion about whether to use spelled out ordinals, and these pages were recently moved back to numeric ordinals, while iPhone (first generation) remains intact. We should keep the usage of ordinals consistent. 159.118.81.240 (talk) 03:26, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Although Apple itself uses numbers to indicate generations, I think WP:ORDINAL should trump it. Support. gsk 03:37, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support There's a precedent for car models that have multiple generations (e.g. Chevrolet Camaro, Ford Taurus, Honda Accord, etc...) using the spelled-out ordinals. I'm not biased towards either one, but seeing that there are many more spelled out ordinals as opposed to the numeric ordinals on Wikipedia (plus it's proper English anyways), I support moving those back to the spelled out ordinals. Jgera5 (talk) 19:10, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:IPod Touch (fifth generation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:30, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on IPad (1st generation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Post-PC[edit]

This article is weakened by the absence of a Legacy section, and of any mention of the term "post-PC", which was a huge part not just of its marketing, but of tech coverage. DFlhb (talk) 04:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Durability[edit]

I was wondering if a chapter about the long-lasting quality would help. There still some units working, only restricted by missing software / encryption compatibility. --Gunnar (talk) 17:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]