Talk:Impaired glucose tolerance

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The[edit]

The page title includes a typo - it reads "imparied" not "impaired". I don't know how to edit that, the normal edit box does not show the title.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.127.155 (talkcontribs) 23:26, 8 January 2007
OK will move.David Ruben Talk 04:46, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stevia[edit]

A herb said to improve glucose tolerance. It can't be mentioned here because this article is for the impaired glucose condition. So please see Sugar Substitute. 117.221.180.17 (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Happy[reply]

Merger Discussion[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge Subclinical diabetes and Impaired glucose tolerance into Prediabetes. Klbrain (talk) 16:01, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request received to merge articles: Subclinical diabetes into Impaired glucose tolerance; dated: January/2018.

Proposer's Rationale: Subclinical diabetes appears to be the same thing as impaired glucose tolerance, see here and here. The term subclinical diabetes appears to be still used - e.g. [1], [2], but if they are referring to the same thing, then they should be merged. I would however leave this to people who may know more to decide if they are indeed the same and if it should be merged. Discuss here. Hzh (talk) 22:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment. Isn't this a form of Prediabetes? If so, both articles should be merged into the parent. – S. Rich (talk) 07:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article appears to claim that it precedes prediabetes. At the moment there are a number of articles that seem to be saying similar things, for example Impaired glucose tolerance, Impaired fasting glucose, Prediabetes, and this Subclinical diabetes. There seems to be a few new papers on subclinical diabetes, perhaps the experts have changed the definition. Whether they stay as separate articles or merged, the subject needs someone with a better or up-to-date understanding to clear all this up, otherwise it gets very confusing. Hzh (talk) 11:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.