Talk:Kraft Foods Inc.

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kraft Foods Inc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:58, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kraft Foods Inc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Title should be Kraft Foods Inc., not Kraft Foods Inc[edit]

This article should be moved to the correct title. At a minimum, it looks really sloppy to get the name of the company wrong. An American lawyer would not make that error---there have been a few cases of American lawyers being severely reprimanded or disciplined for trying to enforce a judgment against an entity not named correctly as a defendant. --Coolcaesar (talk) 02:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kraft Foods Inc. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Kraft Foods Inc.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(I made the following proposal at Talk:Mondelez International, and for simplicity, I suggest the discussion be consolidated there. I am re-posting it here for those who may edit/watch this page but not that one. For clarity, I have modified the quote below in a few minor instances, such as replacing this page with Mondelez International.)

I notice the History section of Mondelez International and the History section of Kraft Foods Inc. are almost identical. (Maybe they are identical, or at least they were until the edits I made just before posting this comment.) This seems like a potential problem. It's unnecessary, for one thing; for another, any edits will have to be made on both pages or else they will fall out of sync. It does not make sense for them to fall out of sync, though, because the history of Mondelez before 2012 literally is the history of Kraft Foods Inc. The history of that company, through all its mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, is complicated enough as it is.

I understand that Mondelez is the legal successor to Kraft Foods Inc., but essentially the old Kraft Foods Inc. split in two, and the other half/legal spin-off kept the Kraft Foods name. I note that the article for the spin-off Kraft Foods does not include any history before the announcement of the spin-off.

I propose that Mondelez International's History section follow the pattern of the spin-off Kraft Foods and exclude everything before the announcement of the spin-off in 2011. That text would be replaced with a link to the predecessor company's History section, with something like "For the history of Mondelez before 2011, see..." (The spin-off company's article has a similar note, though it's at the top of the page, probably because of the shared name. A similar notice could be added to the History section of that article, as well.) Ideally, an editor would compare the text of the History section of Mondelez International with the History section of Kraft Foods Inc. and incorporate any improvements from the Mondelez page that did not make it to the Kraft Foods Inc. page, and then delete that section from the Mondelez page.

Thoughts? --EightYearBreak (talk) 22:25, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Follow-up: I have belatedly realized this discussion could potentially benefit from adding split/merge templates to both articles' History sections, which I have just done. --EightYearBreak (talk) 15:08, 21 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Defunct date incorrect[edit]

This is a minor thing but today is 03/10/2023, so this should read 11 years ago, not 10. What's the reason it's not updated...? 83.219.63.28 (talk) 04:39, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]