Talk:Like Water for Chocolate (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article split?[edit]

The lede is about the novel, the infobox is a film infobox; shouldn't this article be split into separate ones for the novel and the film as is The Color Purple (The Color Purple (film), The Color Purple (musical))? It would make it easier to feel more comfortable adding things like Category:Films about cooking to the article. AUTiger » talk 01:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the article should be split.--RossF18 (talk) 05:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Articles were split. --RossF18 (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Likewaterforchocolate.PNG[edit]

Image:Likewaterforchocolate.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Metaphor/Simile[edit]

Using the word "like" qualifies as a simile, eh? I'll change it, you can revert if you want --Kektk was lazy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.88.184.138 (talk) 02:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Major Edit[edit]

I just watched this movie and decided to give the wikipedia page a major edit to correct some inaccuracies. I also added a few key scenes that I thought were important to the film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaoshiang (talkcontribs) 08:05, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't had a chance to review all the changes, but WP:WAF gives guidelines for writing about fiction. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:14, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Title origin?[edit]

(I haven't read the novel, so perhaps it makes the title meaning clearer.)

I had assumed that "like water for chocolate" meant having to settle/substitute for a more insipid, colorless life, as Tita and Pedro did, rather than embracing a fuller, richer one represented by the emotional sensuousness of chocolate. However, I seem to recall reading somewhere that "like water for chocolate" referred to the hot water in a double boiler meant for melting chocolate and representing the boiling undercurrents of the tale. Does anyone have a source that explains the meaning the author intended? (Hmmmm, I'm suddenly salivating!) Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 09:19, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plot in need of untangling from "themes and analysis"[edit]

The plot is still today more of copy-pasted literature minor exam, then a comprehensible plot outline. Feeble sourced analysis of the script's magic realism/themes is jumbled around inside this section, named Plot, not Themes/Anlysis.

Arcsoda (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Passage removed from plot section[edit]

This passage was in the plot section but with a hidden note: <!-- This passage has no place in the plot section! -->

Tita’s entrance into the dovecote signals her entrance into the liminal state that precedes her transition out of the oppressive grasp of Elena. French anthropologist Arnold van Gennep, concerned with the transitional rites that predictably accompany the passage of an individual from one state to another, divides these transitional rites into three subcategories: rites of separation, rites of transition, and rites of incorporation.[1] The rite of separation is characterized by the removal of self from normal, daily life, which is then followed by the rite of transition, which is characterized by a secession from society alongside a mentor who instills knowledge unto the protagonist. Lastly, the rite of incorporation is characterized by the reintegration of the protagonist, now possessing the knowledge needed to complete the transition, back into society.

Pasting here in case anyone wants to incorporate the text elsewhere, if appropriate. --ZimZalaBim talk 02:06, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ author., Engel, Adam J. Between Two Worlds: The Functions of Liminal Space in Twentieth-Century Literature. ISBN 978-0-355-18078-7. OCLC 1257951949. {{cite book}}: |last= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)