Talk:Majestic Wine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wine, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.WineWikipedia:WikiProject WineTemplate:WikiProject WineWine articles

Food and drink Start‑class

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Start

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging[edit]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 05:38, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Working at Majestic[edit]

I've just seen this anonymous edit. Someone has an axe to grind here, and is attempting to persuade people not to consider working at Majestic. I don't know anything about their employment practices, or what it's like to work there. The claims are unproven and unreferenced, but this is a long edit. It's not just a simple piece of vandalism, someone definitely feels strongly over the issue. Nevertheless, Wikipedia is not the place for opinion and conjecture, and this required investigation.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian Moyes (talk • contribs) 21:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am not so sure - I think some mention should be made of working practices at the company. I myself worked at Majestic - first at the Wimbledon Warehouse... [deleted part] Ivankinsman (talk) 07:36, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted a large part of Ivankinsman's text above due to WP:BLP concerns. Wikipedia is not a forum for voicing opinions about your former managers, even if they happen to be mentioned in an article. Tomas e (talk) 16:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The "working at majestic" section is very glossy, definitely WP:ADVERT for the company with no citations, nor is it written from a WP:NPOV. I've removed it for these reasons. Please don't re-add, and try to keep the article neutral, not a coatrack for company advertising. Additionally, personal observations about the company aren't terribly relevant, Wikipedia has a policy of no original research. tedder (talk) 14:03, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The whole "working at Majestic" section is simply not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. Agne ^Cheese/^Wine 22:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK with this (it was not written by me) but leave in the Steve Lewis performance section. This is relevant to the company and is neutral in tone. This can only be removed if a valid reason is given for its removal. Ivankinsman (talk) 08:56, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(undenting) I removed the Steve Lewis content because it was unsourced and of dubious importance to an encyclopedic article about Majestic Wine. Have notable independent sources discussed those points? tedder (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. This section was unencyclopedic and lacked reliable sources. Tomas e (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Employment Practices at Majestic[edit]

I believe a section on this should eventually be included in the main article. The text below was written and then removed from the main article which is fine. However, it has to be included here to generate a discussion about employment at Majestic Wines, after which I will then write a section on this for the article. PLEASE NOTE: It is not permitted for an editor to remove this from the DISCUSSION PAGE (so does not require sources according to Wiki rules - an editor failed to understand this point)- no names are mentioned so it does not contravene bios. of any living people. It is pertinent to the article and has to be included to generate comments from other wiki contributors. Ivankinsman (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the section, because even on talk pages Wikipedia is not a WP:COATRACK or soapbox. Please don't re-add it. Perhaps you can work on it on your own computer, then re-add whatever sections can be sourced. Otherwise it's a rant/soapbox/coatrack. tedder (talk) 18:55, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Majestic Wine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090225204322/http://www.lsc.gov.uk/aboutus/organisation/councilmembers/C_Giles_Clarke.htm to http://www.lsc.gov.uk/aboutus/organisation/councilmembers/C_Giles_Clarke.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Majestic Wine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:57, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]