Talk:Ostrea lurida

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Karenhlaw.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:53, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Changes[edit]

Today, thanks to info from User:Brianhe, and on the basis of a 2009 paper in BioOne, Journal of Shellfish Research, reporting some molecular research, I worked a great deal on this article and on the article for Ostrea conchaphila which are now understood to be separate species, the former more northerly in its distribution than the latter. Both articles could definitely use more work, but at least I made a start at cleaning them both up. Invertzoo (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great start. The following sections could probably use more references: description, reproduction, threats, decline & return in CA, and status & conservation. Karenhlaw (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ostrea lurida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:00, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]