This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Squeaky Dolphin is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Squeaky Dolphin is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Additionally, the slides released by NBC (p. 47) showed they track Twitter as well with "Millions of events per day feeding BLACKHOLE" (probably a codename for a Twitter database). Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
See my recent edits. First use (in ref) was DMY consistent with GCHQ (British). Then MDY in main text based on that ref. I wander, could a MDY WP:STRONGNAT claim be based on the US newspaper that (first) published? More important than GCHQ being in the Britain that the story is on? MDY would be convienient for consistency with related article(s)? Copy-paste between them not frequent? comp.arch (talk) 11:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
