Talk:Sticky toffee pudding

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

The trivia section contains either a misplaced set of sentences, or sentences that need to be made much more clear:

Sticky Toffee Pudding was the winning ice cream flavor in the 2006 Häagen-Dazs contest, submitted by Judiaann Woo. Sticky Toffee Pudding ice cream was slated to be produced from July 2006 to January 2007. Due to its popularity, it will be released as a full-time flavour. The pudding itself was enhanced and further developed by Lisa Kenyon for her niece Sarah Bruce, a big fan of the pudding and anything chocolatey. Both live in Yorkshire.

The part beginning "The pudding itself..." seems to be inappropriate. Does it mean that Lisa Kenyon is putting in a claim for creating sticky toffee pudding? Or did she develop the pudding upon which the ice cream flavor was based?

And does anyone care that Sarah Bruce is a fan of "anything chocolatey"? (Other than Sarah herself and, apparently, Ms. Kenyon.)

I am removing this sentence for now, unless someone can explain what it means and why it belongs where it is. 76.100.205.82 21:38, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and removing the sentence telling that both live in Yorkshire as well. 76.100.205.82 21:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am removing the sentence "It was originally called "icky sticky toffee sponge." Unless someone can find a source I don't believe it should be in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.238.174 (talk) 01:03, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why Judiaann Woo links off to a page that doesn't exist? Is a Wikipedia page currently in the works for her? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.169.237.21 (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IMO I don't think any of that paragraph belongs in this article. It's an intrusive bit of product placement for Haagen Dazs and adds nothing to the article of note or interest. Traveller palm (talk) 18:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will go farther than the last comment and say the last four paragraphs under "Origins" (starting with the one about Johnny Depp) not only do not belong under "Origins" (obviously), but are simply random trivia and could be removed without harming the article. As Wikipedia encourages readers to "do it", I am wiping them out, since it enhances our understanding of sticky toffee pudding not one whit to know O Magazine said it was sexier than Colin Firth or that Johnny Depp sucks it up and worries about calories. 69.140.128.123 (talk) 06:14, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Remove - I agree. The article doesn't need trivia (even sourced trivia). It does need sources for the main article, but that's a different matter entirely.