This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This is clearly past copyright, does anyone have an online version of the text which could be added as a link?--Crossmr 04:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The problem might be that an English translation is not past copyright...XinJeisan 04:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The only translation is from 1974, so that is still well within copyright. However, what does this reference (Shapira, et al., 150)?????XinJeisan 04:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to me that The Record of Tea is the same subject, but much earlier. Yet this article claims that this book is the first monograph about tea in the world. 64.202.157.11 (talk) 02:31, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Chajing was written during the Tang dinasty, while Chalu was written during the Song dinasty. Since Tang came before Song, it is impossible that Chalu is earlier than Chajing. Indeed, Chajing was written between 760 and 780 CE, while Chalu was written in 1049 CE (i.e. at least 270 years later).
A source citation is needed for the poem by Huangpu Zheng -- for both the original poem and the translation, ideally. I think that the poem should not be included if the source citation is lacking. Tksb (talk) 08:58, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
