Talk:Toona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reorganization of the Toona pages[edit]

Toona related articles would need reorganization. Now T. australis is accepted in the Toona article; in the Toona australis article it is T. australis in the heading, but T. ciliata in the text; in the Toona australis article the species is an australian tree in the first paragraph but an asian-australian tree in the last paragraph. Toona ciliata is redirected to Toona. In the Toona article there is information about T. sinensis and T. ciliata / T. australis which I would place rather in the species articles. Does anybody know if the clumping of T. ciliata and T. australis is generally accepted also in Asia? Krasanen (talk) 09:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC) I placed T. australis as a synonym of T. ciliata, moved the content from the T. australis article to Toona ciliata and redirected Toona australis to Toona ciliata. I also added some distribution data, and moved information about the largest regorded Australian Red Cedar from Toona to Toona ciliata. Krasanen (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are Chinese Toona and Sumac the same? 174.95.64.143 (talk) 16:07, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]