User:MusikAnimal/Dashboard

This user helped get "32 Old Slip" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 September 2014.
This user helped get "Domino Park" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 29 June 2018.
This user helped get "MTA Arts & Design" listed at Did You Know on the main page on 4 May 2015.
This user helped "Nine Inch Nails" become a featured article.
This user helped "32 Old Slip" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Amnesiac (album)" become a good article.
This user helped "Better Out Than In" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Clarence Chesterfield Howerton" become a good article.
This user helped "Hasil Adkins" become a good article.
This user contributed to "Jessica Gomes" become a good article.
This user heavily contributed to "Kowloon Walled City" become a good article.
This user made modest contributions to "Second Generation (advertisement)" become a good article.
This user is a member of the Bot Approvals Group.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
This user has interface administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


User
Talk link={{{3}}}
Dashboard
Articles
Scripts
Tools
Templates
Userboxes
Awards

Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 115
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 57
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 59
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 4
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 129
Requested RD1 redactions 0
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 31
Open sockpuppet investigations 157
Click here to locate other admin backlogs


News

Administrators' Newsletter
May 2024
 
  • Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
  • Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
  • The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
  • This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
The Signpost
25 April 2024
 

Edit filters

Requested edit filters (WP:EF/R)

Replacement of Israel with Palestine

  • Task: No knowledge of wikicodes, but it should apply to article namespaces, scanning for unautoconfirmed/IP edits, triggering when mentions of Israel/Hebrew is replaced with words like Palestine/Arabic/Levant.
  • Reason: There is a increase, likely due to recent events in the number of disruptive edits around Israel articles being replaced with irrelevant informations and Palestine mentions.
  • Diffs:

[1][2] IP edit replacing contents. AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I personally don't think this a good candidate for an edit filter because while it's sometimes disruptive this can be contextually dependent and should probably not be disallowed automatically. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
@Philipnelson99I see. Where should this belong then? AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I mean you're in the right place to request an edit filter, I'm just not sure this would be a good edit filter. If restricted to IPs/non-autoconfirmed that might reduce false positivess but I'm not convinced that would eliminate false positives altogether since it's hard to say if all replacements are disruptive. Happy to hear other opinions on it and it's really up to an EFM to decide to implement it. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This is 1154 (hist · log). Note that it logs both Israel -> Palestine and Palestine -> Israel. As Philipnelson99 points out, setting this sort of filter to disallow would be a bad idea, and even warning might open up a can of worms. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 02:59, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Suffusion of Yellow thanks for pointing out the logging filter, didn't realize it existed. I think logging is really the only reasonable course of action here. If an edit is indeed an issue, it will likely be reverted speedily. Setting a filter to warn when there's a chance that the edit was good faith and not intentionally disruptive seems unproductive to me. Philipnelson99 (talk) 03:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Maybe tagging would work, as any good faith edits wouldn't be reverted but bad faith ones would be easier to see and thus revert? – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 14:41, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I don't think tagging these filter hits is necessary. Philipnelson99 (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Why do you think that? And I'm just curious that's all. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 18:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
I’d like them tagged. I see these changes frequently, usually from IPs. Doug Weller talk 19:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
What would you suggest the tag be @Doug Weller? Something like Possible ARBPIA issue maybe? My concern with tagging is the area is a contentious topic and tagging these edits as a possible ARBPIA issue may need consensus elsewhere. Philipnelson99 (talk) 13:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible a-i issue would be better. It seems obvious enough that I wouldn't think it needed consensus. I wouldn't mention ARBPIA as that's probably too strong. Doug Weller talk 13:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Gotcha, as long as the tag isn't too strongly worded then I'm okay with tagging these. Just don't want someone to get the wrong idea that every filter hit has a problem. Philipnelson99 (talk) 14:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khubeza_patties&oldid=1211130983
  2. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ekron&oldid=1211124521

No rcats?

  • Task: Simple, see created redirects without any rcats, tell the editor to add some rcats.
  • Reason: Too many redirects without rcats.
  • Diffs: I can add links if needed, but seems self explanatory.

~~

Filter 1122 — Actions: disallow
Last changed at 00:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Filter 1305 (new) — Actions: throttle; Flags: enabled,private; Pattern modified

Last changed at 01:16, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Filter 614 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 23:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Filter 869 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 21:29, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Filter 1132 — Pattern modified

Last changed at 21:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Articles

Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV)

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection (WP:RFPP)

Backlog CLEAN!

Permissions

Account creator (WP:PERM/ACC)

Account creator

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
AutoWikiBrowser (WP:PERM/AWB)

AutoWikiBrowser

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Assem Khidhr

Hi! I'm working on WP:WikiProject AfroCreatives (and the corresponding frWP and arWP projects) as part of an imminent campaign and I was hoping I can expedite the addition of our newly created {{WikiProject AfroCreatives}} into relevant articles. I would keep it to black-and-white situations where articles are in Category:African films, Category:African actors, etc. Otherwise, if there's a dedicated bot for this kind of requests that I'm not aware of, by all means let me know. Assem Khidhr (talk) 01:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment An extraneous header or other inappropriate text was removed from this request — MusikBot talk 01:50, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Royalesignature

Reason for requesting autowikibrowser rights Royalesignature (talk). 04:07, 3 May 2024 (UTC) To enhance my editing skills and making edits easier and faster without compromised qualities for quantities

 Not done Request reason has nothing to do with AWB. -Fastily 21:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:BittersweetParadox

I edit pages often and fix WikiLinks, which this is helpful for. I am an Extended Confirmed User; I'm sure there you can see that, but I just wanted to let you know.

Anyway, I have seen many edits on pages using this tool, and I read up about it and it seems very useful. Thank you! Thomasbeem (talk) 06:01, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Note: User renamed to "BittersweetParadox". ToadetteEdit! 06:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Rusty4321

I would like to quickly perform semi automated editing, such as reducing the CS1 error backlog. I understand that I take full responsibillity for these edits and will not sacrifice quality over quantity. Thank you. Rusty4321 talk contribs 05:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Rusty4321 talk contribs 17:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Mass message sender (WP:PERM/MMS)

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
New page reviewer (WP:PERM/NPR)

New page reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:PharyngealImplosive7

I was granted new page reviewer rights temporarily and I think that I'm ready to get them permanently since I've tagged and patroled over 50 pages now. I've also tagged many pages for deletion that were unfit for the wiki. Finally, I would like to participate in the May backlog drive. I thank the reviewing admin for their time and hope that I will be granted this perm. – PharyngealImplosive7 (talk) 16:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Ingenuity (expires 00:00, 29 April 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 16:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy ping to Ingenuity, who granted the trial perm. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Dclemens1971

I have extensive experience with new page creation and expanding stubs into appropriately sourced articles, and I also engage regularly (and constructively!) in AfD debates and PRODs with a good understanding of applicable policies. I'd like to apply this experience by helping out in May with the NPP backlog. Thanks for considering! Dclemens1971 (talk) 21:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Dclemens1971, I appreciate your desire to help out with the backlog as we always need fresh eyes and eager participants. :) I see that you've had some participation with AfDs, which is good because a lot of NPP is related to the nuances surrounding notability. I took a look at the articles you've created. I noticed that some of your articles rely heavily on primary sources? Some examples are Church of Bangladesh Diocese of Kushtia, Church of Bangladesh Diocese of Barisal, Nathan Ingen, and Brian Williams (bishop)? I admit that this has prompted some serious hesitation on my part. I'd rather not reject a request before hearing what you have to say on the matter, though. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the question @Clovermoss. I agree that the pages rely on primary sources for non-controversial facts. Dioceses and other middle judicatories of major church traditions (Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican) have historically been viewed as per se notable, even without secondary sourcing (see AfDs from 2019, 2018, 2018, 2012, 2007, 2007. (The only "delete" results for a diocese that I've seen were for a tiny splinter group with no sourcing available at all or for an apparent hoax). Under the principle articulated by these "keep" results, I operated on the view that the Church of Bangladesh dioceses can be presumed notable. For Nathan Ingen and Brian Williams, WP:BISHOPS states that "[t]he bishops of major Christian denominations are notable by virtue of their status." (In both of these cases, the bishops are also acting primates (heads) of their churches in the Anglican Communion.) To sum up: I understand that generally N:ORGCRIT or N:BIO apply, but WP practice appears to treat major church traditions' dioceses and bishops as inherently notable and that's what I operated under for those articles. Happy to continue the conversation or answer other questions. Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Trlovejoy

Request to participate in the May backlog drive. I have been an editor since 2005. I have knowledge of policies and guidelines. I am a rollbacker and huggle patroller. I have a good record of constructive interaction and moving pages in accordance with guidelines. TRL (talk) 02:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

@Miniapolis or @Spicy or @Clovermoss Hi - I'd like to ask for consideration of this request from last week. Thanks much! TRL (talk) 01:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done as a 1-month trial, since you've only become active recently. All the best,Miniapolis 16:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
 Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission new page reviewer. — MusikBot talk 16:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
This is because the permission was subsequently revoked. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Miniapolis, would you mind striking the above text? I think it confuses the bot now that it has been revoked. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 10:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Struck, and thanks for the poke. All the best, Miniapolis 13:19, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Vanderwaalforces

Put on a two-month trial by Hey man im josh, trial will end in the coming week and I will love to continue contributing at NPP. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Hey man im josh (expires 00:00, 8 May 2024 (UTC)). — MusikBot talk 20:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm under the impression that Hey man im josh wanted to leave this to another admin (since they told me this), otherwise I would've left this to their discretion. My approach for regranting trial perms is to look at patrols, whether any pages were draftified or deleted, and if there is feedback from other editors that was taken into consideration. In regards to the last factor, I noticed that some concerns have been expressed before by Joe Roe. So, this is what I've noticed at this point in time:
  • You have made a lot of patrols during this limited timeframe. I assume that some of the motivation behind this may be because of the backlog and ongoing drive. It's important to make sure you're always focusing on quality and that sacrifices are never made for quantity alone. It took me quite some time to look through your patrol log, but I didn't notice any glaring issues as a whole. I did add stub templates to articles when nessecary but you were otherwise good at noting issues through the page curation process (such as when an article relied on a single source). The bulk of your patrols were clear SNG passes (NPOL, GEOLAND, or NSPECIES). I would advise you to be more careful when coming across articles outside of these clear passes as this is where you've made a few mistakes. I'd be more careful with sports-related articles like Dare Olatunji as most of the coverage there is either statistics or passing mentions (see WP:SPORTCRIT). A few of the articles you patrolled were later deleted (one example is Delta Air Lines Flight 520), while others like Chioma Rowland, Fayse Goh and Vida Loka II are currently at AfD. Some articles you patrolled were speedily deleted: Malhan Family as a G11, Setlhare sa Losika ke Eng? as an A10, and Out of Dark as an A7. You don't typically review redirects but many of the ones you have have been deleted through RfD.
  • You have participated in deletion discussions, many of which you have started yourself. I'm not seeing any clear issues with the majority of your nominations, but I did want to point out Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratikur Rahaman. I understand your NPOL argument as they are not an elected politician (I don't know enough about the sourcing to say the same about GNG) but I did find your comment about the article being promotionally written to be a bit confusing. In your place, I would have likely responded back to the article creator about what language I found promotional, especially since they asked. In regards to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iqra Hasan, your argument about notability not being inherited falls a bit short because the sourcing focuses on her, not her family. I think someone could reasonably come to the conclusion that she meets GNG, but I'm not familiar enough with Indian sources to make that call myself. Overall, you have a very good track record at AfD.
  • I still need to take a detailed look at your drafitications and communication with other editors regarding your patrols. Double checking the patrols themselves took several hours of my time. I don't want to accidently lose all of what I've written above because my internet is starting to be a bit finicky now, but there will be a part 2 once I've taken a break. Please don't take my above feedback too harshly, I just want to help point out what I can to make you a better page patroller. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done – I took a look at your recent drafitications and they seemed reasonable enough to me. I read your talk page archives for April and May and you don't ignore editors who come to your talk page about your patrols. I'd suggest maybe explaining why you would be inclined to send something to AfD instead of just saying so when someone comes to you with a review request... it comes across as less bitey. Ideally, we want to go beyond not just biting. I personally try to go that extra mile and explain why an article wouldn't meet GNG or give examples of what a reliable source they should be citing is (like a newspaper instead of a blog). Given everything I've said as a whole, I'd be most comfortable granting you this permission on a trial basis for four more months. As I said before, please don't take my feedback too harshly. I genuinely do wish you the best in your efforts here and I realize that the nuances of everything can be a bit rough to take in. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 10:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
@Clovermoss Thank you for the feedbacks and taking your time to go through my logs (sorry for that many hours, lol). Yeah, in fact, you will find a lot of my reviews that were speedy deleted or at AfD, if you check the logs against each other (time it was nominated at AfD and time it was marked as reviewed) you will see that I only marked them as reviewed because they are already at AfD. I don’t review them before AfD but rather after they were nominated, so that it can leave the queue. Same thing applies to the speedied articles. Just to take them out of them queue. I hope you now understand why you’d find deleted articles on my patrol logs. I believe this is natural because it’s part of the NPP guide (currently mobile, can’t link to it right off the bat). And, what’s the essence of AfD, after all it’s a discussion and I can say that I have, in rare occasions, nominated articles that are borderline notable just to affirm their notability and not really to get them deleted. For the bite, I don’t think I should call it a bite though, because this user isn’t new and as a matter fact older than me here on Wikipedia, I tend to believe old users should understand things better, but I realized long ago that that is actually not always the case. I didn’t mean for that message to be read as a WP:BITE.
Overall, thank you for being a great admin, thanks for paying attention to details and thank you for providing such helpful and genuine feedback, it is very much appreciated. I definitely didn’t take them harshly as they’re obviously not presented harshly. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
You are correct that WP:NPP states that articles marked for deletion can be reviewed. I didn't consider that angle and that does make your logged actions here seem more reasonable in retrospect. As for newbies... I can understand why you wouldn't consider them to be one, but they didn't really start becoming active until mid-2023 and sometimes people can make newbie mistakes while trying to learn the ropes their first year or so of editing. I generally strive to do my best explaining things to people regardless (unless they make a habit of not bothering to listen). Thank you for the compliment, I do try to pay attention to details even if I don't always catch everything. Alas, none of us are perfect. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
@Clovermoss Thank you so much. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Florificapis

I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [1]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again.

I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot talk 00:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TheTechie

I am requesting this permission to help out with the backlog, as the notice came on my watchlist.

  1. I am extended confirmed and have been here for 3+ years, so I meet the account age/edit count requirements.
  2. I have never had any blocks.
  3. I agree to reviewing on a volunteer basis.

I would like to be able to use this permission, even if temporary, to help with the drive, as said above. If you reply here, please ping me. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Kindly asking, but any update on my application? I'd really like to help out with the drive. If you'd like to decline me, that's fine, just please let me know early. thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 03:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 Done for a trial period of one month. Ping me when it expires for feedback if you're still interested in reviewing at that point. Thank you for offering to help with the backlog. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 09:53, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Thanks @Clovermoss! thetechie@enwiki: ~/talk/ $ 14:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:InDimensional

I would like to participate in the NPP backlog drive.

  • I have experience creating new pages as well as participating in AfD discussions.
  • Never had any blocks.
  • Agree to review on a trial basis. InDimensional (talk) 12:25, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Dudhhr

I'd like to volunteer for the NPP drive this month. I was previously granted the right for a trial period in August (expired a month later, extension request declined), and for another trial in December (for the January drive; unfortunately I was inactive as I was busy IRL). I have a bit of content writing experience (Trams in Olsztyn ) and formerly worked in AfC reviewing. – dudhhr talkcontribssheher 17:19, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:B3251

I would like to help out with the backlog. I’m very familiar with the content policies, having created 71 active articles (most being non-stubs) as of making this request. I’ve additionally had some experience in participating in discussions, handling deletion templates, and moving new articles with significant issues to the draft space. B3251 (talk) 10:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

User:TarnishedPath

I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann‎. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann‎ but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann‎ just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann‎ to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Courtesy ping to Rosguill, as they granted the trial perm. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Remsense

I would like to review more pages, having been granted the role temporarily before. Remsense诉 07:19, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done Hey man im josh (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer (WP:PERM/PCR)

Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Sunnyboi18

Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.

I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([3]). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I'm leaving this open for another, previously uninvolved admin to review, I was just explaining myself. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Allan Nonymous

I have a history of cleaning up grammar, removing and refactoring uncited content and fixing citations. I'm hoping to maybe expand my editing scope a bit. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

User:CanonNi

Hi. I recently got Rollback rights, so I thought it would be nice to have PCR rights as well. The main reason I would like this right is to further deal with vandalism, and accepting good edits. Although the pending changes backlog is not as high as... some other backlogs I could mention, I would still like to help with reviews. Thanks for considering my request! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 21:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:RowanJ LP

I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Rollback (WP:PERM/R)

Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Lynch44

I have been reverting vandalism as an account for about a month now, and have familiarized myself with Twinkle as well. Also note the 20,000 edits, mostly anti-vandal, that I made as an IP. Lynch44 (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
If you consider me not fit for rollback due to this, then I am more than willing to wait further if necessary, and I will try to be more efficient in warning others in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
I've neither approved nor denied your request. But I would like to have a conversation on why you haven't been notifying editors after reverting their edits. Is it because... you didn't know you needed to, you've been acting too quickly without giving proper attention to each revert, etc? -Fastily 05:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Part of it was me assuming the edit was so minor that an edit summary would be sufficient (like the second diff), or, just not giving a warning or notice because I did not feel there was a specific one that could fit. Again, I will try to warn or notify all editors when reverting them in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Yes, please ensure that you are always leaving notifications. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Understood. Moving forward, I promise to notify all editors when I revert their edits, good faith or not. Lynch44 (talk) 01:13, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks for confirming,  Done -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

User:Wiiformii

Hello! For about the past month, I've been patrolling recent changes and have gotten to know Ultraviolet well as I consistently warn users who make unconstructive and bad-faith edits. I am requesting rollback rights to further enhance my patrolling by using tools such as AntiVandal which will speed up the process greatly and Huggle which is a helpful tool to have to combat vandalism. Rollback also makes my reverts faster and more efficient allowing me to respond faster and better. Wiiformii (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
@Fastily Hello, these edits were mistakes on my part, although the large majority of the rest of my reverts come with warnings using Ultraviolet (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Thank you for bringing it to my attention and I will make sure to appropriately warn users in the future. Wiiformii (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
I understand. I promise I will always leave warnings in good faith or not. Thank you for letting me know. Wiiformii (talk) 21:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Great, thanks for confirming  Done -Fastily 00:52, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

User:CGP05

Hello! I revert vandalism quite frequently and I would like rollback rights so I can use the AntiVandal tool to make the process faster. CGP05 (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 06:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I try to warn the majority of editors that vandalize. I will ensure that I warn every time from now on. CGP05 (talk) 13:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

BRFAs

Bot Name Status Created Last editor Date/Time Last BAG editor Date/Time
Dušan Kreheľ (bot) VIII (T|C|B|F) Open 2024-04-07, 05:50:30 Dušan Kreheľ 2024-04-07, 05:56:34 Never edited by BAG n/a
Dušan Kreheľ (bot) VII (T|C|B|F) Open 2024-02-16, 09:24:40 Dušan Kreheľ 2024-03-10, 11:40:20 ProcrastinatingReader 2024-02-20, 13:13:05
BattyBot 81 (T|C|B|F) On hold 2024-02-07, 14:12:49 ProcrastinatingReader 2024-02-15, 12:09:35 ProcrastinatingReader 2024-02-15, 12:09:35
Numberguy6Bot (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-04-21, 15:48:04 Numberguy6 2024-05-05, 16:01:57 Primefac 2024-05-03, 11:33:25
BsoykaBot 3 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-03-23, 02:53:45 Bsoyka 2024-04-24, 18:52:42 Primefac 2024-04-22, 09:48:51
CopyPatrolBot (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-02-19, 02:42:32 JJMC89 2024-05-01, 00:49:05 Primefac 2024-04-30, 12:00:11
SDZeroBot 13 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-03-10, 20:00:57 Sohom Datta 2024-04-07, 15:55:57 Primefac 2024-03-10, 20:57:26
StradBot 2 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2024-02-17, 03:20:39 SD0001 2024-02-17, 05:58:51 SD0001 2024-02-17, 05:58:51
PearBOT 14 (T|C|B|F) In trial: User response needed! 2023-12-28, 20:06:39 Primefac 2024-02-18, 20:11:21 Primefac 2024-02-18, 20:11:21
CapsuleBot 2 (T|C|B|F) Extended trial 2023-06-14, 00:14:29 Capsulecap 2024-01-20, 02:36:30 Primefac 2024-01-15, 07:40:39
AussieBot 1 (T|C|B|F) Extended trial: User response needed! 2023-03-22, 01:57:36 Hawkeye7 2024-02-18, 23:33:13 Primefac 2024-02-18, 20:10:45
DoggoBot 10 (T|C|B|F) In trial 2023-03-02, 02:55:00 Frostly 2024-02-21, 22:41:18 Primefac 2024-01-15, 07:40:49
PrimeBOT 39 (T|C|B|F) On hold 2023-05-11, 12:48:50 Primefac 2023-09-22, 10:51:59 Headbomb 2023-07-02, 17:38:58
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:MusikAnimal/Dashboard&oldid=1013833114"