User:ZfJames/sandbox/templates
page name! Edits Reverted (May 2024)[edit]
Edits Reverted Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
User:ZfJames 05 2024[edit]
Hullo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I reverted one or more of your recent edits to the User:ZfJames page since this is a test of my template. BLAH BLAH BLAH! As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thank you for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 15:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
page name! Edits Reverted (May 2024)[edit]
Edits Reverted Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! 19:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
page name! Edits Reverted (May 2024)[edit]
Edits Reverted Hullo, and thank you for your efforts to help Wikipedia! I'm ZfJames and I just wanted to let you know that I [diff! reverted one or more] of your recent edits to the page name! page since haha!. hello, what's for dinner? As always, if you want to discuss this further, please feel free to reply on this page or start a new section on my talk page). If you have any questions about editing Wikipedia and want help from other experienced editors, place the template {{help me}}(?) on your talk page (with your question after it) or make a visit to the Teahouse. Thanks for editing! —zfJames Please add {{ping|ZfJames}} to your reply (talk page, contribs) 19:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.
AB = Administrative Backlogs[edit]
Administrative backlog[edit]
WP:AIV[edit]
AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism
Reports[edit]
Bot-reported[edit]
- 2601:284:100:5110:59a9:285a:a1b5:3199 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Declined. There may be a legitimate content dispute here, and the user hasn't been warned, not even on another IP on the /64. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 109.73.150.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 225 five times in the last 5 minutes (Vandalism in all caps, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Warned user. Last one they get. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Gy6hhhy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 08:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 114.125.69.167 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 10:45, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 72.80.249.241 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1177 (LTA 1177, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- False positive. Edits are not vandalism. While this IP has a recent well-deserved block history, none of the recent edits have been reverted and they seem constructively intended. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 109.95.35.239 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1292 (LTA 1292, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 19:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 2a02:8085:215f:9a00:89fb:eb7a:930:7f1f (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 384 five times in the last 5 minutes (Addition of bad words or other vandalism, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
User-reported[edit]
- LevelP93 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Admitted sockpuppet of APC IT, as stated in the comments for one their edits to Hassan Ayariga:" Updated, if anything kindly guide me don't take my account down." While they have remove some of their more obvious flattery, the essential syntax, prose, and modus operandi remain the same. Their edit to Hassan Ayariga includes similar errors to those included in their earlier edits, such as: "The party since it’s formation in 2016 has remained one of the active political party in Ghana and has since participated in all political elections in Ghana." This grammatical error of not pluralizing the word party is an error all shared by this user, Dr. Hassan Ayariga, and APC IT. In addition, the modus operandi of removing large amounts of unflattering material to an article about Hassan Ayariga remains the same. While they may've stated that they wish to be guided, this is clearly nothing but a feigned attempt at civility. Their comments in a thread on the Teahouse demonstrate this as they repeat old talking points and show no indication of improving, an example is the following quotation from them: "lol, most said was a lie so i am now publishing the real truth." When another editor tells them that removing large amounts of sourced statements based on their own subjective opinion is wrong, the user left the thread and has not returned since. Irruptive Creditor (talk) 20:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- 166.205.124.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Blanking. DuncanHill (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
CSD / PRODs[edit]
CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions
| Candidates for speedy deletion | Entries |
|---|---|
| User requested | 7 |
| Empty articles | 0 |
| Nonsense pages | 0 |
| Spam pages | 2 |
| Importance or significance not asserted | 1 |
| Other candidates | 5 |
The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )
{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat
| BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently |
|---|
| Proposed deletion – No backlog currently |
|---|
Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items
Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 218 items
Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item
Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items
Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently
WP:UAA / WP:RFPP[edit]
UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection
Bot-reported[edit]
- Tep Studios (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 15:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Promotional? 2" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often promotional in nature - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 02:30, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- Bush3d Official (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported[edit]
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level[edit]
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Kim Woo-jin[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – IPs and newly registered persistent removal of WP:NOTCENSORED content. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
List of Storm Prediction Center high risk days[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High risk being issued for OK today, please protect page for at least 48 hours. BryceM2001 (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Yusufzai[edit]
Reason: IP users have came into the page for months on end adding random content. My previous request (here) for a long duration ban was ignored because... ? So these are IPs that have been tampering around for months, perhaps approaching half a year of this now. I request a months long duration ban on IP users, the sole source of the article being messed around. High protection isn't needed but atleast some level of protection is, for a long duration of time as this just happens to be one of those articles that need it. This article literally degrades over time when left alone thanks to these IP users. RevolutionaryPatriot (talk) 12:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Yeh Hai Chahatein[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IP socks from Entertainment4Reality after named accounts blocked. Ravensfire (talk) 13:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Liver King[edit]
Reason: Frequent BLP vio and unconstructive editing Orchastrattor (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Roti canai[edit]
Reason: Persistent disruptive content removal by unregistered user(s). Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 14:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
List of Sony Pictures Animation productions[edit]
Reason: Addition of unsourced content, high level of IP vandalism, and disruptive editing. 216.208.153.194 (talk) 14:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Hook (2022 TV series)[edit]
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
I have not looked close enough to determine if a request to protect this draft is valid. However, I will say this IP is part of a larger UPE sock farm and we will be dealing with their bludgeoning of this draft (and others) unless a protection is made. And while it is unlikely to stop them, hopefully it will slow them for a while.--CNMall41 (talk) 19:33, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Draft:Wonderland (Pakistani TV series)[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – The IP keeps requesting a review without addressing the issue. —Saqib (talk | contribs) 15:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- User:Saqib has misused the rights as reviewer and is biased in his judgments as expressed in User_talk:Liz#Request_for_Investigation_of_User:Saqib. 182.182.97.3 (talk) 15:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Om Parvat[edit]
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Rangiya railway division[edit]
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 16:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Worcester, England[edit]
Reason: High level of IP vandalism Murgatroyd49 (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 2a02:c7c:8512:5300::/64 (talk · contribs) blocked by Smalljim. Favonian (talk) 16:54, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
KCBS-TV[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Suggested by User:Mer764Wiki. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for mentioning me. Byt no seriously, Broadcasting stations are not a joke. mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 18:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Update: LITERALLY an minute after Mvcg66b3r's revert was reverted, that revert by the vandal was reverted by someone else. (Mvcg66b3r is not an vandal). mer764KCTV5 / Cospaw (He/Him | Talk • Contributions) 19:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Julen Lopetegui[edit]
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by numerous IPs to BLP following press speculation. Egghead06 (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
A-1 Auto Transport[edit]
Indefinite full protection: Deleted twice pursuant to discussion them recreated in mainspace by SPA (now up for speedy deletion). Requesting creation protection to hopefully curb the likely UPE concern. CNMall41 (talk) 19:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Kuru may have intended to do something similar; the current semi-protection has no effect as non-autoconfirmed editors can't create articles anyway. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- ToBeFree Ugh, not my best moment. Thanks for correcting that. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- All good.
~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- All good.
- ToBeFree Ugh, not my best moment. Thanks for correcting that. Sam Kuru (talk) 21:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protected indefinitely. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Requesting immediate archiving... ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Neuro-linguistic programming[edit]
Reason: Full protection - an editor refuses to observe WP:REFVAR, repeatedly changing the reference style, badly, leaving multiple citation errors each time. They have been warned repeatedly on their talk page for disruptive editing, but continue to WP:CANTHEARYOU. Skyerise (talk) 20:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Erik ten Hag[edit]
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. QuicoleJR (talk) 21:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Wars of the Roses[edit]
Reason: High level of IP vandalsim. Kansas Bear (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level[edit]
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
2024 University of California, Los Angeles pro-Palestinian campus occupation[edit]
- 2024 University of California, Los Angeles pro-Palestinian campus occupation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Please reduce it to semi protection. I am a UCLA prof, my students have learned to edit Wikipedia and are keen to contribute. I created the article. But they are new so extended confirmation has blocked their edit access. Noopur28 (talk) 17:56, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page[edit]
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
ChatGPT[edit]
New URL Change from chat.openai.com to chatgpt.com 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- (Not an Admin but...) The main url is chat.openai.com, chatgpt.com redirects you to there. No reason to change it Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 14:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- probably an A/B test 122.104.176.219 (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Israel–Hamas war[edit]
A grammar fix is required for a sentence in the second paragraph of the article:
"During this attack, 1,139 Israelis and foreign nationals including 766 civilians and 373 security personnel were killed, while 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken captive to the Gaza Strip with the stated goal to force Israel to release Palestinian prisoners"
Change "goal to force Israel to" to "goal of forcing Israel to" Aadamwaheed (talk) 20:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests[edit]
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 6 protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC) |
| 7 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 20:59, 6 May 2024 (UTC) |
WP:RFA[edit]
RFA= Requests for adminship
|
WP:RFP[edit]
RFP= Requests for permissions
Autopatrolled[edit]
User:B3251[edit]
- B3251 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I am making a request on behalf of myself, as I sometimes create new articles pretty often (mostly New Brunswick-related). As of right now I have 66 live articles, and I have expanded plenty more. I have had a few deletions: two articles when I was brand new to editing & one list I created in mid-2023 (due to not completely understanding WP:BLPCRIME at the time). Otherwise, my articles have been pretty straightforward and vary in quality, with most being Start/C-class by the time I publish them. I had a little bit of a rough start when it came to "notability knowledge", as many do, but overtime I have grown to have an understanding of WP:GNG and WP:MOS when writing articles. Thanks, B3251 (talk) 11:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Done I've looked through your last 10 articles. You produce clean articles and nobody comes along and does tidy-up work. The obvious area for improvement is with date formats. Often, you use mdy dates in the prose and you consistently use dmy dates for referencing. Not sure why you do that but it's not a good idea. Settle on one date format and then stick to it. And with regards to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Loblaw boycott, I'm unconcerned about that; the worst that will happen is a merge. Good work! Schwede66 08:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
User:TheGreatestLuvofAll[edit]
- TheGreatestLuvofAll (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created at least 25 articles that follow WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG about singers and albums. I am familiar with WP:C, WP:V, and WP:BURDEN in my articles, without copying content without permission, and I make sure my info is sourced in any articles I created. TheGreatestLuvofAll (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
Not done There's always a little bit that others have to clean up when you finish with an article. Nothing major: DEFAULTSORT, dashes, categorisation. But to walk away from such a version is just not good enough. It wasn't just tagged for bare URLs but also as an orphan. And when someone came and fixed your bare URLs for you, you removed the bare URLs tag but didn't attend to the referencing mistake that the other editor had introduced. For autopatrolled, articles need to be cleaner. Your editing seems a bit rushed. With a little more care, you could qualify for autopatrolled in no time. As an aside, removing unpleasant messages from your talk archive is not something you should do. Schwede66 09:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Princess of Ara[edit]
- Princess of Ara (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I recently noticed this user, Princess of Ara. An editor who works mainly on Nigerian related articles and others. While trying to appreciate the user's effort, I got in love with the lovely articles, well sources, written from a volunteer in good faith and now, I am requesting that she be granted the auto patrol user right. It'll also help reduce heavy backlog of NPP. Thanks for your consideration! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 08:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
User:Prince of Erebor[edit]
- Prince of Erebor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have created 75 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Thatbombayboy[edit]
- Thatbombayboy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have made many edits, and I think if I can get permission, I will able to contribute more effectively. Thatbombayboy (talk) 11:08, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:SheriffIsInTown[edit]
- SheriffIsInTown (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Page mover[edit]
User:Kung Fu Man[edit]
- Kung Fu Man (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Requesting page mover rights for my frequent work on video game character articles, many of which involve writing up an article on a userpage to later move to where a previous redirect may exist and working alongside other editors towards this end. Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:WiinterU[edit]
- WiinterU (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I would like to have page moving rights because of many company articles with incorrect article names with their correct names being the redirects. WiinterU 00:24, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Remsense[edit]
- Remsense (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
- I often move articles in a space (China and Chinese-related topics) where there are specific naming conventions that are uncontroversial moves, sometimes requiring #delete-redirect.
- I often move pages around in my userspace, and #suppress-redirect would perhaps clutter the U1 log less. Remsense诉 23:12, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
User:Sunnyboi18[edit]
- Sunnyboi18 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello, I'am applying again for Pending Changes Reviewer, as it was felt by a person who reviewed this that my request was "all over the place" and that "I didn't understand that PC rights are". I don't think that's fair.
I was simply just giving my experience and of having done 632 edits on Wiki involving mostly updating critical information, having been an Editor since Feburary 2021, and being familiar with Wiki Guidelines & Copyright and understanding the importance of making sure the info on Wiki is correct, and preventing Vandalism. And other requests saying that exact same stuff were approved, so not sure what to say but, I'am aware of the importance and privliege of this permission, and would like my request to be considered fairly, as it did not feel like that was the case the first time, based on the response that I got. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 14:36, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for pending changes reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot talk 14:40, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm leaving this open for another, previously uninvolved admin to review, I was just explaining myself. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 18:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're "honest impression" was more of a commentary on me personally rather than my experience and work I've done. So once again, it does not seem like this is being processed in a fair and unbiased manner. Especially when requests have been approved with very little language in them with regard to their background or experience, or with the same amount of/less edits as myself. Sunnyboi18 (talk) 09:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you think my decline of your request was unfair, I did read it, and I gave my honest impression of it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:43, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Allan Nonymous[edit]
- Allan Nonymous (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have a history of cleaning up grammar, removing and refactoring uncited content and fixing citations. I'm hoping to maybe expand my editing scope a bit. Allan Nonymous (talk) 17:10, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:CanonNi[edit]
- CanonNi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hi. I recently got Rollback rights, so I thought it would be nice to have PCR rights as well. The main reason I would like this right is to further deal with vandalism, and accepting good edits. Although the pending changes backlog is not as high as... some other backlogs I could mention, I would still like to help with reviews. Thanks for considering my request! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 09:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done -Fastily 21:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Rollback[edit]
User:Lynch44[edit]
- Lynch44 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I have been reverting vandalism as an account for about a month now, and have familiarized myself with Twinkle as well. Also note the 20,000 edits, mostly anti-vandal, that I made as an IP. Lynch44 (talk) 01:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 22:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you consider me not fit for rollback due to this, then I am more than willing to wait further if necessary, and I will try to be more efficient in warning others in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've neither approved nor denied your request. But I would like to have a conversation on why you haven't been notifying editors after reverting their edits. Is it because... you didn't know you needed to, you've been acting too quickly without giving proper attention to each revert, etc? -Fastily 05:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Part of it was me assuming the edit was so minor that an edit summary would be sufficient (like the second diff), or, just not giving a warning or notice because I did not feel there was a specific one that could fit. Again, I will try to warn or notify all editors when reverting them in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, please ensure that you are always leaving notifications. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Part of it was me assuming the edit was so minor that an edit summary would be sufficient (like the second diff), or, just not giving a warning or notice because I did not feel there was a specific one that could fit. Again, I will try to warn or notify all editors when reverting them in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 10:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I've neither approved nor denied your request. But I would like to have a conversation on why you haven't been notifying editors after reverting their edits. Is it because... you didn't know you needed to, you've been acting too quickly without giving proper attention to each revert, etc? -Fastily 05:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- If you consider me not fit for rollback due to this, then I am more than willing to wait further if necessary, and I will try to be more efficient in warning others in the future. Lynch44 (talk) 01:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Wiiformii[edit]
- Wiiformii (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello! For about the past month, I've been patrolling recent changes and have gotten to know Ultraviolet well as I consistently warn users who make unconstructive and bad-faith edits. I am requesting rollback rights to further enhance my patrolling by using tools such as AntiVandal which will speed up the process greatly and Huggle which is a helpful tool to have to combat vandalism. Rollback also makes my reverts faster and more efficient allowing me to respond faster and better. Wiiformii (talk) 15:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 00:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily Hello, these edits were mistakes on my part, although the large majority of the rest of my reverts come with warnings using Ultraviolet (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Thank you for bringing it to my attention and I will make sure to appropriately warn users in the future. Wiiformii (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- Please ensure that you are always leaving warnings. I can't stress enough the importance of not biting the newcomers; if you find yourself reverting good faith edits, then it's especially important to notify the editor. If you don't want to leave a template warning, that's completely fine, but you do need to leave a talk page message explaining why you reverted the edit. Moving forward, could you please make a promise to leave warnings/notifications for every revert? -Fastily 21:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily Hello, these edits were mistakes on my part, although the large majority of the rest of my reverts come with warnings using Ultraviolet (e.g. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) Thank you for bringing it to my attention and I will make sure to appropriately warn users in the future. Wiiformii (talk) 01:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[edit]
Policies and links
end ----------------------------------