User talk:208.44.170.108

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 208.44.170.108, has made unhelpful edits (e.g. to Jackson's inequality), which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Sasha (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edits you made to United Nations Joint Logistics Centre, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sincerely, He's Gone Mental 16:17, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Vernantois ‎. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Sasha (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Carmen Berrios, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 16:51, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tony the Tiger, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tony the Tiger was changed by 208.44.170.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932711 on 2012-04-09T14:28:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Calabe1992 14:32, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tony the Tiger with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RA0808 talkcontribs 14:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Kellogg Company with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Mark91it's my world 14:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of Nazi Party leaders and officials, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Nazi Party leaders and officials was changed by 208.44.170.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967355 on 2012-04-16T18:23:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Nazi Party leaders and officials with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 18:23, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of Nazi Party leaders and officials with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 18:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of Nazi Party leaders and officials. DVdm (talk) 18:32, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Rosewood, Florida, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rosewood, Florida was changed by 208.44.170.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.961782 on 2012-05-01T16:44:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Elements of art, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 19:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kendrick Lamar. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kendrick Lamar was changed by 208.44.170.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960619 on 2012-09-13T15:24:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:24, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Ignatius of Loyola, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wikipelli Talk 13:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ignatius of Loyola with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Rrburke (talk) 13:40, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ignatius of Loyola with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -- Rrburke (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maybach Music Group, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Guðsþegn (talk) 18:30, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:55, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

October 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of inventors. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of inventors was changed by 208.44.170.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960993 on 2012-10-26T19:05:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:05, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to List of inventors with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 19:06, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of inventors. DVdm (talk) 19:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Canadian Figure Skating Championships with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. O.Koslowski (talk) 15:45, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Gerolamo Cardano. O.Koslowski (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hut 8.5 16:20, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Tomcat7. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Alexander II of Russia because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tomcat (7) 13:45, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alexander II of Russia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tomcat (7) 13:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Alexander II of Russia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli Talk 13:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corinth, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Macedonian, a Greek (talk) 20:26, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Haitian Revolution, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Odie5533 (talk) 16:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  m.o.p 19:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

March 2013[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Black Kite (talk) 13:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to KKKK has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at KKKK, you may be blocked from editing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:48, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Sexual cannibalism has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone, to Oncology because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. — MusikAnimal talk 16:49, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Forensic psychology. If you continue triggering the edit filter, you may be blocked from editing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cesar Chavez, you may be blocked from editing. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Giacomo Meyerbeer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Giacomo Meyerbeer with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Alex discussion ★ 13:47, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking out 5000+ characters and adding nonsense such as he is gay is nothing but VANDALISM. This is your FINAL WARNING.
Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. . Viva-Verdi (talk) 18:48, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UK Research Councils. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Ginsuloft (talk) 19:23, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Blocked for 3 months.

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Audio engineer because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Epicgenius (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vientiane. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Skr15081997 (talk) 14:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
THREE MONTHS of vandalism blocking does not seem to have done much good. This IP is at it again, with two more articles attacked. LEVEL THREE warning.Viva-Verdi (talk) 17:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

April 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Geography of Bhutan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Geography of Bhutan with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you.  A m i t  웃   18:40, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Geography of Bhutan with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:41, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Geography of Bhutan.  A m i t  웃   18:42, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm NicatronTg. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Thimphu because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. Lucas "nicatronTg" Nicodemus (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Vsmith (talk) 15:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dustin V. S.. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions to Oceanic climate has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Dustin (talk) 20:30, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
31 hours of blocking has done no good whatsoever. FINAL WARNING AGAIN, after which I'm sure there will be a much longer block. Viva-Verdi (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia.

August 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 101st Airborne Division has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

September 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ethan Allen has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethan Allen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Widr (talk) 19:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Burmese pythons in Florida because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 19:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Brigantine has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Caballero1967. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to American comic book has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Historiador (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chelsea Grin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. --allthefoxes (Talk) 16:44, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Timeline of Islamic history has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:17, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Biltmore Estate has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

please stop it


Query[edit]

We recently got an Internet connection in our new home in Fort Campbell, Kentucky and were dismayed to find that we are no longer able to edit Wikipedia or create an account. My husband, an avid wikipedian, understands the need to prevent vandalism from schools, but requests that the Admins review this block as this IP address has been re-allocated. Thank you.

User:Gilliam, please unblock me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.44.170.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We recently got an Internet connection in our new home in Fort Campbell, Kentucky and were dismayed to find that we are no longer able to edit Wikipedia or create an account. My husband, an avid wikipedian, understands the need to prevent vandalism from schools, but requests that the Admins review this block as this IP address has been re-allocated. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. Your husband should request unblock under his account and provide this IP address in his unblock request. 331dot (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

331dot, he is currently incapacitated as a result of a coma. Thank you for your time.

I'm very sorry to hear that. You are certainly welcome to request the creation of your own account at WP:ACC at which time if you are still affected by a block, you can request unblock while logged in to your own account(accounts cannot be shared so you should not use your husband's account). 331dot (talk) 18:02, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.44.170.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to appeal the block again. Almost one (1) year has passed and due to the wikt:ridiculous and totally extraneous requirements imposed on us by the Administrator Mr. 331dot, we have still not been able to attain a Wikipedia un-block for our household. I wish for an administrator to grant us due counsel and hearing so that our IP (Internet Protocol) address be unblocked and fully absolved of all restrictions and past damnations. 208.44.170.108 (talk) 14:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. This block is stopping an antisemitic troll from creating accounts. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Did you request an account? 331dot (talk) 15:30, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.44.170.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

331dot, if we were to request an account we would not be able to use it as our home IP address is blocked. :: Addendum I: This is a talk page, but I am making an unblock request and not actually talking (though I suppose I am entering into a conversation with the administrator who chooses to answer this petiton), so I will sign my name (well, my user name), as well as provide the time. 208.44.170.108 (talk) 13:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC) ::: Addendum II: I miss the good old days of surfing around policy pages and obsessively monitoring the recent changes. That is the main thing. I don't care about the talk page privileges and all that mumbo jumbo. :::: Addendum III: On second thought though some sort of arrangement along those lines I reckon it would be a bit hard to implement, so to speak, and get all of those procedures and flags rolling round the bend. Of course I did come here to request some sort of unblock and am willing to enter into discussion and make some sacrifices to achieve that. ::::: Addendum IV: I would also like the Administrator Mr. Gilliam to appear here, or at least roll round, put his hat up, take it down, and get on, if he would like to. I am sure that he is a man of reason and will be persuaded by the case I have made here. Generally most of the Administrators present on this Wikipedia must surely be learned and reasonable men, having attained their most prestigious position. Also, quite a bit of time has passed since last I signed this Unblock Request with four tildes, so I reckon the time has rolled right on round the bend for me to get on and do that again, so here goes: 208.44.170.108 (talk) 13:19, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As stated above, this is a very valid and legitimate block. I'm also removing talk page access as, to be blunt, this is trying too hard to make us believe you are telling the truth. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:45, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 1808 United States presidential election have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:33, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vukky. I noticed that you recently removed content from Acinonyx pardinensis without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Vukky! 😃 (talk to me!) 14:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. Your recent edit to Bobby Fischer appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Isabelle 🔔 13:09, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:2600:1700:8DF2:1200:6133:B72C:C736:985A. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

@Drmies: I did NOTHING wrong. He needlessly deleted sourced content. I.P. editor one edit. Probably a CHUD anyway if he gets so riled up he will write several sentences and get engaged in Wikipedia just being offended by something like that. Please read and understand WP:NONAZIS which I cited in my edit summary. My use of templates was perhaps a little extraneous but I had to get the point across. Please consider blocking the user in question. Thanks - Leroy 208.44.170.108 (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • It was more than a little over the top. Please don't do that again. Drmies (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Original Vampires (The Vampire Diaries) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cynodon dactylon. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 15:34, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.44.170.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a school IP address used by hundreds of students. I bear no responsibility for my students' actions. The amount of 'vandalism' from our address does not justify a 2-year block. Many of our students are dependent on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

As per the comment immediately below. Yamla (talk) 16:43, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Eric Jacobs (Redacted)

Hello. I've removed the phone number you added, since Wikipedia volunteers don't contact people by phone. This IP address has been repeatedly used to violate Wikipedia policy (it is not always visible but is confirmed by Checkuser evidence). This is only a soft block, meaning accounts can still be used but not created using this IP. However, if the problematic behaviour continues I will not hesitate to block it entirely. Frankly you're lucky I haven't already done that, since it has been used almost exclusively for violating Wikipedia policy. Here's a template summarising the block:
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled. please unblock 208.44.170.108 (talk) 15:42, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

-- zzuuzz (talk) 15:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

208.44.170.108 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have chosen to appeal to JIMBO regarding my recent indef block under this IP and Beaneater00 and Leroy08 and AlbanianHernia etcetera. Please refer this unblock request to Jimbo on his talk page. I have no other recourse. I have been CU blocked many times ARBCOM blocked and ARBCOM unblocked and now community/WMF blocked and 2 year blocked on this IP by which time I will have graduated. I swear and maintain everything I did was reasonable. There is a cabal of editors attacking me for my posts on race/IQ and Albanian Irredentism. I was a constructive editor on Simple English Wikipedia at simple:User:Beaneater00 with over 3000 edits. Anti - Vandalism etc. 100 per cent constructive. I was also a constructive editor under Beaneater00 and Table92 for many months before my block and even after I had got it appealed. They blocked me because of my username 'Beaneater' which is apparently a slur against Hispanics. I swear on the name of the Father Son Holy Spirit Jesus Mary and Joseph I never knew of any such thing. I have the good sense and respect for others not to include a racial/ethnic slur in my username. I have no issue with Hispanics. I chose the name because I like to eat beans I am a beaneater. I am not Hispanic though. The original ANI complaint read: "Bean eater" is a widely-known racist slur (see also Beaner). Why on earth is an editor called Beaneater00 not already blocked simply for the name? If one assumes good faith about the choice of name being possibly a reference to simply enjoying eating beans, the name itself will still be offensive to many people. This user is actively engaged in editing far-right US political topics (including arguing about the designation of America First Political Action Conference as White Nationalist), which suggests that they are very much aware of the offensiveness of the name. @Mo Billings: (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC) This is completely false. I was not aware of any slur when I created the account. I believe I received a comment about it already either here or on simplewiki on my talk page and I stated I was not aware of the slur. I consented that AFPAC would be referred to widely described as far-right white supremacist etc while encyclopedia would not itself use these terms -before there was any admin or ANI discussion involved. I did not do it under duress, this is my nature as an editor. There is a cabal arrayed against me because of my differing viewpoints & my username. I don't care about the username, I will change the username to whatever you want. Please just give me a second chance Jimbo. Thank You 208.44.170.108 (talk) 19:31, 31 August 2021 (UTC) Adding text of my original unblock after community ban: I do like this website and it is worth my time. I find it absurd to suggest that I would make 3000 edits around Wikimedia if I did not like doing so. And on your proposal of a community ban, I did not 'game the system', I was specifically advised to seek an unblock from ARBCOM by the user who declined my second UTRS appeal. And User:Tablekitten is not me, his name is the same as my Discord handle but it must be a coincidence. That I was banned from the unofficial Discord chat is not relevant because it has no connection to Wikimedia. And the behavior that caused my ban was arguing with other editors over my additions to Antisemitism, just what could be considered an unsupported synthesis, and they presumed based on what I wanted to add that I was an antisemite. And about the concern over my username, I live in the United States and I have never heard 'beaneater' used as a slur until a complaint was made here on Wikipedia. I chose the username because I like beans. I am not Hispanic, and if it is really an issue, I can change the username. User:Beaneater00/Userboxes/sanity is similar to a userbox displayed by User:Nableezy lamenting the prohibition on pro-Hezbollah userboxes which he has displayed for years. The second user box about Iran is just a political position, I don't see an issue even remotely with that unless any complaints about American-Israeli relations are 'antisemitic' and warrant a ban, which would be ridiculous. I don't push POV, and indeed I did not contest when my edits to the LGBT articles were reverted, mostly because I thought it would attract too much trouble and probably lead to another block. I made my edit to the Sedition Caucus because I was not aware of the ongoing talk page discussion and I did not edit war. I stand by that edit - the wording at that time implied that the Republicans involved considered themselves to be the 'Sedition Caucus'. That is absolutely POV. My edits to Antisemitism were well-sourced, I went out of my way to find reliable sources, and I did not even break WP:3RR. I agree now after my edits were first reverted I should have been less belligerent and began a talk page discussion instead of re-reverting, but it is by no means blockworthy. I think criticism of my edits to War Against Indiscipline is totally ridiculous. It defies belief to say that an American would be biased in favor of one of the several Nigerian military juntas of the 20th century. The article was in a poor state with regard to grammar and phrasing and I fixed it. And my behavior before the original ARBCOM block is not relevant; I edited unconstructively, I was blocked, I went to Simple English Wikipedia as per WP:SO, waited six months with a penitant spirit, and was re-admitted. The edit stating 'This user comes from Israel' was made to point out his biases, claiming that Ayatollah Khomeini had control of the Iranian government at the time of the Iraq War, and not the elected officials and Parliament, is something the Israeli government and media would have you believe, being a mortal enemy of Iran and thus believing that it is undemocratic. I think generally that you have blown things way out of proportion. Beaneater (talk) 09:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC) The original A.N.I. thread was created around midnight UTC WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incident Archive 1061. I was banned within a record THREE HOURS after the thread was created and over the next few days as thread continued and editors agreed on a Community BAN against my name I never had a chance to respond, there was no dissent from me or from any other editor.[reply]

Decline reason:

Given your history of socking and deception, the Wikipedia community has no interest in having you return to editing at this time.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:05, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2023[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Digital divide. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarcGarver (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fermionic condensate have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 14:48, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2024[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Trench warfare—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:53, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Will120 (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at How to Bake Pi. Aspects (talk) 16:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:208.44.170.108&oldid=1214854041"