User talk:216.226.127.120

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

-- zzuuzz (talk) 14:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

this edit is mistaken. Exponential growth and exponential decay involve functions of the form y = ax, where the variable is in the exponent, not functions of the form y = xa. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:57, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Exponential function. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  rdunnalbatross  12:01, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Exponential function. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Exponential function was changed by 216.226.127.120 (u) (t) deleting 18952 characters on 2009-10-09T12:21:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Asia, you will be blocked from editing.
 —  .`^) Paine Ellsworthdiss`cuss (^`.  15:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Great Migration (African American). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 16:25, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Richard Gavin Reid has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:01, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Quaternary. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Quaternary. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:07, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Quaternary. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 16:08, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

JohnCD (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scott Gomez has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Epbr123 (talk) 15:25, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Scott Gomez has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. «Golgofrinchian» ∞talk∞ 18:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dead Man Walking (film)‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pittsford Sutherland High School, you may be blocked from editing. --Fiat Lux (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

May 2011[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 18:43, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Legal aspects of computing, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2011[edit]

Could you not do stuff like this, thanks? I had to go look it up to see if it was right, and this is annoying. Herostratus (talk) 16:33, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

In a recent edit to the page Industrial Revolution, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. --Old Moonraker (talk) 14:37, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to James Alesi, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Calmer Waters 17:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Alesi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. MsFionnuala (talk) 14:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Monroe County, New York with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.  FrostedΔ14  14:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to James Alesi. Wikipelli Talk 14:45, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GoodnightmushTalk 15:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


October 2012[edit]

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Arby's, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arby's with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:12, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Arby's with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Lugia2453 (talk) 18:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Voltaire, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deor (talk) 14:49, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kinu t/c 18:06, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to AA (band), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 16:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm K6ka. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Copernican heliocentrism because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. K6ka (talk | contribs) 17:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Copernican heliocentrism with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. SeaphotoTalk 17:22, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Laberkiste. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mystique (comics)— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Laber□T 13:38, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Liance. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Alternative payments has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -Liancetalk/contribs 22:36, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kersti Kaljulaid. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 18:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shakespeare's Sonnets. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Phil wink (talk) 19:32, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Hong—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Computer security. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Negro league baseball, you may be blocked from editing. --Bison X (talk) 14:34, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Andy Jassy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 16:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]