User talk:66.37.239.34

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your IP address, 66.37.239.34, is registered to Cox Communications Omaha, L.L.C. and may be shared by multiple users, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

November 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Battle of Gaugamela has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Battle of Gaugamela was changed by 66.37.239.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953286 on 2015-11-17T21:04:46+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to DeMarco Murray has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 17:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jeremy Bentham has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jeremy Bentham was changed by 66.37.239.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.971386 on 2016-02-18T16:07:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:07, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Marie-Louise Meilleur has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Marie-Louise Meilleur was changed by 66.37.239.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960953 on 2016-05-09T18:27:12+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:27, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Yintan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 1993 World Trade Center bombing— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yintan 21:54, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yintan 21:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 1993 World Trade Center bombing, you may be blocked from editing. Yintan 21:58, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1993 World Trade Center bombing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 1993 World Trade Center bombing was changed by 66.37.239.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952607 on 2016-11-01T22:03:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Atari has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Atari was changed by 66.37.239.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959558 on 2017-12-14T21:15:51+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:15, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Egg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 21:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz was changed by 66.37.239.34 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953358 on 2018-01-26T14:23:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Girth Summit. An edit that you recently made to United States Bullion Depository seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! GirthSummit _(blether) 14:32, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:37, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Trans— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 16:23, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Transgender hormone therapy (male-to-female), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. PohranicniStraze (talk) 16:31, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Plandu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Yur Mahalleh, Sari— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Plandu (talk) 16:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Sakura Cartelet. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eunuch, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sakura Cartelet^Talk 02:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Culture of England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dirkbb (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:38, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 02:52, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Willsome429. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to V. J. and Angela Skutt Catholic High School have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:27, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Igloo—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:25, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Igloo, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Y.ssk 19:52, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Eevee01. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sean James have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Eevee01^(talk) 10:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm SunDawn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sean James, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SunDawn talk 15:09, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sean James. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 17:15, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sean James, you may be blocked from editing. RFZYNSPY ^talk 01:33, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2021[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Igloo. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 17:58, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Igloo, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 21:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to attempt to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:240:CD01:1410:697A:DCA5:2DD8:C327 (talk) 19:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brainchip (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by 97198 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brainchip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 07:44, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brainchip (January 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources (sources associated with the subject) cannot be the only references used in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brainchip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 66.37.239.34! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 14:18, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Blaze Wolf: I have made significant changes to the page Draft:Brainchip in adding a number of diverse sources and more detailed information, as well as running the article thorough a plagiarism checker. Do you have any other advice? 66.37.239.34 (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brainchip (January 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brainchip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 03:40, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Skynxnex. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Christ the Redeemer (statue) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Skynxnex (talk) 15:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Christ the Redeemer (statue). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Skynxnex (talk) 15:46, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.