User talk:88ui7

Welcome![edit]

Hello, 88ui7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 14:12, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steal the Night for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steal the Night is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steal the Night until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CBS527^Talk 03:28, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories[edit]

Just a note on Category:Casablanca Records artists and Category:Mezzo-soprano vocalists – the way we add articles to a category is to add "[[Category:Casablanca Records artists]]" to each article that belongs in the category, not to edit the category and add the article names there. I've cleaned these categories up. Happy editing, —swpb^T 15:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with Category:Mezzo-soprano vocalists – please avoid creating categories that duplicate existing categories. I've redirected this category to the existing Category:Mezzo-sopranos. Thanks. —swpb^T 15:04, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Synclavier songs has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Synclavier songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 03:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 115.164.209.63 (talk) 06:22, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Desire Wire (Cindy Bullens album), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. read WP:MOSALBUM Jennica✿ / ^talk 01:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Polly Cutter (singer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Polly Cutter (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polly Cutter (singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Newborn Woman (Vicki Lawrence album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newborn Woman (Vicki Lawrence album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newborn Woman (Vicki Lawrence album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. XFhumu^Talk 21:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Newborn Woman (Vicki Lawrence album). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ships in the Night (Vicki Lawrence album)[edit]

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. 88ui7, thanks for creating Ships in the Night (Vicki Lawrence album)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Silver Eagle (Limey album)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Silver Eagle (Limey album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Class455 (talk|stand clear of the doors!) 21:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Limey (UK '70s band)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Limey (UK '70s band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Cabayi (talk) 21:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Silver Eagle (Limey album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Silver Eagle (Limey album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Eagle (Limey album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 23:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've added Limey (Limey album) and Limey (UK '70s band) to the deletion discussion as the same concerns apply. Cabayi (talk) 06:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ships in the Night (Vicki Lawrence album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ships in the Night (Vicki Lawrence album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ships in the Night (Vicki Lawrence album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGracefulSlick (talk) 02:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to discuss this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ships in the Night (Vicki Lawrence album), not the WikiProjects Page. You will also need to provide a valid reason as to why it should be kept. The album being listed and available on Amazon is not a valid reason. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:19, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Limey (UK '70s band)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Limey (UK '70s band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:50, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Album[edit]

Please read WP:NALBUM. Simply being released by a notable artist does not make an album notable in its own right. If an album charted on Billboard and/or had a big hit single on it, then it's likely notable. But most of the albums you're creating are obscure limited releases with no reviews, no charting positions, etc. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:13, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List[edit]

Hi, this is a list of reliable sources for album reviews Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources and also most newspapers and major magazines count as well. Amazon, discogs, bandcamp, soundcloud, itunes, facebook, youtube dont qualify. If you can find any reviews by reliable sources you need to present them at the AFD discussion and add them to the articles, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why your albums keep getting nominated for deletion[edit]

88ui7, that's not enough reason to have an article, just "because it's missing from Wikipedia". You also have to demonstrate it's notable enough to have an article in the first place, by passing the criterion listed at WP:NALBUM. Just adding links to Discogs (which is not considered a reliable source by Wikipedia standards) or to iTunes, Amazon or some other store where you can buy the album is not considered a source, because all it shows is that the album exists, not that it's notable in any way. What you need to provide are one of the following: (1) two or more reviews of the album from professional sources, such as music magazines or newspapers, AllMusic, the Encyclopedia of Popular Music, etc. but not from blogs or websites of "music enthusiasts"; (2) chart performance in countries around the world; (3) articles (again, from professional sources) that talk about the album in detail, providing information about its recording, sales, awards, etc. If all you have is "XXXX is the third album from singer Joe Smith, released in 1974", and a track listing, then the album is likely to be nominated for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 15:05, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Three (2011 album)[edit]

The article Three (2011 album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage in reliable sources, failing WP:NALBUMS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

<less redirecting when correcting that article. Thank you.> ~~88ui7~~

Because there was a deletion discussion that found the album wasn't independently notable. You can still check the page history and summarize what well-sourced content the redirected article had in the article on the artist. Huon (talk) 20:40, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Three (2011 album) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Three (2011 album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Three (2011 album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RA0808 ^talk _contribs 21:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Join WikiProject for Albums[edit]

Hello, 88ui7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in writing or contributing to album articles, you may want to check out WikiProject Albums, with tips on how to make and format a great album article. And while you are there, why not join in the discussions on improving albums in general on Wikipedia.

Again, welcome! NZFC^(talk) 21:33, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Refugees (female folk trio) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Refugees (female folk trio) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Refugees (female folk trio) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NZFC^(talk) 01:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk[edit]

Hello, I have merged your latest question at the WP:HD with your posts from yesterday. Please sign your posts at talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). Please read carefully all the advice you have been given, both at the help desk and here, at your talk page. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 88ui7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Personal Attention) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Personal Attention, 88ui7!

Wikipedia editor Triptropic just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for contribution.

To reply, leave a comment on Triptropic's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptropic (talk) 22:24, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Neverland (2001 album)[edit]

Hello 88ui7,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Neverland (2001 album) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:40, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Newborn Woman) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Newborn Woman, 88ui7!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I'm afraid this doesn't meet WP:NALBUM or WP:GNG, but will be a useful redirect..

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 18:51, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ships in the Night (album)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ships in the Night (album), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

It would be helpful if you would take the time to learn and understand the notability requirements for Wikipedia before creating any more articles. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 08:18, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steal the Night[edit]

The article Steal the Night has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. John from Idegon (talk) 01:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You had created this article by removing a redirect that was instituted by community consensus (see here). I did not realize that until after I had added the PROD. I removed the PROD, and re-instituted the redirect. If you honestly feel that the work you added is sufficient to sustain an article (I don't), feel free to created a draft and submit it via WP:AfC. Also, in the process of doing new page patrol today, I noticed you moved a draft (Draft:Motion (Geoff Muldaur album)) to mainspace. It too did not adequately show notability, so I undid your move. The draft was in the AfC process, had been declined by a reviewer, and had not been edited since. This action by you was disruptive and you shouldn't do that again. You should probably make a thorough read of WP:N and the guidelines linked from there as it seems you do not quite understand what notability means here at Wikipedia. I'll leave you a link to a special help desk just for newer editors where you can ask questions to help clarify your understanding of this. John from Idegon (talk) 04:34, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Steal the Night[edit]

I suggest you work on Draft:Steal the Night until it can pass notability requirements for albums. So far, you have failed to do so and that's why Steal the Night was redirected. Until you do that, you are just wasting everyone's time including your own. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 04:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! 88ui7, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 04:35, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Your actions today on Draft:Steal the Night, Steal the Night and Draft:Motion (Geoff Muldaur album) have been far from helpful. There is never a reason to move a draft to Wikipedia space, your move to reinstate an article redirected by community consensus was editing against consensus and your move to mainspace of a draft circumventing the AfC process was also disruptive. This needs to stop. Notability is not a matter of opinion, but rather the meeting of some fairly objective criteria. Nothing you did today shows any understanding of that. John from Idegon (talk) 04:43, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For You and I moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, For You and I, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:16, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 88ui7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, 88ui7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

France Joli (1979 album) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, France Joli (1979 album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Baby Come Back (Player song), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Binksternet (talk) 23:20, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Amy Grant have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:France Joli (1979 album)[edit]

Hello, 88ui7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:France Joli (1979 album).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

When adding links to material on external sites, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 19:57, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]