User talk:Angry Red Hammer Guy

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Angry Red Hammer Guy! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 19:54, Thursday, June 4, 2020 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Angry Red Hammer Guy! Thank you for your contributions. I am Ed6767 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Ed6767 (talk) 22:09, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warm welcome and all the helpful links Ed6767. Angry Red Hammer Guy (talk) 22:22, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to my talk page[edit]

Feel free to leave me a message; while I cannot guarantee a prompt response, I will probably answer within 72 hours. -- Angry Red Hammer Guy (talk) 18:51, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editor Talk pages (including yours) are not places to try to start chats, or invite people to comment, or propose non-Wikipedia ideas. Editors have been blocked for using Talk as chatrooms. Primary use for Talk is for editors to leave comments about your editing of articles. This can range from awards (Barnstars) to cautions, warnings and block notifications. David notMD (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes sense. I will certainly keep that in mind for the future. -- Angry Red Hammer Guy (talk) 16:37, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Idea![edit]

This is an idea that I had, but I plan to refine it with sequential edits of this talk. If you like this idea (or come up with a similar one), please notify me so that we can collaborate. If you don't like this idea, please tell me why. When I've satisfactorily fleshed out this idea, I plan to propose it (somewhere).

What if there was a Wikipedia page devoted to extremely long and well thought out games of chess, played by Wikipedians?

It could be set up relatively like a talk page, were anyone can add a chess move to the game, or vote on a preexisting move.
Moves would be written in the format: [Move written in chess notation], [Number of yes votes] [Creator's signature]
For each game, players could be split up into two teams, based on which team they play for first. People who add (or vote for) a black move could only play as black in the future, and the same for white. -- Angry Red Hammer Guy (talk) 00:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is a project to build and expand and maintain a free online encyclopedia. It is not a social media site. People who want to play chess online have plenty of websites to choose from. Our hobby here is writing encyclopedia articles. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:36, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Cullen, now that you say that, my idea makes a lot more sense as a non-Wikipedia thing (even if it's done in the style of Wikipedia). -- Angry Red Hammer Guy (talk) 16:45, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No headline[edit]

Hello Angry Red Hammer Guy, if you thanked me for my opinion, your welcome if you want to talk to me, (Hamuyi) Use my talkpage. Always, Hamuyi (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Angry Red Hammer Guy,

Here is a tip to edit your talk page, If you want to edit your talk page, You can click the edit button on the top of your talk page.

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Angry Red Hammer Guy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Artificial Edit Count Inflation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Angry Red Hammer Guy! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Conflict of Interest?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Linter error in signature[edit]

The tag <font>...</font> you are using in your signature is deprecated. Please consider replacing it with a span+CSS equivalent <span style="color:#ee9a22">...</span>. —⁠andrybak (talk) 13:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for pointing that out! I have updated it in your suggested way, and it seems to work just fine. I am assuming that this came to your attention when I posted some userboxes to the new userboxes talk page. If this is the case, what did you think of my userboxes? If this is not the case, please disregard the second part of this message. — Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 18:00, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend avoiding all off-topic userboxes. That is, please consider only using userboxes directly related to your contributions to Wikipedia. And don't spend too much time on userboxes. Focus on contributing to articles instead. If you don't know where to start, see section "Help out" of the Community portal. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox request[edit]

Hello Angry Red Hammer Guy I am from Tunisia is it possible to get a Userbox for that? Carthago824 (talk) 19:49, 4 december 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carthago814 (talk • contribs)

Hi! It looks like there is already a userbox that might work for you:

Wikitext

userbox

where used

{{Template:User proud|Tunisia}}

This user is proud to be a
Tunisian !

linked pages

Userbox request[edit]

Can I have a userbox that has a picture of pi on it and says, "This user believes that pi repeats" and have the pi symbol link to the pi Wikipedia page? 2003 LN6 (talk) 18:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but I don't think I can make the pi image link to the Wikipedia page about pi. How's this?

Wikitext

userbox

where used

{{User:Angry Red Hammer Guy/Userboxes/piRepeats}}

This user believes that pi repeats.

linked pages

This is nice, thanks! 2003 LN6 (talk) 01:39, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice: biographies of living persons and post-1992 American politics[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! — Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 00:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gina Carano[edit]

Greetings. Claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election have been widely shown to be baseless. Multiple published, reliable sources describe Carano's claims as false. Suggesting otherwise is whitewashing. Thank you. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thank you for your input; I appreciate it. I would also like to thank you for bringing WP:STICKTOSOURCE to my attention, and I will try my best to remember it in the future. I recognize that many reliable sources have stated that claims of 2020 election fraud are baseless and false, and I would like to point out that many other reliable sources (which lean to the right rather than the left) state that widespread 2020 voter fraud is a real possibility. This is a very contentious issue. Indeed, I would even go so far as to say that most people on the right believe 2020 voter fraud is real, and most people on the left think the opposite. Saying that Gina's claims are false would be choosing one political side over the other, and a direct violation of WP:NPOV. By not saying that her claims are false, I am not whitewashing, and I am not choosing a side. I am simply trying my best to uphold Wikipedia policy. However, I understand the value of including people's viewpoints, and would be more than willing to accept something like: "Gina Carano has said that there was widespread election fraud in 2020, a view which many people believe to be false." I would also like to say that all my edits are intended to improve Wikipedia, even if I sometimes miss the mark. I am willing to discuss this further, however, I cannot guarantee promptness in my responses. Thank you, and please excuse the length of this message. — Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 01:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sangdeboeuf Please be notified of my message. — Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 02:58, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is based on published, reliable sources. Whether the general public believes something to be true or not is irrelevant. I've addressed your other concerns at the article talk page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 03:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sangdeboeuf Thank you. I have proposed a counter argument on the article's talk page. — Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 03:35, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]