User talk:Carthago814

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Carthago814! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 10:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 14)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not an article - content more for your userpage User:Carthago814 - see Wikipedia:User pages
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Carthago814! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fatih Mosque[edit]

Hello! I may be interested in helping you create such an article. A WP-article on any topic is meant to be a summary of the WP:RS we can find about it, and if there are no such sources, we won't have an article about it on WP, see WP:GNG.

So, the first important question is, what WP:RS do you have that we can base the article on? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:04, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Grabergs Graa Sang thanks for responding I Have Found a few Turkish news agencies like Sabah.tr and the Greektimes who all have interesting information on the Fatih Mosque in Enez for example I was build in the 10th century and recently restored. 19:57,11october
Can you link them? I don't know Turkish (I assume you do), but google translate helps to some extent. There seems to be several mosques with this name, see [1]. Is "our" mosque on that page, if so, which?
If you want to make WP-edits that sticks, a fundamental skill is to learn how to add references or "inline citations" (the little numbers in article text which links to the reference section). See WP:TUTORIAL about that. WP-content lives or dies by it's WP:RS. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:01, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Are these [2][3][4] about the topic or something else? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC) Yes That one is exactly the one that i am talking about the Fatih Mosque ( Hagia Sophia) in Enez. 14:30 12 October[reply]

Agdam mosque[edit]

I've seen that you reverted my revision on the Agdam Mosque. My reasons are as follows: 1- although the part about the bodies from khojali IS sourced, but after checking the sources I found that the first source only mentions 200 bodies being moved to Agdam (and not to the mosque) and the second source can't be reached to verify it altogether. 2- the second part about the reports: the source and the included text is from a letter sent from a Turk official in Igdir to the Pope making it the quotation from Turkish sources and not Azerbaijani, and claiming that "many Azerbaijani and one Turkish news agencies reacted to.." something either requires sources for each one or a source that says that explicitly. So I changed the wording to match given sources. Kevo327 (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC) I see Kevo I was also confused because the mosque in Agdam Wasn’t destroyed during Khojali massacre so it is impossible that the bodies were moved there. And about the second source it doesn’t really have anything do with Agdam Mosque. Also I saw that you have got some interesting things on Armenia on your talk page (even though I don’t agree with all of them) that I haven’t seen before so my compliments for that. 19:48,20 November (UTC)[reply]

Caeterum Censeo Carthago Gratis Agenda Esse :-)[edit]

Hallo Carthago, thanks a lot! Our garden is not very big, but we will try to find a place for the goat. Otherwise, Easter is not far away... :-) I am glad that you liked my articles about Istanbul! Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 16:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Masjid Noor ul-Islam moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Masjid Noor ul-Islam, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Bilorv (talk) 19:49, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Masjid Noor ul-Islam (December 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not enough here in sources or content to accept right now. There might be some notability here, it being the first American mosque of the Burmese Muslim community (if that can be verified).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Bkissin (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Tunisia userbox[edit]

Hey Carthago814, a while back you asked me if it was possible to get a userbox that signifies your being from Tunisia. This question of yours was placed on my user talk page as a userbox request. I previously responded to this request on my user talk page, but I don't think you were notified of this, as you did not respond. Here is a userbox that I think might work for you:

Wikitext userbox where used
{{Template:User proud|Tunisia}}
This user is proud to be a
Tunisian !
 linked pages

— Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 17:32, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Angry Red Hammer Guy I am very pleased to see this userbox as I am a proud Tunisian thank you very much for helping out on this Carthago814 (talk) 18:48, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. :) — Angry Red Hammer Guy <talk> <email> 21:36, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aseleste was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There are no references at all, which means the article is unsuitable. It is unclear whether you are trying to write an article or doing test edits, but if you are doing test edits, please do not submit it to AfC. As of right now, I think you should practice making edits as it seems like you are not familiar enough with wikitext.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
~ Ase1estecharge-paritytime 14:00, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Arnaudija Mosque.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Arnaudija Mosque.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 12:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Masjid Noor ul-Islam[edit]

Information icon Hello, Carthago814. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Masjid Noor ul-Islam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:03, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Masjid Noor ul-Islam[edit]

Hello, Carthago814. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Masjid Noor ul-Islam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zeynel Bey Mausoleum[edit]

Information icon Hello, Carthago814. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zeynel Bey Mausoleum, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Slimane Kahia moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Slimane Kahia. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is missing a lead section . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:18, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Portugal–Angoche conflict has been accepted[edit]

Portugal–Angoche conflict, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 12:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tomb of Hazrat Omar has been accepted[edit]

Tomb of Hazrat Omar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 23:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Bu'ath (April 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Ka'b ibn Asad. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 09:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Order of Merit of the Republic of Cyprus (April 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Carthago814&oldid=1219800337"