User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Minatti (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Lake Hancock. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft still doesn't contain enough material to warrant a stand-alone stub, and the material in this draft is also in the Lake Hancock article. Either the article can be left alone or expanded, or this draft can be expanded and then resubmitted.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:11, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Empire Football League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Middletown, New York and Watertown High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: L.R. Burleigh (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSubmarine was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheSubmarine (talk) 14:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Seriously? FloridaArmy (talk) 14:31, 16 September 2018 (UTC)

Photo captions

Thank you for the images you have been adding to various articles. In general, there is no need to add the name of a non-notable photographer to the caption of a photo, per WP:CAP. Thanks!

@Magnoila677 which photog are you refering to? I have drafts of a couple that are quite notable and need to be moved to mainspace. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
You've added "L.R. Burleigh" to several photo captions. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:50, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
See Draft:L.R. Burleigh. He seems quite notable and is covered substantially in reliable independent sources. Certainly the draft entry can be expanded but I see no reason we shouldn't have an entry on him. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:53, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Great. When the article is live you may wish to add him back to the captions. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
It can be live as soon as someone moves it to mainspace. I am prohibited from doing so. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:00, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
I personally would not move that article to mainspace in its current form, per WP:GALLERY. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:14, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

<outdent> I'm happy to remove the gallery once it's in mainspace. I'm working through his works from Commons and it's useful to have an organized list because there are many duplicates and different versions. I do think the list is useful for anyone reading his article to see which locations he rendered and to easily access the relevant image, but if there's a policy prohibiting that layout I am more than willing to abide. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:List of scenic railroads has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of scenic railroads. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Marshall Academy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marshall Academy. Thanks! Yanjipy (talk) 20:14, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
@User:Yanjipy I added some additional section breaks per ypur request. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. W. Chorley Elementary School (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more secondary sources to indicate this is a notable WP:GEOFEAT geographic building/location. As a school it would probably end up being a redirect to a school district.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:51, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
From the page you linked: "residences and commercial developments may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." This source discusses it in quite a bit of detail. And the school district website linked also has a detailed account of the former school and its history, pedaogy, design features, demolition etc. Of course there are other sources and I'll see if I can add some more but I beleive notability is well established. While the district website might count as local the detail it goes into and the way it discusses building make clear it was notable and significant. You note it's described in the town's article but no redirect exists. Is the article on the town where people should expect to look for information on a historic building? FloridaArmy (talk) 20:55, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
@User:AngusWOOF here's everything that the article about the town says about the building: "The J. W. Chorley Elementary School, designed by American architect Paul Rudolph, was built in the 1960s and demolished in 2013.[11]" FloridaArmy (talk) 20:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

John Milton of Florida

I hardly think it is 'conjecture' to mention that he dreaded working with the Republicans.

In his final message to the state legislature, he said that Yankees have developed a character so odious that death would be preferable to reunion with them. Valetude (talk) 23:20, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

As I recall the bit I removed as conjecture was attached to his suicide. He left no note. Some have suggested he was cleaning his gun. Others have suggested an unwillingness to reconcile as you've stated. We just don't know. I looked into it was best I could and while there are rumors and such no one knows. I believe his statement that you not above remains in the article. As far as "Yankee aggression" I stumbled on Sweetwater Creek State Park and there's some interesting history there. Could use expansion. I had never really heard aboit those sort of events. Burning of cities and such yes but women and children taken prisoner and sent by train to be refugees in another state? Whoa. Is there more to the story? And what were they making at the mill? Confederate uniforms? I didn't see it stated. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:29, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Casey DeSantis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casey DeSantis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casey DeSantis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:30, 19 September 2018 (UTC)

Help

The main photo at The Holland Hotel needs rotating if someone knows how. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

I tried. A bit messy though, so revert back if you don't like it! --regentspark (comment) 01:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
Thanks RegentsPark! Looks much much better to me. I cant2 read sideways very well. FloridaArmy (talk) 02:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
I had to remove the caption because that was showing up sideways. There must be some way of separating the image and the caption but I can't figure that out. Still, you're right. This makes more sense even without the caption. Thanks for catching that. --regentspark (comment) 02:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
I was wondering about the caption. I think an infobox would solve that problem. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wright's Liquid Smoke (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There is not enough written about this specific product to warrant an article
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Flat Out (talk) 00:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: David T. Howard High School has been accepted

David T. Howard High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Stuartyeates (talk) 03:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Great! It's very difficult to get articles on African Americans and related subjects approved. For example Draft:Isaiah T. Hatton. FloridaArmy (talk) 03:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Just another gentle reminder about the need for edit summaries. Deb (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Steven Sainz

Feel free to expand and tidy up the article in draftspace, but I'm not going going to move to main until after the election. I recently had my own bad experience with a political candidate being deleted. She is running for US Congress and has a virtual guarantee of winning, but the deletionists want to purge any candidates who aren't extremely well-known. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 13:26, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Okay. The sourcing is weak, so I understand. I think IAR and common sense should apply, but the election is soon enough. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:30, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I though state office holders were deemed inherently notable so I was surpised when Draft:James Gettis was turned down. Is being a State Rep not enough? He was also a Florida Supreme Court justice (when the position rotated) and I thought the coverage and sourcing was pretty solid, but obviously someone else disagreed. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
I think he is notable, however the reason it got turned down was because it was short and had only 2 sources. Add a few more sources and a bit more content and it is good to go. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 13:44, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blair Building has been accepted

Blair Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

• Gene93k (talk) 23:34, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Gettis has been accepted

James Gettis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Flat Out (talk) 02:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Vaux and Withers) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Vaux and Withers, FloridaArmy!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is not a disambiguation page. Please work on it in draftspace and submit via WP:AFC if you feel it is a notable topic, or it could be redirected to the best target.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 05:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rice Building

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rice Building, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

  • It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 13:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, yes. I created it in Mainspace by accident. I'm working on it in draftspace now where I moved it. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:L.R. Burleigh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:L.R. Burleigh. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 00:50, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rice Building has been accepted

Rice Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dan arndt (talk) 03:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Oakdale, New York into Dowling College. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the note. I did say "From Oakdale, New York" in this edit although I wasn't able to move the content over until the subsequent edit. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Establishing good editing habits

I've noticed a few of your recent edits to Seattle-related content. Please add edit summaries to describe your changes and please, please do read the sources you're using before adding them to the entries (which need to be checked for typos and inconsistencies). SounderBruce 18:09, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the message. Where did I mess up? FloridaArmy (talk) 18:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
I see you made a correction to cited content that I did not add. Here's the article before I touched it. The interurban part is already there. The only thing I think touched in those bits was to take out "city cars" since it seemed to me to be redundant to say that a service that also included interburban services included city services. I hope that makes sense. I haven't looked at the source to see if you are correct or not, but you're objecting to something I didn't have anything to do with. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:54, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Sure enough the source says "..an arm of the national Stone & Webster utility cartel, which also developed interurban railways between Seattle, Tacoma, and Everett." So as I read it, the content was correct before you changed it.

Speedy deletion nomination of Josephinum (disambiguation)

Hello FloridaArmy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Josephinum (disambiguation) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TomCat4680 (talk) 01:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I blanked it and moved it over to Josephinum. Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:12, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Frank Abell

I went ahead and moved "Draff:Frank Abell" to Draft:Frank Abell, as you appear to be creating a series of drafts on possibly notable individuals. Feel free to work on the draft, although the "Draff" redirect will be shortly deleted. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 01:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Thank you sir or maam. He's actually one that's quite notable. Thanks for the fix! Party on. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:46, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodore Peiser, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reconstruction (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kurt E. Armbruster has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kurt E. Armbruster. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt E. Armbruster (October 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The coverage here is not sufficient to establish notability as a historian.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
I added aditional reviews of his work and resubmitted. FloridaArmy (talk)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glendale, Massachusetts has been accepted

Glendale, Massachusetts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt E. Armbruster (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This individual does not appear to satisfy musical notability or general notability as a historian. If it is the opinion of the submitter that the subject does satisfy notability, please indicate, in an AFC comment or on the talk page, how notability is achieved, and resubmit.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:21, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Robert McClenon, thank you for reviewing some of my submission. The entry on Armbruster includes reviews of his books from the Oregonian, Seattle Times, Columbia journal, and several other periodicals. I'm not sure what the issue is honestly. If an author and their work have received substantial coverage in reliable independent sources doesn't that establish notability? He's also noted as an expert on Seattle's railroad history and music history in a couple of other Seattle Times article but I've seen too many so can't access without a subscription at the moment. I also think authors who oublish woth established University presses are assumed to be quite notable. I saw he also gives presentations and has served on panels. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:30, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
User:FloridaArmy - I meant to explain on the draft talk page or in an AFC comment, where it would be seen by all future reviewers of the draft, not to explain it to me on your talk page. Please explain on the draft talk page, for the benefit of future reviewers of the draft. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Robert McClenon I did respond there as well. If you wanted a discussion there you could have initiated it on that page and tagged me. Instead your posted here on my talk page. So I responded here as well. It gets a bit confusing when discussions are broken up all over the place. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:27, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hackley Library has been accepted

Hackley Library, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 09:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis Millet has been accepted

Louis Millet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 12:20, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wyandotte Building has been accepted

Wyandotte Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 12:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Problem re: article name

Please see Talk:Seville Hotel (New York City). Thx. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter F. Martens has been accepted

Walter F. Martens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles T. Mott has been accepted

Charles T. Mott, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Davis and Elkins Historic District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Mott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marshall Academy has been accepted

Marshall Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 10:25, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Braniff Building has been accepted

Braniff Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Harry Allan Jacobs has been accepted

Harry Allan Jacobs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 02:21, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walinwa has been accepted

Walinwa, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 18:25, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Buffalo Criterion has been accepted

Buffalo Criterion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:10, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Motta has been accepted

Stanley Motta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond Planet has been accepted

Richmond Planet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adolphus Humbles has been accepted

Adolphus Humbles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:56, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: T. Parker Smith has been accepted

T. Parker Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:58, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of scenic railroads has been accepted

List of scenic railroads, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank D. Abell (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Catrìona was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Catrìona (talk) 00:51, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parfitt Brothers has been accepted

Parfitt Brothers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 00:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Syd Brown (boxer) has been accepted

Syd Brown (boxer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:41, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: L.R. Burleigh has been accepted

L.R. Burleigh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Jellett has been accepted

Edwin Jellett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:56, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew J. Robinson (builder) has been accepted

Andrew J. Robinson (builder), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:58, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walter Burridge has been accepted

Walter Burridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:47, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank G. Abell has been accepted

Frank G. Abell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Winema Theater has been accepted

Winema Theater, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:46, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grein Building has been accepted

Grein Building, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oskar Gross has been accepted

Oskar Gross, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: RDX (reggae duo) has been accepted

RDX (reggae duo), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:54, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Spann has been accepted

Henry Spann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 21:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edwin Deming has been accepted

Edwin Deming, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kurt E. Armbruster has been accepted

Kurt E. Armbruster, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kirk Academy has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kirk Academy. Thanks! JC7V-constructive zone 00:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kirk Academy has been accepted

Kirk Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 01:05, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (RDX (reggae duo)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating RDX (reggae duo), FloridaArmy!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for developing the new article on RDX (reggae duo) and for working with the reviewers who commented on the early drafts.

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:50, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

List at top

I've been working your list of pending pages. Most have been accepted already and I think I've got all the ones in the AfC pending. Feel free to ping me of you have any more that need review. Your topics are much more interesting then the typical crud we see at AfC. Legacypac (talk) 20:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks very much User:Legacypac! Draft:Fank D. Abell hasn't gained approval yet, but hopefully soon. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:03, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Colin Teague (missionary) has been accepted

Colin Teague (missionary), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:59, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isaac H. Anderson has been accepted

Isaac H. Anderson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 06:50, 18 October 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruthmere Mansion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaux Arts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Family Limitation has been accepted

Family Limitation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:20, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abby Phillip has been accepted

Abby Phillip, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:30, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgia Conservancy has been accepted

Georgia Conservancy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 04:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgia Conservancy (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
K.e.coffman (talk) 04:09, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Legacypac and User:Editorofthewiki I don't understand the logic of excluding this subject. Not only does it have an entire entry on it in the New Georgia Encyclopedia but the group is involved in statewide legislative efforts, has been covered in relation to the creation of several major conservation areas, has had the trips it leads covered, and has been around from 50 some odd years. Maybe y'all can help? FloridaArmy (talk) 04:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
I agree and I've accepted it. Please post this info on the talkpage. BTW why do you use AfC? Was that mandated? You do really good work. Legacypac (talk) 04:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Yes, mandated. I was told I created too many articles. I didn't create the Georgia Conservancy draft, I found it languishing in draftspace. Thanks very much for your help. FloridaArmy (talk) 04:43, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
While I think you have moved past creating poorly sourced stubs. Headed to earning autoconfirmed status. There are 60,000 pages in Draft to sort through. I love finding good ones among the junk. Legacypac (talk) 04:46, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Watt (CNN reporter) (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more secondary news articles on Watt himself, that aren't coming from the press releases about him joining certain news organizations or the website profiles.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: I.H. Bonsall has been accepted

I.H. Bonsall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:33, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Prettyman has been accepted

William Prettyman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:44, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Bancroft Cornish has been accepted

George Bancroft Cornish, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 20:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Watt (CNN reporter) has been accepted

Nick Watt (CNN reporter), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:14, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nick Watt (CNN reporter) (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not establish biographical notability, which is based on what third parties have written about the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 22:23, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
How does it compare to Nicholas Watt? FloridaArmy (talk) 02:17, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Also, how many Emmy Awards does it take to make a reporter notable? FloridaArmy (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Minimum 3 Emmy's but I've accepted it under WP:ANYBIO Legacypac (talk) 20:16, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred P. Shaw has been accepted

Alfred P. Shaw, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! JC7V-talk 22:59, 26 October 2018 (UTC)

I requested a history merge to show that you created the article. I had to CSD the Alfred P Shaw under R2 before I could accept your draft. However I requested to an admin to do a history merge showing attrition since all I did was publish your draft. Cheers. JC7V-talk 22:59, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
Cool! Thanks User:JC7V7DC5768. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lula Lake Land Trust has been accepted

Lula Lake Land Trust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mike Boots has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mike Boots. Thanks! – Yanjipy (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
User:Yanjipy I added photographs and additional sources per your request. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mike Boots has been accepted

Mike Boots, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 14:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Funny Girls (New Zealand TV series) (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add the main actors for the show, what channel it aired on, when it aired, television infobox, and notable reception. You can use the sources from my talk page as well as others.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Funny Girls (TV series) has been accepted

Funny Girls (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:16, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Great! Thank you User:AngusWOOF. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Williamstown, Massachusetts

Your recent edit to Williamstown, Massachusetts disrupted the formatting of the article. Would you have a moment to fix it? Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Waterman (d. 1812) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Waterman (d. 1812). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paulina Peavy (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amy Rosenbaum has been accepted

Amy Rosenbaum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:10, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Case and Draper has been accepted

Case and Draper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: A. Alan Hill has been accepted

A. Alan Hill, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FloridaArmy/Archive_5&oldid=871601037"