User talk:Jackson883941

help desk, or place {{Help me}}

the unhappy camper box[edit]

for those wishing to "colaberate" dont use this, for those who are wishing to complain or add anything to my talk page this is not positive, add it here. you may add what you wish to this section and it will stay, positive messages in other sections will also stay,certain users do not have the authority to add text outside this box, if you are wondering if you have the authority, then you probably do. Jackson883941 (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Part of being collaborative is being willing to take criticism and use it to better yourself. Labeling those who leave critical comments as "unhappy campers" only shows that you are not willing to take criticism. If multiple more experienced editors are criticizing your actions, chances are they are right. Not heeding their warnings and advice could lead to a block for WP:NOTHERE. Don't take this as a threat, as I am not an admin. I have seen many editors refuse to listen to criticism and change their behavior, leading to blocks. Don't dig yourself into a hole you can't climb out of. - ZLEA _T\^C 22:58, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"leading to blocks" ,i coulnt agree more... Jackson883941 (talk) 23:10, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

when i say dont touch my talk page, im talking about reverting or changing my messages, like what you did Jackson883941 (talk) 23:21, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I did no such thing. I reverted myself after I realized I had made a mistake. Also, your interest in blocking "some users" has been noted. - ZLEA _T\^C 23:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

" Also, your interest in blocking "some users" has been noted" dont care, leave me alone. Jackson883941 (talk) 00:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - ZLEA _T\^C 23:38, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Factors include hostility to other editors, refusal to collaborate, and possible block evasion based on your edit of 16:27, October 31, 2022. What was your previous account? Cullen328 (talk) 02:56, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure this user wasn't the one pulling the joe job mentioned here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User talk:90.254.56.9. Before any unblock is considered, I think a checkuser should at least be contemplated. He iro 03:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackson883941 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1) this is my first account.

2) I am willing to colaberate with other users. if you read the first sentence of the unhappy camper box you would see... how exactly was I unwilling to colaberate?. in the large aircraft article, i stopped reverting and went to the talk section, so we could come to a consesus... also look at my edits not my talk page edits/ user page, those pages are for me, and change.

3) wishing to block another editor was due to their unwillingness to leave me alone, i accepted the consesus on the large aircraft section, and the user continued to bother me. i simply wished to move past this. wishing to stop users from using my talk page was directed at that specific user as an interm method of blocking them. moreover, wishing users would leave my talk page alone is meant specifically at my comments, the user in question altered my writing by deleting it without my approval. i dont want users editing my words or removing them.

4) if you would reveiw my edits they happen to be useful and productive. so far 502994(this is from the top 5 veiws, it is more than this) users/visitors have veiwed pages that i have edited, revewing these edits reveal, show that i am actually a productive user.

5) while this is my first account, this is not my device as it is owned by a third party. not sure what exactly was happening on oct 31 but, between now and the begining of my account i have used 3 different devices. 2 of which where not owned by me and have had different owners, how exactly was my edit on oct 31 an attempted ban evasion?

6) i simply wish to be reinstated and move on from this.

7) if i have been such an uncolaberative user then, why have my edits lasted long enough to rank up 502994 veiws on wikipedia articles i have edited. 8) i am not user 90.254.56.9 with out doxxing this user, websites like ipaddress lookup, reveal locations of unlogged users. User:Heironymous and others beleive this is me, under no circumstances would i ever let my ip address become public as easily as that, and even if i did, going online and stirring the melting pot would be illogical and dangerous, something I would not do. another thing is i dont live in the united kingdom...

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jackson883941 (talk) 16:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

View count is not a good measure of collaboration. I am curious about how you got that number, though. - ZLEA _T\^C 17:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

home page on the right Jackson883941 (talk) 17:16, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've never seen a view counter on the "home page" (I think you mean Main Page), not even on the mobile app. I don't think the number you're seeing is what you think it is. - ZLEA _T\^C 17:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Homepage Jackson883941 (talk) 17:27, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I learn something new every day. - ZLEA _T\^C 17:31, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a relatively new thing, and it doesn't activate automatically for older users. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 20:11, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock me now[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackson883941 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ive done nothing wrong90.254.48.205 (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request was made by an IP. If it's you, log in before requesting unblock- but if this will be your request, it will not be accepted. 331dot (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

why am i being targeted[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackson883941 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your just proving my point. this is an unfair block and you know it.90.254.48.205 (talk) 19:22, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As yet another of your sock accounts were just blocked, I'm now revoking talk page access on this page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.