User talk:Jarble/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 |
"InternationalComparisons.org" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect InternationalComparisons.org has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 14 § InternationalComparisons.org until a consensus is reached. Largoplazo (talk) 02:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Effects of unemployment on men has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 26 § Effects of unemployment on men until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:35, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
"Transgender ideology" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Transgender ideology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 13 § Transgender ideology until a consensus is reached. MikutoH (talk) 23:31, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Invitation
Hello Jarble!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:History of Rio Grande do Sul
Hello, Jarble. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:History of Rio Grande do Sul, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Racism in Myanmar
Hello, Jarble. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Racism in Myanmar".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 10:15, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of List of lone wolf terrorist attacks for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of lone wolf terrorist attacks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Groupthink (talk) 20:55, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
The redirect Cardiovascular disease and saturated fat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 28 § Cardiovascular disease and saturated fat until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:08, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jarble. Thank you for your work on History of slavery in Arkansas. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 02:53, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jarble. Thank you for your work on History of slavery in Delaware. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 02:54, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jarble. Thank you for your work on History of slavery in Tennessee. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 02:52, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
- @North8000: The article was written by User:Jengod, not me. Jarble (talk) 02:55, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pre-Columbian history of Quebec
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Pre-Columbian history of Quebec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safyrr 01:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Safyrr: Why did you blank this page and request that it be deleted? Jarble (talk) 01:42, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- Why didn't you read the talk page? I'm trying to rename Prehistory of Quebec to this because it is a full article that only covers pre-columbian history. I suspect that it wasn't originally called that due to the existence of this redirect page.
- Safyrr 02:48, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Safyrr: Since we can't rename the article without deleting a redirect, this should be done by requesting a page move. Jarble (talk) 02:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
"Native American clothing" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Native American clothing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 19 § Native American clothing until a consensus is reached. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 19:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
"Beastforum.com" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Beastforum.com has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 27 § Beastforum.com until a consensus is reached. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 07:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Careless edit of Template:Lesbian feminism sidebar
When you transcluded the Template:Lesbian feminism sidebar on 22 October 2023, you screwed up the template. If you had previewed your edit you would have seen that the entire content of the Groups section (33 linked articles) disappeared and was replaced by the list of books (Les Guérillères, etc.).
All you needed to do before publishing your edit was to check and review all the sections to ensure that your edit had not caused an error in the template. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo. 04:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Pyxis Solitary: Thanks for fixing that; I accidentally transcluded the "Books" section instead of the "Groups" section there. Should we transclude these sections again, or leave the duplicated lists as-is? Jarble (talk) 15:21, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
- I have no issue with transcluding related templates such as this one, and it does reduce the labor it takes to update both the sidebar and the navbox. But for one week, any reader who has viewed the sidebar and is not familiar with all it normally contains, did not know what it was missing. So the transclusion has to be done carefully. Pyxis Solitary (yak yak). Ol' homo. 09:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Century in topic
Template:Century in topic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:45, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
"Anatomy of vertebrates" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Anatomy of vertebrates has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § Anatomy of vertebrates until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
"Female anatomy" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Female anatomy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § Female anatomy until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 16:40, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
The article Causes of climate change has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
To make way for proposed article name change from Attribution of recent climate change to Causes of climate change, see talk page at Attribution of recent climate change
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Old Afc message transfered
- @Scope creep: I didn't write this article. It was written by AsteriodX. Jarble (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Jarble, the Afc software is terrible, its crap. Usually you just copy it to the correct editor. Can you do that. Thanks. scope_creepTalk 20:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
"Deep state in Russia" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Deep state in Russia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 26 § Deep state in Russia until a consensus is reached. QueenofHearts 06:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
About the article
Ever since you stated that the Penis article needed a rewrite, I decided to tweak the existing info and add new info with sources. See for yourself and tell me what you think. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 00:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Autisticeditor 20: This is a good start; the article still has too many haphazardly-organized lists of trivia (in this section, for example). Maybe these lists should be removed. Jarble (talk) 01:50, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- How about now? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 02:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Autisticeditor 20: This is somewhat better, but this section might need to be rewritten. It should be structured like the Mammalian kidney or Mammalian eye article, as an overview of the subject instead of a list of species-specific characteristics. Jarble (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I tried. Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 02:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Autisticeditor 20: This is somewhat better, but this section might need to be rewritten. It should be structured like the Mammalian kidney or Mammalian eye article, as an overview of the subject instead of a list of species-specific characteristics. Jarble (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- How about now? Autisticeditor 20 (talk) 02:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Level of detail of excerpts
Hi, just a word about the use of excerpts between articles of different types, or at different levels: I saw you selected some materials to do with magnetoception. Thing is, an article like Dog needs minimal detail about mechanism, and can take a bit of light chatty text about whether the mechanism actually occurs or not, its possible presence certainly being an interesting surprise to many readers of such a general (not very electrophysiological) article. That same light chatty text, however, is not going to fit at all well in a highly technical article about the quantum mechanism itself. I'd hazard a guess that there will be very few cases where a chunk of biology text can be included wholesale in an article with a different context. Suppose we have a high-level taxon article: it will say little about any one species, and as much as possible about what all the species have in common. That material will almost always be at the wrong level – too vague on species-specific detail, too detailed on general mechanisms – for the subsidiary taxa. And so on: sharing will, in fact, hardly ever work properly. I can see that 'excerpt' is a tempting mechanism, promising quick gains for little effort: but unfortunately, it will often be a step backwards in explanation, rendering articles uneven and fragmented. Sorry, but there it is. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Chiswick Chap: I added an excerpt about magnetoreception in fish because the Fish article did not mention magnetoreception. Should this excerpt not be included? Jarble (talk) 19:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. I just rewrote the bit in Insect to the required level of detail (without a separate subsection), and I have an idea I'll do the same over at Fish, for the same reason. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:34, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Please do not add navigation templates to articles that are not linked from those templates. WP:NAV-WITHIN: "every article listed on a particular navigation template generally has the template placed on its page." That implies that articles not listed on a template are not meant to include that template. --Omnipaedista (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnipaedista: Yes, I should have added this article to Template:Non-classical logic before putting the template on the article. Should the template include modal logics such as normal modal logic, regular modal logic, and provability logic? Jarble (talk) 14:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you could add all those in parentheses after the term "Modal Logic" on the "Non-classical logic" template. Please also make sure you place nav boxes in their right place as per MOS:SECTIONORDER ("End matter: Other navigation footer templates (navboxes)"). --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnipaedista: That might be a good task for a bot; do we need to request a bot to rearrange these templates in their correct order, or has this already been done? Jarble (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot operate a bot myself. That's OK, I'm not implying you should do any fixes. Just giving a heads-up for the future. --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Omnipaedista: That might be a good task for a bot; do we need to request a bot to rearrange these templates in their correct order, or has this already been done? Jarble (talk) 14:36, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you could add all those in parentheses after the term "Modal Logic" on the "Non-classical logic" template. Please also make sure you place nav boxes in their right place as per MOS:SECTIONORDER ("End matter: Other navigation footer templates (navboxes)"). --Omnipaedista (talk) 14:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
"Wage labor and slavery" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Wage labor and slavery has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28 § Wage labor and slavery until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
"History of work" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect History of work has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 28 § History of work until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 23:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Injuns
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Injuns requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 13:42, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Brain health and pollution
A tag has been placed on Brain health and pollution requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Copy and paste move of Neuroplastic effects of pollution (which was prodd'd), and subsequently moved again. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Medicine&diff=prev&oldid=1213142112
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bon courage (talk) 12:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
"Hinduism in Bolivia" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Hinduism in Bolivia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 1 § Hinduism in Bolivia until a consensus is reached. Binnenstaat (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jarble. Thank you for your work on Slavery in al-Andalus. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jarble. Thank you for your work on List of people from Kollam. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add references
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)