User talk:Julia Rossi/Archive menu 6

Ar 1, Ar 2, Ar 3, Ar 4, Ar 5, Ar 6

October to December 2008

Coming up for a dog?

Sadly I have no idea if it was based on personal experience or not. Would be nice to think he lived on a farm and had a pig, horse and donkey. Nice to see you back after another long absence, btw. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 09:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Mac book

I knew you had to be a Mac user; moi aussi, although I do tend to prefer Safari to Firefox. What have you got qua hardware? I'm on a Power PC iMac desktop, sadly showing its age a little these days. Looking longingly at a new Intel-based model. See you like userboxes – I have a dinky little Apple one on my userpage, feel free to snatch and customise it if you wish. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 10:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I just need one of these, I'm not fussy which exact model. I know, the whole Intel thing is a sad development but the way things are going, some software is already only available for Intel-based Macs, so the time to jump ship is fast approaching. If you like Powerbooks then this is the baby for you. As for how I knew you're a Mac person, it was the combination of beauty and brains mention of Safari that gave it away. I thought it was only available for Macs, but maybe I'm wrong. Astutely, --Richardrj ^{talk email} 10:37, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Just as an aside, AppleWorks – now there's a creaky piece of software. Suggest you take a look at Pages, which is probably pre-installed on your laptop. Not free to get full use of it unfortunately, but it's stratospherically better than AW and also knocks MS Word into a cocked sunhat. Si-ick! --Richardrj ^{talk email} 11:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

The Elegance of the Hedgehog

Hi Julia. Thanks for the "prosification" and all. Regards, Efe (talk) 07:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks again. --Efe (talk) 08:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Well, for the kindness and for the "prosification" of one of my novel-related articles. Thanks Julia. Efe (talk) 08:21, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Just keep up that brilliant "prosification" and you're getting more if others recognize your works. I'm not a good editor but I hate copy editors who are too much, but you're not one of them Keep it up. --Efe (talk) 09:28, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome. And thank you again. --Efe (talk) 09:39, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Julia. I think you deserve the credit:

On 4 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Elegance of the Hedgehog, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Efe (talk) 07:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome. Hope the GA process goes smoothly. --Efe (talk) 07:22, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Gee, I think we have a petty problem. I am adding more info and you're copy editing it. Anyway, I got some interesting info. Just keep on editing them, OK for me. Thanks, really. --Efe (talk) 11:40, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Damn. My English is just not good. But you are here so I am fine. Yeah, we can make this, but I requested the reviewer to delist the nom. I was too confident to nominate it prematurely. --Efe (talk) 11:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

By the way, is it ok to change something inside a quotation? Please forgive me. --Efe (talk) 11:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Im a stupid gay, really. I haven't finished this yet, but I worked on Nights in Rodanthe. See now, I am pressured! My! I requested before but Skomorokh considered extending the "deadline". And then I requested again, following our petty "edit war". hehe. =) --Efe (talk) 12:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I am actually aware of it, but what you have changed was not in my "brain". I don't know how to fix this whole quotation: "she has the same simple refinement as the hedgehog: a deceptively indolent little creature, fiercely solitary – and terribly elegant". without changing "solitary – and terribly" to "solitary—and terribly". --Efe (talk) 12:05, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, not a edit war, that's why its written with "_". I was to drop you an e-mail, but I think its not possible. --Efe (talk) 12:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Its OK. Here, its around 8:30, so Im about to off. You're living in Australia right? So its probably around 11 there. Good night, Julia. --Efe (talk) 12:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

I hope you're still awake. As you can see here Talk:The Elegance of the Hedgehog/GA1, Skomorokh really don't want to fail the article, as "requested". Since I have added more, could you please fix a little if there are any obvious ungrammatical phrasing? Thanks, Julia. --Efe (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

This user helped promote The Elegance of the Hedgehog to good article status.

As a sign of my gratitude. --Efe (talk) 02:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome. A pleasure, too, working with such nice nice people. --Efe (talk) 03:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User_talk:Catherineyronwode#Please_keep. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Verbal chat 11:41, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Point taken. I apologise unreservedly for this slip in my own morale and hereby strike out the offending text. Julia Rossi (talk) 11:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Blue Moon Rising

Cheers for the quick edit! Much better! Have you read the book? One of my favorites of all time

Cabe6403 ^{(Talk•Sign!)} 23:01, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Conviction politics

I didn't exactly understand your problem at the DYK/T page ("having trouble with the format of references as given in the article"). Could you elaborate further? Thanks! Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 21:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I see the ref, but I see no error? Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 23:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

I think what you mean is this: <ref>El-Ayouty, p. 118</ref> (same ref with different page number?) which comes out as this:

Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 15:02, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Yep, no problem. By the way - hopefully this doesn't make things unnecessarily complicated - if you are pointing to the reference directly above the one you are making, you can just say ibid. then the pg. # - see the wiki article. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 21:45, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

If I understand you correctly: <ref name="a">Book A, p. 23</ref><ref name="b">Book B, p. 176</ref><ref name="ibid">''Ibid''. p. 37</ref>

Ibid. p. 37 can only refer to book B, not Book A, because B is directly above it. I'm not a total expert on this thing - once again, check out the article, I guess. Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 22:53, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - November 2008

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: Knotty boy

Mmph mmph mmph! --Richardrj ^{talk email} 07:06, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Biog blog

Hi Jules (may I call you Jules?), thanks v much for the sound advice. Frankly it'll probably never happen, I have a full-time job and I don't have the time to devote to it, publisher or not, so it's likely to remain a pipe (pipa?) dream for the foreseeable future. As for why there's not already a biography, maybe just no-one's thought of it. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 14:31, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Car star

That Weir film looks great, I need to see it. (No girls in parasols though, I take it.) This car was also quite unpleasant. BTW my hero Leonard Cohen is visiting your part of the world next year [1], do go if you get the chance, his show is amazing. Still trying to get out of these blasted knots, typing with my nose is quite hard. --Richardrj ^{talk email} 10:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Crop top

You are the queen of google. That was an utterly inspired piece of sleuthing. Note, jodhpurs could be replaced by lederhosen. Swish, --Richardrj ^{talk email} 11:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Conviction politics

You deserve this as much as I do.

On 6 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Conviction politics, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Bsimmons666 (talk) ^Friend? 21:13, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Cat scan

Saw your Mexican singer response, nice work but you suggested a copy-paste approach to scanning those categories. Took me a while to work this one out but you can wikify them, it's just not very intuitive. You need to put a colon before the word Category as well, i.e. [[Category:Mexican singers]] doesn't work but [[:Category:Mexican singers]] gives Category:Mexican singers. Adios, --Richardrj ^{talk email} 06:46, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Cake

Thank you for the encouragement. I went to go see what edit I made and could not find myself in the article history. Gee, I'm starting to get amazing at this! :) LilHelpa (talk) 13:58, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Ha! Thanks for tracking that down. Hey, and thanks for all you do around here. Seems like you should be eating some top-of-the-line cake yourself! LilHelpa (talk) 14:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for In Praise of Shadows

On 8 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article In Praise of Shadows, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

S. John Ross

When writing a biography its quite normal to divide the events of the life from a description of the works. A list in which each stage of a person's life has a major heading and then each work etc also has a major heading is inappropriate and often confusing. Even though Ross's page is not long, it has been divided just as I would for any other artist/writer etc Life with several subheadings, then Work.

His work was not a series of events that followed the event of settling in Australia. His work began in the US and continued in Ausdtralia. That paragraph talking about his method and his subjects is not soemthing you can place chronologically.

Very few biographies require major headings for the chronologic sequence of the person's life. In general the major headings are: Life, Works (ie paintings, publications, albums or whatever), Honours, Influence etc.

The use of too many major headings and a lack of understanding about how to divide things into appropriate sections and sub-sections is an on-going wiki-problem.

Amandajm (talk) 12:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Amandajm, it's a nice article. Please be careful not to "own" it. It depends what you mean by normal because the formatting I follow is how I understood WP:MOS and is the majority sequence found in biographies. "Life" is something like putting "Biography" as a section head which is re-stating the type of article it is. For example, it would seem pointless to put "Novel" as a section in an article about a novel. It's rather vague to say it's an ongoing wiki problem because people may find your favoured stylistics a problem. You might like to check with someone in the biographies project – and I may have missed a new ruling. In that case would appreciate a link in support of your view. Thanks, Julia Rossi (talk) 21:57, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

You are right that putting Biography as a heading is inappropriate, since the article is basically a bio, of course. We will go back to Life as a major heading, because, as stated above Life with appropriate subheadings, Work or Works, with appropriate subheadings, and Influences, with appropriate subheadings, are commonly used within wikipedia biographies. see El Greco which is an FA.

Let me reiterate that the section of Ross's Work is not a chronological section. It is a section which covers aspects of his work from the time he was trained until almost the day he died. It cannot be fitted into the chronology of his life.

Coming at a person with an accusation of an "ownership" issue, simply because they correct your formatting is not pleasant.

Amandajm (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Reference Desk Barnstar
		Thank you for contributing to my "greatest" poll on the Reference Desk! --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 05:02, 13 November 2008 (UTC))

		The Special Barnstar
		In addition, your selection for Greatest Actor, David Gulpilil, won! Congratulations! --Ye Olde Luke (talk) 05:14, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Byte bite

[2] And that's when you bought one of these and you've never looked back since! --Richardrj ^{talk email} 10:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

renegades and rebels

Hey Julia

WRT your comments on the renegade president-elect, you may be amused to know that the floral arrangements for the BBC's regnal opening were handled by Rebel Rebel. The Queen comes to snip a ribbon in London and finds modern-day Guy Fawkes in a white van. BrainyBabe (talk) 19:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks

Thanks for all your messages.. I've been around a little bit as an IP, but just decided to log in and contribute as Froth again ヽ(´ー｀)ノ .froth. (talk) 18:47, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

White horse (mythology)

Thanks for the push, I've started the page. Would you have time to help? It's very basic, and I'm not especially great at placing images or finding the right categories. I began organizing it by individual mythology, but an organization by motif might be just as good and more interesting, once there is more material. I found it fascinating too :) WikiJedits (talk) 22:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. I really am looking for help though :) I don't know what DYK is, if it's something that should be done perhaps you could look after that part? WikiJedits (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I will look back tomorrow or later (no rush!) for the suggestions. WikiJedits (talk) 22:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Julia. Thank you for the nom and the link. It looks fine to me.

Re the version in your sandbox, "Portrayal in myth" looks wonderful, why don't you put it in? The only thing that looks weird is the bit about the white horse sometimes being black, I think that's confusing. Perhaps omit it to read: As part of its legendary dimension, the white horse in myth may be depicted with seven heads (Uchaishravas), or eight feet (Sleipnir).

(Re: Sleipnir, I think we can put him back; I looked up the original source Gylfaginning and found that although the colours of the parent stallion and mare were not specified, Sleipnir is definitely described as "was gray and had eight feet". So since someone added a sourced sentence in the lede saying mythological white horses include grays as well as the pure whites, I think we can add Sleipnir (thought not his parents) back in.)

Yes, the images are all from other wiki articles.

Thanks again! Cheers WikiJedits (talk) 01:39, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Julia, thank you for all your work on the article. I saw the text had been moved from the Iranian (changed from Persian) bit, but am still not sure how to deal with it. About the grey-white distinction, I thought Montanabw's sentence added to the lede covered it adequately. I'm not sure I grasp all the genetics part, but I think the lede makes clear that this article will include technically pale and grey horses as well as technically white. But if you do understand it better, I think a sourced paragraph would be wonderful. Maybe Montanabw could help? I will leave a note for them too. About the hook, I really don't know, but I think it looks fine. Maybe people are more likely to click it when there are several interesting things mentioned. Thank you again for your encouragement. WikiJedits (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Got your message, just plug in more of what you want on the article talk page and I'll se what I can do. Also, feel free to read Gray (horse) and swipe anything there that's useful. Montanabw^(talk) 00:32, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Morphodite!

Hi Julia:

I see that we are editing the same article.

I first heard the word 'morphodite' when I played the role of the corpse in the play "Crossing the Bar".

I later learned that Harper Lee used the word in "To Kill a Mockingbird" and, just the other day, that Truman Capote also used it. I'm guessing that it was a fav word when they were childhood friends.

Best wishes, CBHA (talk) 03:44, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi Julia: Thanks for the feedback. You didn't interfere with my edit.

I asked about "morphodite" HERE. Did you see this or was morphodite also discussed on the Entertainment desk?

I know of no source that mentions both Harper Lee and Capote using the word. I guess that counts as original research.

Re acting - I'm waiting for the "right role". It's a race against time. ;o)

Cheers, CBHA (talk) 04:45, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I wasn't thinking of adding the Capote mention into "morphodite", I was just asking for my own information. I'm glad you added it. Actually, I have a vague recollection that another writer with a personal link to Harper Lee and Capote also used the word.

"Crossing the Bar" is a one-act play. I'm doubtful that it warrants an article.

Having said that, I recall that Wikipedia has 22 articles about flatulence and I wonder "does one article more or less make any difference?"

The title "Crossing the Bar" certainly refers to the poem by Tennyson. The play is set in a funeral chapel where a body lies in a casket. Two friends of the deceased arrive. They talk in sad terms of their dead departed friend. "Such a lovely man". "He looks as good as when he was alive". "He does." "Better even".

"He looks so natural when he twitches like that." "Yes he does." "Is he supposed to be twitching like that?" "Oh my God, he's alive!"

Or words to that effect. It goes on from there and is a very funny piece.

Please let me know if an article about a one-act play is appropriate in your opinion.

Cheers, CBHA (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Telemachus's Dad

I thought I'd keep both sides of the conversation on my talk page. --- OtherDave (talk) 00:24, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

DYK for White horse %28mythology%29

On 25 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article White horse (mythology), which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 01:42, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Re: White Horse dyk

My pleasure! Thank you for doing so much work on the article, and for contributing to DYK. Best, —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 07:03, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Julia, for the nomination and following it through. I can't navigate that DYK page at all, so confusing :) so thank you very much for all your efforts. And of course for the kindness to think of it! Best, WikiJedits (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Name of the white horse

Well, this might be only of marginal interest, but there I know a joke about a white horse, and it may be the only one there is. Perhaps there is a place for it in the article.

A white horse comes into a bar and asks for a whisky. The bartender asks “What sort of whisky would you like?’ and the white horse says “I’m not sure. What have you got”. So the bartender says, “Well, how about a Black and White?”

“I don’t think so”, says the white horse.

“Ballantynes, then”. “Nope”, comes the reply.

“Johnny Walker?” “Not today, I don’t think.”

“Teacher’s?”. “No, not that one”.

“A nice shot of Dimple, perhaps?”. “Well perhaps on another occasion”.

“Black Bottle?” “No.”

“Chivas Regal?” Ahhhhh…..no thank you.”

“The Famous Grouse?” “No thanks”

“Dewar’s, then?”. “Not for me”.

Then the bartender has a brainwave. “Wait!”, he says. “We’ve got a whisky named right after you!”

“What?,” says the white horse, “Eric?”

Well, you either love it or hate it, but you’ll never ever forget…the name of the White Horse.”Myles325a (talk) 07:35, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Elegance novel pic

The normal setting is 200px to keep the image sizes within some reasonable limits. It is good to have decent images on wikipedia but for aesthetic reasons(sic and so as to not overdo the factual text information and also to not push the copyright (fair use issues) it is good to load images of this size and definition. Also if they can be of a common size that gives a more professional impact when reviewing a number of book and novel pages/articles. Also I notice that the caption talks of the hardback cover - the key thing is that it normally should be the "1st" edition cover. If this is the case it is that which should be asserted by the caption,thanks for all you contributions to such articles. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 09:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Lotus in a Pond

Hello Julia:

Thank you for the information about a "lotus in a pond".

You seem to have knowledge of a very broad range of subjects. I feel I am being educated, informed and entertained when I read your notes. CBHA (talk) 05:26, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the 'picture of the day' link. Great picture. I used to grow water lilies. Never lotuses.

You being closer to the International Date Line, I expect your picture will change first, so I can look into the future. Great!

Cheers, CBHA (talk) 16:16, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Florizel

Dear Julia,
Thanks! I would have had to have been virtually psychic, or perhaps 'psychically virtual', to have thought of that! I have cleared it. Eebahgum (talk) 14:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Won't worry (now, thanks!)

Dear Julia, thanks for updating your remark, which I'd originally found unjustly critical (N.B. subjective take, of course) and posted in haste for clarification. I know that you're a diligent respondent to Ref Desk queries and field a lot of diverse topics, which I appreciate and respect. As I'm unavoidably intermittent in participating while no less devoted, and (what can't be otherwise known) sometimes catch flak from listserv-forum colleagues for being too, well, aggressively wordy—it aggrieved me that what I'd written on that query seemed unacceptable to you. Thanks for hearing me out, and best wishes for our future joint efforts! -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 08:55, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Further: Wow, thanks for the indeed-cheering words, 'preciate that. Moreover, this has brought back to me how important my written communications are, even (especially!) those written at off-hours (as my WP contributions perforce must be). See you on (not in ;-) the Lists! -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:25, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Strange.. Aye SSL sounds pretty unconventional. At least not heard it here in India. Anyway, thanks a lot :) --RohanDhruva (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

mmmmmm... donut....

Thanks for the kind words... and the delicious snack! Matt Deres (talk) 17:17, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Gerald Epstein

Thanks for the follow up message. Anyone can nominate for deletion per the AfD process. I use Twinkle which makes the nomination process very easy. – ukexpat (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

You can enable Twinkle and other useful tools in the gadgets tab of your user preferences. – ukexpat (talk) 01:29, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Twinkle

There are two ways to install it - the first (easier) way is to add it as a gadget in your preferences. The second (harder) way is to add it to your monobook.js file as described in Twinkle. Hope this helps!  – ukexpat (talk) 01:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Hmmm you stumped me -- you may have to ask at the Twinkle talk page. – ukexpat (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Stoat vote

Thanks Jules. You want cuteness, though, check out these guys or, closer to home for you, these ones. Say ahhhh! --Richardrj ^{talk email} 11:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Maya Deren and Meshes of the Afternoon

Thanks for improving that critical discussion in the Deren article earlier today. Looking at the article as it now stands, I've relocated the text into the article on Meshes of the Afternoon itself, to avoid weighing down the biography page. The critical text is still light on references but I've commented in what I think are the article sources so that they can be improved. AllyD (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Waltzing Ma-tilde

No worries, I just knew it had to be you :) --Richardrj ^{talk email} 13:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

We might be able to get the planet to do wheelies if we play our cards right...

...but honestly, who'd be able to tell? HalfShadow 00:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Maybe orbits are the wheelies and it's the solar system that's tooling around the galaxy... the scientists can tell, but I like the idea of the big rocket driver best Julia Rossi (talk) 00:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

But no fuzzy dice in the cockpit. That'd just be silly. HalfShadow 00:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Gorn, that's just what you need to p*** off the other planets Julia Rossi (talk) 00:55, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Because we need some class here: skull-head gearshift, okay, flame paintjob, okay, massive stero system (though in a vacuum, it's probably not going to have the effect we're hoping for), okay. Fuzzy dice is just a bit too redneck. We could play chicken with the other planets, though. Scrape off the continents we don't like. If the velocity and change in environment temperature hasn't already killed everyone, of course. HalfShadow 01:05, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

What, no naked ladies on the mudflaps? What's on the player btw? We could burn off shooting stars too. Julia Rossi (talk) 01:08, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you  :) DuncanHill (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks.

Just got Persona 4 an hour ago, too. It's always nice when I have a new game. But then, I have so many... HalfShadow 00:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Santa can get ripped; I've been waiting for this for six months. HalfShadow 02:22, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Advance Merry Christmas

Wow, how sweet. Advance Merry Christmas too from the Philippines. --Efe (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

I actually tried to add a single </div> but I went out; I still had a class. That's only when I realized it needed three. Thanks for fixing the template, anyway. Regards, Efe (talk) 02:33, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Yuletide Felicitations

Thanks, Julia. May yours be a good one too. -- JackofOz (talk) 01:46, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

What Jack Said

And lang may yer lum reek, too. --- OtherDave (talk) 01:53, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Julia: this is Lowland Scots (sometimes called Lallans): Long may your chimney smoke, meaning (roughly) live long and prosper. --- OtherDave (talk) 13:01, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Festive gratitude

Awesome! Thanks Julia. All of the best to you too! Zain Ebrahim (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2008 (UTC)