User talk:K6ka/Archive 24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

15:29, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Editing News #1—July 2019

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Did you know that you can use the visual editor on a mobile device?

Every article has a pencil icon at the top. Tap on the pencil icon to start editing.

Edit Cards

Toolbar with menu opened

This is what the new Edit Cards for editing links in the mobile visual editor look like. You can try the prototype here: 📲 Try Edit Cards.

Welcome back to the Editing newsletter.

Since the last newsletter, the team has released two new features for the mobile visual editor and has started developing three more. All of this work is part of the team's goal to make editing on mobile web simpler.

Before talking about the team's recent releases, we have a question for you:

Are you willing to try a new way to add and change links?

If you are interested, we would value your input! You can try this new link tool in the mobile visual editor on a separate wiki.

Follow these instructions and share your experience:

📲 Try Edit Cards.

Recent releases

The mobile visual editor is a simpler editing tool, for smartphones and tablets using the mobile site. The Editing team has recently launched two new features to improve the mobile visual editor:

  1. Section editing
    • The purpose is to help contributors focus on their edits.
    • The team studied this with an A/B test. This test showed that contributors who could use section editing were 1% more likely to publish the edits they started than people with only full-page editing.
  2. Loading overlay
    • The purpose is to smooth the transition between reading and editing.

Section editing and the new loading overlay are now available to everyone using the mobile visual editor.

New and active projects

This is a list of our most active projects. Watch these pages to learn about project updates and to share your input on new designs, prototypes and research findings.

  • Edit cards: This is a clearer way to add and edit links, citations, images, templates, etc. in articles. You can try this feature now. Go here to see how: 📲Try Edit Cards.
  • Mobile toolbar refresh: This project will learn if contributors are more successful when the editing tools are easier to recognize.
  • Mobile visual editor availability: This A/B test asks: Are newer contributors more successful if they use the mobile visual editor? We are collaborating with 20 Wikipedias to answer this question.
  • Usability improvements: This project will make the mobile visual editor easier to use.  The goal is to let contributors stay focused on editing and to feel more confident in the editing tools.

Looking ahead

  • Wikimania: Several members of the Editing Team will be attending Wikimania in August 2019. They will lead a session about mobile editing in the Community Growth space. Talk to them about how editing can be improved.
  • Talk Pages: In the coming months, the Editing Team will begin improving talk pages and communication on the wikis.

Learning more

The VisualEditor on mobile is a good place to learn more about the projects we are working on. The team wants to talk with you about anything related to editing. If you have something to say or ask, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) and Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2019

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 1 — 2nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2019, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 30, 2019)

The Montsoreau Flea Market is the largest flea market in the Loire Valley, France
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Flea market

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Decriminalization of marijuana • Sadomasochism


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

13:07, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #9

14:26, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 31, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Butter churning in Nepal

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Flea market • Decriminalization of marijuana


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 July 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

21:42, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2019

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 32, 2019)

The human body has several organs.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Butter churning in Nepal • Flea market


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

13:24, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Great Spirit

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Butter churning in Nepal


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 34, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Bianca Wahlgren Ingrosso

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Great Spirit • Organ (anatomy)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 19 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

15:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi

Ip by staff I didn’t do anyhow — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blake20 (talkcontribs) 23:58, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 35, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Pitchfork

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Bianca Wahlgren Ingrosso • Great Spirit


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 26 August 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Elaine Cameron-Weir edits

Hello,

I was editing the page of Elaine Cameron-Weir to better reflect her career. An updated and concise narrative biography felt appropriate. If my original edit could be restored, that would be much appreciated.


Id245829 (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello,

I noticed that my edits to the Wikipedia page for Elaine Cameron-Weir were reverted again. These changes were made per her gallery's request. Can my changes be reinstated? If not, what can I do to make sure that my edits are not removed?


Id245829 (talk) 14:14, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Id245829, the reason your edits were reverted were:
  1. Your edit removed basically everything from the article, including valid citations to sources.
  2. Your edit replaced the entire article with something that is both shorter and less informative than the previous version.
Have a look at this edit, for instance. An edit like that would almost certainly be reverted, because you removed the entire article and replaced it with something of lower quality.
You may also want to look at your talk page to see the messages left for you there.
Moving forward, there are some things to keep in mind:
  • Editing with a conflict of interest is a bad idea. If you're being asked to make changes by someone you're close to or work for, it's worth taking a pause. Additionally, if you're being paid to edit, you must explicitly disclose who is paying you. In such cases, it is often preferred that you use the talk page of the article to discuss changes, and make edit requests for any changes you want to make.
  • Everything you add needs to be verifiable. Everything on Wikipedia needs to be supported by reliable sources, and they must be properly cited in the article. We cannot accept original research (e.g. "I just know it" or "<person> told me").
  • We do not remove information simply because "it is old" and "outdated". If it is encyclopedic and well-supported by sources, we keep it. The process of updating articles, therefore, should not result in the removal of the entire article.
k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2019

This week's article for improvement (week 36, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Pitchfork • Bianca Wahlgren Ingrosso


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

09:07, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added BradvChetsfordIzno
readded FloquenbeamLectonar
removed DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

CheckUser changes

removed CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 37, 2019)

A vegetable soup prepared using udon noodles
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Vegetable soup

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Pitchfork


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 9 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Wikipedia user supporting terrorist organizations

Is there any way I can report a user on Wikipedia for supporting terrorist groups? SpinnerLaserz (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 38, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Miniature book

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Vegetable soup • Organ (anatomy)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 16 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Lil Tjay Name

Hi There - I’m a representative of Columbia Records. The name on Tjay’s Wikipedia is incorrect. I’ve changed it to Jayden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jvincentsalcedo (talkcontribs) 19:26, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar!!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
This is for your valuable efforts for countering Vandalism and protecting Wikipedia from it's threats. I appreciate your effort. You are a defender of Wikipedia. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 16:21, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, K6ka. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Lupin VII (talk) 02:29, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 39, 2019)

Animation illustrating the discovery history of satellite galaxies of the Milky Way over the last 100 years. The classical satellite galaxies are in blue (labeled with their names), SDSS-discoveries are in red, and more recent discoveries (mostly with DES) are in green.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Satellite galaxy

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Miniature book • Vegetable soup


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 23 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter

Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019.

June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated!

June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585.

Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent.

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Sockpuppet account

The editor you just banned is back as a named account ArthurWithCommonSense and has inserted the same content on the Karl Pilkington article. – Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 22:51, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

@Wallyfromdilbert: I blocked them. Obvious quack. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:28, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 40, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Aaron Fechter

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Satellite galaxy • Miniature book


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:17, 30 September 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

The Signpost: 30 September 2019

16:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Growth team updates #10

18:49, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

IP copyvio

You recently blocked User:74.218.153.218 for 36 hours several days ago for repeat WP:COPYVIO violations. They have now returned and resumed, see [30]. Would you mind applying a lengthier block and rev delling the aforementioned edit? Heiro 19:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

@Heironymous Rowe: Looks like Yamla already got to it. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 20:43, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
Awesome. Thanks Heiro 21:12, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 41, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Frenemy

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Aaron Fechter • Satellite galaxy


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

15:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 11, No. 2 — 3nd Quarter, 2019
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2019, the project has:


Content


Project Navigation
To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MediaWiki message delivery (talkcontribs) 15:51, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 42, 2019)

The U.S. Navy guided missile cruiser USS Josephus Daniels (CG-27) maneuvers around an island as it passes through the Strait of Magellan en route to Punte Arenas, Chile, on 1 July 1990, during exercise "Unitas XXXI", a combined exercise involving the naval forces of the United States and nine South American nations.
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Strait of Magellan

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Frenemy • Aaron Fechter


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:15, 14 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

23:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Editing News #2 – Mobile editing and talk pages – October 2019

Read this in another languageSubscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Inside this newsletter, the Editing team talks about their work on the mobile visual editor, on the new talk pages project, and at Wikimania 2019.

Help

What talk page interactions do you remember? Is it a story about how someone helped you to learn something new? Is it a story about how someone helped you get involved in a group? Something else? Whatever your story is, we want to hear it!

Please tell us a story about how you used a talk page. Please share a link to a memorable discussion, or describe it on the talk page for this project. The team would value your examples. These examples will help everyone develop a shared understanding of what this project should support and encourage.

Talk Pages

The Talk Pages Consultation was a global consultation to define better tools for wiki communication. From February through June 2019, more than 500 volunteers on 20 wikis, across 15 languages and multiple projects, came together with members of the Foundation to create a product direction for a set of discussion tools. The Phase 2 Report of the Talk Page Consultation was published in August. It summarizes the product direction the team has started to work on, which you can read more about here: Talk Page Project project page.

The team needs and wants your help at this early stage. They are starting to develop the first idea. Please add your name to the "Getting involved" section of the project page, if you would like to hear about opportunities to participate.

Mobile visual editor

The Editing team is trying to make it simpler to edit on mobile devices. The team is changing the visual editor on mobile. If you have something to say about editing on a mobile device, please leave a message at Talk:VisualEditor on mobile.

Edit Cards

What happens when you click on a link. The new Edit Card is bigger and has more options for editing links.

Toolbar

The editing toolbar is changing in the mobile visual editor. The old system had two different toolbars. Now, all the buttons are together. Tell the team what you think about the new toolbar.
  • In September, the Editing team updated the mobile visual editor's editing toolbar. Anyone could see these changes in the mobile visual editor.
    • One toolbar: All of the editing tools are located in one toolbar. Previously, the toolbar changed when you clicked on different things.
    • New navigation: The buttons for moving forward and backward in the edit flow have changed.
    • Seamless switching: an improved workflow for switching between the visual and wikitext modes.
  • Feedback: You can try the refreshed toolbar by opening the mobile VisualEditor on a smartphone. Please post your feedback on the Toolbar feedback talk page.

Wikimania

The Editing Team attended Wikimania 2019 in Sweden. They led a session on the mobile visual editor and a session on the new talk pages project. They tested two new features in the mobile visual editor with contributors. You can read more about what the team did and learned in the team's report on Wikimania 2019.

Looking ahead

  • Talk Pages Project: The team is thinking about the first set of proposed changes. The team will be working with a few communities to pilot those changes. The best way to stay informed is by adding your username to the list on the project page: Getting involved.
  • Testing the mobile visual editor as the default: The Editing team plans to post results before the end of the calendar year. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: VisualEditor as mobile default project page.
  • Measuring the impact of Edit Cards: The Editing team hopes to share results in November. This study asks whether the project helped editors add links and citations. The best way to stay informed is by adding the project page to your watchlist: Edit Cards project page.

PPelberg (WMF) (talk) & Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:51, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2019)

A vignette thought to represent Medjed, Greenfield papyrus, British Museum
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Medjed (god)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Strait of Magellan • Frenemy


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 21 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

14:35, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2019)

Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Audience

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Medjed (god) • Strait of Magellan


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

Thanks

Thanks for the warm welcome (and the cookies) :)

Cathaleya (talk) 14:29, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

For swiftly taking care of WP:LTAs at WP:AIV DBigXray 15:56, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

16:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2019

Hi, k6ka. I see you're currently working on TeamTrees. I suggest not start working on the page TeamTrees because there's a draft currently pending review at Draft:Team Trees. If you want to contribute to the topic, please do it in the draft because the topic hasn't been approved to be an article yet. You could continue your work by moving and modifying your contributions to the draft. If you think the correct title should be "TeamTrees", start a discussion in Draft talk:Team Trees. I really appreciate your effort. We mentioned about it in Discord today if you forgot. —Wei4Green#TeamTrees🌲 03:31, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

I honestly just started editing it very absentmindedly; I thought the draft had already been merged (didn't check the page history and was only half-paying attention to Discord). Oh well, it's time for me to go to bed anyways... —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:33, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2019)

Concert attendees at the Electric Daisy Carnival, Los Angeles, California, 2010
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Concert

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Audience • Medjed (god)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

16:47, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Should Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection be updated with your change? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChipWolf (talkcontribs) 21:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

 Markedk6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 21:37, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2019)

The Coleco Gemini video game console, a console clone of the Atari 2600 produced by Coleco in 1983
Hello, K6ka.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Coleco Gemini

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Concert • Audience


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructions

22:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ANI Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Jehochman Talk 16:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

I'm perplexed

I really don't get your block of Parulpahari. Did you not see my comments at the AIV report or on the user's talk page? – Uanfala (talk) 15:29, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

@Uanfala: I did see your comments. And I disagree with them. See Praxidicae's response. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
The user adds to Western Pahari a link to a website about the Western Pahari languages that contains extensive description of their gramars: that was good. Then they add the link to a broader article: Northern Indo-Aryan languages, where it arguably does not belong. The Praxidicae comes along and reverts them alleging it was spam (no, the website is not a personal blog, I don't know where they got that idea from), then directly escalates to giving the user a level-4 warning (no previous messages of any type had been given on the user's talk page) and reporting them to AIV. Yes, the user was wrong in reinstating the link to Northern Indo-Aryan languages after it had been removed and they were wrong to add it to the two category pages – and that's what I was trying to explain to them. I did comment both in the AIV report and on the user's talk page, to the same effect as what I'm explaining now. I only did what frankly should have been both Praxidicae's and your own due diligence and what happens then is that you completely ignore all that and give the user an indefinite block. I hope you'll appreciate why I'm finding this situation perplexing. – Uanfala (talk) 15:47, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
It's their own personal blog. It's not a reliable source and it's a blatant attempt to spam their own work. Praxidicae (talk) 15:48, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
If you click the link you will also see this. They link their FB, Twitter and other social networks there where it explicitly states it's a personal blog run by "@pahariparul". We don't allow self-proclaimed experts to insert their personal websites all over the place just because it is about the subject. Praxidicae (talk) 15:52, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
(edit conflict)Yes, it's likely they are the creator of the website. But where did you get the idea it was "a personal blog". What I'm seeing at https://www.himachalibhasha.in is a website entirely dedicated to the Western Pahari languages, with extenstive content on aspects of the grammars (see for example its content on nouns or the phonology. This is a suitable website to add as an external link. – Uanfala (talk) 15:57, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Literally, read the site. It's not a reliable source. It is not suitable as an external link and it literally says "personal blog" on their "official" Twitter and Facebook, all of which are on the website. Praxidicae (talk) 16:01, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Yes, I did read the site. Have you read it too? I didn't know you can read Hindi. – Uanfala (talk) 16:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
And yes, the website has links to the bottom to a corresponding page on facebook and on twitter, so what? Yes, it's no a scholarly publication and should not be used as as a source for any strong statements, but it is not used as a source – it's added to the "external links" section. For minority languages, it's common to add external links to websites by members of the communities concerned. – Uanfala (talk) 16:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
If I claim to be an SME in Baltimore accent can I link my personal website which is unsupported by reliable sources, even if it's correct? No, that would be called original research and we don't allow that in external links or anywhere else. Praxidicae (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
  • Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting. - WP:ELNO. Praxidicae (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
    • What exactly on the website do you find misleading? Anyway, I'd be happy to continue this discussion on the article's talk page (or elsewhere), but as for the Baltimore accent, the situation is not comparable as there likely exist quality online sources already, so there's less scope for community-led initiatives here. Anyway, what brought me here was the unjustified block of this user. K6ka, would you mind lifting it please? It really continues to be difficult to see why a user should be blocked without meaningful explanation and over a matter that experienced editors disagree about. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
      • I'm not unblocking a user who makes edits like this one. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
        • Oh, yes, I reverted that one, that's definitely a sign of low wiki-competence. However, if you would like to block someone for CIR you'd need to have a larger sample of their edits. It is not right to indef people after their first step, and it is not right to indef people over a matter that there's disagreement about. – Uanfala (talk) 16:20, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Clear cut. Repetitive spam/promotion that continued after warnings and multiple reverts. I'd have blocked too. It's not a CIR block, it's a spam/promotion block. They can appeal at any time if they promise to stop spamming their site. -- ferret (talk) 17:24, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Uanfala "It is not right to indef people over a matter that there's disagreement about"? So you think that every time one individual editor is against an indefinite block that editor has a veto on the block, even when there is an unambiguous consensus among other editors for it? Because that is what you are saying. When you posted that message you knew full well that three other editors, including two administrators, all held the same opinion, and that you alone held a different view. (Since then Ferret has raised those figures to respectively four and three.) Consensus is that the editor was spamming, and that the block was justified. No, we don't forbid blocks whenever there's "disagreement" about it, especially not when the disagreement consists of one person out of line with consensus among everybody else. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 22:03, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Are we looking at the same case, JBW? Here's the sequence of events as I've seen them:

  • Parulpahari adds to the article Western Pahari a link to https://www.himachalibhasha.in/, a website in Hindi about the Pahari languages.
  • I have a look at the website and decide that this is the kind of external link we normally allow on that sort of article, so I incorporate it into the external links section
  • The user then adds that link to two categories (where it does not belong) and to another article (where, arguably, it also does not belong)
  • Praxidicae, who it later turns out mistook the website for a personal blog, then comes in and posts Parulpahari's first talk page message: a level 4 [sic!] warning, and then files a report at AIV.
  • I comment on the report [45] to the effect that this is not spam and there's no need for admin action, and leave a brief note stating the same on the user's talk page.
  • At this point I was hoping the misunderstanding would have been cleared, but K6ka jumps in, ignores what I've written and blocks the user straight away. Now, if there's consensus among "three other editors, including two administrators", then this is nowhere to be seen at this point. The only thing that at least comes near to an informed opinion was against any type of block.

So, what am I missing? Yes, several editors have so far commented favourably about the block, and maybe that's the consensus you're referring to. But it was my impression that consensus was meant to be achieved through informed discussion and not through head count, and what I'm seeing so far is one editor perpetuating the false claim that the website was a personal blog, and two other editors simply asserting that the link was spam, without giving explanation and without any readily visible means how they could have arrived at that conclusion without either experience in the topic area or knowledge of the language the website is in. – Uanfala (talk) 01:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Uanfala, I'm not sure why you can't see that the user in question was clearly attempting to spam their own website and game SEO by backlinking on Wikipedia. Prax is correct, the site does not meet the guidelines for inclusion set out in WP:ELNO. It's clearly NOT the kind of site we would normally include in the external links section. Aside from the attempted SEO gaming, it's only one website about a broad topic, and linking to it would give preferential treatment (WP:UNDUE) to that one site. In a broad topic area (rather than a specific person, company, product, or similar), we would link to some sort of verifiable and "official" professionally published site in the External Links section, but not other random sites that someone puts up on the internet about that topic. You claim Prax "mistook the website for a personal blog", I don't think she's necessarily mistaken at all, the site has contact info with what is clearly a personal live.com email address. That really looks like someone's personal blog/website to me - a prettily formatted one, for sure, but still not any kind of official website or professional publication. I would seriously and very kindly suggest that you drop the matter. Waggie (talk) 01:40, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for your input. Well, I guess I don't see the topic to be as broad as you do. This is a group of closely related languages without any official status, and I wouldn't expect there to be any decent "official" websites out there. See, even for the more significant Nuristani group, all we've got is one linguist's collection of notes, and for many of the smaller languages of neighbouring Pakistan we don't have any online resources besides the scant content at the Forum for Language Initiatives. Sure, that guy's page isn't coming from an established organisation, but for minority languages we can't often expect more. My approach has generally been to allow, and often encourage, links to grassroots initiatives. As far as I can see, a huge amount of work has gone into that website and I'm not seeing any indication it's being used to promote any views or to sell anything. – Uanfala (talk) 02:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
I'd suggest running it by a WP:RSN then and seeing if it's usable. But the fact remains, the link was being spammed by an editor named after the site's owner. This is a classic spam case and almost any admin viewing AIV reports would have blocked. That the link might be useful is irrelevant to the user's clear intent and disruptive behavior. -- ferret (talk) 02:08, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any indication it's being used to promote any views or to sell anything. Now it's my turn to be perplexed. This edit most certainly looks like an attempt to get people to visit their website. That is indeed spam (and fairly run-of-the-mill spam too). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 02:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)