User talk:Keronica Grant

I did your post edit feedback. Cgchapman (talk) 00:32, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Wikipedia User: Cgchapman

- Replace with username for version on talk page**

Date of review: 05/04/2013

Name of editor: Wkipedia User: Keronica Grant

- Replace with username for version on talk page**

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/04/2013

Date review submitted to instructor:

Length of edit (too long/too short): This edit had a good length.

Image (needed/appropriate): Image not needed. This edit is okay without it.

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): This edit is accurate to the information in the textbook.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): This edit is accurate and relevant to I/0 Psychology.

Wikiformatting: Good formatting.

Grammar & composition: Good grammer and compostion.

Other comments: None

Cgchapman (talk) 11:33, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keronica, I was wondering if you got a chance to post the peer review of my page in Blackboard Wiki because if you have I can't find it. MsNika349 (talk) 20:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Have you purchased the book for class yet? If so, can you tell me how much it cost? Thank you.Nikicia (talk) 18:46, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi how are you? Aaleksanian 19:04, 7 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaleksanian (talk • contribs)

Hi Keronika I'm good, thank. Hope everything is well with you too!

Aaleksanian 04:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaleksanian (talk • contribs)

Hi Aaleksanian, everthing is great thanks for asking. Have a bless week --Keronica Grant (talk) 05:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey[edit]

Ok. I did nt think of going to the library to see if it is available there. I'll definitely check it out. Thanks. Have a great day!Nikicia (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Hi Keronica, yes I know I fixed it with the help of Professor. But I am actually the only one who has posted under the names. So I also inserted my name if you could peer review me I would appreciate:)[reply]

Keronica[edit]

Hi Keronica, I think i'm in your psych class. could you instruct me as to how you went about registering your username with the professor? the first part of assignment 2. thanks in advance. Trinirebel (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)trinirebelTrinirebel (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Class[edit]

Hey Keronica, how are you liking the class so far? Hmehta0120 (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Keronica, This project is driving me nuts. Any advice? I see your page is looking great. Thanks.Nikicia (talk) 17:52, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keronica. I just requested a peer review but I dont see my request on blackboard. Can you do me a favor and tell me if you see it please. Also, tell me what you think or bettter yet, be one of the first to review it. Thank you. God Bless!!Nikicia (talk) 09:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Keronica

Thanks so much for the review. I was ready to pass out because of this assignment. After this class I never want to see wikipedia again!Nikicia (talk) 22:32, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

wrong feedback[edit]

Dear Keronica, I deleted your feedback in the dropbox and you can resubmit it. Regarding the student not doing feedback, delete their name from your request. Since it is so late you may wish to ask someone to peer review you, a friend in the class, perhaps. Dr Ashton (talk) 14:02, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PEER REVIEW[edit]

Hi.. do you mind putting the feedback on the peer review page under my name in blackboard. I need it to do the self assessment ..Thnx PAGETURNER22 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

Hi I saw that you did a peer review of my page, thanks for taking the time to do it. However,I realized that you didn't gave me points for certain things which I thought was weird, considering that I ensured that I add certain things to my page before I post a peer review request. Joan Bailey (talk) 02:23, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your message[edit]

Hi Keronica,

I just saw your message, but previously when I looked on your peer review request, I saw that four people had reviewed your page and tonight when i double checked, I saw there are now five! So I guess you don't need little old me. (tell me if I am wrong)

God bless! Nikicia (talk) 03:36, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HI[edit]

Hello, would you mind peer reviewing my page please? Smjeanbaptiste (talk) 15:30, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WOE IS ME[edit]

Keronica have you started the project yet (editing wiki)? I don't know if I'm going to survive this one!198.61.19.14 (talk) 17:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NEED HELP[edit]

KERONICA, WHAT AM I DOING WRONG?? I DID THIS BEFORE BUT NOW I CANNOT SEEM TO REMEMBER HOW TO COPY THE PRE EDIT FORM AND PASTE IT TO GET REVIEWS. I HAVE BEEN AT THIS FOR HOURS. CAN YOU HELP PLEASE.Nikicia (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox 2 (actually your third sandbox!)[edit]

Hey there! I'm just letting you know that I moved KGrant Sandbox to User:Keronica Grant/sandbox 2. You now have three sandboxes:

Happy editing, and feel free to drop me a line if you have any questions! Thanks, Ignatz mice•talk 03:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Transactional Leader.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Transactional Leader.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]