User talk:Lonelykartika

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chandranath Mishra Amar, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.museindia.com/authprofile.asp?id=406.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Pursuant to your note at the article's talk page, I'm afraid it doesn't matter if the article uses only one source; what matters is if the article too closely follows or copies any source at all. For instance, the source in question says:

Chandranath Mishra ‘Amar’ was born 2nd March, 1925 at Khojpur, Madhubani. He received the traditional education and was awarded the degree of ‘Vyakaranacharya’. He taught Maithili at the M.L.Academy, Laheriasarai

You placed the following text in the article.

He was born 2 March 1925 at Khojpur, Madhubani. He received the traditional education and was awarded the degree of ‘Vyakaranacharya’. He taught Maithili at the M.L.Academy, Laheriasarai.

I have bolded the content that was precisely copied from the source to make it clearer. Almost all of this passage is copied directly, with minimal alterations. This is one example; I have not looked at the rest.
This is not permitted by our copyright policies. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You should also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
I will clean up any copied or closely paraphrased content in this article, but it's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:57, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Arvind Kejriwal Anbu121 (talk me) 07:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Lonelykartika! Your additions to Draft:Indian Railways Institute of Transport Management have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 14:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Lonelykartika! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 14:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ToadetteEdit! 11:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:17, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The references are the Government resources. This institute is a Ministry of Railways organisation. These organisations are legally bound to publish factually correct information. The news articles in the reputed newspapers are used to put forward any point. Lonelykartika (talk) 06:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]