User talk:Mrphilip

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PhilEdits, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

To keep up to date with interesting news and developments, you may also wish to subscribe to The Signpost, our illustrated monthly newspaper, and have it delivered directly to your talk page.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Eagleash (talk) 06:38, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Mrphilip! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:44, Wednesday, April 25, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Hello, from the Portals WikiProject...[edit]

You are invited to join the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system...

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted on April 17th, and is going strong. Fifty-nine editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make portals more dynamic (self-updating), and to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished two tools so far, with more to come. They are Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.

Discussions are underway about how to further upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too).

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 23:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much[edit]

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 18:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

What has been happening with portals...[edit]

Since May, the number of portals has more than doubled. There are over 1500 new portals. (Previously, it took 13 years to create that many).

We have developed a single-page paradigm, in which almost all new portals take up one page each, rather than dozens of subpages like they used to, while still presenting more content than than the old designs. This saves a great deal of time in portal construction. My average construction time for portals has dropped from about 6 hours to around 3 minutes each.

This was made possible by templates with underlying lua modules that pull excerpts and images from articles, and then display them in the sections of a portal.

A major innovation of portals is the application of slideshows (on desktop and laptop computers), for both images and textual excerpts, fed automatically, so editors don't even have to add items to the entry queue, unless they want to. Here are some examples:

Portals are automatically updated, in that they show the latest version of material from the articles they excerpt it from. The same with pagenames pulled from sourcepages. As sourcepages are developed, the selection displayed on the portals that use them progresses along with them.

Other improved features include conditional news, "did you know", and WikiProject sections that only appear if they have content to display. For example, when a news item is reported on a subject in Wikipedia's current events department, the subject's portal automatically generates a news section presenting the news item.

And portals are still evolving. For a couple prototypes of what they are heading toward, see Portal:Continents and Portal:New York City.

I hope you liked this update, and that you enjoy using portals as much as we have been enjoying redesigning them.

Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 08:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office[edit]

Hello, Mrphilip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office (March 16)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://isgmh.northwestern.edu/2017/01/20/21st-century-cures-act-calls-for-expanded-nih-focus-on-sexual-and-gender-minority-health/, http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/DBASSE_191476.PDF. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SITH (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mrphilip! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SITH (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- I posted in the thread you started Legacypac (talk) 05:26, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as National Institutes of Health. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:03, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Mrphilip! You created a thread called how many hours should be allowed before deleting draft article reviewed 1x at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWednesday Salon & Skillshare format survey[edit]

Wikimedia NYC wants YOU.... to give us feedback.

Hello! You are receiving this message because you attended a WikiWednesday with Wikimedia NYC in the past year. We would like to hear about your experiences with this event and your feedback about how we can make future events even better.

Fill out the survey HERE.

This survey is meant to collect information about the Wikimedia NYC group’s “WikiWednesday Salon & Skillshare” which is a monthly event held for the purpose WM NYC members and visitors sharing information about Wiki* projects as well as for the WM NYC Board to communicate important information about the Wikimedia Foundation and global Wiki* movements with membership.

This survey should take five to ten minutes to complete.

Fill out the survey HERE.

Reminder! our next event is:
Sunday July 14: Great American Wiknic @ Roosevelt Island

Wikimedia New York City Team 15:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Oversight for redundancy and research gaps[edit]

Hello, Mrphilip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oversight for redundancy and research gaps".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

==Thank you for this reminder. Others had suggested the topic was not crucial but I think it is worth my time. No need to undelete edits, new information from citations requires overhaul. Stay tuned. Mrphilip (talk) 12:14, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Electronic cigarette topic area. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

QuackGuru (talk) 13:21, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm OXYLYPSE. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Khaldoon Al Mubarak have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. OXYLYPSE (talk) 08:12, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mark Wahlberg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 08:46, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLP warning and discretionary sanctions alert[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. El_C 09:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 09:04, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

Yesterday you edited the biography of a living person to call her a "bastard" based on the circumstances of her birth. You also gratuitously inserted the name of this same person in a photo caption about birth out of wedlock in a patently inappropriate way. Your previous edit before that was to insert the words "delivered direct from a fat cow on" before the date of birth in the lead sentence of another BLP. Your previous edits before that were to insert the words "Birthed from cow" in the infobox of still another BLP. Both of these were blatant vandalism as well as BLP violations. Your other recent edits have included proposing to add two deceased people to LGBT categories based on no sources at all, as well as irrelevant insertions about homosexuality in the haemophilia article.

Please consider this a final warning that if we see any more edits like this, you will be blocked indefinitely and/or prohibited from editing BLPs. Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:30, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

United Nations LGBTI Core Group moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, United Nations LGBTI Core Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:46, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Queering Wikipedia 2021 User Group Working Days: May 14–16[edit]

The Wikimedia LGBTQ+ User Group is holding online working days in May. As a member of WikiProject LGBT studies, editing on LGBTQ+ issues or if you identify as part of the LGBTQ+ community, come help us set goals, develop our organisation and structures, consider how to respond to issues faced by Queer editors, and plan for the next 12 months.

We will be meeting online for 3 half-days, 14–16 May at 1400–1730 UTC. While our working language is English, we are looking to accommodate users who would prefer to participate in other languages, including translation facilities.

More information, and registration details, at QW2021.--Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group 02:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:United Nations LGBTI Core Group[edit]

Hello, Mrphilip. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United Nations LGBTI Core Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:United Nations LGBTI Core Group[edit]

Hello, Mrphilip. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United Nations LGBTI Core Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 10:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]