User talk:Nasugbu batangas

Archive
	1 2 3

Hello, Nasugbu batangas! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 10:39, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Possibly unfree File:10 Commandments in Ilocano.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:10 Commandments in Ilocano.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Blurpeace 00:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Religious Orders (1st Order)[edit]

Can you finish that infobox? I think it can be really useful in the future. Adelbrecht (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I really want to but i cannot. I don't know that to do next... Jayzl Nebre-Villfania (talk) 06:30, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox Religious Orders (1st Order)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Religious Orders (1st Order) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Drmies (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox Religious Orders[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Religious Orders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Drmies (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox Religious Orders[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox Religious Orders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Drmies (talk) 16:27, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Countertenor[edit]

Hello, Nasugbu batangas. I have posted here some remarks about the article Countertenor you may be interested in. Cheers --Jeanambr (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:A Statue of Blessed Pedro Calungsod at Molo Church in Iloilo.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A Statue of Blessed Pedro Calungsod at Molo Church in Iloilo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T/C) 20:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Drilnoth (T... I took this picture myself. I think i was just not knowledgeable enough about the "copyright" categories when i uploaded this. But anyway... If this is for deletion, i can't do anything. I just want to say that i took this photo myself. 180.191.126.108 Jayzl Nebre-Villfania (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2011 (UTC) 09:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:I am an Igorot Shirt.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I am an Igorot Shirt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Igorot Pride Shirts.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Igorot Pride Shirts.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:38, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:ECP-TEC Covenant.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ECP-TEC Covenant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:39, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Hymnal 1940 (inside).jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Hymnal 1940 (inside).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 05:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Baguio Midland Courier.JPG[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baguio Midland Courier.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Baptism of Jesus in Nativity Chapel.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Baptism of Jesus in Nativity Chapel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 21:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Jesus, the Divine Word.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Jesus, the Divine Word.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Caritas & Remate Comparative Sizes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Caritas & Remate Comparative Sizes.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Some Editions of the Bannawag Magazine.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Some Editions of the Bannawag Magazine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:44, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:EPC & CCA Hymnal.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EPC & CCA Hymnal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. $The Haz talk$ 08:20, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cubao Cathedral (side view).JPG listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cubao Cathedral (side view).JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Portrait of Lorenzo Ruiz in San Carlos Seminary.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Portrait of Lorenzo Ruiz in San Carlos Seminary.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — JJMC89 (T·C) 19:50, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Crucifix with the Four Evangelist.jpg[edit]

The file File:Crucifix with the Four Evangelist.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Church of Saint Anne in Molo in Iloilo City.jpg[edit]

The file File:The Church of Saint Anne in Molo in Iloilo City.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Low-quality, unused photo of church where superior free alternatives exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 18:30, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Statue of Charles Borromeo in a seminary in Makati.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Statue of Charles Borromeo in a seminary in Makati.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 16:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Ilocano Dictionary Published by the CICM in 1930.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Ilocano Dictionary Published by the CICM in 1930.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 15:46, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]