User talk:Pradeep Suryavanshi

March 2018[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:CLCStudent. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —RainFall 19:13, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Civility[edit]

Please have a look at Wikipedia:Civility - you as well as the anon leaving abusive messages will end up getting blocked if you continue to post such messages. utcursch | talk 17:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; the next time you post a message like this one, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. utcursch | talk 20:10, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khaga. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. : Noyster (talk), 18:12, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This does not appear to be a draft article but a complaint that is difficult to understand. I see that this complaint has also been posted at the Help Desk. Follow the advice given by the Help Desk. This is duplicated, but it is not a draft article. Follow the advice of the Help Desk.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pradeep Suryavanshi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Pradeep Suryavanshi/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pradeep Suryavanshi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Khaga. Sitush (talk) 04:33, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 09:01, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider adding to the Wikipedia in your native language instead[edit]

Hi, Pradeep Suryavanshi. Your editing in general, as well as your own comment about your lack of English here, "I did not speak very much english thats why i did not understand any of your warning", suggests that your English isn't good enough to contribute to the English Wikipedia. If you don't understand warnings, and if you spell English with every word capitalized, you will have great difficulty in contributing usefully here, and in communicating with other users. Please consider adding to the Wikipedia in your native language instead. Bishonen | talk 10:44, 14 April 2018 (UTC).[reply]

May 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 19:14, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WARNING[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Khaga, you may be blocked from editing. --Adamstraw99 (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]