User talk:Praxidicae/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 10

Slimzinaminor

Hi Chrissymad. I recently left a contested deletion talk ( I think it's called ) for the article Tyrone Jefferson. I'm new at creating articles and just want to make sure I'm doing it right. Can you please see the item there and help me validate things? user:SlimzinaminorSlimzinaminor (talk) 12:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Psssst....category requests for protection...

....Pending changes does no work on category pages. Cheers. Lectonar (talk) 13:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't even think about that in my haste to stop this persistent LTA. Thanks, @Lectonar:! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

You're welcome; I just hope the semi-protection will not stop bots from auto-adding foreign language links or such...Lectonar (talk) 14:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
@Lectonar: unfortunately seconds after the block for that last IP, another one started. :( Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi

How do i change the image in wikipedia? The CB400SF wiki is using an outdated picture. Danialsalehin (talk) 19:44, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Premi O Premi

It looks as though you got your report of the sockpuppetry in first and mine duplicates yours. Unfortunately, I was expecting that this would happen, that is, that there would be sockpuppetry. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion review for Daniel A. Norman

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel A. Norman. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakeyanorman (talk • contribs) 05:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Block

My sincere apologies for two things: first, for the block, and second, for not telling you about it. I did intend to post a message here telling you about it and apologising, but I was so involved in following a rather complex sockpuppetry case that I forgot about it. You posted a speedy deletion tag on a page, giving the reason as creation by a blocked editor in defiance of a block. I checked it out and found that you were right, so I decided to block the editor, but instead of clicking on the block link for that editor I clicked on the block link for you, which was right next to the other one in the administrative history of the page. I wish it were possible to actually delete the block log, but I'm afraid it isn't.

By the way, who is jgs? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

I was just joking with you! :P JGS is the creator. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I did realise that you had taken it in a humorous spirit, as your message to me was clearly joky, and not the angry "How dare you abuse your administrative power against me you member of the evil cabal of rouge administrators" kind of thing one gets from editors who are really annoyed by things like this. However, I still think I should have done you the courtesy of telling you and offering my apology before yo found out for yourself. Oh well... The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to the club! We have our own special infobox:

This user has been the victim
of an unintentional block.

--NeilN talk to me 23:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


NeilN ONE OF US! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
Wow, that is one bizarre scene! --NeilN talk to me 23:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Synexis Biodefense Systems

Looking at it some, it seems that a company representative created the page at the behest of another group working with them(who state they are "documentarians"). They explain why they feel the page should not be deleted on the talk page- though where they are so closely working together this seems like it could be meatpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

@331dot: Sometimes I wonder if my eyes are going to get stuck like this from constant eye-rolling at some of these contested deletion reasons. XD Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
I totally understand. :) 331dot (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

What is fault with my article

You are discouraging the emerging article writers by repeatedly complaining . What fault did you find in my article? Can u explain y?Continue your skill of scolding and aniinhsnipimh Edson Frainlar (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Edson Frainlar - The question starts off in flawed but understandable English and becomes incomprehensible. Have you considered contributing to the Wikipedia in a language in which you are proficient? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)


Delete what?

Hello, you just sent me a notice not to delete the speedy deletion from article but I didn't create the article. I read that you can help with making the article better. Could you give me a hand, I won't be a cotton-headed ninny muggins! :) Vaznylon (talk) 00:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Catcreekcitycouncil

I think your comment here might be in the incorrect section... I posted in the checkuser/admin section by mistake and moved mine afterward... but I figured I'd leave yours for you to judge. :) Home Lander (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Don't worry, with these sorts of rampages, SPIs can get messy sometimes. It looks to have calmed down now, though... GABgab 20:48, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Whoops! Thanks! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

No problem. I added this one from the log (note "lion" in the name) but not sure if it is connected yet. Home Lander (talk) 20:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Well, well

Well, well. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:11, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

It looks like a male admin has blocked him (as an asexual Martian administrator should have, for that matter). Robert McClenon (talk) 01:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Fastest way to get yourself blocked and all your pages nuked (instead of waiting for the AIV and CSD patrols) is to post something like that. --NeilN talk to me 01:21, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
I'm not sure how I feel...he complimented and insulted me at the same time. I guess I'll just take my tan legs to the beach! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:36, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

The Pezzin family

Actually, according to WP:BLANKING, he is allowed to remove those notices from his user talk page. He's never asked to be unblocked so there is no declined unblock request that cannot be removed. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:12, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Yeah, I reverted my edit once I realized it didn't apply to this. Sorry! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Diabedia

Hello, Praxidicae. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Diabedia.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Home Lander (talk) 17:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Sock-hunting tools

[1] and [2]. Happy hunting! GABgab 20:32, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for your kind words about my article!

Scratchn1989 (talk) 00:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

!Scratchn1989

Chrissymad, please stop deleting my article that I am substantially proud of and I believe is of acceptable quality for Wikipedia. It is essential that this article not be deleted as DJ Bomer is a notable personality and it is important that information about him be available online to users all over the world. Please keep this article. If you have problems with it, fix it! Please don't just delete it; instead make improvements - because that is what Wikipedia is about! Let's all work together to create the best article we can!! Thank you for your understanding Jamesm72e4 (talk) 01:06, 14 February 2017 (UTC)Scratchn1989

Hi, which user are you, Scratchn1989 or Jamesm72e4? In any case, I am all about fixing articles that need it however I can't manufacture notability - which is something this article is totally lacking in and I can find no independent reliable sources that would remotely establish notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 01:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Contents

Re: "Peters band" wiki page. Someone has been posting information that is before the courts. The defendants cannot rebuke any statements made and that have not been proven. It appears the article is to smear the defendants. there is no historical information, just information that pertains to the case. I deleted most of it and replaced with a link to "online shaming". The page has been reverted back to its original for which I thank you. 2b0o1b7 (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


CER

RE: CER. I specifically added that disambiguation to the page because after reading I could find no sources for it. There are other terms on that page that have no internal articles. I've emailed a trusted friend who told me it was a thing, not just some BBC made up term, and I've posted on Twitter to ask someone with a deeper background in the subject to make an article. The fact it does not yet have a Wikipedia page shocked me, but because I've used references the general visitor can get a general high-level idea from the linked article, which is why I referenced it. I Believe it fulfils your first point.

  • Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for

If you remove it again OFC I'll cease, but really I'd prefer it if this could be escalated as I believe it is an exceptional circumstance. LewisCowles1986 (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC) LewisCowles1986

@LewisCowles1986: The issue is that external refs and links do not belong on a DAB as a DAB is essentially for navigation. If it's not covered in an article or not an article itself, it does not belong on a DAB. Please see MOS:DAB for more details. I have already reverted the last edit, so please do not add it back. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@Chrissymad: I'm just getting used to Wikipedia, but the application of the rules seem arbitrary in this context. There are other red links on that page. Judging from the article you've linked with the MOS:DAB, it seems you are suggesting an article would need to exist first, which seems less than ideal and not in keeping with the very page I've edited and edits I've made. I Still don't agree that the link doesn't belong on a DAB it is a disambiguation, but I will respect that you clearly have more seniority and it will waste both our time for us to get in a reversion cycle. Could you please let me know how to escalate this or what can be done to feature the valid disambiguation for CER? LewisCowles1986 (talk) 18:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
@LewisCowles1986: Disambiguation pages are not for content but for easy navigation to relevant content. Disambiguation pages aren't for defining anything that might exist but for what already exists on Wikipedia. As far as the redlinks go - redlinks aren't prohibited on DABs but can be used when a relevant blue link links to it, in this case Biometric discusses CER. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Eddie Rodriguez

You had my page "Eddie Rodriguez (Adam Apple)" deleted. Please don't do that again, it is for an approved Information Technology project at UWF. The context is approved by the individual.

@Adam Apple 2015: Wikipedia requires notability and verifiability. That article was neither and it was not encyclopedic. Additionally, please do not edit at the top of talk pages and make sure you sign your edits with four tildes. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Ashmit.bansal

Looks like we were tripping over each other on catching the speedy removal. I cautioned, went to re-add the CSD, noticed you'd done it, then noticed you'd added a uw-speedy3 for the same event I'd just added uw-speedy2. In the interest of being fair I've removed the level 3. Given that he's been using a sock too I'm pretty sure a level 3 will be required soon. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 13:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

@Cabayi: Seems were both pretty speedy with those speedy deleters ;) As far as the warning, considering it's already been deleted once + the socking + removal of the tags, I felt a level 3 was warranted. In any case, it's at SPI now anyway :3 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ashmit.bansal. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:15, 17 February 2017 (UTC)


Ken Sibanda

Please state your reasons why you feel Ken Sibanda should be deleted I thought your edits were vandalism96.225.51.35 (talk) 18:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)?

@96.225.51.35: As you've been told before, the subject doesn't satisfy notability and has been deleted several times via AfD, speedily deleted as sock creations, denied at deletion review. The way to go about creating an article that has been salted is to request it and not to sock... Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


And as you know from before, the subject was discussed ten years ago and a lot has changed. I think you are going about this the wrong way. If you want to wage a war against the subject you have to find other avenues. I do not agree that is subject was not notable ten years ago, he is not notable now. Please stop with whats looking as a racist attempt to stop creation of this page. This issue has already gone as far as the Foundation itself, and I think you should look at the references before fighting.

Samantharabin618 (talk) 18:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Sock blocked. Article now at Draft:Ken Sibanda as it contained some changes from deleted version. --NeilN talk to me 18:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Grace YuYe Wan

Hey Chrissymad

I am a different person editor Jerrymistake. I am not same as person as Gracewan 2016 and Bradlay2016. Bradlay2016 is creating different Grace Wan. I am creaing Grace Yu Ye Wan. Grace Wan and Grace Yu Ye Wan both have same names, but its different person. In the world there were thousands of same name person can call "Grace" and lots of people can have first and last name is "Grace Wan." For example I heard lots of same common names is "Chris", "John", etc. but is different person. I am creating with articles and this articles talks about a real living person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistakejerry (talk • contribs) 19:43, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

@Mistakejerry: Both were about the same person and contained links to the same IMDB page, so I think you may be mistaken that they were writing about another Grace Wan. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:57, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

No Chrissymad its different names. There lots of Grace Wan popular names. There ia Grace Wang, Grace Wong, Grace Chan, Grace Lam, etc. Grace Yuye Wan- Grace is first name, Yuye is middle name, Wan is last name. I am writing about another person Grace Yuye Wan. Grace Yuye Wan have two imdb websites because one is her real imdb, the other one is just backup website. Please do not delete Grace Yuye Wan on Wikipedia. It is real person. I believe is real. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mistakejerry (talk • contribs) 20:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

  • There may be many Grace Wans (and variations thereof) in the world, but you are writing about the same Grace Wan that was deleted at AfD. The only difference is that you're giving her middle name, which makes no difference on Wikipedia. I must warn you that we can very, very easily see that the two articles are about the same person, so trying to claim that you're writing about a completely different person is seen as lying. Things like this are frequently very easy to uncover, so there's no point in saying that you're writing about a different person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 02:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Shut up Chrissymad you are not a real person i can say like that to. Who are you? What kind of title you are? Why you don't like hate on And don't believw Grace Wan. I told you Grace Wan is very well known famous star celebrity. She is good person. She is real person. You get out if yoi are not related to Wikipedia users.

No one is saying she isn't a real person - she's just totally and utterly lacking in notability. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 06:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
  • To add on to the hilarity, I just noticed that one of the socks posted a message on my talk page saying that they were one account... only to have posted on one of the other ones. I haven't seen such a poor attempt at hiding their sockpuppetry and trying to rebut a lack of notability in a really, really long while. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: Not exactly the brightest socks in the drawer...but still they persist. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:48, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Your new userpage

Just so you know, your new icons sit right over the rollback/revision options when viewing diffs. While I don't expect a need to be using those features, I just thought I'd let you know ;) Primefac (talk) 16:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

@Primefac: I removed one of the rather useless icons/links - does it look better now? :3 Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The icons are still on top of the text. But if you like it, go for it. You're certainly not the worst random-things-in-odd-places user. Primefac ([[User

talk:Primefac|talk]]) 17:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Canadian Aviation Historical Society

I just received word on February 22 that the article above was being challenged and found out that it had been deleted. Since there was no time for a revision, can you send me a copy of the files so I don't have to start from scratch. As a rejoiner, I just looked at the American Aviation Historical Society, an article about a similar organization and yet the CAHS article was deleted; this makes no sense. FWiW Bzuk FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:31, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Bzuk - it was deleted because it did not establish notability and was rather promotional, you'll likely need to make the request at WP:DELREV as I am not an admin. Cheers! Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 14:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Where was the discussion on the article, as I was notified after it was deleted. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Bzuk, it sure looks like you were notified. Primefac (talk) 15:30, 22 February 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
Seeing the notice after the deletion was the issue; at the very least, I wanted to help the article retain its status. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Bzuk, I see that you have posted on the talk page of the deleting admin. Given that this was only 12 hours ago, please be patient - not all of us are in the same time zones! Primefac (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

New Category: Sig Sauer Firearms

I created this category because of constant vandalism from use who refuses to understand that SIG no longer exists and no longer has any relation to Sig Sauer Firearms. That use is also creating categories for each and every Sig Sauer model, which is excessive. Sig Sauer also makes rifles and shotguns. So the existing Sig Sauer Semi-automatic handguns is a bit excessive. I have taged a completely meaningless Sig Semi-automatic handguns for quick deletion since the abusive user is continually using this reference (to a food packaging company that is actually now named Sig Holding). Sig no longer exists. There are two versions of Sig Sauer firearms. We cannot know which company makes which models since only some are made in Germany and Some in the USA while the USA company now exports many of the models created here since production started in 1990 to Germany as allowed by their laws. A general Sig Sauer Firearms category would eliminate the need for a Sig Sauer Rifles and and Sig Sauer Machine Pistols and a Sig Sauer Shotguns category. In this I think less is better. Digitallymade (talk) 07:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

23:01:04, 8 March 2017 review of submission by Culturecommit


Opps and thanks! First submission to wiki... I removed the offending material but am keeping the initial paragraph about CCP intact. Though the initial information about CCP does draw from their mission statement as one of my sources, it doesn't draw exclusively and includes outside information. Let me know if you have another suggestion though.

Thanks again! Culturecommit (talk) 23:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
Thank you for tirelessly patrolling (or as we now say, reviewing) new pages and tagging the junk for speedy deletion. This list is pretty hard work! --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Knock knock

Possibly SJS sock is back again so keep your eyes on. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:13, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

@GSS-1987: I have an idea of who you might be talking about though you didn't include the name...begin with a W? ;) Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:14, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

and end with 6. I was thinking to give you a challenge to find him but you are already on the track lol. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Ironically I started writing you a message this morning about it but stopped because it overlapped with another sock too - though I still think its SJS at this point. Waiting for the inevitable [[you know what]] articles. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:18, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
Yeah [[I know what]] articles 😉. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

What about this? see the edit summary. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

@GSS-1987: OH BABY! Let's go to the SPIparty! Made it so easy... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
😂🎉 let's go. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@GSS-1987: There's so much to choose from here... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:05, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
SJS Done. Any idea about Enaya Afzal their English and editing pattern is very similar. GSS (talk|c|em) 17:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@GSS-1987: I've been looking at that as well but not seeing the SJS connection at this point, but I've been wondering if they're socking, it's all very suspicious. Was thinking more an Nsmutte type sock too. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:45, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

SJS again? GSS (talk|c|em) 07:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

@GSS-1987: WELL LOOKIE HERE!CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:16, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

You missed it see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Singer Jethu Sisodiya 😂. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
OMG not again 😭. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

I think our Mexican redirect fiend is back

Remember User:Atorres50? Yeah, well I just got tagged in a requested move that bears all the hallmarks of him at Talk:Azteca (multimedia conglomerate). You might want to take a look. On the other hand, the requested move is actually not a bad one to make. Raymie (t • c) 15:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

@Raymie: Yeah and the stupid template tagging leads me to believe it's a definite evasion. *sigh* CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
@Raymie: Looks like he's been a bit busy today...


2607:FB90:4855:471A:4D37:F3CB:A249:58EA (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
2607:FB90:2191:C563:B449:300F:EDB5:5772 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
2607:FB90:2169:4A09:6035:3DFD:D5AA:433E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
2607:FB90:6649:C5A8:F0B6:8A5A:EE93:1886 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
2607:FB90:6644:A76:C38E:79B8:20CE:2D71 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Looks like there's one more...
172.58.21.144 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Raymie (t • c) 16:28, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hot off the presses... Raymie (t • c) 00:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
2607:FB90:6654:D513:8631:76DE:2123:FB6B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
@Raymie: reported to AIV as a block evasion - but just a quick suggestion, let's just call him/them Atorres50 ;) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:15, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I am in the process of opening an SPI for future use. Raymie (t • c) 00:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Raymie I actually have some uh...extra details? Idk what to call it but I think it may be worthy of LTA rather than SPI at this point since Atorres is the only named account but I found a definite connection to something going back quite further than their registration as Atorres50. Check here in a bit CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 00:19, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Extended content
Alright. I'm going to dump this information here from the SPI which I won't go through with. I'd found at least 10 IPs. Raymie (t • c) 00:23, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
|ip1=2607:FB90:4855:471A:4D37:F3CB:A249:58EA
|ip2=2607:FB90:2191:C563:B449:300F:EDB5:5772
|ip3=2607:FB90:2169:4A09:6035:3DFD:D5AA:433E
|ip4=2607:FB90:6649:C5A8:F0B6:8A5A:EE93:1886
|ip5=2607:FB90:6644:A76:C38E:79B8:20CE:2D71
|ip6=172.58.21.144
|ip7=2607:FB90:6654:D513:8631:76DE:2123:FB6B
|ip8=2602:306:36D5:5690:38DC:2091:B380:445
|ip9=2602:306:36D5:5690:7D6B:6CAA:736E:449C
|ip10=66.215.134.13
|evidence= Weird template tagging including self-talking IP talk pages and nonsensical RfDs, requested moves and !votes in topics related to broadcasting in Mexico and the US. Has at times impersonated other users in discussions (such as at [[Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_February_7#Azteca_Deportes|this RfD]]. Note that each of these IPs has been reported to AIV and banned with the help of {{u|Chrissymad}}. I am creating this SPI primarily for future use.
It never stops... This diff is especially curious. Raymie (t • c) 07:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Do you have any plans to finish that informational subpage or send information to LTA? And would a block of that entire 2607:FB90:: range be appropriate or would it be very broad? Raymie (t • c) 21:33, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Raymie I do indeed - it's a bit more complicated than I thought because I'm pretty sure this (and atorres50) are actually the work of another master but there are a LOT of diffs/edits. I dunno about the range blocks though. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I may want to propose it, but it seems to be the range for T-Mobile USA and it could have the potential to block a whole carrier. T-Mo has an IPv6-only stack on Android, apparently. Raymie (t • c) 21:37, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Raymie: All I'm gonna say is take a look at the table here and some of the masters/socks edits CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:39, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Also the only reason i'm not 100% convinced they're not the same master is because atorres is largely unintelligible but I can understand some of what those puppets say, but they're more or less the same and significant overlap. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@Raymie: been watching this discussion unfold - great work to both of you have you considered adminship? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 21:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I have not, but Chrissy has been extremely helpful in this process. I am looking at the Fangusu stuff now. Observations:
  • Fangusu and Atorres50 are both T-Mobile users in southern California, Riverside primarily (the 2607 range. 2602 is AT&T San Diego)
  • Atorres50 and his socks never had involvement with children's shows articles. It's mostly US and Mexican TV, some sports arenas, and weird page tags, RfDs and RMs, none of which match Fangusu
I personally think they are different vandals. Raymie (t • c) 21:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Raymie: I'm now with you on this, just saw that 172 IP for Fangusu and saw enough of an overlap but take a look here. Lots of nonsense, silly blocks, changing user names and the socks have overlapping interest and are part of the same range block AT brought up with his first edit here. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 23:02, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
The racing articles definitely match. If I had to open an LTA case (which I believe is the appropriate course of action), I would include these areas of interest: Raymie (t • c) 23:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Television, primarily in the US, Mexico and the Philippines
  • Sports, especially racing and sports arenas
  • The previously mentioned page tagging, RfD and RM habits
I believe the only way to effectively handle him for now is the 2607:FB90:: range block, which might actually be feasible. Semi-protection of articles in the space would also help. Raymie (t • c) 23:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I just asked for semiprotection on the Talk:Azteca (multimedia conglomerate) page. Could we also get a checkuser to analyze the potential for collateral from the 2607::FB90 rangeblock? Raymie (t • c) 01:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

As far as a rangeblock of 2607:FB90::/32 goes, magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  Not happening. The collateral would be extreme. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 02:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Understandable. I always figured it would be a bit of a long shot, but thanks for taking a look anyway. We'd probably be in the news for that one. In the meantime, I'm going to suggest more semi-protection for involved topics and users. Raymie (t • c) 04:17, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

@Raymie: FYI...Only included the last few days worth of IPs CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
For your hard work and overall awesomeness. Your dedication is commendable. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Harsh Warning

Bit harsh on WonderlandKitty don't you think with a level 3 warning straight away for what seems like Good Faith editing? Yes, they've removed the speedy deletion but as far as I've seen, they've made an effort to rectify their behaviour. Just something to consider. I've been watching the page that they have been editing since its creation via Recent Changes. Thanks for your time. -=Troop=- (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

@Trooper1005: I didn't think it was harsh as the article had previously been deleted for the same issue, they'd been told several times as you can see from their talk and removed the tags at least 3 times. It seems they've gotten the message at this point and plan to rectify it, which is great but they didn't heed the other warnings or messages, so I felt a level 3 was appropriate given the nature of their edits and non-response initially. I hope that makes sense. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I think one of the removals of the speedy deletion tag was a self-revert by another user but I see your point. Thanks. -=Troop=- (talk) 18:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
@Trooper1005: They were also given guidance yesterday with regard to copyright issues here. In any case, they seem to understand now, so all is well. :) CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Barnstar of counter-sockery
I think it goes without saying that your contributions in both identifying sockpuppets and compiling evidence on them is greatly valued - I see a mop in your future, and Wikipedia would be lucky to have you serve in such a capacity.


Keep up the great work -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 21:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Seconded, perhaps SPI clerking along the way? GABgab 21:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Good old User:Fergus MacTroll, I showed this picture to my kids on the weekend and the consensus was it is a dragon. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Because

The speedily deletion add by a new user,who have not better experience about WP:CSD. GB fan refuse to tagging speedily deletion because there are many mistakes.please see this user's all CSD tags there's many mistakes. ((WORLDBOY (☎) 12:25, 20 March 2017 (UTC))

WorldBoy, You need to worry about things you know about. CSD is not one of them. ~ GB fan 12:28, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) WorldBoy The user who tagged it is certainly not a new user, their account is several months old and has several thousand edits - and even if they were, you gave no decline reason on what is seemingly a valid criteria as you can tell by its deletion. You've now been given guidance and asked by several users and others to stop with your disruptive editing but still you persist. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Rather ironic, given that WorldBoy is hardly a new user, either. GABgab 21:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi. I have seen you around the admin boards and occasionally banged heads with you (which is not a bad thing; I like having people around who can politely disagree with me); have you considered a poll at WP:ORCP? My main concern from a quick spin through contributions is that most of your article space edits are either reverts or removal of content, which wasn't a problem for Primefac, but he had a specific task in mind (TfD) when he asked for the tools. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Heh, given the amount of SPI work she does (and by proxy, asks me to help out with), I would heartily support a run ;) Primefac (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
@Ritchie333:, @Primefac: Thank you both for the encouragement and kind words :P I think I've got a bit to go before I even ORCP, but sometime in the future. Gotta work on some of that content creation CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
You might find User:CaroleHenson/Admin-in-training interesting reading; also Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red has got plenty of articles that should be created or worked on. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Request on 00:31:35, 25 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by 118.70.212.22


Hi There. Just to clarify that the article I wrote on the 'Failed Griquatown Community Coinage' was not a copyright infringement. The forum on Bidorbuy.co.za was generated because of the article that was researched and sponsored by myself. I do however make a reference to bidorbuy.co.za forum that have used my article to generate a discussion. I can provide evidence of this should you require it. If you can provide further advice in order to have Wikipedia publish the article then it would be awesome!

118.70.212.22 (talk) 00:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

118.70.212.22 (talk) 00:31, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Request on 06:55:14, 27 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by 106.51.37.223


Please help me with tips/formatting tips so that I can publish this article without it sounding like an advertisement.


106.51.37.223 (talk) 06:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

There are no formatting tips I could give you as formatting wasn't the issue here - it was rather promotional and read like an advertisement or an about us section on their website. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and as such requires the tone to be neutral. Are you affiliated with this company by any chance? CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:37, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Re: Draft:IsidoroMartinez

Hello! Is the article Draft:Isidoro Martínez approved? I am going to start to complete the article... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnsmith256 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Johnsmith256 No - you need to work on it in draft space and then submit it for review - if it were submitted as it is currently it would be declined as there are no sources and it doesn't establish WP:NOTABILITY. Please also sign your comments with four tildes: ~~~~ CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:43, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Ping Notifications from Talk:Bond-dissociation energy

@Chrissymad: Is sir a paid editor and suffering from a chronic shortage of time? It appears that sir has not even noticed that this is not a submission for a new article, but an addition for an orphaned reference in the article Bond-dissociation energy that was commented out way back!
Bkpsusmitaa (talk) 01:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Bkpsusmitaa, not to get philosophical but we're all short on time in one way or another. I believe my colleague declined your draft because the topic already exists, and you should be collaborating with editors on the article's talk page to improve the article. Primefac (talk) 01:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

Request on 13:17:08, 28 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by AbhilashSalvaji


Hello Chrissymad,

Thanks for reviewing. I tried updating the page Kiara (Given Name). But the person who owns the page is not allowing the edits and the information on that page is not complete and legitimate. Hence I have to create this page. Could you approve this page instead as it has more details that would benefit the readers.

Thanks


AbhilashSalvaji (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

AbhilashSalvaji No one owns an article. Your edits were reverted as they were unsourced. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)


I would like to know where were the sources for the information posted by that user. Also who authenticated it before making the article live. It is very serious issue, because there is no indian origin to the name called Kiara. How come that user said, it is 'God's gracious gift'.

I don't want to waste my time fighting people's mindset and trying to prove them right or me right. I would want the information to be presented in the right format. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.101.24.109 (talk) 05:56, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

175.101.24.109 you will have to be more specific, I have no idea what you're talking about. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your message regarding the death note page i would happily discuss it further with the other editors, and you, if you want to. thanks again Anger0104 (talk) 19:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Anger0104 There isn't much to discuss about it - you've been asked by several editors to stop adding information that is not reliably sourced to the article and yet you continue. Please stop. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

BestTanmayEver

Just a few thoughts, which you may or may not find interesting.

This is an excellent example, I think, of an editor who comes to Wikipedia full of enthusiasm for the idea of contributing, and then gets thoroughly frustrated and confused. Wikipedia really can be very new-user-un-friendly. He or she needs plenty of help, if we are not to lose yet another potentially good contributor, but it can be very difficult to provide suitable help to someone who really does not seem to begin to understand what is going on. For example, he or she does not seem to have grasped what a "source" is at all. I think your idea of moving the article to draft space was a good one, as it looks to me as though the subject may well be notable, in which case deletion would not have been helpful. A quick glance through the results of a Google search shows a large number of sources which are not suitable for the purpose of showing notability in Wikipedia's terms, but there may well be others among them that are suitable, and it may be worth a search through them, but at present I don't have the time to do it.

By the way, I made my comment about repeated use of "help me" tags because I saw that the editor had apologised for using the tag again when posting a new help request, so I thought he or she had probably misunderstood what you had said. I thought a message differentiating new tags with new requests from new tags without new requests might help to clear that misunderstanding up. With hindsight, I can see that the way I phrased it could have been seen as a criticism of you, but that is not what I intended. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Request on 10:47:59, 29 March 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Donaloc42


Dear Chrissymad:

Thanks for your feedback regarding my article on The Songs of Article.

I am new to Wikipedia - this is my first article - so I am learning how it all works and bravo to all of you who put in so much time in helping to administer such an amazing universal resource.

I realise that most of the text on The Songs of Amergin come from http://www.anupictures.com/project/invoking/ because this is my website and I am the one who wrote it there !

Professor John Carey & I worked very closely on bringing this wonderful Poem back to public prominence and given the widespread international interest in it we both felt strongly that people would find their way to it through more directly through Wikipedia.

So I look forward to your advice on what I can do to have it included on Wikipedia .

Le míle míle buíochas (with many many thanks)

Dónal Ó C

Donaloc42 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)


Donaloc42 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Donaloc42 (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Donaloc42, if you own the text on the website and would like to release it for use on Wikipedia, you can either officially donate the text to Wikipedia or add a "copyleft" notice on the website itself. Please see WP:DONATETEXT for the steps to take for both situations. Primefac (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Submission declined (Draft:Corsar)

Hello Chrissymad. I'm new to Wikipedia and would like to write an article for a musician, however when I'm trying to submit it for review, my submission is being rejected because of bad reference links. Could you please give me some tips about how could I improve my article's references? I saw a few articles without references here on Wikipedia and they were accepted. Thank you in advance.

Kind regards, Mark Bogdanov — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.57.241.98 (talk) 20:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Warning

Without proper Reason you deleted wikipedia article. You are giving warning for deletion. If you do such a things you will removed from wikipedia. Wikipedia team49.126.168.229 (talk) 13:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) How dare you, Chrissymad![FBDB] GABgab 13:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
@GeneralizationsAreBad: I got mop powers and didn't even know it! (∩｀-´)⊃━☆ﾟ.*･｡ﾟ CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
It could be Twinkle is just broken again and its giving you the block/delete options again, it used to do that to me a lot and then they suddenly starting working for some reason as well. Amortias (T)(C) 19:20, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Amortias, it was a sock creation. They need no warnings given before deletion. Chrissymad didn't delete the page, either. Primefac (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Panopticon

My original edit was deleted because I didn't include a link. I included a link and got an extremely vague revert. Care to elaborate? worldDownInFire (talk) 16:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

WorldDownInFire disambiguation pages are for disambiguating stuff on Wikipedia - there shouldn't be refs or external links. Please see Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:45, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

While appreciate your diligently unhelpful reverts and comments, I'd appreciate if you'd give me 5 minutes to get all the pieces in place. worldDownInFire (talk) 19:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

WorldDownInFire I gave you a direct link to the dos and don'ts of DABs - adding content like you did was entirely in the 'don't' column. Add it to the DAB if there is an article or significant coverage in another article, until then, it's not appropriate on a DAB. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:18, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

What would be helpful is if you fixed whatever I had apparently done wrong instead of reverting. Glad to see you've been going strong at this since April 8, 2016 I can only trace my involvement in contributing to Wikipedia to September 7, 2004 .worldDownInFire (talk) 19:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)@WorldDownInFire:Removing a link from a disambiguation page is being helpful. You can't expect other editors to write articles about something you are planning on adding to a page that links specifically to pages that already exist. An editor with your length of tenure should be aware of this, as well as the fact you should be commenting on content not contributors as you have done in your edit summaries. Amortias (T)(C) 19:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Glad to see I'm not the only one. TSIR worldDownInFire (talk) 19:35, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

WorldDownInFire You're clearly not here to collaborate or be productive, so please refrain from editing my talk page any further. Thanks! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:39, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

WP:UAA reports on users with no edits

Information iconGenerally, there is no reason to report usernames with no edits whatsoever. Per WP:UAAI :"Wait until the user edits. Do not report a user that hasn't edited unless they are clearly a vandal. We do not want to welcome productive editors with a report at UAA, nor do we want to waste our time dealing with accounts that may never be used." The exceptions are obvious hate speech or names that attack a living person/Wikipedia editor, those are blockable even without any edits, but other run-of-the-mill violations need not be reported unless and until they at least attempt to edit, and you should be able to clearly explain what the problem is if it is not immediately evident.

For whatever reason, every day dozens, if not hundreds of accounts are created that never make one single edit. It is our responsibility as admins to conscientiously review every report a user makes at UAA, so we have to check for contribs, deleted contribs, and tripping of the edit filter for every one of these reports, only to find out there's nothing there and therefore no problem to be solved. So we add the {{wait}} tag to the report, it goes to WP:UAA/HP for a week or more, and must then be reviewed again to see if the account has since become active before removing it. That's time that could be spent doing more productive things, but you basically obligate admins to do it by making such reports. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:55, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

Accusation: Geojournal

Hello there! I just recently received a notification that I was mentioned by you. Then, to my great surprise, I was suspected of being a sockpuppet of this user Catcreekcitycouncil, completely unknown to me. After investigating your suspicions about my account being a sockpuppet, I began to approach why this confusion occurred in the first place. I am a relatively new user, but I have read up on plenty of Wikipedia how-to and policy prior to creating my account. While it may seem that I am trying to reach 500 edits, I can assure you I am not and that I am just working out the ways of Wikipedia. I apologize if this sounded accusatory, but I'd like to clear this up, which I am sure can be done in just a matter of time. Geojournal (talk) 17:10, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

A7

Regarding this on @Adam9007: talk page - yes, being a CEO (regardless of the company's notability) is a CCS. This was a correct removal of a bad speedy tag. It looks like Adam might have worded his edit summary poorly on EFC Ltd, but to be clear - if you are talking about sources in the context of A7 then you are doing it wrong. A7 is about credible claims: whether there is sourcing or not is irrelevant. VQuakr (talk) 19:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

I've deleted as A7, BTW. --NeilN talk to me 19:11, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict)VQuakr Specifically with EFC Ltd - there was not a single claim of anything other than it being a company that does xyz. Nothing significant and credible. And further, they were both speedily deleted under A7... CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Draft:Maruti Suzuki Ignis

Can you please tell me where my Draft went or which admin deleted it, I could not find it in the deletion logs I need it back as :-

  1. I could not contest the deletion
  2. You could have notified me regarding the problem I would have deleted the part and and redone the article.
  3. The first two lines contain info which I forgot and I cannot find it in the web or the brochure from where I summarised it from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WIZRADICAL (talk • contribs) 10:55, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
WIZRADICAL You were notified, twice, in fact. Once for the decline and a second time for the deletion as copyright infringement. The content was not summarized - it was directly copied. The deleting admin is RickinBaltimore. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:14, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

You may have miss understood me I meant that by the time I logged in (12:15 IST) I found the article already gone. Secondly the first two lines of the article were not copied but summarised Those lines are which I need .You are talking of the second para which I admit I copied .Sorry for any inconvenience caused. I meant good faith but a certain sloppiness on my part led to my mistakes.Thank for the infoWIZRADICAL (talk) 11:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

WIZRADICAL I didn't delete it but copyright violations are a legal matter and compromise the integrity of the project, so they are deleted rather quickly. I'd suggest asking the deleting admin for assistance as I am not an admin and did not delete it. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

OK Thanks.WIZRADICAL (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Reject Page Due To Reference Links

We were trying to create Instappy Wikipedia Page but it got rejected due to non-verifiable reference links. As per guidelines, we have given genuine references of press releases, award entries etc. from trust-able websites. Our competitors are also following the same strategy and have mentioned the same websites in their reference links and their page is present on Wikipedia. Could you please guide us where we are going wrong? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anchal Gupta (talk • contribs) 12:56, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Anchal Gupta, the issue is that Press Releases are generated by the company itself and thus do not demonstrate notability (and as PRIMARY sources are discouraged). When finding references, ask yourself "did the company write this?" If you answered "yes" then you should try to find a better source. Primefac (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

17:19:28, 4 April 2017 review of submission by Paulethorpe


Hi Chrissymad,

Thanks for your comments. The reason for my creation of this page is that others pointed out to me that references from the Object Identifier page incorrectly referenced ASN.1 and X.680 or X.690 rather than X.660 where Object identifiers are actually defined. I hoped others would click the link and see this placeholder page and help fill in the correct content. I can try creating some additional information here before you make it public, but my primary objective was to have a place holder for the correct standard on the Object Identifier page. If there is a better way to get this updated, please let me know. Paulethorpe (talk) 17:19, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Paulethorpe I'm not sure what you mean by make public - everything on Wikipedia is public. However if you mean on the draft and the draft is a suggestion for changes on the article itself, I would recommend placing a notice on the talk page of the article itself to inform others interested in the topic. With that being said...good luck cause I have no idea what the topic actually is! :3 CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:21, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Chrissymad The Draft is a suggestion for a new page on the correct reference which is referenced from the "Object Identifier" page. The original reference from the "Object Identifier" page was an incorrect reference. I edited the "Object Identifier" page to provide the correct reference to X.660, and tried to create a Draft for that page. This Draft is what I was hoping could be publicly accessible so that other could complete the content. If there is a better way to do this, please let me know.Paulethorpe (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for UN-deleting an resubmitting my article...not sure what the other guy was looking at. Msboogaloo (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Article Deletion

First of all, I still have that article in my sandbox, second of all, what do I need to add to the article to allow it to stay? And third of all how do I add pictures to articles? Bunsdome (talk) 21:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Bunsdome That was not in your sandbox, it was in main space. I would focus on finding sources, specifically independent reliable sources before uploading or worrying about dealing with the copyright of any photo associated with it. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 21:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

What I meant is I have a copy of that article if I want something added, Ill add it on my sandbox then ask for a review. Bunsdome (talk) 21:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Violent/Murderer Offender Registry (U.S.)

Hello Chrissymad,

Here is a little (one evening) research I have done on this subject:

My homework on this subject:

Thank you for helping me out in the chat room, hope "spring time" is going great for you and yours! --Vwanweb (talk) 23:34, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Request on 02:52:20, 6 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Sivagopiim


Hi, Good day Chriss

Just wanted to know how I can made the page that I created to live. Need your advice Sivagopiim (talk) 02:52, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Request on 17:57:41, 6 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Meadad


Hi,

first of all I would like to say a thank you for your efforts reviewing my submission.

Partially I can agree with your verdict (this was my first submission, I didn't expect better :) ), but please help me to have a proper fix. What I do not know is that am I referring the books via ISBN numbers wrong, or you had concerns with the references in Hungarian? Also I am not sure if I should populate the article with further Hungarian citing or is an accepted way for linking a translated page (e.g using google translate).

Thanks in advance, Meadad

Meadad (talk) 17:57, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Meadad, I believe the concern was that the references themselves (the ones talking about Dudich) are from his own website. As PRIMARY sources, they are strongly discouraged and do nothing to demonstrate notability. You need multiple, independent reliable sources that discuss an individual. Primefac (talk) 18:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)

WCPW: What Culture Pro Wrestling

Hi, I don't understand why the WCPW: What Culture Pro Wrestling page I created was deleted, what guidlines is it against exactly?

I was going through some Wrestling pages and found it weird that WCPW did not have a page as it is rapidly growing, having some of the best performers in the world turning out for them. It's perhaps already the UK's most well-known promotion that isn't ICW, and has had many former and now WWE Wrestlers perform.

I know it used to have a page as I visited it a couple of times, and I'm baffled why it was deleted and why mine has been deleted.

I would think that a company that actually exists, is growing rapidly and therefore will be far bigger than it is now years down the line would have a place on Wikipedia to document the accomplishments and history of not just the company in real-time, but also performers who are, and will-be World known stars.

Could you explain this to me please, because I'm new to editing and find this baffling. Also, what's this sandbagger thing?

DeanoBarka — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeanoBarka (talk • contribs) 16:07, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

DeanoBarka This article has been repeatedly created and deleted because it does not come close to meeting our notability standards. "Will-be world known" stars are not currently notable unless they have independent reliable coverage, articles are a result of independent reliable coverage, not the other way around. As far as sandbagger, I assume you meant sock puppet. Sock puppetry is using the same account to evade a block or meat puppetry, which is when several different people come here for the same purpose, generally to promote and push something onto Wikipedia. Once there is significant independent reliable coverage, there can be an article but until that time it is likely the same thing will continue to happen (deletion.) You might find this deletion discussion of some use to understand why it was deleted again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Culture Pro Wrestling. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)


Hi again,

No, this is my first account. The "will be world known" was for younger guys. WCPW currently has Alberto El Patron (Alberto Del Rio in WWE and Cody Rhodes on their roster, who just left WWE last year and are huge stars. Other people who have appeared in WCPW include Bullet Club (Young Bucks - Best and most popular Tag Team in the World, who are part of New Japan Pro Wrestling, the second biggest Wrestling Promotion in the World behind WWE & Adam Cole), and since working for WCPW these preceding Wrestlers have now gone on to work for WWE: Killian Dain (Big Damo), Naom Dar, Kurt Angle, Matt Hardy, Trent Seven, Tyler Bate (WWE UK Champion, winner of the WWE UK Tournament and WWE's younest EVER Champion), Pete Dunne, Joseph COnners and current WCPW Champion Drew Galloway who has just re-signed with WWE. Also in the broadcast team of WCPW is Matt Striker, formerly of WWE and currently part of Lucha Underground, and also as part of the team they have had Jim Ross (J.R.) who at Wrestlemania 33 just 5 days ago called The Undertaker's last ever match at the Undertaker's request, and Jim Cornette who at the WWE Hall of Fame last Friday gave an induction speech for the Rock and Roll Express.

WCPW have also arranged a Pro Wrestling World Cup that has received a lot of coverage and is currently underway, sporting some of the best talents in the World that are not in WWE including many that I have previously mentioned and others such as Rey Mysterio who is a massive star.

They are a company who have done so much after only running their promotion less than a year. If you just search in to google Pro Wrestling World Cup you will see all the coverage and buzz in forms of articles just for that. There's a reason that independent people like myself are obviously trying to put a page on this site, and it's because it's a company that needs coverage. I had written the page myself earlier today, but obviously it's going to have similar information as other attempted pages and it's because it's about the exact same thing. Until you deleted my page and then flagged me for something I've never heard of before I was preparing to elaborate on a lot of WCPW's accomplishments etc. including the coverage they have amongst many other things and the points I have made here.

The promotion's Pay-Per-Views are even part of the FIGHT APP whch houses Ring of Honor, TNA and ICW Pay Per Views and shows along with MMA and Boxing, if you go on the site you will see on April 29th their PPV is advertised for $14.99.

The promotion has had plenty of coverage, for example, The Metro, which is a newspaper and news site based in the UK wrote an article back in October time about WCPW and Adam Pacitti, who was then the kayfabe General Manager, The Huffington Post wrote an article at WCPW's creation also, and there are many many more examples I can come up with off the top of my head.

In it's first ever show it trended Worldwide on Twitter.

I honestly don't understand your reasoning whatsoever, a quick google search can tell you everything you need to know.

DeanoBarka (talk) 00:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)DeanoBarka

hello my dear

whats the problome in Babak Rahnama ?? speedy deletication?? o_o — Preceding unsigned comment added by MinaIrani74 (talk • contribs) 16:01, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

help me to create Babak Rahnama

PLEASE CREATE BABAK RAHNAMA OR HELP ME TO CREATE IT I THINK WIKIPEDIA ADMINS ONLY WANT DELET MY ARTICLES :( This eliminates unnecessary slow Wikipedia's users MinaIrani74 (talk) 16:15, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

MinaIrani74 WP is not for promotion and you certainly shouldn't be making multiple accounts to continue promoting someone, when you've already been blocked for it...CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:24, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rishi Aurobindo Mission School

Could I please get your thoughts on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Rishi Aurobindo Mission School? Thanks! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Withdrew MfD nomination and nominated for G11 instead. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Syntactic noise

Hi again Chrissymad, I was just wondering if I could get your opinion on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Syntactic noise. Thank you for your time. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:39, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion closed. Primefac (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Adam9007. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, PCP Garden, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Adam9007 (talk) 03:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Adam G. Landolfi Article.

Hi ChrissyMad, It is not in fact a biography of a living person. Adam Landolfi passed away in 2007. I am about to add references anyway. Please leave this page up if you can, he is a notable alumni for a high school in Brooklyn and my students need this information for a project. Thanks. I've read over all Wikipedia rules, hopefully after th sources we're good to go. AngelleL (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Peak Performance

Hi, I've added five references to the short entry for Peak Performance, mainly relying on notability of the founder Sylvester Stein (wikipedia entry) and two other independent websites that confirm the current magazine's credentials. Hopefully this meets notability guidelines. Thanks Rugbyboy2 (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Rugbyboy2 (talk) 08:56, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Reason

Sir, why you reverted my changes. I want to contribute wikipedia by editing but all my edits get reverted. Even I put 100% true fact over that article.Subedi Mukti (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Blocked. --NeilN talk to me 01:37, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Reason

Sir, why you reverted my changes.why deletion about An Xiao JingWeijilushang (talk) 09:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

 Looks like a duck to me -- Dane talk 01:48, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion tag reverted

I've reverted your speedy deletion tag on Nacarid Portal Arráez. This person clearly exists, as a simple Google search attests. Her notability is questionable, but this is clearly not a hoax. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

WikiDan61 I tagged it as a hoax because of the content - I realize she exists but all the claims in there are dubious at best. See also: here CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 16:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Ali Ahmad Awan

Good catch! Thanks! Also your graphics soothe my mild OCD. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 20:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

WCPW World Championship deletion?

What's your problem with WCPW? Why do you want to delete the article?

I didn't use multiple accounts and I don't even know that someone made sockpuppetry with this IP.

Well back to the business, I don't use multiple accounts and I just want to make first article like you say with reliable sources.

ThePerstigousHelper134 (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Saving Hope

Original Airdate is for CTV, in Canada, on Sundays. Not for US airdates. Please leave it as is.

Also the rule for directors and writers is they only get linked once per season. Thank you. 65.95.181.170 (talk) 00:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Zodiac Vodka

I don't understand why you would revert that? Find a source if you can, or put it up for deletion if you think it deserves it. But until either of those thing happens, at least use the most neutral version. 141.126.35.239 (talk) 00:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

That was totally my mistake - was going to fast on Huggle and reverted the wrong edit! So sorry! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae/Archive_3&oldid=1139452553"