User talk:Soccer-holic/Archive

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Seria A 2009-2010 Kits and Sponsor[edit]

Guys I already add this trivia into serie A 2009-2010 page, but the other remove my trivia twice. why ? They said that we need some consensus ? Why ?? I mean I got the data from wikipedia italian page, and then I go to the official website for each club to prove it... I mean what else I need to do, so we can trivia about serie A kits and sponsor for 2009-2010 season ? Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikus kecil (talkcontribs) 11:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Borac Cacak or Zemun[edit]

Zemun should be the participant in the UEFA Cup as Serbian cup finalists, but they might not have gained UEFA license because they were relegated from Serbian First Division which is 2nd level football league in Serbia. Regards, Isavevski (talk) 21:16, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I found one here but it's on Serbian. It's from today. It says that UEFA refused to give licence to Zemun and they can appeal in the next 10 days. So we have to wait and see. Isavevski (talk) 21:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Undo[edit]

Go onto the page history and compare the last good version with the latest 'bad' version. At the edit summaries on the top, if you click the undo on the right hand side all of the intermediate edits will be undone too. Hope it helps. Aheyfromhome (talk) 21:11, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If a player is sent off with two bookings, it should be {{sent off|2|23|60}}. {{sent off|1|23|60}} is only for when a player is given a straight red after already having recieved a yellow. – PeeJay 19:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Putting content other then scores into Template:fb r[edit]

Yeah, it also took me a while to figure out if any content could be put in there besides the scores. I'm glad there is such a way! By the way, thanks for updating the Russian Premier League 2008 article with these templates; I was planning to do it someday, but could never actually find enough time to figure them out =D  ARTYOM  13:00, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the Ligat ha'Al 2008-09 article, I would support transformation into fb r's. You are probably right on the talk page, stating that it's not as important to note when (in what matchday) a match was played; the scores would be enough. Regarding the uniformity of all season articles in that league - I'm sure all season league articles of each country have something particular in common, but it doesn't mean that they shouldn't be transformed. Fb r's are easy to use and, more importantly, are standard - I always support standardization!  ARTYOM  03:16, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Prva Liga 2008-09[edit]

Hello Hockey-holic, Well about Turnovo, their name has always been Turnovo, Horizont is а betting company in Macedonia and starting this year it is the main sponsor of FK Turnovo so they changed their name to FK Horizont Turnovo similarly like Rabotnički changed their name to FK Rabotnički Kometal about 10 years ago (Kometal starting this year is the main sponsor of Vardar so Rabotnički changed their name back to FK Rabotnički). As for Bashikimi (Baškimi) the thing is that the chairmen of the team are ethnic Albanians and they prefer Latin alphabet so they prefer Bashkimi but if you translate the name from Cyrillic (Башкими) it would be Baškimi as the letter 'Ш' has a special character in Latin - 'Š' (SH is pronounced the same as Ш but in Cyrillic it would be СХ as our language is phonetic). I prefer Baškimi because it is still a Macedonian club but I leave it to you to decide. About the code with the round number I don't understand exactly what you mean. If you think it is better like that you can put it and I'll give you my opinion. Regards, Isavevski (talk) 15:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How can I change rules for classification because head-to-head comes before goal-difference. Isavevski (talk) 18:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice[edit]

Hey Hockey-holic, I appreciate your advise a lot, and I've been a bit worried about that issue for some time now. Do you have any advice on what top-level European soccer leagues need a regular updater here on Wikipedia? Rougue1987 (talk) 23:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Reliable source for Montenegrin football[edit]

Hi, I'm Croatian myself and i don't really follow Montenegrin football, but I suppose you could use the Montenegrin FA First League page for results, once the season starts (currently it displays the 2007-08 season stats). The same goes for UEFA page on Montenegro. I couldn't find a site dedicated to football scores only that covers the Montenegrin league, but once the season starts you could also check out Montenegrin newpapers online for daily news (Republika, Vijesti). If I run into something more useful, I'll let you know, but this is the best i could do for now. Timbouctou (talk) 17:52, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PL Fixtures[edit]

Lol, don't worry about it - like you said, it's complicated and I'd prefer not to be sued above all else. Besides, I know it's nothing personal! Cheers for the message though. :-) --El Pollo Diablo (Talk) 19:12, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your quest to kahriman, bs.wiki[edit]

Hi. I´m not the one you asked, but i would like to explain you the different between those two city names. Istocno Sarajevo is the eastern part of the city, wich is under the control of serbian entity. In the case you use this name, your on the side of serbian, otherway your on the side of bosnian :-). I think, the best way is to use Sarajevo (Istocno Sarajevo) to recduce the moves :-) best regards Seha--194.24.158.8 (talk) 21:03, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hättest gleich gesagt, dass man dir in deutsch schreiben kann :-) ist sehr heikles thema bezüglich des orts. Wie ich bereits oben schrieb, am besten du benutzt Sarajevo und in klammer Istocno Sarajevo, da ansonsten irgendwer beleidigt sein könnte und ein edit-war entsteht. Grüße aus Österreich Seha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.24.158.8 (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not Kahriman either but as guy above I'll try to give you good answer. I agree with previous poster. Team was created in Sarajevo 80-90 years ago. During the war serbs started calling few suburbs 20km east of the city for "Serbian Sarajevo". Bosnian high-court has since then prohibited use of this name so the name was changed into "Eastern Sarajevo". During this time team which was inactive for around 40-50 years was recreated. It's base is in Sarajevo suburb "Lukavica" but this suburb is officially called "Eastern Sarajevo".

I don't think that anyone is going to mind as its supporters are using both names. I've seen use of "Slavija, Sarajevo", "Slavija, Istocno Sarajevo" and even "Slavija, Lukavica". Regards from bs wikipedia —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.221.92 (talk) 21:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ist schon ok, hab jetzt lachen müssen!Seha —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.24.158.8 (talk) 22:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vote for UEFA Cup 2008-09 Goalscoring table[edit]

You said, "Moved my vote from 'Two Table' to this section in order to reach a decision." Right now, the "One table" votes have only 50% of the total vote total. There's no gaeuantee that this will decide concensus. Kingjeff (talk) 19:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was just stating that 50% of the vote doesn't garuantee a decision. It just looked that way based on your comment by your vote. Kingjeff (talk) 20:07, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Don't worry. You're German. It's Okay. Even Germans are allowed to make the oddm istake. Kingjeff (talk) 20:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Help[edit]

Hello, I saw you set up faroe islands 2008 with a fb-template, which is very effective (nice job). I recently created a new article Ukrainian Premier League Reserves 2008-09 and tried to set up a fb-template, but it didn't work out for me. Can you please set one up for me in the article (you don't have to put correct standings, I will put them myself, but just if you can put the clubs in for me (they are in the template in the bottom of the article)?)? Thanks for your help and time, and I appreciate your contributions. --Shustfan (talk) 19:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks, I will try to do it when all the club articles are created.--Shustfan (talk) 20:37, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NBC Salyan in Azerbaijan Premier League[edit]

Per your request, I added a line in team changes, with a cite, regarding NBC Salyan replacing FK Masallı in the Azerbaijan Premier League this season. I've also updated the appropriate template and the main League article. I've also created an article for the club itself and a club template. Yes, I've done no work recently! --Friejose (talk) 21:10, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Cup[edit]

Seems the logical thing to do, yes. Probably should have done so myself. :) Sam Vimes | Address me 21:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serbian Superliga[edit]

Yes, it says that Mladost Lučan retreat due to financial reasons and that Smederevo was a candidate to enter the Superliga but Banat had better support from its home town Zrenjanin. Isavevski (talk) 10:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bashkimi withdrawal[edit]

I'll find a citation later and I would update live just today. I will refrain live updates from tomorrow. :) Isavevski (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map of Ukraine[edit]

Nice map of Ukraine that you added in the 2008-09 season. Although your map is slightly different from the one I submitted for the Ukrainian Premier League I think both of us have to consider the dilemma of FC Kharkiv who are playing in the city of Sumy after leasing the Stadium there.

Also I'd like to know where the documentation is for {{location map start etc... This is a nice way to draw maps.

I also think that you need to change the "Map of Ukraine" - Footer, because it should be "Location of team in Ukraine this season."

And is it necessary for the top of the page indicator not to update until all the days games are played... Haven't you noticed how many updates are done for EC League and UEFA Cup games??? Do you really think that will stop folks editing? Usually one of our regular editors will go over the standings at the end of the day? Brudder Andrusha (talk) 15:56, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It is the usual way I put maps into articles. :-)
Just a matter of curiosity. You didn't enter the latitude and longitude coordinates? Did you have a tool?
I used the latitude and longitude info given in the Wikipedia articles of the cities (which can be converted into decimals by just clicking on them, opening a GeoHack site in the process). If those are not available, I rely on good old Google Earth.
As for Kharkiv, I didn't know that they actually do not play in Kharkiv right until now. Nevertheless, I would leave the map as it is because it could lead to confusion.
Probably - But be prepared for a name change. Something which is frequent in YKPAIHA.
Really the stadium in Sumy is very nice and its about time the city had a club that was worthy of that stadium. The thing is teams have folded whenever they have tried to play there.


The documentation for the Location map templates can be found here. There is currently an improvement drive for those templates under way as well, executed by the team of the German Kartenwerkstatt. A list of updated maps can be found here.
As for the caption, I simply forgot to change it. You are correct, it should read something like "Locations of teams in the Ukrainian Premier League 2008-09.
Thanks for the doc info. I changed the caption as per your indication.


Finally, I put the "whole day edit" template on the top of the page since there were recent edits involving just one game of a day instead of all games. If you have some script working that automatically commits the updates, or people that do clean-up at the end of each day, the template can of course be removed.
We are in the midst of cleaning up the standings (historical) and I think that style has taken over alot instead of consistancy.
Keep up the good work! Hockey-holic (talk) 16:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Brudder Andrusha (talk) 20:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fb match[edit]

To be honest, I find its use of show/hide to be gimmicky. I also think that it devotes too much attention to non-essential information, such as bookings and red cards, and its presentation is a bit tacky. – PeeJay 11:56, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In one of your recent edit summaries on Russian Premier League 2008 you were asking if anyone could create the {{Whole Day Edit}} template in Russian. I can do it, but will it be okay for an English Wikipedia article to have an informative template in Russian? I don't think I have seen informative templates like that in other languages here before. Do you think I should still go ahead and create it?  ARTYOM  03:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you ordered the table by alphabet, which makes it easier to look up a team. However, the table was ordered by last season's final standings, which causes the 'top' matches to be at the top left and the matches between lower teams to be on the bottom right. Also, the color associated with the results (blue = home win, white = draw and red = away win) then helps to easily notice a 'strange' result. To be more clear, the top teams should win against the lesser teams, so the top right of the table should be colored blue, while the top left should be colored red. Other colors mean 'unusual' results.

Personally I'm more in favor of sorting them as they were, based on the results of last year. By the way, noticed that also the list of clubs at the top is in that order and that the pages of the previous seasons also have this sorting... instead of the alphabetical one. --Pelotastalk 15:31, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Poli Iasi - Farul...[edit]

...was abandoned due to the failure of the floodlights. Still, seems like the ref didn't really follow the exact rules, so the match will most likely be played on another date. I've added the essential facts, the advice was much appreciated. Cheers. Skeri2007 (talk) 15:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cup competitions[edit]

I was just wondering do you know if there's an user who creates and updates this seasons' national cup competitions or it's done by random users. I'm asking this because I noticed that half or more articles on this subject aren't created, although some of the cups are held only during one year (2008, 2009 etc.), like Kazakhstan or Iceland. Also there are created but poor pages that need updating (for example Romanian cup). I would have done some work but I don't know that much languages.--SonjiCeli (talk) 19:16, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm from Croatia and that sentence I wrote about Romanian cup was just an example of an article that is "not quite good". Thanks for advice.--SonjiCeli (talk) 22:20, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UEFA Europa League[edit]

Hi, I noticed you've taken action on the name change of the UEFA Cup announced today, good work! This enquiry is actually about the fb-templates, which I have been getting to know this season, but haven't fully understood yet. I hope you can make this a bit clearer for me? What is actually the difference between "fb competition" and "fb round"? Is it so that the competition template isn't needed if a round is specified? Because earlier in the season the links from the league tables didn't work properly (didn't navigate to the round specified) since the link were missing a ndash instead of the hyphen. Which template should I change? I changed alot you know, and finally it worked, but I don't remember which edit that made the impact... =P

At last a suggestion: You've redirected Template:Fb round2 2009-10 UEFA Cup QR2 to Template:Fb round2 2009-10 UEL QR2, so now the links on all of the league tables using the first link will get here. Meaning we have to edit all the league tables! Wouldn't it be better to remove the redirect and insert the same code in both templates to reduce work? And start implementing only the new template next year?

I know this became alot of information at once, but focus on my suggestion first, then if you have time (and the will) you could help me understand the "fb-templates"... =) lil2mas (talk) 14:34, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Israel[edit]

Where can I find results for this year's Israel cup? Israel football federation page is too weird for me (not latinic, everything is from right to left) and some other sites (soccerway, RSSSF, kicker) haven't updated it yet. Or maybe I should just wait that these sites put it on?--SonjiCeli (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cup articles[edit]

OK, I will try as hard as I can to write these remaining articles. I've found a source for the Lithuanian cup and I'll write it as soon as possible. The problem are official sites that are sometimes pretty lousy. They aren't updated (Slovakian site still lists last year's final as the last game) or they're not complete (Moldova). Anyway, the articles will be complete. I just wanted to ask you what about translating from the foreign Wikipedia? The Slovakian cup, for example, is fully written in Slovakian Wiki, but the usual sites (soccerway, kicker) don't have it in full amount. I know it's not the way Wikipedia works, but if it's the only option... Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 13:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only one more to go!!! Bulgarian Cup 2008-09 is the only cup still unwritten (except Andorra and Armenia, but those can wait). I've just written Georgian Cup 2008-09 but one result is missing and for some other I'm not sure if they're correct, so if you want to and have time could you check it somewhere? I'm sorry that I didn't help you with the Hungarian article, but I was busy with other articles.
Anyway, great job with all these articles, I really admire your patience and energy to do all that work. SonjiCeli (talk) 21:29, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cups, task force[edit]

I've found 2nd leg results on Georgian football forum (?!) but the last result is still missing and I hope I will find it.

As for the task force, I will join if there are enough users to create one. I'm not sure about the time I could spend doing all that work, but I'll try to contribute as much as I can. I just wanted to ask you is the task force for this season only or it is for next seasons too?

Anyway, there is still a huge amount of work (just check out cups around October 29) but I believe we can do it, especially when some seasons are over (for example Russia, Sweden, Finland etc.) and our work becomes easier until March. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 12:39, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UEL 2009-10 spots[edit]

I had a discussion through undos with MTC about this question, but I'm not really sure. And the subject is this: A Cup winner (therefore qualifying to UEL) wins the league and receives a spot in Champions league. Their place then receives Cup runners-up. But do they receive the exact same spot as the Cup winners or the place earned through their league? Please check out Faroe Islands situation for example. I believe they should receive the same spot but MTC says something about Motherwell last year that did not. Please help. SonjiCeli (talk) 20:45, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Rogue1987 started a discussion on this issue on the UEFA Europa League 2009–10 talk page, I have written my "statement" there... =) lil2mas (talk) 14:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I encourage you to write an e-mail since it is an unsolved problem (so far). I checked the discussion on UEL 2009-10 talk page and I agree with everything said. It is a logic explanation until the official facts from UEFA are known.
Talking about messengers and stuff, I don't use any of these. Although I believe that even in this situation there won't be any communication problems, I know that using messenger could make our lives easier. I will consider starting to use one of these and if I do, I'll contact you via e-mail (I couldn't find that link but it will probably appear). Anyway, anything you want to tell me, or anything that could help in organizing our updates and contributions (like who can update regularly which league etc.), you can post it on my talk page. Bye SonjiCeli (talk) 18:02, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, I forgot to ask you one question. Do you know what happened with Man Utd. - Fulham match in Premier League 2008–09? There are no information about match being postponed, but those teams still (actually for quite some time) have one match less than others. SonjiCeli (talk) 18:39, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ties, cup winners[edit]

Hi, me again. I wanted to ask you two (unrelated) questions, just to satisfy curiosity. No.1: Two teams (in a league) have the same amount of points. Next tiebreakers are head-to-head (1st points, 2nd goal diff., 3rd goals scored). Does it matter if the match between them finished 0-0 or 5-5? No.2: The club secured UEFA spot for the next season (in this situation possible only via domestic cup). What happens if that team gets relegated at the end of that season? That almost happened to PSG in last year's Ligue 1 season, and even Valencia was in that danger for some time. Thanks, bye. SonjiCeli (talk) 18:38, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UCL 2009-10[edit]

What about this guy Loveeuropeanfootball? Why is he doing all that changes and is it correct? Are the name changes really true? SonjiCeli (talk) 23:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to stop by and say that this article is (or will be) a problem if we don't do something about it. HonorTheKing (that has written the article) doesn't contribute anymore and Number 57 (that also speaks Hebrew AND is a regular contributor) doesn't seem to be interested in the cup. I tried (maybe successful, but I'm not sure) to add the last results and now it is a decent article (as far as it can be).

But the problem just begins because next rounds are missing and the number of teams competing in the next round doesn't match with the number of teams I counted. Anyway, I wanted to ask you if you want to could you find an editor that speaks Hebrew so he can update the results or could you find some English source? I searched the whole Google but couldn't find anything. It isn't completely outdated yet but a month from now it definitely will be so any help in this area would be absolutely necessary. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 22:50, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I wasn't even aware of this Google application. It's pretty good and understandable enough. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 14:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the delay on updating the article, It's updates to last matches now and I'll update regularly so you don't have to worry about that article.
- HonorTheKing (talk) 16:28, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JK Maag Tammeka/JK Tammeka[edit]

They just shorten their name, because their sponsor Maag refused to support them henceforward. GGib (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK and thx. Hockey-holic (talk) 18:25, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Goal differences, awarded matches[edit]

Hi, I'd like to ask you what about goal differences when the matches are awarded with some score (usually 2–0 or 3–0)? As I could see from the previous cases (like in this year's Lithuanian league, match between Atlantas and Žalgiris), goals were not counted in overall goal difference. However, in this last match (in Serbian Superliga 2008–09, between Rad and Čukarički) goals for Rad and against Čukarički were counted on soccerway.com (and you also counted them in the article). Can we have an agreement on this, just to avoid future confusion? Thanks, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

top goalscorers[edit]

What should we (or could we) do with those leagues that list all scorers? That is, in my opinion, unnecessary and not very encyclopedic. Good example is Danish Superliga 2008-09, and I believe Serbian article also featured that. SonjiCeli (talk) 14:04, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Almost done[edit]

Hi,

I just wanted to stop by and inform you that there is only one cup article still unwritten, Armenian one. I found an announcement on fedandfut.com about Andorran Copa Constitució 2009 and wrote the article.

Anyway, congratulations to you and Rougue (and to other minor, but still notable contributors) for doing that huge amount of work to improve this season's football articles. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fb cl match[edit]

Hey, I noticed you put the average goals in the table but I noticed that it only works with the 2pts system. Can you get it to work with the 3pts system. Thanks --MicroX 15:27, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In 2004 and 2005 they used it in Peru. Then they changed it. Every year there is always some kind of change in the Peruvian league.

Sorry to bother you again, but I misunderstood what average goals is. I thought it was a points-per-game system. So you can undo my request on the template.--MicroX 17:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

templates[edit]

Could you please fix the 2009-10 Champions league templates according to the new name changes. I tried to redirect QR3 (Ch. and non-ch.) templates but it seems they don't work. Thanks, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 11:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia football map[edit]

Would you mind add a map for First League of FR Yugoslavia 1993-94. I am expanding the article. Matthew_hk tc 11:27, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could do it if there would be a Location map base picture for the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia in its borders from 1992–2003. The current Serbia picture cannot be used, as Montenegro is not included, which would make a map factually incorrect for the time in question.
The first option to solve the problem would be to ask NordNordWest if he can create a picture, as he and a few other contributors are currently overhauling all Location map base pictures (see also here (in German) for Europe as an example). I have linked to the talk page of his German account since chances are a lot higher that he might respond more quickly there.
The second option would be that I try my lackluster Photoshop skills once more, but this is only an option if NordNordWest declines to do a picture. Furthermore, this option is not recommended, as results may significantly differ from NNWs work... :-D
In any case, could you drop a message if and how he responded? :-) Regards, Hockey-holic (talk) 12:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Then would you mind add the map for Serbian Superliga 2006-07. Matthew_hk tc 13:05, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Alright. The map will be added within the next 24 hours. --Soccer-holic (talk) 15:37, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(De)linking dates[edit]

In league articles, should we link dates that come after Last updated: under results and standings tables (or any other date in the article)? I'm asking this because there was a broad consensus not to link them and now Rougue1987 started to link the dates again. Please inform me if there has been a change in point of view about this topic. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 19:11, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please (if you have time and will, of course) search for this year's Andorran cup results since fedandfut.com only displays forthcoming fixtures (that are also incomplete)? I believe two rounds have been played so far. Thanks, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 14:11, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serie A H2H Column[edit]

Didn't even think of adding the head-to-head column, good idea! And thanks for fixing the Chievo position too, I thought I had copy/pasted them up, didn't notice it hadn't stuck. --Snojoe (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help if you think this article needs help[edit]

Here's the link. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please (or Rougue) add results and standings tables for this article since I really don't have time during this week and the season starts on 7 March (next weekend)? Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 22:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Help needed on exact condition on draft pick in Wisniewski/Pahlsson trade[edit]

As far as I know, no information has been released regarding the condition of the pick. My guess would be that it's dependent on the Hawks making it out of the first round, but there's no reliable source yet. Teemu08 (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lithuanian A Lyga 2009 - unforeseen development[edit]

Actually, for quite some time I've been following Lithuanian football news, mostly from futbolas.lt, so I know everything about that situation. Kaunas and Atlantis withdrew and Žalgiris were denied a license. I don't know if you've read this, but Žalgiris split up in two clubs that have the same Žalgiris name: "old" one (with officials and licenses), and "new" one (with manager, players and fans). Even FK Vėtra have been considering the possibility of playing in second tier.

Believe it or not, but I planned to write today everything you've already written in the article. I could do further research on the net about this topic, but seeing what you wrote in the article, that would mostly be it, and I think nothing else happened (unless someone else withdrew since yesterday evening when I last checked futbolas.lt). As I see it now, the only thing we could do is to wait future meeting(s) and see what will LFF decide (correct me if I'm wrong but the next meeting will be held on 24 March).

As for the article rewriting I think I could sort out that Controversy section, and maybe compare the article to the previous season's one and add what is missing. Maybe even more references could be added. Anyway, I think that only some minor fixes could be done, while I would not add standings and results yet. Thanks for the info, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it seems that the whole situation is solved. Since it is pretty obvious which teams will play in 2009 A Lyga I could add results and standings tables. I presume that each team will play four times against every other, just like the last year. But could you please suggest me which source to use (which will be added now or later, when available) and what abbreviation to put for FK LKKA ir Teledema Kaunas (three-letter, if possible)?
Also, if this is not too much trouble for you, could you write articles for Banga Gargždai and Kruoja Pakruojis? I think it's too much for me since I haven't written any of that kind of articles.
P.S.: I got in edit conflict with you three times today. SonjiCeli (talk) 16:00, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

German football templates[edit]

Your recent changes to some of the German football templates make them appear wrong in the articles, I had to fix a few, like Template:Gauliga. There are lines appearing in places where they shouldn't be and lines missing where they should be. I havn't got the time right now, to go and check them all, can you please check your work and see what it looks like in the articles? EA210269 (talk) 00:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the Oberliga Bayern article, and see how the Template:German Amateur Oberliga (football) displays, please. Got to go, back to work! EA210269 (talk) 00:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think, I found the problem, two lines were left before the Navbox: |- and |. Additionally, I had to remove the "child", not sure what it means or does but it upset the template. Hopefully all good now, but check for yourself if you got time. EA210269 (talk) 08:21, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The templates look quite good now, nice work. EA210269 (talk) 11:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Soccer-holic, if you speak Greek and be able to read this article carefully http://www.novasports.gr/soccer/anational/default.asp?aid=174981 you'll understand why you don't need to add (R) after OFI's name. Thanks, Dimitrissss (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: 2009 NHL Entry Draft[edit]

There hasn't been too much vandalism during the last few days. I'll keep an eye on it though and protect it if needed. - Rjd0060 (talk) 13:52, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


apologies, I didn't notice your changes. Only noticed the vandalism that had occured. Bmcnamee (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Preliminary rounds in cup competitions[edit]

Should we add qualifying rounds to the cup articles, even if they are on a national level? I wouldn't have asked this question if these rounds were smaller (several matches, see Albania). However, in 2009 Norwegian Cup (which I'm planning to write soon) there are two preliminary rounds, with the first one featuring around 100 (!) matches. I'm not sure, but I think that first and second (maybe even third)-league teams enter after those two preliminary rounds. Anyway, my question is should we list those rounds or not? Thanks, bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 22:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info AND for all the sources. Yes, they seem incomplete, but I'll just wait for another few days before writing them down. If all the qual. matches' results appear on one of the listed sources, I will probably add them. As I've seen from the Norwegian 2009 season calendar, there are only two qualifying rounds, after which we have 128 teams. In Q1 + Q2 rounds we have (if I counted correctly) around 150 matches, and teams from first three tiers enter in the First round proper. Anyway, adding qual. matches will depend on the sources. Thanks a lot! SonjiCeli (talk) 11:36, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Goalscorer source[edit]

When you wish upon a star... kalaha 08:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fb templates[edit]

Tell me, what do you think about moving all fb templates to commons and share it in all wikimedia projects? In my opinion, football tables and results can be easily shared among all-languague projects because digits can be understand in all languagues. I am not shure will it work, because I just started to looking arround and I am just curious about technical and socilogical possibilities. So write me please your opinion. Regards.--Verwolff (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your answer. It looks like my idea is impossible to launch due to technical reasons. In simple words, templates cannot be transferred to commons like pictures. Hopefully in future releases media-wiki software give me opportunity for this. Now, I have to forget about it. I stick to converting old templates to fb. Regards. --Verwolff (talk) 12:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like there hasn't been enough problems with incorrect half-updaters, but now one anonymus editor added a Positions by Round table. It hasn't been filled yet, but he has the source. The thing is that in the same article there exists such table, but it displays wins, draws and losses of every team in every round. Plus, the article is definitely too big as it is, and some content should be removed to reduce the size. Anyway, I didn't want to delete that new Positions by Round table before consulting with you. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 21:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I also wanted to tell you that I won't be able to contribute as much as I used to, so everything is up to you and Rougue when you find some time to do that. I won't update full-time certainly until 1 May, maybe even after that, but I'll probably be back for last few rounds in most of the articles. Sorry, but my school obligations are just too big to contribute now. I hope you'll be back during the week. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Liga I 2008–09[edit]

What I vandalized? You don't see that man is playing with fire? I made a nice table, why not let it? Look at other examples: La Liga 2008–09#Scoring, Ligue 1 2008–09#Top goalscorers or Premier League 2008–09#Top scorers. These are fine and that the Liga I 2008-09#Top goalscorers is it? Sorry for my broken English. 89.33.128.101 (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the guidelines at Template:Current sport, especially the part that says "It is not intended to be used to mark an article that merely has recent news articles about the topic". Scottish Premier League 2008–09 does not receive enough edits/attention to be considered a current event by our standards (which are, admittedly, contrary to what is usually considered a "current event"). These templates exist to warn our readers about rapidly changing articles, they do not exist to tell our readers that something is currently ongoing. That's what the lead of the article is supposed state. --Conti| 14:43, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm planning to apply the guidelines to all articles equally, yes, but I'm not sure if a bot is a good idea, as it can't easily tell whether an article is being heavily edited (or, more importantly, whether an article might be heavily edited in the very near future). If a discussion should take place, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports sounds like the right place to me, since Template:Current sport isn't only about football. The participants from the WikiProject Football are more than welcome to join in the discussion, of course. --Conti| 15:30, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I've just started a discussion at Template talk:Current sport and left a note at the sports and football WikiProjects. --Conti| 15:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Was the revert of my edit in this edit intentional or accidental? If the former, I'd really like you to voice your opinion at the discussion about the template. --Conti| 11:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gambrinus liga[edit]

Hello, I respond to your question on my discussion page. I suggest that the correct (and maybe the only possible) name of czech first division should be "1. liga" if you don't want to name it with the sponsoring company. But (as is written on the Gambrinus liga page) - the name with the sponsor is used from the very beginning; after Czechoslovakia get split to Czech Republic and Slovakia. Then the very first season of the czech (not czechoslovak) league was played as "Gambrinus liga" and since then the name never changed.--Quelhar (talk) 21:46, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Israeli league tie break rules[edit]

Please see my entry in Template talk:Ligat ha'Al 2008/09 table--Nitsansh (talk) 19:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colors[edit]

Okay, what colors should we use on those relegation and qualification for relegation spots? I noticed several articles being changed to lighter red, as well as Azerbaijan Premier League 2009–10. I could agree with any one, but it really should become a "rule", something that everybody would stick to.

P.S. If there is a consensus reached, shoud I change colors in this season's articles? SonjiCeli (talk) 11:11, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I must admit your proposal looks really good (not just the colors, the whole subpage). IMHO, that could be the standard we're looking for. I wouldn't change anything, although the relegation play-off color does look a bit too light. Anyway, we could take it to WikiProject talk page right now, if you ask me.
As for other regular contributors, should we ask them for their opinions on the proposal via their talk pages or just ask them to join the discussion on WP:FOOTY talk page? I would rather contact them first and then our unified opinion take to the community.
P.S.#2: Good luck with the job interview :) Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 13:56, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I posted the messages to dozen or so major contributers and we just wait for the answers. SonjiCeli (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Now I remember what I also wanted to ask you. How about inputing 4th color for Europa League spots? I think it is possible if some team is an Europa League title holder (thereby qualifying for the group stage), but did not qualify for Europe AND that same association has three regular spots in three different qualifying rounds. For example it is (in theory, of course) possible in my domestic league in Croatia where all three teams enter in different rounds (three different colors), and some other team not qualified for Europe wins Europa League that year. SonjiCeli (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One more question[edit]

Vaduz won Liechtenstein Cup 2008–09 and qualified for UEL. Do we need to denote that in Swiss Super League 2008–09 standings table or not? Plus, if such thing needs to be denoted, a special row has to be built because they will definitely be relegated. SonjiCeli (talk) 21:03, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll add some note or something. I was even a bit "afraid" of asking you this pretty irrelevant question because I can only imagine how busy are you at the moment. Nevertheless, if you need some time without Wikipedia, do it and don't worry, everything will be updated on time and correctly. :) SonjiCeli (talk) 22:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Fb round2 2010-11 UCL QRP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Raymond Giggs 04:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UPL[edit]

Why did you revert my edit?--Anatoliy (Talk) 15:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have added my thoughts about the topic of standings templates and the such. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 11:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bundesliga standings[edit]

I don't understand why the lettering is needed. The color has really nothing to do with it. All the information needed is in the Qualification or relegation column. Hubschrauber729 (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maps and club locations[edit]

On a map which shows locations of clubs, are those locations selected for a club's home town and the ground they used to play on, or the ground they are eligible to play on due to licensing system/some other reason why they can't use their own stadium? I'm asking because I noticed a Prva HNL 2009–10 map which shows incorrect locations of clubs when we talk about the home towns, but will use the depicted stadia for some time.

Just one thing, most of the clubs that are now shown as using some other team's ground will most likely switch to their original grounds after the first couple of rounds, so their positions need to be modified. SonjiCeli (talk) 10:28, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the info. I'll probably just wait for the next season to start before changing anything.
P.S. What about the League article proposal? As I could read from the Project talk page, people don't fancy it too much and have numerous complaints, so I guess there's no solution if we're going to apply it or not. SonjiCeli (talk) 11:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I Agree. Task force is exactly what we need. SonjiCeli (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Map reply[edit]

I'll have a go after tonight's World Cup q's. One possible might be something like what I did in Allsvenskan 2009, but sort of reversed. In that I should be able to create a zoom in on the Istanbul area and put it to the left (instead of overlap like in Allsvenskan 2009) chandler 14:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, he he he. GoodDay (talk) 14:20, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. GoodDay (talk) 14:25, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Slovak Superliga 2009-10[edit]

Maybe I don't contribute as much as I used to due to very important exams, but I follow most of the things going on now, and I noticed your work, which I will comment later in the post.

First of all, the situation in Slovakia. For two or three weeks I'll probably have enough time to investigate it all and hopefully find more references. Things will be clearer as the beginning of the season is getting nearer. But, as I could understand the things are pretty much clear, as they will play under Senica's name next season and retain the Inter's name for this season only.

Now, your experiment. The results tables are more-less the same, except the first dozen of rows with links to clubs. Could you just align the names in the left column to the left side, as they used to be aligned?
However, the standings table is one thing that "bothers" me. It's not something big, but... When there are clubs with particularly long names (like Dunajska Streda here or numerous examples in other leagues, that also need to be piped to avoid FKs or FCs), for contributors things become more complicated. Usually some part of the code (gf, ga or even losses) has to go to the second row. That can create confusion and several double-checkings. One thing is when you edit Slovak or Welsh league that nobody edits and you have time to carefully add numbers, but what about Spain, England or France that have many IP editors who try to edit something as fast as they can to be the first ones. Imagine the number of wrongly calculated numbers there.

Personally, I liked better the version of the articles that we used in the whole 2008-09 season, together with templates and everything (as I stated on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football). But, if the majority is against it, there is nothing I can do. SonjiCeli (talk) 13:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Aris Thessaloniki FC[edit]

Is there any particular reason why you reverted only Aris Thessaloniki's current squad and not for example Olympiakos or AEK one's in Greece or even, lets say Hertha's, since you are German? Aris1983 (talk) 15:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I am calm, the Aris' article was a mess, I am currently trying to update it and by checking the history section you can see I faced some difficulties with partizan users :-)! Thanks for directing me to the Manual style page, it will help me very much! Aris1983 (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nordirland[edit]

Moin! Die Poskarte Nordirland ist jetzt fertig. Gruß, NNW (talk) 20:27, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tube69[edit]

send me the rules plz... because i am sure its not against thanx...

Bottom templates; Georgia[edit]

Is there any possible way that the bottom season templates (2008-09 and 2009-10 in European football (UEFA)) are visible and unhidden all the time as they used to be? It's a minority, but it becomes pretty annoying when you have to unhide it over and over again every time you return to the page.

One other thing. I noticed that you started Umaglesi Liga 2009–10 article and wrote some info about team changes and stuff. As I could see from goli.ge, Georgian football site, Mglebi Zugdidi and Baia Zugdidi merged into one club. It can be seen here, in the first line of second paragraph, where the clubs are being named (notice the slash). It can also be seen here on pfl.ge (league's official site) (fixtures for the first round, see away club in the last fixture). However, these are probably not the references that would explain how, where, why and when, but they just mention the new club name. In the first article I mentioned, you can also notice the third paragraph which mentions Gagra and Spartaki in the beginning of the first sentence, as well as Meskheti one row under, directly under Spartaki's name. That might be the explanation for Meskheti's absence, as well as reason for Gagra and Spartaki being spared from relegation. The most recent article I found on goli.ge is completely about Ameri (Pirveli Liga 2008–09 Eastern group champions that were not promoted), and it might be the explanation for their absence from the league.
The problems are that a) I don't understand a thing, except the clubs' names (only due to updating regularly the Umaglesi Liga), b) google translator does not translate from Georgian (+ Georgian language isn't related to any other, so I cannot use some other languages' translation like I do in Kazakh (I use Russian) and Macedonian (I use Bulgarian)), c) I couldn't find any other Georgian text translator on the internet, and d) I don't know any Georgian contributor interested in football that could help us out. So, here are the possible sources for all those things that happened. If you know any kind of way we could figure out what the hell is written in those texts, it would be no problem to find the sources, especially because goli.ge has plenty of texts and I'm sure we could find some references.
I also noticed that you wrote the name of the Georgian reference in Latin alphabet, although I don't know how did you figure out the letters, but it is a good sign that we might do something in this area. Bye! SonjiCeli (talk) 22:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I hope someone would be kind enough to help us, although I don't have many nice experiences with non-football-related Wikipedians who speak those "exotic languages".
P.S. I'm sorry that I didn't help you in writing new season articles, but I had two extremely important tests. For a few days I'll most likely be able to contribute as much as I used to. SonjiCeli (talk) 09:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance[edit]

Hi, I was wondering if you could have me making those two articles a Featured Article - Israel State Cup and the List of Israeli football champions; I rewrote the entire articles to make it the best in my look, I took FA Cup and List of English football champions as an exemple to the work, note that some stuff look almost the same with small changes. I hope you may know what else the articles need. PS: I will add some pictures to the articles in related topics.

- HonorTheKing (talk) 03:08, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Geographical location information[edit]

This information has been restored as it adds clarity to where these teams are located in regions of Ukraine. In future bring this up to discussion before just ad hoc deletion. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 11:16, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons behind the removal are the following:
  • The content in these sections is already sufficiently displayed through the map. No need to explicitly repeat this, as most people are able to read a map.
  • The content is utterly trivial and only of interest for those people who have a combined interest in football, stats and geography. This group is naturally only a very small subset of the population of the Earth. Therefore, broad interest in the content, even among football-interested readers, cannot be assumed; WP:TRIVIA and WP:NOT#IINFO can thus be applied.
  • If a reader is interested in the Ukrainian regions (or German Bundesländer or Spanish autonomous regions or similar administrative units), he is usually going to access them through the respective country article, not via any other place.
By the way - no need to be aggressive. After all, there was no personal insult involved, and my username is not PeeJay. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:52, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. This article is tied to the Ukraine Wiki Project not just the general football project. The map of Ukraine is divided by regions (or oblasts) as they are called in Ukrainian. Those regions are not easily identified by just looking in the map and anyone who would wants more clarification could use the links in the regions table to help access them. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 12:09, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that this argumentation can be used. Almost every league article is bound, if available, to the WikiProject of its nation. However, the primary focus of these articles clearly lies on football and not on the countries of the leagues. The connection between these two topics is made by the title, the mentioning of the country in the lead paragraph of the article and the map (which already is a bonus for the majority of articles as it is only implemented for more recent seasons in most cases). Anything going beyond is just information overkill. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 13:00, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The connection of pages is not clear cut. You as someone who only really cares about football pages on WP has his views how things should interrelate. I as a Ukrainian see this area (a football competition in Ukraine) as part and parcel of the country. And hence my focus of inter connecting with Ukraine as just as important. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 13:59, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ligue 1 top goalscorers[edit]

I don't understand you beef towards posting the current top goalscorers atm in the TOPGOALSCORERS secton. I can understand if I was writing an entire article on when they scored, where they scored, and how. I am simply posting the top goal scorers as of the moment. What's different from what I'm doing to someone constantly updating the 2009 UEFA Champions League Final page when the match was being played?

Anyway, if it's a violation, then so be it, but if it is, I am surely certain you will be among the first watching the 2009 FA Community Shield page tomorrow to ensure their are no updates on scores, who scored the goals, when they were scored, and how. Right?ThaKid555 (talk) 19:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not really in a bad mood, I was mainly confused since I did this yesterday on the Ligue 2 2009–10 and the Championnat National 2009–10 without any problems. I guess since football leagues, excluding England and Spain, doesn't get that many hits, it wasn't noticed. Ah well. Appreciate the response. ThaKid555 (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers...[edit]

...for sorting out the cats on my sandbox, the thought never crossed my mind :@ Uksam88 (talk) 13:30, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Austria Fully Professional Leagues[edit]

Have you got a source for Austria 2nd level, which you added some time back (Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues). Thanks Eldumpo (talk) 08:54, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Canysp[edit]

Hi! Okay! I would like to have the side deleted! Can you help with him? Greet! I construct a side now. I would like you to look at it and you would write down your opinion of him! The name of the side:Debreceni VSC season 2009–10 with a greeting--Canysp (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I may ask you for so much yet that you should lay it in for me these, because I do not know it unfortunately how is needed. I write it in smoothly only here that you are some code is needed? If you have a mood please make it. --Canysp (talk) 10:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot requests[edit]

Bot requests usually take a few days to process, as they first have to be written and then they have to be approved by some sort of committee to make sure they're not going to make any unfavourable changes to the encyclopaedia. – PeeJay 13:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strategy for involving more users into TF[edit]

Well, I'd say: if you want to get more people involved into the taskforce, then make a request to join the project ot the whole WP:FOOTY community at first. Then, I would suggest to propose a new field to include into the Template:Football for articles with are supposed to be part of the taskforce scope. --Angelo (talk) 07:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just one question[edit]

If a club gets demoted at the end of the season or something similar happens, but not because of their league position, should we add some info about it on both seasons or just on the latter? For example, right before A Lyga 2009 Kaunas and Atlantas withdrew from competing in A Lyga, which is very good explained in the article. However, there is not a single word about it on A Lyga 2008 article. Also, all clubs are in their "regular" league positions in the league table. Should there be anything about it on the 2008 article or not? SonjiCeli (talk) 15:24, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hi dud
plz help us in Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran football, Wikipedia:Persepolis F.C., Iran Pro League and Football in Iran.
tnx Shahin (talk) 16:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problem[edit]

Oh, I see. Thanks! Qampunen (talk) 22:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Invitation[edit]

Hi Soccer-Holic!

Thanks for the invitation. I just joined the project and added a comment to the discussion. Being at the end of the world internet access here is better than I expected and with plenty of spare time I can even do the odd contribution whenever I feel like it. Yay!

Greetings from Bali, OdinFK (talk) 02:34, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copa del Rey 2009-10[edit]

Just reverted back to its previous state, now it should be fine. --Angelo (talk) 10:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

moving footy articles[edit]

Thanks for putting in the time to move some footy season articles. Just a friendly reminder: Whenever you are moving footy articles from "Footy league 2009–10" to "2009–10 Footy league", don't forget to update the category sort at the end of the article to read as [[Category:2009-10 domestic football (soccer) leagues|Footy league]]. That way the articles will sort by league and not year; it's pointless for 2009–10 to be the default sort in the 2009-10 category. JohnnyPolo24 (talk) 12:06, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009-10 Belgian First Division[edit]

Thanks for updating the page. However, when updating the goalscorers, please refrain from adding goals to some scoring players instead of to all scoring players. Although the goal scorers were not updated since October 7th (and this was clearly mentioned on the page!), you only added the one goal for Chavez. He scored indeed, but by only adding this goal and not all the others scored, you make it difficult to keep up.

I'm sure you knew there were more goals scored as you corrected the total number of goals scored. Thanks! Pelotastalk 00:27, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009-10 Welsh Premier Division[edit]

Oreet man. There may be something wrong with the table still, I can't fathom how it's happened but the places seem to be in the wrong order when sorted ? It could be just the way the sorting copes with the Points score but thought i'd give you the heads up 80.193.130.5 (talk) 10:01, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Colors in league tables[edit]

I am not supportive of keeping the newly-changed colors without any sort of consensus. That's how Wikipedia works, we simply can't accept a newcomer to push his favourite choice of colours without any proper discussion. I will revert them all, won't take that long. --Angelo (talk) 22:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ligas Superiores del Peru[edit]

Those leagues are new to me. I will suggest you ask User:MicroX. He is pretty much the point-man when it comes to Peruvian football and might be better able to help you on that subject. Digirami (talk) 10:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I was an expert but there is a lot I don't know. Ericysteph did a good job gathering all the info on the Ligas Superiores 2009 because the website that he's using is almost a blog and has all of its information spread out. I've had trouble looking for Copa Peru information on that site before. I give the season article a weak "keep" because I don't know how long that website is going to keep up with the Copa Peru. It seems like it is the only website that has detailed Copa Peru news, even though it is just a blog. --MicroX (talk) 03:10, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Colours in league tables[edit]

Sorry for making a fuss about colours in league tables. I thought that (User:Soccer-holic/League season article) is the result of consensus and I changed it in many 2009 and 2009–10 season articles. I think that is a good idea to make a formal petition about these colours. Maybe the colour of UEFA Europa League highest round would be a bit darker, like #A5E2FF? Regards. Lukasb1992 (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
PS. Sorry of my English.

Help-me[edit]

The user Kevinzuela is creating tables false from file Copa Simón Bolívar 2009. I'm putting the ratings properly, but after a day he puts a nonexistent classification with a number of games unreal and even serious contradictions in the number of victories and defeats a team in the league, situations such as all clubs have more wins than losses . This is vandalism. Please help me!

Thanks, --Daniel Dalence (talk) 15:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2009-10 Ekstraklasa Location map[edit]

First of all, thank you for your appreciation for my work!

As far as the location map concerns, I think something's wrong with the map. I checked the coordinates for Odra, but they're - according to the map - still located on Czech territory!

--Adriano7 (talk) 19:07, 07 November 2009 (CET)

Location maps of teams[edit]

Hello, i could do with some help if you would be so kind to help me?

I want to create location maps for the football leagues of Asia. I have tried starting with the Bahraini league, but using the coordinates for the cities that the teams play in, seems to give myself some rather strange results. I'm wondering if you can help me, or tell me how to it correctly.

As stated before, i've tried with the Bahraini league, so any example for this league would be helpful. Regards. Druryfire (talk) 20:30, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers pal, thanks very much for your help. One thing i am wondering, is who you work out the coordinates? For example, Muharraq has coordinates of |latd=26|latm=15|lats= |latNS=N and |longd=50|longm=37|longs=|longEW=E and the code you have written is lat=26.25 |long=50.616667, how do you work out that figure? Druryfire (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary[edit]

Sure. I'll use edit summaries, especially when reverting, even if the reason for my revertions are quite obvious. I apologise. Qampunen (talk) 07:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming reply[edit]

Yo!

They are stalled. I sent a request to have all the Primera Divisions renamed, including the Spanish one, in the Talk:La Liga, but one user objected, and a big debate ensued. That somehow led to the conclusion that the rename had no consensus, even though about 6-7 approved. So I guess renaming one by one to the approved format is the best solution now.

In dealing with Honduras, look to the Argentine Primera season article as an example. Digirami (talk) 17:53, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate sponsors in name[edit]

Hey I noticed that you moved the 2010 Liga Postobon back to the old title. I just want to say I moved a few others to Copa Mustang from the Colombian league but I am going to move them back. This is just to let you know. --MicroX (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Azerbaijan Premier League[edit]

Hi, I just wanted to ask you if you have time to do one thing. NovaSkola, who is interested in Azerbaijani football and knows a lot about it, informed me (see link to my talk page) that the 2009–10 Azerbaijan Premier League will be played in two rounds: first is double round-robin (22 games) and the second is the split of the table in two parts, with each team playing 10 extra games. So, can you adapt the current article to reflect the competition modus used during this season? I would have done it myself but I'm extremely busy these days and I barely have time to update the leagues (luckily, there are only few of them currently active). Thanks in advance. SonjiCeli (talk) 15:27, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009-10 Azerbaijan Premier League[edit]

Hello, I checked that article and everything looks fine. I will let you know, if any changes. Meanwhile Azerbaijan First Division 2009-2010 - I am not sure, what is going on there due few clubs went bust or entered administration so we have to wait few months to see. Because Neftchi ISM, Revan Baku as far I know, one of clubs became farm club of PFC Neftchi Baku, other ones is bust or something.--NovaSkola (talk) 01:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

colors[edit]

You put "colours do not indicate any qualification. Definitive qualification for a competition before the end of a season is realised by addition of qualified=y to a line". Then why do continental and world cup competitions do the opposite where colors are only applied after qualification has been ensured? Or like in the qualifiers where green/blue lines were used and colors were only placed after qualification was ensured? I'm confused as to why we do things one way for leagues and differently for international tournaments. --MicroX (talk) 22:15, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template conversion[edit]

Good day to you, Soccer-holic! I am writing to you because I noticed last night that several days ago you converted the Regionalliga Nord template to a full navbox (see diff), I saw from your contribs that this was just one of many conversions. However, upon your formatting you seem to have completely forgot that the teams listed under these templates often have more than just one footer template requiring Template:fb start and Template:fb end. Are you intending to fix this like I have done here, or are you not bothered? I'm not angry, so I hope you don't feel like I'm having a pop at you for no reason. I think maybe you had simply forgot how your changes can render the following templates on the club article pages seeing that you had done this to a number of league templates. Have a nice day! Jared Preston (talk) 09:05, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TFF Second League[edit]

Hi Soccer-Holic! I'd like to inform you about TFF Second League pages. I noticed that you merged 2009–10 TFF Second League Group 2 and 2009–10 TFF Second League Promotion Group with 2009–10 TFF Second League. I undid these changes, because all these are not the same and both include individual group details and statistics which cannot be shown in a general page like 2009–10 TFF Second League. Thanks for your interest and support. Slayer35 (talk) 22:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Portsmouth's lack of UEFA license[edit]

Hey, thanks for calling me on that. I've been, er, gone from the project for a while so I'm not used to providing links like that. Just out of practice, I guess. Anyway, I've added the ref so all is well again. Have a good one. -- Grant.Alpaugh 18:59, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]