User talk:Stuartyeates/Archive 25

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 20 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25

Information icon Hello, Stuartyeates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of fellows of the Royal Society of New Zealand, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Turkish emigrants to New Zealand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Stuartyeates,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 July 2023

Tech News: 2023-27

MediaWiki message delivery 22:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: June 2023

This Month in GLAM: June 2023





Headlines
  • Albania report: CEE Spring Campaign 2023, Albania and Kosovo
  • Asia report: Donation of images from the National Centre for Biological Sciences
  • Brazil report: Native Brazilian photographer wins Wiki Loves Folklore Brazil 2023
  • Croatia report: Half done in 2023
  • Germany report: Museum tour, WLM, handouts and image donation
  • India report: Wiki Exploration Programme GLAM activities
  • Indonesia report: Conclusion of Mini Grants; Second #1Lib1Ref Campaign; Wikisource Workshop in Bali
  • Italy report: TCI and Turin Academy of Science
  • Kosovo report: CEE Spring Campaign 2023, Albania and Kosovo
  • Netherlands report: A new book, new Wikipedia articles, videos and further images on Africa
  • New Zealand report: Report on the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections Conference 2023 and Auckland suburb updates
  • Philippines report: GLAM outreach activity at University of Nueva Caceres: Digitization, workshops and proofread-a-thons as future collaboration
  • Poland report: GLAM-Wiki workshops for the Czartoryski Library; Work on the GLAM-Wiki Project Page Continues; End of Internship within the "Praktykuj w Kulturze" Program
  • Sweden report: Knowledge overview; Almedalen week
  • Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Programm
  • UK report: Cultural diversity
  • USA report: WikiWednesday returns to Manhattan; Wikimedia NYC and Art+Feminism; WikiConference North America 2023; GLAM Wiki 2023
  • Special story: Flickr Foundation and Wikimedia Foundation partner to build Flickypedia
  • GLAM Wiki conference report: The call for proposals is now open for the GLAM Wiki Conference
  • Calendar: July's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2023-28

MediaWiki message delivery 19:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Request on 16:34:51, 13 July 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Icsteveoh


I would like to have a page similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_Geospatial_Center or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_Department_of_Transportation. I don't understand why this agency isn't applicable. What steps can I take to have a better chance?

Icsteveoh (talk) 16:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

  • Hi Icsteveoh the pages you mention also have similar flaws. I can't speak for the other editors who have worked on them, but I've tagged them as needing third party sources. As a tertiary source, wikipedia is built on secondary sources; no document written or published by an agency can be a secondary source of information about that agency. Look for press coverage, review articles, etc. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:09, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
    Thanks, I've gone and done that. Icsteveoh (talk) 20:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
    What you need to be looking for is significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Passing mentions are not significant. News articles based on press releases (or built around quotes from employees) are not independent. You're heading in the right direction though. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:25, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, Stuartyeates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Claims Settlement Act 2022, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Settlement acts

Information icon Hello, Stuartyeates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Settlement acts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2023

Tech News: 2023-29

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-30

MediaWiki message delivery 02:19, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-31

MediaWiki message delivery 23:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 August 2023

Growth team newsletter #27

12:42, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Kotlarsky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Kotlarsky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Kotlarsky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mary McQueen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary McQueen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary McQueen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

IncompA 09:12, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-32

MediaWiki message delivery 21:19, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: July 2023





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This Month in Education: July 2023

Tech News: 2023-33

MediaWiki message delivery 05:58, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023

Tech News: 2023-34

15:23, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Krzysztof Pawlikowski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krzysztof Pawlikowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krzysztof Pawlikowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Panamitsu (talk) 11:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-35

MediaWiki message delivery 13:58, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2023

Tech News: 2023-36

MediaWiki message delivery 23:32, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Talk:Lisa Nakazono for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Talk:Lisa Nakazono is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Lisa Nakazono until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

    • Sorry, this was meant to be (of course) an AfD for the article, not the talk page.

Imaginatorium (talk) 07:59, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-37

MediaWiki message delivery 21:06, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2023





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

The Signpost: 16 September 2023

Tech News: 2023-38

MediaWiki message delivery 19:18, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello Stuartyeates,

New Page Review article queue, March to September 2023

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-39

MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-40

MediaWiki message delivery 01:25, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2023

Nomination of Andrea Haines for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrea Haines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Haines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Graham87 (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Request on 29 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by LarsHolmberg


Hi! I tried to reply to your declining of the new draft for Locust earlier, but somehow it ended up on MY talk page instead of yours. Because I didnt hear from you, I tried to resubmit to get your attention, but then the article got blocked instead...

I'd like to know more specifically what your objections are and how to alleviate them. I have also found another source from a peer reviewed publication that I could add and work in to the article to further support notability.

I dont know how to auto-generate this post so I've copied the source from another one on your talk :) LarsHolmberg (talk) 07:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

I've replied in depth at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk where the conversation appears to be happening. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hi! Did you see my reply there? LarsHolmberg (talk) 13:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-41

MediaWiki message delivery 14:37, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: September 2023

This Month in GLAM: September 2023





Headlines
  • Argentina report: Disseminating open culture
  • Brazil report: Amazonia on Wiki
  • Colombia report: Wikidata and the editing of Ibero-American scientific journals
  • France report: Celebrating Rugby Herstory and History in Toulouse; Les Lorraines sans pages
  • India report: Wikimedia Commons Contest connects Pune citizens with the rivers Mula & Mutha
  • Italy report: 10,000 institutions on the Wikimedia projects
  • New Zealand report: West Coast Wikipedian at Large
  • Poland report: GLAM-Wiki educational activities
  • Portugal report: With multiple events, September was a busy month for Wikimedia Portugal
  • Sweden report: Wikipedia in education; Continuation at Swedish folk high schools; Wikipedians at the Bookfair
  • UK report: A new WIR and a very old book
  • USA report: Wikimedia New York City Election 2023; San Diego/September 2023; Climate Change and Food Safety
  • Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons report: OpenRefine and Wikimedia Commons: train the trainer course participants and two surveys
  • Wiki Loves Living Heritage report: European photo contest finalists, Local Contexts Wikiproject at GLAMhack
  • WMF GLAM report: Wikisource Loves Manuscripts, ICOM outreach, Flickr Foundation partnership, OpenRefine adoption, new sources in The Wikipedia Library, Image Description Month events, and the GLAM Wiki Conference
  • Calendar: October's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Growth team newsletter #28

Trizek_(WMF) Talk 23:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-42

MediaWiki message delivery 23:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023

Tech News: 2023-43

MediaWiki message delivery 23:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-44

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello Stuartyeates:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 2500 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:25, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I saw that you've marked Hun clan as reviewed. The original article is available at Hun. It's possible that the creator might be a LTA trying to insert a Gurjar POV into various articles about kings and clans. I've taken the step to file an SPI for this. It's important to note that the sources provided in this article only make claims. – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

This is an area I know little if anything about. You may be right. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Discord invite

Hey there. Congrats on being on the backlog drive leaderboard. I really appreciate you helping out at NPP. If you want to hang out with other NPPs, consider joining us on the NPP Discord. Discord is live chat software that can be really fun. If not no worries. Thanks and see you around :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

P.S. I notice your top 10 user talk sections are not auto archiving due to missing headings and/or signatures. I'd be happy to fix that for you if you'd like, just let me know. Happy editing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you, but I'm not really a Discord kinda person. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears Award

This award is given to Stuartyeates for collecting more than 50 points per week in the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for your continuous contributions to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:31, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

October 2023 NPP backlog drive – Points award

The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia   
This award is given to Stuartyeates for collecting more than 500 points during the October 2023 NPP backlog drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to the drive! Hey man im josh (talk) 01:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Request on 03:07:42, 2 November 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Cd634011


Hello! Any help regarding this article is much appreciated. Both reviewers do not seem to be seeing this as a scholarly book, which has different requirements for establishing notability compared to other types of books.

I have made edits to include over a dozen additional secondary references from sources that are independent of the book's author. These include references to textbooks, other academic books, and papers from other fields (e.g., neuroscience, education, economics) that use work featured in the book.

This is a highly specialized academic book, so I used those guidelines for notability per the "Academic and technical books" section of this page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(books). The book was published in Routledge's Scientific Psychology series, which is a prestigious series that includes books by well-known and respected figures in mathematical psychology, such as Duncan Luce and Louis Narens. Books in this series normally undergo multiple levels of peer review. The audience for this book is relatively narrow, as mathematical psychology is not a large field. As a tenured professor in Experimental Psychology, I believe it to be an important contribution and have used Chapters from the book in my graduate seminar in Cognitive Psychology.

Please also note that while many of the original references are connected to the book's author, they are all from peer-reviewed journals and thus have undergone review by other experts in the field. These references are not independent of the subject, but they are in-depth and reliable, and they are important to demonstrating how the work in the book has been scientifically validated.

Cd634011 (talk) 03:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Notability is always about secondary sources on the topic. To be honest, I'm not seeing the secondary sources here. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

But how cna this be fix? ~~

Comment on Draft:Exeger Operations AB

Hi.

Regarding: Draft:Exeger Operations AB

In your opinion, are the following references accepable in a Wikipedia article?

  1. https://www.epfl.ch/labs/lpi/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/M_Grtzel-research-achievements-and-their-social-economic-impact-June-2021.pdf (page 8 and 9)
  2. https://www.newelectronics.co.uk/content/features/eternal-battery-life/
  3. https://www.ribaj.com/products/solar-cell-technology-artificial-photosynthesis-extracts-power-from-indoor-and-outdoor-light-powerfoyle-exeger

I also would like to understand the part of your comment about "press releases and the company's research publications". I have removed such references from the draft. Which ones of the current/remaining references apply to you comment?


Thank you for your help.Regards,

DerekHal22


Derekhal22 (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

These are primary sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 November 2023

Tech News: 2023-45

MediaWiki message delivery 21:04, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Postcard from the Coast

Postcard from the West Coast

Wednesday 8 Nov, 2023

A bit of a gap since the last postcard, but what a great time we've had with the Wikipedian at Large project in the interim • The highlight has been having Marshall and Lyn join me on the West Coast for a few days, visiting Fox Glacier and Whataroa • We now have good photo collections for the newly-created Waitangiroto Nature Reserve, and a a much improved article with galler • The Whataroa article has been improved with local history and links to the White Herons • We also have much better coverage of Fox Glacier, including new Ngāi Tahu viewing place Te Kopikopiko o te Waka, and photos of Te Weheka Walkway/Cycleway and the South Side Walkway/Cycleway • Could I get you all to check back through your contributions and add anything extra you've done to the [Progress page as we wrap up • Also—I'm hosting a catch-up meeting on Sunday November 12, 2:30 pm, online at my Whereby chat room. This is a chance to go over anything you'd still like to see improved, talk about how the project went and possibilities for future ones, and announce winners of prizes for most or best contributions. Drop me a line at mike@rove.wiki if you can make it (or can't but have ideas about the project) • Thank you all for your contributions, however small, and chat soon. — Giantflightlessbirds
White heron viewed against river and bush
Kōtuku at Waitangiroto Nature Reserve

Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 19:27, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft:List of 250 most-backward districts (2006)

What do you think is the copyvio at Draft:List of 250 most-backward districts (2006)? I agree the list is copied from the source but as it's alphabetically listed by state and district, that doesn't seem to be creative (and hence not a copyvio - Wikipedia:Copyright in lists#Copyrightability of other factors). Nor does the choice of districts appear to be creative but is a factual list based on calculation (see Wikipedia:Copyright in lists#Copyrightability of content).

I can see a straightforward decline of the draft for notability but not as a copyvio. Nthep (talk) 13:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Nthep. I differ on whether the choice of districts is creative (politics is always creative), but you're right it may not be a copyvio. You're welcome to add a note that it may not be a copyvio and give another reason instead. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Thx. I've made a note and re-declined the draft as lacking notability. Nthep (talk) 19:28, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, Stuartyeates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mana (moral authority), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: October 2023

Dear Stuart,

Thank you for your interest for this physics topic. You write using a template

>This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. (October 2023)

  • Could you please explain this remark? The topic of car speed and energy usage is part of European high school basic physics, and in the Netherlands played a role in policy discussions of reducing the maximum allowed car speed to lower CO2 greenhouse gas production. (The day time max speed was reduced from 120 km/h to 100 km/h.) This is simply hardcore 18th-19th century very classical physics about kinetic energy and friction from physics books, so no, no, there are no personal feelings or original arguments here. Would that i had discovered this...

Please your reaction, thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 08:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

User:Hansmuller: The note I posted was unrelated to the content of the article. The note that I posted related to the structure and formatting of the article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and all articles are unified by consistent style and formatting. Particularly the first part of this article needs to be recast. There are a whole list of rules at WP:MOS, but usually it's easier to find a similar / related article and see how it's structured. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Dear Stuart, thank you for your reply and suggestion. You suggest Particularly the first part of this article needs to be recast. What can i do? A similar article is Drag_(physics). Perhaps you don't want a summary and a simple calculation at the beginning? Formatting? Can you be more specific? The enormous - quadratic - energy consumption at higher speeds is essential knowledge for car drivers, right?

  • Please your more specific suggestions, thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 09:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2023





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Draft: Exeger Operations AB

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/start-up-idea-exeger-powerfoyle-peter-h-j-auwerx/

Is this webpage an acceptable reference to an article about Exeger and Powerfoyle?


Kind regards,

DerekHal22 Derekhal22 (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Absolutely not. That's LLM-spew, as per the bottom Peter Auwerx, chatting with chatGPT latest version.. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:20, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-46

MediaWiki message delivery 23:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Request on 12:23:47, 15 September 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Stef joosten


Hi Stuart, Thank you for taking the trouble to review my draft.

I have a clarification question about your comment: "Most of the refs don't appear to mention the subject."

Do you mean the references to scientific literature? I don't understand this comment yet, because the subject "Ampersand" is mentioned in three references. These three are the seminal articles on this topic and are peer-reviewed academic work. The hyperlinks in my draft refer to other Wikipedia contributions, so readers can find further explanations for such terms as they see fit. In this way, I did my best to make everything traceable and verifiable.

So, I suspect I don't fully understand your comment yet. Could you please elaborate a bit, so I can adapt the draft in the right direction?

Would you like me to include a language definition? Or examples? I'd be happy to, even though the very first hyperlink in the draft points to https://ampersandtarski.github.io/, which is the authoritative documentation of Ampersand.

I'd really appreciate some more clarification on your comment.

Stef joosten (talk) 12:23, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

User:Stef joosten Articles need to be based on secondary sources with in depth coverage of the topic. Sources from the authors of the programming language aren't independent. Sources which don't mention the programming language don't have in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Dear Stuart,
I have improved the article on the citations. However, we still have a problem: Ampersand is a small topic in computer science. Therefore, there are no in-depth sources in which I don't participate.
I dare dispute, however, your conclusion that the in-depth secondary sources are not independent. The secondary sources that are scientific papers have been reviewed by independent academics in scientific conferences and journals. Most notably the international conference on Relation Algebraic Methods in Computer Science (RAMiCS), which boasts a thorough and independent review process. Surely, those sources are not questionable or unreliable. This is precisely why Wikipedia does not forbid self referencing; it leaves room to scrutinize self-referencing critically.
The problem is: Your refusal means that well-established scientific results in small niche-areas are unpublishable on Wikepedia, even when based on solid and acknowledged research results.
So please reconsider the paper with the improvements I have made. If you still find it wanting, I have to rest my case with deep regrets on my side.
Best regards,
Stef Joosten Stef joosten (talk) 08:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Encyclopedias are tertiary sources, that is built on secondary sources. Secondary sources in an academic context are review articles. You are welcome to re-submit the draft for review and get a second opinion on this. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:47, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

mi redirects

For your redirects, how will you sort them into modern, Biggs and traditional? 118.149.77.35 (talk) 05:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

By hand. Yes, it's likely to be a big job. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

Tech News: 2023-47

MediaWiki message delivery 00:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-48

MediaWiki message delivery 23:07, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Draft about Zula Globe

Hello, can you help me to edit my draft https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Zula_Global? Thank you for suggesting me to use independent sources. For this reason, in addition to the official sites of the game, I also wanted to report some newspaper articles and a famous player of the game. Unfortunately, however, apart from this information there is nothing else online, since it is just a game and not, for example, historical facts. Could you help me by specifying better what you mean by "indipendent sources" about my case? Thank you for helping me! Rassolino (talk) 07:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Independent sources are a key requirement for having a wikipedia article. I had a look in google and there didn't see any. If none can be found, you're not going to be able to get an article accepted. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my submission List of California political scandals. As to your points:

TOO MUCH BOILERPLATE: The boilerplate here exactly matches the boilerplate on the article List of Alabama political scandals which has already been accepted by Wikipedia for publication. But I agree with you. Each of the paragraphs is an answer to previous editors who could not seem to find a definition of ‘scandal’.

OLDER CITATIONS: Absolutely. I have citations that go back to 1857. I did not use them because some editors have argued this article is too long. They think it would not fit on a modern cell phone! I therefore censured myself, but could easily add more citations, if it will be accepted.

PUBISHING WITHOUT REVIEW: Perhaps I should be talking to the editor who approved List of Alabama political scandals. He mentioned there is a way for published authors to publish again using create articles yourself, but I’ll be damned if I can figure out how. So I submitted this at Articles for creation which led to Article Wizard which led to you. What am I missing? Johnsagent (talk) 03:07, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Growth team newsletter #29

18:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

WP:MOVETODRAFT userscript

Hello, I have tagged a redirect for CSD R2 that was left behind when you draftified We Who Wrestle with God. You might find the MOVETODRAFT user script useful for draftification—it helps inform creators about draftification and tags the redirect for CSD R2 that was left behind after the move. – DreamRimmer (talk) 12:56, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

Tech News: 2023-49

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Request for guidance

@Stuartyeates A draft (Draft:Odisha Urdu Academy) submitted for review was declined with reasons. Now that I've removed a lot of content against wiki rules, is it worth re-submitting now? I will resubmit if you guide me; otherwise, I will try to improve. Khaatir (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

It's hard to say. There's an excellent source at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bhubaneswar/urdu-academy-put-on-the-backburner/articleshow/54707661.cms . I suspect that there may be more sources in Urdu (this being an Urdu Academy after all). If you can find one or two more articles like that in Urdu, the article will qualify for inclusion. Important points are (a) published somewhere reputable and (b) those involved with the Academy are not involved in publishing the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
@Stuartyeates I have made corrections to the best of my ability, added reliable references, and omitted unnecessary detailed material that is not covered by secondary sources. I have resubmitted for review. Khaatir (talk) 03:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Sport Inside

Hello. Could you take another look at Draft:Sport Inside? I added the Expand German template at the top. The German version of the page, which has existed since 2010, has the sources you requested, but I'm not able to translate them. Thanks. - Richie2023 (talk) 17:37, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Their own website is not independent and IMDb is a website that anyone can edit. These are not suitable. Surely there are some German-language sources? Stuartyeates (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Exchange_Job_Definition_Format

Thank you for the suggestion to "steal" some references from https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchange_Job_Definition_Format (which is a published article). The principal German author of that page has added several of his sources to our English page, and says we have more sources than he does.

Question: We believe we had addressed all the "reliable sources" & "primary source" complaints, with updates and several secondary sources added, yet the article was declined once again.  Do you have any thoughts on how best to clear complaints and get this article published?

Thanks again, - Jim Jmekis (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
39 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Endocrine surgery (talk) Add sources
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C HMS Lutine (1779) (talk) Add sources
705 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Cooking oil (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Hotel des Indes (The Hague) (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 880 (number) (talk) Add sources
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Andrew Salkey (talk) Add sources
197 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Ultrasound assisted extraction (talk) Cleanup
46 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 269 (number) (talk) Cleanup
68,270 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA 2023 Israel–Hamas war (talk) Cleanup
299 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Cat food (talk) Expand
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Post-assault treatment of sexual assault victims (talk) Expand
1,293 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Debit card (talk) Expand
1,092 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B East African Federation (talk) Unencyclopaedic
107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Military history of the Philippines (talk) Unencyclopaedic
6 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Whale mounds (talk) Unencyclopaedic
40 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Eelam War II (talk) Merge
84 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Qasim Nanawtawi (talk) Merge
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Roads in Bhubaneswar (talk) Merge
141 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Illegal drug trade in the Philippines (talk) Wikify
251 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Bangsamoro Islamic Freedom Fighters (talk) Wikify
2,530 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA The Lesser Key of Solomon (talk) Wikify
5 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Severe intellectual disability-progressive spastic diplegia syndrome (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Christine Rollier (talk) Orphan
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Darakhshan Andrabi (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Blossom (British brig) (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Kyle Loveless (talk) Stub
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Mater Dei School, New Delhi (talk) Stub
66 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start 90,000 (talk) Stub
221 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Udhampur railway station (talk) Stub
44 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Jamia Millia Islamia metro station (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

Draft:International Comission for the History and Theory of Historiography

Dear Stuartyeates,

You have recently reviewed the proposed article on the International Commission for the History and Theory of Historiography (ICHTH), Draft:International Commission for the History and Theory of Historiography. I am grateful for your effort and interest. To my regret, however, you rejected the submission, leaving the following reasons for rejecting the article in my talk page: 'Wikipedia articles require reliable independent secondary sources with in depth coverage of the subjects. I'm not seeing significant independent secondary sources on this org. A quick scan in google scholar isn't helpful either. If decent sources are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page once you've resubmitted the article for review'.

I must clarify from the outset that ICHTH is not an association that produces scientific historical information itself. Therefore, a scan of Google Scholar will necessarily disappoint. In the Constitution of ICHTH (https://www.ichth.net/constitution) it is stipulated that ICHTH “promotes the study of theory of history, history of historiography, philosophy of history, historical methodology, and historical culture. It encourages debates and exchanges among different approaches to the above subjects of study.” In short, it is a global platform where philosophers of history and historiographers meet, in essence to promote scientific historical knowledge worldwide  - a purpose, indeed, that is at the heart of the Wikipedia project itself.

Let me now show you that ICHTH is worth a Wikipedia entry from both a quantitative and qualitative angle.

I have just googled 'International Commission for the History and Theory of Historiography' and found 22,100 results, including, for instance

- Wikipedia's own article on Historiography

- The web page of the International Committee of Historical Sciences: https://www.cish.org/index.php/en/members/international-organisations/

- This page from the Huizinga Instituut. Netherlands Research School for Cultural History: https://www.huizingainstituut.nl/working-group/theory-of-history/

- A newsletter from the Wesleyan University, Conn., USA: https://newsletter.blogs.wesleyan.edu/2018/03/30/kleinberg-lectures-in-france-elected-to-historiography-commission/

- The page of the Centre for Historical Culture, University of Rotterdam, The Netherlands: https://www.eur.nl/en/eshcc/research/centre-historical-culture/general-information

- A book chapter published by Bloomsbury in the United Kingdom, quoted in the proposed article: https://books.google.com.br/books?hl=pt-BR&lr=lang_en%7Clang_pl&id=lcAAEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA165&dq=%22ichth%22+%2B+historiography&ots=ySvMTymuAC&sig=EmK35ugc8D5zQ0r91gsf1Yy-GL4&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22ichth%22%20%2B%20historiography&f=false

I think the list already suggests that the ICHTH is not as invisible on the web as the review might have assumed.

However, there are other ways than internet frequencies to assess the relevance of an academic organisation like the ICHTH. Longevity, global representativeness, the prominence of its members within their fields of study should all somehow be included in the assessment. The ICHTH is a 43-year-old academic association. It is an official member of the International Committee of Historical Sciences (https://www.cish.org/index.php/fr/membres/information/?pdb=508), the world’s umbrella organization for historical sciences, but it functions completely autonomously just as the 70 or so other associations affiliated to the ICHS do. ICHTH is made up of leading university professors and researchers from all over the world, many of whom are considered important enough to have their own Wikipedia pages. For example, the Board of the ICHTH (https://www.ichth.net/board) consists of 13 members coming from 12 countries ranging from Canada over Nigeria to China and Australia. And its list of honorary members includes names such as Natalie Zemon Davis, Hayden White, Romila Thapar, Georg Iggers, Peter Burke, Joan Wallach Scott, Jürgen Kocka and Frank Ankersmit - a quick glance at their Wikipedia entries will confirm how important they are/were not only for the theory or history of historiography, but for historical studies in general.

Judging relevance will be unfair if we limit ourselves to the mechanical application of criteria designed to prevent spurious self-promotion or marketing strategies by profit-driven people and companies. And if we think in terms of longevity, representativeness or prominence of members, we will easily find Wikipedia articles on organisations of all kinds that would rank below the ICHTH.

So, in light of the above, I would kindly urge you to reconsider the decision to reject the article. Thank you very much for your attention. Aoaassis (talk) 09:12, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Answered at Draft:International Comission for the History and Theory of Historiography. Stuartyeates (talk) 17:35, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

Yes, where to find these sources? That is the problem. ~~ ~~

If sources are the problem, I had just listed some good ones above, attesting that the organisation exists and is recognised in its field. To the attentive and not ill-disposed eye, that should have sufficed. Such a pity that it has not. Aoaassis (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Close reading will reveal I said 'in depth coverage of the subject.' I don't see that n any of these sources. You're welcome to resubmit to get another editors opinion. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:14, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Request on 10:32:55, 8 December 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by Ruslan Sharipov


In comments to my draft article you wrote "We need independent sources". Please let me know, (1) you need independent sources for existing content or (2) you need extra content with independent sources. If (1) is the case and if you need independent sources for the section "Institutes and Departments", would it be OK to remove this section or maybe I could find independent sources for some items in the list and keep these items removing others and thus making the list incomplete? Please which option is better? Ruslan Sharipov (talk) 10:32, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Hi Ruslan Sharipov. Right now the draft has a wall of sources, almost all sourced to uust.ru. Wikipedia, as a tertiary source is not built on what people say about themselves (primary sources), but what independent third parties say about them (secondary sources). You need to be looking for in-depth coverage, not database / ranking websites or recycled press releases. Look for coverage in region news sources. Coverage of sports teams can also be useful, if independent. You also need to include the Russian name(s) after the English names, so other editors can easily search for sources. It is possible that this newly established institution does not yet have the coverage to meet our criteria, but I don't speak/read Russian, so I'm not sure. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
I've remove half the content based on primary sources and approved it based on the other sources. Also tidied up the other two articles. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:44, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2023





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Speedy deletion nomination of List of Colorado political scandals

Hello Stuartyeates,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Colorado political scandals for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want List of Colorado political scandals to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 18:46, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-50

MediaWiki message delivery 02:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

This Month in Education: November 2023

Submission Review: Liberty Latin America

Hi Stuartyeates!

Thank you so much for taking the time to review my article about Liberty Latin America.

Draft:Liberty Latin America

But I'm not quite sure why it's still being rejected. I've followed your advice about the reliable sources. But I'm not having any progress. Do you have any specific feedback or can you helo me with the article in general?

Thanks! Altaria06 (talk) 19:45, 14 December 2023 (UTC)

Page review

Hi! I hope you are doing well. If possible, can you help me review (curation) this page Great Divine Temple. Thanks! Đại Việt quốc (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Done Stuartyeates (talk) 09:42, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Đại Việt quốc (talk) 04:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-51

MediaWiki message delivery 16:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive

The Articles for Creation Barnstar
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 192 reviews, for a total of 272.5 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

– robertsky (talk) 06:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,040 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bashkortostan (talk) Add sources
25 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 318 (number) (talk) Add sources
41 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 881 (number) (talk) Add sources
46 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sterlitamak (talk) Add sources
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Copenhagen Derby (talk) Add sources
103 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 999 (number) (talk) Add sources
553 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C 58 (number) (talk) Cleanup
214 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Northern Ndebele people (talk) Cleanup
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Collinsville mine disaster (talk) Cleanup
60 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C General practice (talk) Expand
27 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro (talk) Expand
2,558 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Larry Nassar (talk) Expand
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Stray Little Devil (talk) Unencyclopaedic
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Goin' a Buffalo (talk) Unencyclopaedic
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Extinction (Bernhard novel) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
14 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Polish–Soviet War in 1919 (talk) Merge
72 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: GA Feijoada (Brazilian dish) (talk) Merge
477 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Feijoada (talk) Merge
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Pondicherry International Film Festival (talk) Wikify
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Thriving (talk) Wikify
50 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Georgian Labour Party (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Rustem Akhunov (talk) Orphan
1 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lyailya Galievna Galimzhanova (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Nigeria Youth SDGs Network (talk) Orphan
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 836 (number) (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Roskilde Håndbold (talk) Stub
40 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 241 (number) (talk) Stub
365 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub 971 (number) (talk) Stub
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kongsberg Digital (talk) Stub
27 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Move or Die (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-02

MediaWiki message delivery 01:18, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

NPP Awards for 2023

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

For over 100 article reviews during 2023. Well done! Keep up the good work and thank you! Dr vulpes (Talk) 02:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Resubmission of GRESB article draft

Hey @Stuartyeates, thanks for your comments on the first submission of the GRESB article. To address your feedback, I have added two new secondary sources to the article (see source #5 and #17). Additionally, source #7 and 11 are both secondary sources. As such, I have resubmitted the article and hope to hear your valuable feedback soon. Thanks again for your time and effort. ESGBencher (talk) 14:26, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

ESGBencher I suggest that opinion pieces, things with associated people in the byline and attributions of data sources are not indepth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your continued dialogue on this proposed page, @Stuartyeates. While I know I put a few sources that are opinion pieces to explain some additional context (I'm happy to remove them if that is helpful), the main sources I mentioned above were written by third parties with no association to the organization, so I think they should qualify based on the criteria. Again, thank you for your support as I get more familiar with contributing to wikipedia. ESGBencher (talk) 10:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

Copyright in accepted AFC

Hello. I thought I should let you know that there was copyright in an article you accepted at AFC. The article, Kuki-Naga conflict in Manipur, had copyvio before it was accepted by you. I requested revdel for the copyright. Thanks! MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry MrLinkinPark333, usually I check for copyright issues. Not how this happened. I'll endeavor to not to let it happen again. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:50, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
No worries! Thank you for replying :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 17:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2023





Headlines
  • Albania report: Wiki Loves EuroPride in Albania 2023
  • Bosnia & Herzegovina report: A year in review ...
  • Croatia report: 2023 in review
  • Czech Republic report: Wiki-residents establishing meeting took place in December
  • Germany report: Go-ahead for Wikidata Project of GLAM institutions from Baden-Württemberg
  • Italy report: WLM Local winners and funds for 2024 GLAM projects
  • New Zealand report: Auckland Museum summer updates
  • Poland report: Intense end to a year of GLAM-Wiki activities in Poland
  • Sweden report: Photo memories project concludes; Sörmlands museum passes 1000 uploads to Wikimedia Commons; Wikimedian in Residence supports an upload of music content; Subject terms from Queerlit; Wikidata for authority control: 3 years of work
  • Switzerland report: Swiss GLAM Program
  • UK report: 2023 in Review
  • USA report: WikiConference North America 2023; TSU and USF; Philadelphia WikiSalon; Wikimedia DC Annual Membership Meeting; Wikipedia Editing 101 for All; NYC Hacking Night; Upstate NY workshop; Wikiquote She Said Project
  • Wiki Loves Living Heritage report: Thank you for making Wiki Loves Living Heritage happen!
  • WMF GLAM report: Updates and invitation to test the Commons Impact Metrics prototype
  • Calendar: January's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Salinas v. Texas

Hello, I'm the author of Draft:Salinas v. Texas , how can I ensure this is not a copy, because I have a warning that this redirects to Thompkins v. Berguis, I made this draft becuase I don't see a wikipedia article that I've mentioned above, I hope you notice this and thank you Jlvshistory (talk) 01:56, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

No, it has been fixed, thanks Jlvshistory (talk) 09:15, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
I believe that this has already been fixed by someone with the appropriate permissions. Let me know if you still see a problem of any kind. 08:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-03

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Stuartyeates. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ngāti Kahungunu ki Wairarapa Tāmaki nui-a-Rua Claims Settlement Act 2022".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Settlement acts

Hello, Stuartyeates. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Settlement acts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 08:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Draft article rejection - Stochastic survival of the densest

Hello Stuartyeates,

Thanks for reviewing my article. I received the following feedback from you: "The academic paper at the core of this article has been cited only 3 times. This is not what notability looks like."

May I kindly ask you more constructive suggestions rather than only pointing out this? Is there any way I can improve the article, or the simple fact that the paper has only three citations (so far) makes the page I wrote not even worth being considered? Thus, we cannot communicate science unless the topic is "popular"? Any suggestion would be really appreciated.

I would like to underline that the paper was published only one year ago (yet, on a journal with impact factor of 11.1 in 2022), and describes a very specific topic. Also, the issue of clonal expansion has been puzzling researchers for years (as you might have seen from many of the references I cited).

There is a huge gap between society (non-scientists) and science in specialist journals. As a scientist, the effort I was doing in writing this article was trying to bridge the gap with the knowledge I have acquired so far and a non-scientific user.

Many thanks in advance for your feedback! Ceciliafruet (talk) 21:06, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Ceciliafruet: Wikipedia is a tertiary source, it needs to be based on secondary sources. The universe of knowledge that never makes it to secondary sources cannot be mentioned by tertiary sources such as wikipedia. This concept does not qualify for inclusion in wikipedia; yet. Come back once the paper or concept has significant coverage in secondary sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-04

MediaWiki message delivery 01:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-05

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul Dunărea (Zimnicea) (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul Săgeata (talk) Add sources
1,713 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Ufa (talk) Add sources
24 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start The Cyber Shinobi (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul Ladislau Bölöni (talk) Add sources
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul CFR (Craiova) (talk) Add sources
7 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C David Trubridge (talk) Cleanup
246 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Teledyne FLIR (talk) Cleanup
131 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Kingdom of Tahiti (talk) Cleanup
647 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA AI boom (talk) Expand
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Lhasa (computing) (talk) Expand
32 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer (talk) Expand
253 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Mataram Sultanate (talk) Unencyclopaedic
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Social technology (talk) Unencyclopaedic
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C California Master Plan for Higher Education (talk) Unencyclopaedic
75 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Prussian mythology (talk) Merge
92 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C British Ceylon period (talk) Merge
447 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Thermographic camera (talk) Merge
1,663 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Hermann Hesse (talk) Wikify
23 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Regalia of Romania (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul Otto Greffner (talk) Wikify
54 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Operation Renewed Hope (talk) Orphan
10 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start MindsDB (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Iván Vargas Blanco (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Instituto de Antropología e Historia (talk) Stub
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul Orășenesc (Ovidiu) (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: B Olutasidenib (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Rimma Utyasheva (talk) Stub
33 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Ducal hat of Liechtenstein (talk) Stub
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Tarlatamab (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-06

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar

This award is given in recognition to Stuartyeates for collecting more than 200 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:33, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Streak award

Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears Award

This award is given in recognition to Stuartyeates for collecting at least 50 points during each week of the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2024





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

This Month in Education: January 2024

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

Tech News: 2024-07

MediaWiki message delivery 05:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Upcoming Event in Auckland

You might be interested in an upcoming event in Auckland. Wikimedia Aotearoa is having a WikiCon! WikiCon Aotearoa 2024 is the annual gathering for all new and experienced editors of Wikipedia, Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, and Wikisource projects. Anyone interested in editing is welcome to attend. This conference is organized by Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand (WANZ). It aims to provide training to new editors, to encourage editors to learn new skills, to grow the Wiki community in Auckland and to ensure that we have a fun weekend. Food and refreshments provided.  

When: Saturday 23 March - Sunday 24 March 2024

Where: Auckland University of Technology - Sir Paul Reeves Building - WG Building 2 Governor Fitzroy Place, Auckland.

Cost: $10, fully catered, sponsorship / registration fee waiver available  

We are offering full scholarships (registration, travel & accommodation) to attend - please contact info@wikimedia.nz for more information.

To see the full programme as it develops check out the Wikipedia Event page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiCon_Aotearoa/Auckland_2024

To register: https://events.humanitix.com/wikicon-aotearoa-2024 CopperAlchemy (talk) 01:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-08

MediaWiki message delivery 15:35, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft:TETRA_Mobile_network_codes_in_ITU_MCC_region_2xx_(Europe)

Thanks a lot for the review of my draft page @Stuartyeates . Your comment has been: "I'm seeing zero in depth coverage in secondary sources.". I´m not sure what you are referring to. I guess you say that the lists created just are referenced by the regional regulators and their publications and you would require additional sources on top of this? Is my understanding correct? This process would be different to existing handling of e.g. Mobile_network_codes_in_ITU_region_2xx_(Europe), which reflects the same source handling as I applied to my draft. I appreciate your feedback on this in advance! Maedula (talk) 14:10, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

As a tertiary source, wikipedia must remain silent on subjects without secondary sources. Without this, we're not an encyclopedia. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:13, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Request on 03:09:44, 25 February 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by AWolfSpider


The message left as the reason for taking down the article I wrote said there were sources on google scholar I could use instead of ones cited. I checked google scholar prior to writing the article and there are no relevant sources. The species of spider that was the topic of my article does not have much information so I don't know how to go about finding better sources. AWolfSpider (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

AWolfSpider (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

If I were writing the article I'd be including at least 5-7 of the hits from google scholar in the article. Pretty much everything that isn't just a passing mention. No need to remove existing refs though. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
There are no sources that I could find on google scholar that aren't just passing mentions of the spider. Do I just abandon the page? AWolfSpider (talk) 13:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Napoleonic looting of art in Spain

I guess the author found out how to bypass AfC. My concern is that he/she may create more such articles.

  • The English is also terrible. This is not machine translation from Spanish, it is worse.
  • there is already a Napoleonic looting of art
  • Am I correct in thinking that there is no consequence for new editors bypassing AfC? Elinruby (talk) 06:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
I've PROD'd Napoleonic looting of art in Spain. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. And you are right, the references are terrible Elinruby (talk) 06:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
Btw I put a little work into it but but don't let them cite that to turn down the PROD Elinruby (talk) 06:43, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
1,597 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Navajo Nation (talk) Add sources
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C GenieKnows (talk) Add sources
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Boogami (talk) Add sources
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ufa State Petroleum Technological University (talk) Add sources
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Jalil Keyekbaev (talk) Add sources
87 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (talk) Add sources
322 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Qwant (talk) Cleanup
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start IPTP Networks (talk) Cleanup
110 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Almon Brown Strowger (talk) Cleanup
23,670 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B LinkedIn (talk) Expand
188 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Cybersex trafficking (talk) Expand
1,771 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Threads (social network) (talk) Expand
128 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Internet video (talk) Unencyclopaedic
80 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C King of Easter Island (talk) Unencyclopaedic
29,119 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: FA Nvidia (talk) Unencyclopaedic
82 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: FA Ocean stratification (talk) Merge
54 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (talk) Merge
362 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Thermography (talk) Merge
52 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Business action on climate change (talk) Wikify
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Clyde Hendrick (talk) Wikify
48 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Economics of climate change mitigation (talk) Wikify
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: Start Operation SpecTor (talk) Orphan
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start David W. Kennedy (academician) (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Operation DRYER (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Ministry of Communications, Infrastructure, and Housing (talk) Stub
23 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Viewzi (talk) Stub
60 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Chanda and Munda (talk) Stub
51 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Wikiseek (talk) Stub
112 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Resmetirom (talk) Stub
28 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Yooz (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

Tech News: 2024-10

MediaWiki message delivery 19:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2024





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Tech News: 2024-11

MediaWiki message delivery 23:02, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-12

MediaWiki message delivery 17:38, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

This Month in Education: February 2024

Updated draft page for GRESB per your recommendations

Hi @Stuartyeates: I made several changes to the GRESB draft page per your recommendations. If you have time, I would appreciate your further feedback. Draft:GRESB ESGBencher (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-13

MediaWiki message delivery 18:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Small Press Distribution (talk) Add sources
27 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Parsijoo (talk) Add sources
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Stadionul Fortuna (talk) Add sources
16 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Zetes (company) (talk) Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ladislau Bölöni Stadium (Târgu Mureș) (talk) Add sources
783 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bashkirs (talk) Add sources
107 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Project Zero (talk) Cleanup
85 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Hissein Brahim Taha (talk) Cleanup
131 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Fairness (machine learning) (talk) Cleanup
1,418 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B 2023–24 NFL playoffs (talk) Expand
1,485 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Paytm (talk) Expand
30,376 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Election Commission of India (talk) Expand
132 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Googlewhack (talk) Unencyclopaedic
888 Quality: High, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: GA Peter Singer (talk) Unencyclopaedic
44 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Climate change education (talk) Unencyclopaedic
49 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Borteyman Sports Complex (talk) Merge
2,007 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B First-past-the-post voting (talk) Merge
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Bromous acid (talk) Merge
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Congress Hall, Ufa (talk) Wikify
66 Quality: High, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: GA Pier 57 (talk) Wikify
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start David Kuo (author) (talk) Wikify
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Robert McBlair (talk) Orphan
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start R-187 Azart (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Bryant Villeponteau (talk) Orphan
67 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Triangle mesh (talk) Stub
21 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Giovanni Bianchini (talk) Stub
76 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Quthbullapur (talk) Stub
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Anghel Iordănescu Stadium (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Ministry of Social Development (Guatemala) (talk) Stub
62 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Info.com (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Your userpage

[[ Hi, just a question. The redirect on your user page leads me to a page which has as the only text "To enable the newcomer homepage, visit your "Newcomer editor features" settings in Preferences. Return to Main Page." It's your user page, so if that was the intention, no problem, but perhaps you thought we would see something else? Fram (talk) 08:25, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi User:Fram. I've been playing with Special:Homepage, which is a relatively new innovation from the WMF. It appears to interact poorly with redirects and not-logged-in users. To be honest, I'd prefer WMF fixed their stuff. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
Who wouldn't :-) Thanks for the reply! Fram (talk) 09:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
User:Fram, worked out what I was doing wrong. See Special:Impact/Stuartyeates / Special:Impact/Fram. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Oh, thanks, interesting! Fram (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

Tech News: 2024-14

MediaWiki message delivery 03:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello Stuartyeates,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-15

MediaWiki message delivery 23:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

The page <name> has been reviewed.

@Stuartyeates and @Utopes I would like to ask for advice. I have a lot of notifications and many of them are "The page <name> has been reviewed."

However, some of the articles that I created did not get that notification. Kurk Lietuvai is one example, but there could be more. Did I do something wrong or should have done something better?

I am asking you two, because you seem to be very experienced editors and some of my “reviewed” notifications have your nicknames next to the them.

Best regards,
Frequently.by.train (talk) 15:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi Frequently.by.train. Page review is one of of the quality control processes here. There is a high backlog, but there are occasionally backlog drives to get the numbers down. As far as I can tell you've done nothing wrong. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @Stuartyeates!
I had another look at my notifications and the page mentioned in my example seems to be the only one (of those that I created) without "reviewed".
What difference on/for Wikipedia does it make if an article has been "reviewed" or not? Does it in any way indicate lower quality, if it's not reviewed? I tried to make one as good as I could, so this would be a gut punch. 😅
Best regards,
Frequently.by.train (talk) 15:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Frequently.by.train I'm sure there's a statistical difference in quality, because there are a few odd things that get caught in review, but being unreviewed is not a bad thing. All my new pages are unreviewed when I create them, and I've been here nearly 20 years. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)