User talk:Stuartyeates/Archive 23
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 |
New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020
Hello Stuartyeates,
- Your help can make a difference
NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.
- Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate
In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.
- Discussions and Resources
- A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
- Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
- A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
- Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2020
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2020
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:150 Women in 150 words
Hello, Stuartyeates. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "150 Women in 150 words".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:23, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Collections Now Available (September 2020)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up for new accounts and research materials on the Library Card platform:
- Al Manhal – Arabic journals and ebooks
- Ancestry.com – Genealogical and historical records
- RILM – Music encyclopedias
Many other partnerships are listed on our partners page, including Adam Matthew, EBSCO, Gale and JSTOR.
A significant portion of our collection now no longer requires individual applications to access! Read more in our recent blog post.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 09:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
This Month in GLAM: August 2020
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Sarah Ann Elsom for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sarah Ann Elsom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Ann Elsom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Phanachet (talk) 19:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2020
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Polish people of New Zealand descent
A tag has been placed on Category:Polish people of New Zealand descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Survey on proposed 2021 Wikimedia Aotearoa conference
Hi there, as an editor in Aotearoa I wanted to let you know about the survey currently running to catch people's interest in an in-person conference in 20201. Here is the link - it's open til 18 November. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/K37CY2B MurielMary (talk) 10:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2020
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Stuartyeates,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2020
| ||||||
The article Bror Erik Friberg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Old article with one source about a person that doesn't meet notability guidelines.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StartOkayStop (talk) 08:40, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- That reads like one of the representative bios. What do you think, Stuart? Schwede66 09:02, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- There's quite a bit of stuff about him, I've added a ton of references to the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
academicbio
Are you ok with me tweaking your academicbio template for a few minor issues; mostly MOS-related? Schwede66 23:09, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2020
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: December 2020
| ||||||
New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now (February 2021)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is announcing new free, full-access, accounts to reliable sources as part of our research access program. You can sign up to access research materials on the Library Card platform:
- Taxmann – Taxation and law database
- PNAS – Official journal of the National Academy of Sciences
- EBSCO – New Arabic and Spanish language databases added
We have a wide array of other collections available, and a significant number now no longer require individual applications to access! Read more in our blog post.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects!
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
--12:57, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2021
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2021
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
"Cake-Tin" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Cake-Tin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Cake-Tin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 13:36, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2021
| ||||||
Hundred-year-old, questionable, ethnography is not appropriate here
Not sure what the age has to do with it. Many of these are attributed or support uncontroversial information so even if they are questionable they could still be useful. Not sure these deletions are appropriate and the canned edit summary doesn't help. Aircorn (talk) 11:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- It's a classic case of Wikipedia:OLDSOURCES; Best's books are now considered superseded (and I'm not removing his peer-reviewed stuff). Stuartyeates (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Garrick Cooper for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Garrick Cooper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
nearlyevil665 10:47, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2021
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:01, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
MAP International
Hello, thanks for the feedback on my recent edits on MAP International...usually what I do is more minor edits, so I may have erred. You said I didn't provide an adequate explanation for the changes, but I thought that's what I did in the "edit summary" when I listed my brief reasons and used sources. What can I do differently moving forward? NashvilleNathan (talk) 03:54, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
(1) Content doesn't get removed because 'the case was dismissed'; if you have a source that says it as dismissed, you can add content saying that it was dismissed, but not remove the original content. (2) The entire MAP International article is based on primary sources, it seriously needs more tertiary sources, not the removal of them. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:23, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Bare URLs
I really wish you would not use bare URLs when adding references. It's acceptable for beginners to allow bare URLs so that referencing happens at all. In my books, it really isn't acceptable for experienced editors. Schwede66 22:38, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
My standard practice is to add bare URLs and then use reflinks to fill them in. Reflinks has been unreliable recently, which is why the second step has been failing more frequently. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:26, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: May 2021
| ||||||
Concern regarding Draft:Thomas George Macarthy
Hello, Stuartyeates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thomas George Macarthy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
"Category:Māori langauge revivalists" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Category:Māori langauge revivalists. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 16#Category:Māori langauge revivalists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:33, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
New Zealand Romney
Hi, Stuart Yeates, I hope you are well! I never attach much or indeed any importance to the importance parameter of Wikiproject banners, but – just a thought – I did wonder if that of the most numerous sheep breed in one of the world's principal sheep-producing countries might perhaps be higher than 'low'? It's fine with me either way, of course. Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
- JustlettersandnumbersThe evaluation of importance is automated and not a manual choice I made. You're more than welcome to change it if you like. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
The article Tony Foster has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Slim notability claim
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --- Possibly ☎ 02:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
- User:Schwede66 / User:Possibly thanks. See Tony Foster and Tony Foster (artist). Both of the could do with a ton more work, but they both seem to belong here. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive
Hello Stuartyeates:
WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.
Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 2500 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.
This Month in GLAM: June 2021
| ||||||
Thank you for providing feedback on Draft:Boris_Maciejovsky
I appreciate the time you took to go over my submitted draft.
In response to your comment, I made some edits to include more independent sources. Wikipedia:Independent sources states that independent sources are third party sources and that peer-reviewed articles meet these criteria in the absence of conflicts of interests. In the section on "Conflicts of Interests," the site states that "Caution is needed on topics with large commercial interests at stake, where controversy may be manufactured, and genuinely controversial topics where there may be a great deal of honest debate and dissent." I double checked the citations used for the draft and none of them appear to have any conflicts of interests; neither are they funded by companies nor do they deal with controversial subjects. I thus believe that the peer-reviewed academic publications in footnotes 12-18 meet the strict criteria for independence, as peer-review is the gold standard in scientific publications.
In the revised draft, I also included additional press coverage about the work of the author (footnotes: 3-8) and his TEDx talk, which was organized by a third party organization and thus also meets independence (footnotes: 19-21).
I also included links to the wikipedia pages of his co-authors in the last sentence of the last paragraph. And provided sources to the biography section (footnotes: 9-11).
Finally, I followed your advice and deleted all peacock references ('best', 'numerous').
Again, many thanks for taking the time to improve the submission!
- "I thus believe that the peer-reviewed academic publications in footnotes 12-18 meet the strict criteria for independence, as peer-review is the gold standard in scientific publications." Peer review articles written by you are not independent of you AND they don't contain in-depth coverage of you. You've still got a long way to go on the sources. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Request on 21:40:45, 16 July 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by DaffodilOcean
Thank you for taking the time to look at Draft:Clare Reimers that I submitted to Articles for Creation. Reimers is an academic so she should be evaluated for notability using subject-specific guidelines, in her case WP:PROF is appropriate. Given this, she meets criteria #3 for WP:PROF because she is an elected "fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor". In her case she is a fellow of the American Geophysical Union and a fellow of The Oceanography Society, both of which are mentioned on her page in the section on 'Awards'. Can you please reconsider this submission given this information?
DaffodilOcean (talk) 21:40, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Draft Theta Network
I don't understand your criticism. I used the US patent office which is independent. I cited Bloomberg, CNN, Forbes, Huffington Post and other publishers which are independent. When mentioning some of the partnerships with Theta such as the World Poker Tour, I made sure to use the World Poker Tour's own press release which is independent confirmation as both the World Poker Tour and Theta are in alignment with the fact that such an agreement exists (and they would be the ones who would know). I also used three of the most reliable cryptocurrency websites for outside verification (binanceresearch, coinbureau and aboutbitcoin.io.). This cryptocurrency clearly qualifies as something noteworthy given its partnerships and current use and I have used as many independent sources as I can find. Unless you want me to cite github (https://github.com/thetatoken) which is where most of the code can be found (as I think that it is mostly open-source), I don't know what else you expect. With the exception of sites like the US patent office, coinbureau and aboutbitcoin which I utilized, no one covers cryptocurrencies in any great detail.Eincrat (talk) 12:59, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
Layton Reid
Hi my creation of Layton Reid was unapproved by a previous editor, her account was suspended because she had multiple accounts and she also happened to approach the subject person 'Layton Reid' and asked him to pay her to approve the page. I believed she rejected the article on purpose for financial gains rather than the suggested reason. Bill cai1992 12:21, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
- This is about Draft:Layton Reid? Whatever motivations User:Jenyire2 / User:Mariah200 maybe have had, half the references in that article don't mention his name and most of the rest aren't independent. You can always leave the draft for a bit and see whether more sources get published. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:36, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
Use of circumflex as substitute for macron
Please take a look at the Google results for "Mâori". This does occur a lot (in particular many European keyboard layouts have easy access to â so people who have French keyboard layouts or the like are liable to use it in preference to ā). The Beehive have also used it a lot in the past, presumably for technological reasons. I'll try to dig up some worthwhile citations that can be added. —porges 02:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Found at least a reference to this in a book so have cited it. —porges 02:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Uni of Canterbury
I don't think there is much more point in engaging them in discussion, think best to just wait it out and see if others join the conversation. Will keep an eye on the page otherwise. — NZFC(talk)(cont) 09:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Hello. More than 10 years ago you tagged this article for notability. You may be interested in the deletion proposal. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 16:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Thornley has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
nearlyevil665 07:54, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
A pie for you!
|
Thank you for helping with the query for the AfC backlog drive leaderboard, and for helping to keep it updated! Enterprisey (talk!) 07:56, 28 July 2021 (UTC) |
Request on 22:20:28, 2 August 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by JMH2021
JMH2021 (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello Stuartyeates, thank you fo the feedback. Would you please undelete my work so I can keep working on it? Thank you very much. JMH2021 (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2021 (UTC)JMH2021
- Hi JMH2021, I beleive what you're looking for is at Draft:Candyce_M._Kelshall, you may need to scroll down or look on the history tab. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:43, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: July 2021
| ||||||
New Wikipedia Library collections and design update (August 2021)
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library is pleased to announce the addition of new collections, alongside a new interface design. New collections include:
- Cabells – Scholarly and predatory journal database
- Taaghche - Persian language e-books
- Merkur, Musik & Ästhetik, and Psychologie, Psychotherapie, Psychoanalyse - German language magazines and journals published by Klett-Cotta
- Art Archiv, Capital, Geo, Geo Epoche, and Stern - German language newspapers and magazines published by Gruner + Jahr
Additionally, De Gruyter and Nomos have been centralised from their previous on-wiki signup location on the German Wikipedia. Many other collections are freely available by simply logging in to The Wikipedia Library with your Wikimedia login!
We are also excited to announce that the first version of a new design for My Library was deployed this week. We will be iterating on this design with more features over the coming weeks. Read more on the project page on Meta.
Lastly, an Echo notification will begin rolling out soon to notify eligible editors about the library (T132084). If you can translate the notification please do so at TranslateWiki!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 13:23, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
Draft resubmitted
Hi Stuart, I'm pretty sure this is not the correct way to message someone on Wikipedia, but I couldn't figure out how to do so otherwise. I've resubmitted the article on John Coverdale with substantial edits, and I'm happy to make additional changes if you think they are necessary. Mtrngi1919 (talk) 01:05, 16 August 2021 (UTC) |}
Indigenous studies redirect removed
Stuartyeates
Hi, just to let you know I've removed the redirect from Indigenous studies to Indigenous people and will be working on expanded the article. MassiveEartha (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi MassiveEartha, that's all good. If it's under construction for a while, you might want to move it to draft. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Draft page for review
Kia ora! Hoping that I can tempt you to review Draft:Jocelyn Harris if you have a moment; it's just been added to the AFC list. With best wishes, Somej (talk) 09:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- I took the liberty of tracking down her PhD thesis and doing some tidying. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Congratulations from WikiProject Articles for Creation!
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar & The Teamwork Barnstar | 
|
| Congratulations! You have earned The Tireless Contributor Barnstar and The Teamwork Barnstar for reviewing 81 drafts and doing 45 re-reviews during the WikiProject Articles for creation July 2021 Backlog Drive. Thank you for your work to improve Wikipedia! On behalf of WikiProject Articles for Creation, Enterprisey (talk!) 00:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC) |
This Month in GLAM: August 2021
| ||||||
New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021
Hello Stuartyeates,
Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.
Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.
At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.
There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.
Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:52, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary-Beth Sharp has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Stuartyeates (talk) 00:44, 17 September 2021 (UTC)- Stuartyeates, How does this make sense? Accepting an AfC draft that you yourself submitted? ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- TheAafi, I note that Stuart has created a few thousand articles over the years. Schwede66 00:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Schwede66, I see. Thanks. I thought adding an AfC tag was unnecessary. They could've managed to move the draft to mainspace without adding AfC tag to it. Anyways, I'm happy with your response. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi User:TheAafi, I rescued the draft in very poor state and improved it. I then attempted to get some second opinions (I have been known to get caught up in things) then promoted it ~10 hours later after no one screamed. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:39, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Schwede66, I see. Thanks. I thought adding an AfC tag was unnecessary. They could've managed to move the draft to mainspace without adding AfC tag to it. Anyways, I'm happy with your response. ─ The Aafī (talk) 06:11, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- TheAafi, I note that Stuart has created a few thousand articles over the years. Schwede66 00:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I have a search set up for drafts that contain the word artist, which is how I came across the above. I saw your note and poked around to find more sources. The first three currently in the article are new (Washington Post 2008, a public radio station and Cleveland.com). I do think the coverage is all about the same person. In any case, I resubmitted it, in case you are in the mood to review it again. Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 02:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Hello again. I ended up adding nine good sources to the article. That has established notability and I have moved it to article space. Your input is of course most welcome there! Thanks. --- Possibly ☎ 05:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Stewart Murray Wilson
On 12 October 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Stewart Murray Wilson, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 09:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: September 2021
| ||||||
Ways to improve Garth Cooper
Hello, Stuartyeates,
Thank you for creating Garth Cooper.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
* The academic career section in this article does not address the career of this person. It speaks to a conflict this Professor was engaged in. Hence, this is not encyclopaedic in nature.
- Please avail of the information given in WP:SOURCES and provide appropriate information about this person's academic career. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 03:20, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Kendall Clements
Hello, Stuartyeates,
Thank you for creating Kendall Clements.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
* The academic career section in this article does not address the career of this person. It speaks to a conflict this Professor was engaged in. Hence, this is not encyclopaedic in nature.
- Please avail of the information given in WP:SOURCES and provide appropriate information about this person's academic career. Thank you.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Robert Nola
Hello, Stuartyeates,
Thank you for creating Robert Nola.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The academic career section in this article does not address the career of this person. It speaks to a conflict this Professor was engaged in. Hence, this is not encyclopaedic in nature. Consider the Wikipedia policy for Academics at WP:NACADEMIC and do the needful. You may also wish to avail of the information given in WP:SOURCES and provide appropriate information about this person's academic career.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 03:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Ways to improve Doug Elliffe
Hello, Stuartyeates,
Thank you for creating Doug Elliffe.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
** The academic career section in this article does not address the career of this person. It speaks to a conflict this Professor was engaged in. Hence, this is not encyclopaedic in nature.
- Consider the Wikipedia policy for Academics at WP:NACADEMIC and do the needful. You may also wish to avail of the information given in WP:SOURCES and provide appropriate information about this person's academic career.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 09:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 backlog drive
| New Page Patrol | November 2021 Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
Elizabeth Rata
Hi Stuart, I'm unsure if you saw the legal threats that were made yesterday on Elizabeth Rata. I wonder if you wouldn't mind just taking a cursive look at the page, even though I know you recently edited the page, to ensure that it meets the standard of a biography of a living person? Thank you! Nauseous Man (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the heads-up, Nauseous Man, I'll take a look at this. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:14, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
"Wīwī" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wīwī. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 7#Wīwī until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Blanket move discussion NZ your vote
Hallo Stuartyeates,
You have participated in a previous vote. There is a blanket move discussion initated by User:Spekkios to revert your vote on other pages which is here: Talk:Fox_Glacier_/_Te_Moeka_o_Tuawe#Requested_move_2_November_2021 in case you are not aware of it yet. Gryffindor (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: October 2021
| ||||||
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Mary-Beth Sharp for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary-Beth Sharp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Nauseous Man (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your participation in the November 2021 New Pages Patrol drive
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| For reviewing at least 10 articles during the drive. |
Thank you for reviewing or re-reviewing 15 articles, which helped contribute to an overall 1276-article reduction in the backlog during the drive. (t · c) buidhe 12:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: November 2021
| ||||||
Thanks for Bunkie Board
Thanks for the prodding on Bunkie board. I added some info and sources, and left a note on its talk page. -- ke4roh (talk) 13:13, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:40, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of George Turnbull Niccol
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on George Turnbull Niccol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TL | The Legend talk 02:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Niccol
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Henry Niccol requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TL | The Legend talk 02:47, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Henry Niccol moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Henry Niccol, is not suitable as written to remain published. The wrong volume of DNZB was cited; I fixed it. There may possibly be enough material there for an article, but the present article does not show it. ). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 02:30, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: December 2021
| ||||||
This Month in GLAM: December 2021
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I see you've rejected Draft:Liz Fong-Jones for "references... do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Seems weird - among the 54 (!) references on that page, quite a few seem quite indepth, independent, and reliable. For example:
- https://www.businessinsider.com/google-engineer-liz-fong-jones-alleges-harassment-cover-up-2018-10 - focused on her
- https://www.businessinsider.com/google-engineer-fong-jones-leaves-company-2019-1 - focusing on her
- https://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2019/01/07/liz-fong-jones-google-leaving-for-startup-goog.html - focused on her
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2019-06-10/tech-diversity-and-inclusion-efforts-haven-t-worked-advocate-fong-jones-says-video - focused on her
- https://www.fastcompany.com/90275462/meet-the-google-engineer-getting-its-workers-ready-to-strike - focused on her
- https://www.fastcompany.com/90250497/the-inclusion-advocate-liz-fong-jones - focused on her
- https://www.wired.com/story/inside-google-three-years-misery-happiest-company-tech/ - not completely focused on her, but 25 mentions
That looks like quite a bit, honestly. Que pasa? --GRuban (talk) 20:35, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Articles that are based around her tweets, google+ posts and/or interviews of her are not independent. The wired one is rock-solid, but most of these are not indepth, independent journalism. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:05, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- You have a point, WP:INTERVIEW says there is a debate about how much to count interviews for notability; but they are not all interviews, much of each of them are in the journalist's words, they are all long, indepth, independent of each other, about the subject, and I'm not at all sure I picked the best seven, there may be better ones. Then there are 54 references. And the article is well written. That does all add up. I'm pretty sure this article would pass WP:AFD. However, I'm not really the author, so wouldn't want to step on his toes. @SquareInARoundHole: Would you like to
- look for more sources, or
- get a third opinion, or
- we can be WP:BOLD, put it in mainspace and possibly go through an WP:AFD if Stuart or someone else nominates it? --GRuban (talk) 19:54, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
- @GRuban: It's only my second article, so I would like a more experienced third party put some work into it before pushing it through to the mainspace. I do believe that this is a Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red and Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies issue, and I'm more alarmed after she was removed from the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women project. She is also verified on Twitter, which in many ways has more strict policies on notability. I'm wondering if Portal:Transgender might be able to help us here? SquareInARoundHole (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe @Tbhotch: or @CybJubal: can give some direction or assistance? My investment in this subject is around increasing both the representation of notable women and LGBT people in science and technology on WP. SquareInARoundHole (talk) 16:51, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Sceptre: You may also be interested in weighing in on how to get Draft:Liz Fong-Jones ready for mainspace? I believe she is sufficiently notable, but I'm still new enough that I may have done her a disservice in my article writing that it just needs cleaning up. SquareInARoundHole (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: January 2022
| ||||||
WP:AFC Helper News
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
- AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
- The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Meeting Invitation: to establish Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Inc ("WANZ Inc") as an Incorporated Society and register as a charitable entity
Kia ora,
We are meeting on Thursday 17 March at 7.30pm on Zoom to establish Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Inc ("WANZ Inc") as an Incorporated Society. Please do join us. You can find more information here
Einebillion (talk) 07:14, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Article for Susie Woods
Kia ora, I note you have a tag on the page for Susie Wood saying it needs more secondary sources. Perhaps this could be reconsidered? I have added more information and references today and none of these could be called primary. No problem either way, just making a courtesy contact to explore the best forward to improve this article. Kind regards.Realitylink (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
- Refs 4,5,6,12,13,14,15,18,19,24,25,26,27,43 and 44 have her as an author. Many more are published by her employer or a collaborator. These are primary sources and most of the article is sourced to them. We are trying to be a tertiary source, which means cutting out everything sourced to a primary source. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:20, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2022
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Melodownz and primary sources
Kia ora Stuart, could you point to me which primary sources you were referring to when you added the banner to Melodownz? I'm a little confused. --Prosperosity (talk) 03:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Monique Eloit
Hello, Stuartyeates. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Monique Eloit, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:27, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Monique Eloit
Hello, Stuartyeates. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Monique Eloit".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Moana Jackson
On 4 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Moana Jackson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 01:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2022
| ||||||
Notice that you are now subject to a topic ban
Greetings, Stuartyeates. This message is to inform you that, pursuant to a community consensus, you have been indefinitely topic banned from the subject area of biographies of living persons. BLP in this context has been specifically defined by Arbcom as follows: "any edit in any article with biographical content relating to living or recently deceased people or any edit relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles on any page in any namespace"
. This ban will be logged at WP:EDRC. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, ~Swarm~ {sting} 17:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
New Wikipedia Library Collections Available Now - April 2022
Hello Wikimedians!
The Wikipedia Library has free access to new paywalled reliable sources. You can these and dozens more collections at https://wikipedialibrary.wmflabs.org/:
- Wiley – journals, books, and research resources, covering life, health, social, and physical sciences
- OECD – OECD iLibrary, Data, and Multimedia published by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development
- SPIE Digital Library – journals and eBooks on optics and photonics applied research
Many other sources are freely available for experienced editors, including collections which recently became accessible to all eligible editors: Cambridge University Press, BMJ, AAAS, Érudit and more.
Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: log in today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 13:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.
I'm not seeing a single independent secondary source on the above article. On what basis did you promote it from draftspace? 174.212.227.174 (talk) 20:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sources such as https://www.edcan.ca/awards/the-ken-spencer-award/2015-winners/ https://www.tricitynews.com/local-news/education-spotlight-teachers-at-coquitlam-school-finalists-for-cmolik-prize-3052569 https://reporter.mcgill.ca/introducing-mcgills-newest-loran-scholars/ https://www.tricitynews.com/local-news/the-hug-that-turned-a-foster-kid-into-a-son-3063362 Stuartyeates (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
- Passing mentions don't speak to notability and school newspapers are not generally considered reliable sources. The existence of sources isn't what your looking at when reviewing AfC submissions, it's the state of the draft. Also, if you're thinking that employees or students winning awards speaks to notability, that too is incorrect. See WP:INHERIT. 174.212.227.174 (talk) 09:08, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- If you have a problem with the article, I won't hold it against you if you put it up for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:56, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2022
| ||||||
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Tech News: 2022-20
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.
Changes later this week
- Some wikis can soon use the add a link feature. This will start on Wednesday. The wikis are Catalan Wikipedia, Hebrew Wikipedia, Hindi Wikipedia, Korean Wikipedia, Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia, Portuguese Wikipedia, Simple English Wikipedia, Swedish Wikipedia, Ukrainian Wikipedia. This is part of the progressive deployment of this tool to more Wikipedias. The communities can configure how this feature works locally. [1]
- The Wikimedia Hackathon 2022 will take place online on May 20–22. It will be in English. There are also local hackathon meetups in Germany, Ghana, Greece, India, Nigeria and the United States. Technically interested Wikimedians can work on software projects and learn new skills. You can also host a session or post a project you want to work on.
The new version of MediaWiki will be on test wikis and MediaWiki.org from 17 May. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis and some Wikipedias from 18 May. It will be on all wikis from 19 May (calendar).
Future changes
- You can soon edit translatable pages in the visual editor. Translatable pages exist on for examples Meta and Commons. [2]
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.
18:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
"Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 17#Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:54, 17 May 2022 (UTC)