User talk:Theroadislong/Archive 60

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 55 ← Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62 → Archive 65

Request on 00:22:33, 21 August 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Stagename2020


Hi, you just reviewed my article about Articles of Unity. Thank you so much for taking the time to review it. I wanted to clarify some things to make sure I can resubmit the article and have it accepted.

You said that Twitter, Soundcloud, and Youtube are not considered reliable sources. I was curious if you can clarify some things.

1. The citations "Rising - The Hill TV- Unity 2020 Plan". www.youtube.com. Retrieved 2020-08-19. and "Bret Weinstein Introduces the Unity 2020 Plan on Tucker Carlson Tonight". www.youtube.com. June 29, 2020. are links to videos from mainstream news sources, the Hill TV and Fox News, respectively. Can youtube be considered a reliable source when it is a video of a mainstream news source or do I need to cite this another way?

2. Citations 11-15, including one twitter citation and some of the youtube videos, are links to messages or podcasts where different public figures endorse the Articles of Unity. Are twitter and youtube considered reliable sources in this case or do I need to cite these endorsements another way?

I will make sure to flush it out with more media sources if they arise. Thank you for your help :)

Stagename2020 (talk) 00:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Hey Theroadislong, I know that you must be busy with the work you are doing within and outside of wikipeidia but I just wanted to follow up on my questions in case they got lost among the other questions. Can you please help clarify the questions I had above? Thank You. Stagename2020 (talk) 23:14, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Stagename2020 As commented by another reviewer the draft needs independent sources, far too many of the sources are primary such as Bret's own YouTube channel. You are free to re-submit, I will leave it to another reviewer to look at. Theroadislong (talk) 07:05, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Review of Yasmeen Williams Page

Thank you so much for your feedback and suggestions. I've paired back even further, added some additional sources, and fixed (fingers crossed the external links in the text). I think (hope?) it's in good shape now and I'm going to resubmit!

Toadalicious (talk) 23:35, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Question on a comment you made

Hello. So recently you commented on Draft:Elijah Joyce. I would like to discuss it with you. I do not see how you can approve of the deletion on a draft. There is so much more information on Joyce that I am working on adding, but I can't add it all in 7 days. Like in my mind, it is worthless to try to fight a deletion, even when I know he is notable. In a sense, I can't even work to prove he is notable without it being deleted. It is the same as if I went to your most recent draft and started the deletion process a few hours after you started the draft. Can you possibly recant that comment so I can attempt to prove his notability before the deletion process? Thank you. CurrentWeather (talk) 11:00, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

CurrentWeather You can offer the sources you have in the deletion discussion, even if you don't have time to write up the article content they will support. 331dot (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
CurrentWeather the discussion takes around 7 days you have plenty of time to provide the sources that establish any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
I understand it takes 7 days, but I am so frustrated. My draft shouldn't be complained at UNLESS I haven't edited it for 6 months. Look at Draft:Poundz. It has almost 0 content but it won't be deleted because they author has 6 months to edit it and make it good. My draft has 7 days to become an amazing article otherwise it is deleted. So stupid why people don't give others a chance. CurrentWeather (talk) 11:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
It should take you less than 5 minutes to find sources if he is notable. Theroadislong (talk) 11:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Maria Mallaband

Hi

you have just messaged me as i am trying to update our Company profile. I am unsure how to do this as it is factually incorrect and is showing an old logo. There is also reference to a tragic incident in 2012. This is really upsetting our residents and staff, that is is published on Wikipedia. Thank you Jackie Hallewell — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackie Hallewell (talk • contribs) 11:37, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't have profiles, it has articles about notable subjects, if you would like any changes to be made, you will need to discuss this on the article talk page, but the content you want removed is very reliably sourced so is unlikely to be removed. There is no logo showing in the article? Theroadislong (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:collegeinsider.in

hi Theroadislong i found out that Draft:collegeinsider.in is rejected for review , kindly guide me what i lack in this draft and that notability things in confusing and if possible kinldy guide me what all changes i need to do to bring it for article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanrabbit96 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft Draft:Collegeinsider.in lacks any independent sources, the topic appears to not be sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Hempress Sativa

Hi there,

I made a number of changes in accordance with your guidance a couple of months back.

I'd be grateful if you could review it when you get the opportunity.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBalticCount (talk • contribs) 18:18, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

If you don't mind I will leave it to another reviewer, I don't see how they pass WP:NMUSICIAN. Theroadislong (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Help Theroadislong! :)

Hello Theroadislong, Please help me. my dads name is wrong on this page and i need your help im not sure how else to change it. ive tried everything. His name is not JOSE DE JESUS GUTIERREZ REBOLLO, it is JESUS HECTOR GUTIERREZ REBOLLO. below i will add citations to the very best of my ability. I also have my birth certificate, his death certificate, and all sort of legal paperwork, your help would be invaluable to my family and I.

https://mvsnoticias.com/noticias/seguridad-y-justicia/confirma-sedena-muerte-de-gutierrez-rebollo-247/

https://aristeguinoticias.com/0706/mexico/inai-ordena-a-sedena-desclasificar-expediente-del-zar-antidrogas-gutierrez-rebollo/

https://www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2013/12/19/934684 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgutierrezrebollopriego (talk • contribs) 16:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

 Done. Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Cedar Point peninsula

All three of you “reviewers” just now proved my point 100%. The Cedar Point peninsula is obviously a verifiable geographic location. Your personal dispute about my lack of formatting knowledge on here, is in no way, whatsoever, applicable to the truth-worthiness of that article. (If the formatting issues were a problem for YOU, then why didn’t you...an EXPERIENCED FORMATTER.....simply expend a few seconds to fix the formatting, rather than kill the whole article????) [Nor did the other two reviewers reasoning for the ‘declining’, take into consideration the actual truth-worthiness of the article, itself. So I give-up attempting to reason with the entirely false reasoning from you (plural) reviewers. ]

Nobody is doubting that it is a verifiable geographic location, but Wikipedia articles need to be notable and we show they are notable by providing sources which cover the topic with in-depth coverage. Your draft Draft:Cedar Point peninsula (Ohio) had one link which was a passing mention. If you are not prepared to do the work, why are you here? Theroadislong (talk) 16:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

That reference indeed mentions Cedar Point pensula IN-DEPTH...(but not if you already prejudiced yourself against my formatting skills). WHERE exactly in wiki’s regulations, does it say that contributors must become fluent in every aspect of Wikipedia, to be able to contribute? (In fact, contributors don’t even need to be ‘members’ to contribute here. Despite your own apparent confusion to the contrary.)

The link [1] is most definitely not in-depth coverage. Theroadislong (talk) 17:27, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps instead of you making obviously ill-informed comments....instead, why not simply try using the google-books search-box (for that very book), by using the search term “Cedar Point”. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:C878:174B:40C1:DDD4 (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2020 (UTC) In case you don’t understand how to use the book’s search-box: https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=wNMyAQAAMAAJ&q=%E2%80%9CCedar+Point+Pleasure+resort%E2%80%9D&redir_esc=y#v=snippet&q=%E2%80%9CCedar%20point%E2%80%9D&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:C878:174B:40C1:DDD4 (talk) 17:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Which gives one mention. Theroadislong (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Ummmmm....keep trying the book-search-box, my friend....you will succeed in discovering page after page about it (several pages which are entirely devoted specifically to this exact subject). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:C878:174B:40C1:DDD4 (talk) 17:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC) If you still mysteriously have no luck with the search-box, try this page: https://books.google.com/books?q=%E2%80%9CCedar+point+then+was%E2%80%9D&id=wNMyAQAAMAAJ&output=text — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:C878:174B:40C1:DDD4 (talk) 18:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

What ever... in the time you have been ranting at me, you could have been adding sources to the draft, I'm finished here, please don't post on my page again. Theroadislong (talk) 18:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

And, in the time that you have been wasting, you could have simply granted article-status to my draft (so that it would be worth MY while to continue improving it. History of Erie County Ohio: With Illustrations and Biographical ... Lewis Cass Aldrich · 1889 · Erie County (Ohio) “”Cedar Point then was a bit of wild land seven miles long sheltering , by its long arms , Sandusky bay . It was covered with timber , and a sandy beach edged the shore . ”” — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1009:B16D:882D:C878:174B:40C1:DDD4 (talk) 18:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Article: Centrinian Publishing

Hi,

The article Centrinian Publishing was rejected with the following reason: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Can you please what this means please as the company is a book publisher, but there has been no glorification of the company, just the description of what the company does?

Is there something that needs to be done to have it approved?

Draft Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Centrinian_Publishing

Wikipedia only publishes articles for topics that have received significant coverage in reliable sources your draft has none of these. Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Article: Centrinian Publishing

Hi,

Thanks for your response. I'm not sure if I'm replying in the right place, but I just wanted to respond to your message. I'm one of the owners of the company. This is not a paid editing. I created the article so the company can have a page where people can find out more about the company. There is definitely no payment for creating the article. As I stated, there's no glorification of the company, just a simple description of the company and the kind of material we publish. If you see anything that needs to be changed, I'm happy to do so. ( Eldermagus (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC) ).

That is considered paid editing on Wikipedia and you will need to make the required disclosure on your user page. Wikipedia doesn't host "a page where people can find out more about the company" it has articles about notable topics. Notability of a topic is judged by looking at the depth of coverage in independent, reliable, secondary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 18:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

I am not advertising

Hello Theroadislong, 

          I am Sasi Praneeth Reddy Sadhu, a b.tech persuing student. I want to tell you that I am not advertising in Krishna University page if you think that it is advertising the page of Andhra University and other universities will not have any information. In what kind the text I have added in Krishna University comes under advertising. The text I have added is just the details of the university and also I want to tell you don't think all will advertise in Wikipedia. I am adding details about a Government university which is a non profit university and you are telling that it is advertisement. If you think so, block my account I have no objections because I will edit it, not only it I will add details regarding other universities and colleges in Andhra Pradesh as a resident of Andhra Pradesh.

So, waiting for your response and I will again re edit it. Thank you, Sasi Praneeth Reddy Sadhu (talk)Sasi Praneeth Reddy.SSasi Praneeth Reddy Sadhu (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Content like “committed to producing high-quality scientific minds with global academics.”, “infrastructure is good with labs, neat classrooms and all essential amenities”, and “This brilliant insignia highlights the equal emphasis laid by Krishna University on Humanities, Life sciences, Science and Technology” is just blatant promotional adverting all sourced the university’s own website, we have no interest in what they say about themselves ONLY what independent say. If you keep on adding inappropriate content you will be blocked. Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Cedar Point Peninsula

I've now rejected the submission; not sure how long we could let this guy go on wasting everyone's time (including his own) or really where to report it if it continues. ANI I suppose; not something I want to resort to. Eagleash (talk) 18:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Good call, a weird one that. Theroadislong (talk) 18:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Re: Kate Lord Brown

Have submitted numerous changes to this article (previously rejected for various reference issues). Haven't edited a WP page in years, though - please let me know how (or if) I can make it better. Thanks for your help.

FLJerseyBoy (talk) 20:40, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

You need to find more reliable sources that cover her in-depth, also see the criteria that she needs to meet at WP:NAUTHOR. Theroadislong (talk) 20:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Sonz Of Thunder UK - Re- review

Good afternoon,

I have taken on board what you said out my draft article on Sonz of Thunder.

As a result, I have written it so that it does not appear like a press release as that was the reason it was rejected

please can i plead with you to re review it.

Kind regards

Nkechi36 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkechi36 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The band would need to pass the criteria at WP:NBAND. Your draft has zero sources. Wikipedia is only interested in what people who have no connection with them have chosen to publish about them. The article should be limited to a summary of what such independent reliable sources have said about them.

My article declined

I am new in Wikipedia. Where am I doing wrong I become confused. My article on Success Point College has declined again and again how can I fix the issue please guide me. Because I am the first article writer. How to properly follow the guidelines of Wikipedia please send me the exact rules so that I can write my first article carefully. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SyadRahman (talk • contribs) 12:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Please be aware that writing a new article is difficult, and start by reading your first article: You need to show that the college meets Wikipedia's requirements for notability - Wikipedia is only interested in what people unconnected with the college have published about it in reliable places such as major newspapers. Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Diana Isabel Jervis-Read

Please take note of in-use notices and check when they were added (and by whom!). Fair amount of time spent on that to no effect. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 12:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Really sorry didn't notice, my bad. Theroadislong (talk) 12:28, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Not to worry; BTW (in case you not already ware) that Ohio Peninsula editor got some help from Cyphoidbomb, who fixed his 'draft' and tried to explain. Still don't think he quite understands though. Eagleash (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

September Women in Red edithons

Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media: Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging

How many independent sources do you need for an article to be published

Hey Theroadislong, I realize that there may not be an exact number, but can you tell me how many independent sources you would like to see for a wikipedia article before it is published? I just want a little guidance on the number of citations that I should add before I attempt to resubmit the article for publication. Thanks and I hope you have a good weekend :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stagename2020 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Three good independent, reliable sources is usually sufficient. Theroadislong (talk) 18:10, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

A question on the draft article 'Pomogailo Anatoliy"

Dear Theroadislong, You have added a comment the draft article "Pomogailo Anatoliy". Unfortunately, it has been declined. I have a question - why are the references not enough for Wikipedia? They do show the texts of publications concerning the subject of the article. In addition, the reference to the web-site "math-net.ru", the reference to the web-site of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, the reference to the web-site "lifelib.ru" and the reference to the "Intellectual system of the thematic research of the scientometric data" - all of them are the independant and publidhed sources of information in Russia concerning the subject of the article. All these web-sites are the international data bases of the articles and details about their authors. The subject matter of the article is the Soviet and Russian scientist - so, the information about his articles are the main part of the references. I do not understand - why are they not reliable and not enough for Wikipedia? Could ypu please clarify it? So that I could fix the draft of the article. Looking forward to your reply. Thank you!

Kind regards, Rhodium66 (talk) 20:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)Rhodium66

Rhodium66 The sources you have included do not demonstrate that the subject meets our guidelines for notability. Normally, this is done by showing that the subject has received sustained in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources. Theroadislong (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Sooshi Mango

What more would you like to see - I added that they are comedy trio (@sooshimango), who have a significant audience. Runitwild (talk) 11:26, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Chomeley Ardaniel

Hello!

I am a new user and contributor I have made some revisions already about the reference. for Chomeley Ardaniel. Can you please review the changes. Honestly I have no idea of the tagging syntax and I have tried to make amends just now. Please take a look at it again.

Thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devon Salve (talk • contribs) 16:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft was rejected, the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 16:34, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

James Greeno

Hi--thanks for checking my Wikipedia edits. I am a novice and counting on the community to help get this right. However, the notability concern is unwarranted. Have a look in Google Scholar--you'll find over 9,000 results. No doubt there is work to get everything sourced properly. Please remove that particular flag. Thanks ````Valerie — Preceding unsigned comment added by VLShalin (talk • contribs) 01:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

The notability tag is helpful, in that it shows that the article has not established notability yet, independent sources are required too. Theroadislong (talk) 06:44, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Regarding Barinderjit Singh IPS page review

I am adding references for your perusal please — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mridul095 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Tradesocio

HI Theroadislong. Thank you for reviewing my submission. You left a message for me on my talk page related to the above draft article. I have just fixed the issue and put a reliable source. Please review it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dereena (talk • contribs) 08:49, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

You have not fixed the issue, see WP:SOLUTIONS and also declare any conflict of interest as requested. Theroadislong (talk) 08:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Revelino Irish band

Hi,

I'm fairly new to the community so it is not totally clear why my submission was rejected.

Could you please advise what exactly is require to get this approved.

The band did exist and were fairly popular and well known in Ireland during the 1990's.

Would really love if you could help me out.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palethinboy (talk • contribs) 23:09, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm afraid Palethinboy that none of your sources are considered reliable by Wikipedia, and the band would need to pass the criteria at WP:NBAND, can you suggest how they would? Existing, being fairly popular and well known is not enough. Theroadislong (talk) 06:55, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi,

My sources are reliable, they include Irelands leading Music Magazine & Media Newspapers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palethinboy (talk • contribs) 10:22, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

The pass several more than 1 of the 12 criteria setout in the rules:

1. There are various album & live reviews available online from Hotpress Magazine, The Irish Times and other well known media. 2. Albums & Single have charted in Ireland. http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement Title: DON'T LEAD ME DOWN Artist: REVELINO Label: DIRT Date of entry: 27.04.1995 Highest Placement: 29 Weeks in the Charts: 2 3. n/a 4. n/a 5. 2 Albums released on DiRT records https://www.irishrock.org/labels/dirt.html 6. n/a 7. n/a 8. Nominated for Hotpress awards Irelands biggest music magazine. https://www.hotpress.com/music/the-final-countdown-1994-502485 https://www.hotpress.com/uncategorized/revelinobr47100-greatest-irish-albums-2764140 9. n/a 10. Inclusion in soundtrack to well known movie I Went Down https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126344/soundtrack 11. Yes one example here: https://www.rte.ie/radio1/late-date/programmes/2018/0111/932686-late-date-thursday-11-january-2018/ 12. n/a — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palethinboy (talk • contribs) 10:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for adding some better sources, it would help if Facebook and Discogs were replaced with reliable sources however, I'll let another reviewer take a look. Theroadislong (talk) 10:59, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply to adding content for Max Healthcare

Hi,

I would like to inform you that i am the employee of max healthcare and my motive is only adding correct inforamtion about the max healthcare.

You can contact me: mohit.khatodiya@maxhealthcate.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxhealthcare (talk • contribs) 11:51, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Maxhealthcare You added purely promotional content for example "one of India’s leading healthcare services company". Wikipedia has no interest in what the company wants to say about itself, ONLY what reliable sources have reported. Theroadislong (talk) 12:23, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Sahil Sangwan

Hi, I have just submitted wiki profile about Sahil Sangwan an Indian Pro wrestler which you have declined. Kindly let me know why you declined his page ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deepakkalkal10 (talk • contribs) 14:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Sonz Thunder UK

Good Afternoon

Thank so much for the feed you gave me again. I looked at everything you said and added some sources to the article and I have reworded it as well. I also bear in mind what you said about the author of the article and that wiki prefers the author not to be directly related to the Artist.

I am directly related to them. I saw the group perform and I was impressed and really believed they were fantastic artist. at the time I did not realise my brother's Godmother who I knew since I was born was their auntie. some of their relatives knew my mum from London from the church we used to go to. when I met them, took avid interest in their music and started making sure nothing was neglected on the social media but I never knew them personally and I discovered there was no wiki on them so I decided to right a Wikipedia article on them, I have built a rapport with them having discovered I knew some of their family but I am not directly related so there is no biasness in the article

I have re submitted it would it be possible for you to re review it.

Kind regards

Nkechi36 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nkechi36 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Nkechi36 I'm afraid the content is totally unacceptable which is why it was rejected and not just declined. statements like " the brothers went full stream ahead", "always had a passion for music ", "having realised how talented his children were" "the brothers with their Christian values" etc etc etc. ado not belong in a neutral encyclopedia article.Theroadislong (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Uswa College Islamabad

I have added a reference please check it out Kumail1293 (talk) 18:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Why do you keep declining the Margaret Paul page.

How many independent sources do I need? Wikipedia doesn't have a set amount. I have 4 and you're only claiming that there are two.

She has written numerous books and hold a PhD from an accredited university in her area of expertise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by M52grinnelly (talk • contribs) 21:37, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Two of your sources are to her books, which clearly are NOT independent and do not contribute to any notability Theroadislong (talk) 21:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Is my draft article good enough for publication now?

Hey Theroadislong, I hope you are doing well.

I have expanded the sources on the draft for the article on the "Articles of Unity" since your last comments a week or two ago. Here is the link to the draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Articles_of_Unity. Can you please tell me if it fit the minimal criteria to be published yet? Thank you :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stagename2020 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes, Stagename2020 looks good to me, resubmit and give it a go. Theroadislong (talk) 07:03, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

I have resubmitted it so please take a look at it. Thank You for your advice and help! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stagename2020 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your guidance. Just wondering if there is a step-by-step guide to generating Wikipages? I am trying to be factual around the content as last time I was informed it was too product related. Is it permitted to mention the microfluidics technology? Perhaps including more information and background on the founders would also be recommended----

Draft:Mission Bio

Thank you so much for your guidance. Hopefully I am addressing the concerns. You mentioned that there was too much information around the financing of the company. Do you suggest I add more information about the co-founders and leadership. I would like to also include details about the microfluidics technology. Advice greatly appreciated---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinetogramm (talk • contribs) 20:26, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

You are being paid to edit, I am a volunteer, I have no desire whatsoever to help you. Theroadislong (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Expanding article

Please Don't Reject Me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuchisakeonnanaughty (talk • contribs) 21:17, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Article

Hi, 

 I made edits & added independent references. Kindly review.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaryamAsh (talk • contribs) 12:53, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Just a wall of hagiographic text, how about some paragraphs and some attention to neutral tone. Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Sandbox deletion request

You have requested that my sandbox be deleted on the grounds of advertising. But my sandbox is completely blank? I believe you've done this by mistake? TurboGUY (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry yes, a lot of sandboxes suddenly appeared in WP:AFC full of spam, but guess it was some sort of glitch in the matrix? Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Okay, not to worry! TurboGUY (talk) 15:17, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply:

Please do not leave that public on my page lol that you could’ve message me any kind of way personally JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

ref Draft:Lil Kei all content is viewable by anyone here there are no secrets? Theroadislong (talk) 11:21, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Not being secretive I want you to do the same with other users my client is as important as everyone else’s, we at OMO do not support personal information being available publicly. No reason why your guess about my article matters! My artist had actually been on radio and previously being featured on published news! Do not come over here with that be professional, Thanks! JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 11:54, 6 September 2020 (UTC

reply:

I’m gonna report you I’m trying to give you the benefit of doubt to not spam my link with comments JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup When you create a draft, reviewers will look at it and comment, this is to help you and others get the draft accepted, removing the comments is not helpful, you are free to report me where ever you like, I have added the submit template for you, but advise you that the subject does not pass the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN so is unlikely to be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Sorry about that thank you so much I was confused! Thank you for your help JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Reply:

What do you mean? Why would it not be accepted? JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 11:15, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Because JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup, musicians need to pass the criteria at WP:NMUSICIAN in order to have an article about them accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 12:34, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Sure, what to do please help! I know you’ve been doing this for a long time JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup (talk) 12:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
JabrielAtOmoMusicGroup Articles must show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources how the person meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person or in this case, the definition of a notable musician. Not every person merits an article on Wikipedia. If the person does not have significant coverage in sources, coverage that goes beyond brief mentions, routine announcements, etc. they would not merit an article at this time. You may find it helpful to read Your First Article, successfully writing a new article is the absolute hardest task to perform on Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 12:59, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Edit on "Is Genesis History?"

Hey Theroadislong,

I made the edit on the page because, having just watched the film, they do actually specifically employ the scientific method in their presentation. They merely reach scientific conclusions contrary to other notable scientific works.

You can discuss this on the article talk page, good luck with that! Theroadislong (talk) 17:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Cannot edit

Hi - I had an article rejected for copyright violation, so I intend to change it, but the version I CAN edit has information missing in it. A complete section of test and a picture. The draft entries are now unavailable, what do I do now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by NiborJacks (talk • contribs) 19:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

The copyrighted content has been removed, you will need to paraphrase the content not copy and paste it. Theroadislong (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Question about MRI (Medical Research Institute)

Hello!

Thank you for your guidance on this article.

Do these references work? Also, I do not see where to add the references:

https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20070605005576/en/Natrol-Acquires-Medical-Research-Institute http://coryholly.com/content/ed-byrd-man-who-put-creatine-map https://www.amazon.com/Nitric-Oxide-Revolution-Edward-Byrd/dp/B000BNK9K2

Ed Byrd's first company: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EAS_(nutrition_brand)

Thank you!

See WP:REFB for help with formatting sources, the Amazon link is not a suitable source though. Theroadislong (talk) 19:27, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Cannot edit

The removal isnt the disputed area, its a source of a PDF that is my work anyway. I was going to remove the source entry to the link to download the PDF only. The picture is up on wikicommons, and the text is mine, not from anywhere else, please help... — Preceding unsigned comment added by NiborJacks (talk • contribs) 19:17, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I don't understand what you are asking about Draft:Hermann Gross. The draft appears to be totally sourced to your own works, so will be problematic for you. Theroadislong (talk) 19:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
A complete section has been deleted from the submitted draft. I simply need the section "World War 2" restored back. The image is also mine, uploaded to wiki commons. The disputed area seems to have been the download link to a PDF that was also mine. What do I do to get the info back, as I wrote it?— Preceding unsigned comment added by NiborJacks (talk • contribs) 19:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
You would need to speak to the deleting administrator User:Moneytrees about that. Please also learn how to sign posts as per the comment on your user page. Theroadislong (talk) 19:37, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

User:Catherine E M Glover/sandbox

What is this taken from exactly? I can't find a source. Thanks, Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 18:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Strangely neither can I now, I have removed the speedy. Theroadislong (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
@Moneytrees: Thinking about it, I recall that I couldn't add the link to the copyright violation because the site was blacklisted. Theroadislong (talk) 20:01, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
I've run into that problem too; If you remember what it is, you can edit the url to get pass the filter or you could just permalink the earwig report. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 20:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Re-submission of Motive Partners Draft Page

Hi Theroadislong,

Hope you are well!

You gave very good feedback on my Motive Partners contribution recently, and I just wanted to say that I have updated the page with a less 'advertorial' language and removed some of the articles so that they are now all written by fully independent journalists. Hope that is helpful and that you can this time approve the page.

Let me know if there are questions regarding the content.

Best, Project Identity6804 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Project identity6804 (talk • contribs) 06:27, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Christopher Tadgell

Hello! Thank you for reviewing the draft of Christopher Tadgell (found at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Meredith0209/sandbox). I'd just like to query the notability, as according to WP:NACADEMIC his election as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Antiquaries fulfils this requirement? Should I rearrange the info to foreground this? Thank you for any tips! KerstingFan (talk) 12:39, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure that being a a fellow of the Royal Society of Antiquaries fulfils that criteria? Theroadislong (talk) 12:49, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for a speedy reply! The bit I was referring to in WP:NACADEMIC notes that an academic is notable if they meet 'any one of the following conditions... (Condition 3) The person has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor'. From the SAL's website, it notes that Fellowship is a competitive election process where excellence in the field is required, which I would interpret as 'highly selective', especially with only 3300 living members https://www.sal.org.uk/our-fellows/becoming-a-fellow/. However I wasn't sure, so I don't know if there's anyone out there who would confirm/ how to confirm the SAL fellowship qualifies. What would you suggest as next step? Thank you! KerstingFan (talk) 14:57, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Re-reviewing of Marina Bondarko (Model) page

Greetings Theroadislong, I've added more references about the topic with few additional information and resubmit it. Do check it out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shelikesme (talk • contribs) 12:44, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Lots of directory listings, but still nothing there to suggest they pass WP:GNG, can you suggest how they do? Theroadislong (talk) 12:51, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
As Far as General notability guideline has concerned,Model being an Belarusian you can see her news is in Indonesian, Vietnamese newspapers, So this suggests they pass WP:GNG Shelikesme (talk) 13:16, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok, I don't agree so I'll leave it to another reviewer. Theroadislong (talk) 13:20, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Thank you Sir! You are so kind, I want to be like you in Future.Shelikesme (talk) 13:31, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Sir, how long will it take an another reviewer to review it. Shelikesme (talk) 17:54, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Could be two minutes or could be 2 months. Theroadislong (talk) 18:08, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

The road is really long, haha) Shelikesme (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

You approve it Sir let's make it happen. Shelikesme (talk) 19:37, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hermann Gross re-edit

Hi again - after your comments on language neutrality and sticking to "facts" rather than subjecture, could you possibly pass your eyes across a re-written entry to see if this is more along the right lines? It seems pointless to try to publish again if I am going down the wrong road again

Much appreciated

NiborJacks (talk) 06:27, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

I'm afraid it does not read like an encyclopedia article it reads more like a book which isn't surprising as the only sources you give are your own books, there is far too much original research and conjecture. Theroadislong (talk) 07:13, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Is my draft fine now

Sir made the required changes and added references in my draft https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:DIVYA_AGARWAL. Please tell if it is fine or more changes are required. Thank you Rjidindiana (talk) 12:00, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:CameraLK

Hey my cameralk submission got declined. Can I know the areas which I have to change to get this approved. This is a reputed company in South East Asia. And I have attached the references from Sony as well. It would be a great help if you can give some advice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laksisi1997 (talk • contribs) 10:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not a paid person to do this writing. I'm just trying to add Sri Lanka companies and people to wikipedia since majority of notable figures in our country doesn't have a wikipedia page. So I'm actually trying to give some recognition to Lankan businesses and people who deserves that. I'm doing this in my free time. It would great if you can advice me how to get the job done in articles like this because I can assure I'm not being paid :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laksisi1997 (talk • contribs) 11:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
[[U|Laksisi1997}} you have stated on your user page that you have a conflict of interest with Draft:Anushka Gunasinghe which means you also have a conflict of interest with his company page Draft:CameraLK. If you are not being paid, what is your conflict of interest? Theroadislong (talk) 12:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft : DIVYA AGARWAL

Sir the article " Divya Agarwal " has no details and is protected. Thats why I had to create a new draft in capital letters. Rjidindiana (talk) 04:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Also I did ask few administrators for help. They told that if my draft is acceptable then editors can help me. Rjidindiana (talk) 04:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

I you can help regarding same, it will be great. Rjidindiana (talk) 04:48, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Hermann Gross re-edit

I note the tone comments. Can you give me an example of what/where I need to edit please, as I have read the Wikipedia guidelines, and cannot see where it now violates language guidance. Also the pictures. How does one upload images if not to Wiki commons? eg the pictures of paintings, for example, under Picasso's entry? I have the original photographer copyright agreement, but it would appear you are referring to the actual artist?

NiborJacks (talk) 07:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

The photographs of Picasso's work are in the public domain in the United States, this means that they were first published prior to January 1, 1925. Your draft has large amounts of original research, each and every substantive fact requires an inline citation, your draft has just a list of your own books at the end, this is not sufficient. Theroadislong (talk) 07:25, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

As the subject matter has never been studied, I doubt he is going to be able to get any of those citations, as nothing exists. Reviews do, of course, but I dont think you mean that. Would it be better just to limit the entry - for now - to birth / death and what he did ie painter etc??

NiborJacks (talk) 07:35, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia's guidelines for notability require that the subject has received sustained in-depth coverage in reliable secondary sources. If reliable sources do not exist, then we can't have an article about him. Theroadislong (talk) 07:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your review

Thank you for your reviewing the draft for Shochiku Studio. I will add information referring Japanese page of the same and other reliable sources for "significant coverage". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hama takashi (talk • contribs) 09:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft of church of Asherah

Hi I am the primary source for my religion , there are no notable articles on the subject of my particular branch of Satanism .

What can I do to change that ? or fix the problem with my article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelo2386 (talk • contribs) 12:01, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

You can only wait, until the church HAS been the subject of multiple in-depth coverage in reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 12:05, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Timothy_Galpin Question again

Hello,

One more time i need your help, i updated some new sources about the page, still not enough? Need more sources? thanks for your help again. have a good day.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Timothy_Galpin

--Comery07 (talk) 11:50, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft of Clicks hair controversy

Hi

Regarding your review/decline of my article; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Clicks_hair_controversy This information is being updated in many different articles at the same time, with some articles being more up to date than others.

See these;

It is better to have it in one place so it can be linked to and kept up to date as this is an ongoing event.

Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meisterlone (talk • contribs) 11:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

No sorry I disagree, Wikipedia is NOT a news service. Theroadislong (talk) 11:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

This makes no sense, this is not 'news' but rather an account of a very significant event. Why synchronize the same information across multiple articles? It is asking for inconsistencies. (they keep popping up) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meisterlone (talk • contribs) 11:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Deletion notice?

Hi, are you in the current AfC crew? You left me a message, but I think what happened was I moved a page written in someone's sandbox and they created another page by blanking the automatic redirect created during the process. Rankersbo (talk) 12:02, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Walter Feldman artist

With all due respect, this artist is way more notable than many you have written about. Famed art critic More Ashton called Feldman one of the most significant new modernist artist in a 1950s review (I just can't find the original Art Digest citation because they went out of business long ago). But that is OK Wikipedia's loss and I'll stop donating or contributing.ArtResearcher1955 (talk) 13:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

ArtResearcher1955 See other stuff exists. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible to get inappropriate articles by us, and the fact that they exist does not mean yours can exist too. If you'd care to point out some of these other problematic articles, we can address them. Donations are collected by the Foundation that operates the computers Wikipedia is on, and they are not involved in day to day operations. If donating or withholding donations affected content, this would cease to be a neutral encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
ArtResearcher1955 I didn't say he wasn't notable, but your sources do NOT establish notability, I'm sure there are sources out there, I have posted a link to one of them that you could use, but I see you have now sadly deleted your draft. Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok... I have created a basic stub for Walter S. Feldman you are welcome to add reliably sourced content. Theroadislong (talk) 14:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft: Evan Luthra

Hello

Thanks for reviewing my submsission !

Please can you tell me which sources should I remove from the page and which ones should I add from the following: Crunchbase AngelList NextShark Yahoo Finance Business Insider Business today DailyO ONN Network Irish Tech News

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by DavidConx (talk • contribs) 14:50, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Yuri_Suzuki_(artist/designer)

Hi. You've rejected the article earlier this year and since I have made some revisions. Can you please take a look and review the changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Getlucky24 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

You would need to suggest how they pass WP:NARTIST. Theroadislong (talk) 18:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
(talk page watcher)@Theroadislong: I had never heard of this guy... but I found two museum collections and added numerous sources. would you mind if I clean this up and move it to article space? I have been editing it and I think it is iclose to ready, but it needs a tiny bit more work.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Sure yes! I am walking in Wales with little time, please go ahead! Theroadislong (talk) 21:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Will do, thanks. I would very much prefer if to be walking in Wales at the moment.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 01:17, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Clan/Surname Article declined

Respected sir, How to make this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Swargiary article acceptable ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boro wiki editor (talk • contribs) 18:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Find at least three sources that cover the topic in-depth, neither of your two sources even mention the subject? Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft assistance

Hello Theroadislong, thanks for your review on the declined draft (Crackydon). Like Pjarkur noted on previous review. He said the filmography needs more sources. I would appreciate if you take your time to review it once again and give your thought on where I need to improve..This will guide me on where to point light while editing.

Thank you! Fancyajonder (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Why

Why did you move R Nait into the draft. Are you going to improve on it? Indian Viki BKN (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Because a sockpuppet account moved it from draft before it was ready for mainspace, what is your interest in the subject? Theroadislong (talk) 15:25, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I believe this is a sock for the banned account. I've reported them here. Thanks.GreaterPonce665 (TALK) 16:04, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

I want to reach a consensus with you

Dear members of Wikipedia or long term volunteers,

Please never never never bring the misleading part back to the article again before you have got permission from the TOP MANAGER at Wikipedia Company and Wikimedia Foundation. I have reached a consensus with the Wikipedia company and Wikimedia Foundation to remove the misleading part from the article.

The misleading part of the article demeaned my loved one's image. People misunderstood my loved one due to the misleading information in the misleading part.

This misleading part had been leading overwhelming stress on me. I cannot live my normal living life before I have removed it.

Please respect my feeling!!! Please respect your TOP MANAGER'S decision!!! I will super appreciate your understanding !!! Thank you!!!KathleenKathleen12345 (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

You need to discuss your edits on the article talk page. Theroadislong (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Help understanding how to improve declined page

Hi, You rejected my page - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Genesis_Research_Trust last week. Would be great to try and get a few practical tips of what I can change? Many thanks, Jules

Two of the sources are to your own website, sources should be mostly independent, Wikipedia cannot be used as a reference, The Mirror sources are mere passing mentions, sources need to be in-depth to establish any notability. The Imperial source does not load and The nature source doesn’t mention Genesis Research Trust. Theroadislong (talk) 11:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Everett McCorvey draft

Jacalyn Carfagno (talk) 20:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Hi....you read the page I developed on Everett McCorvey a few months ago. Thanks for your criticism and suggestions. I've done quite a bit of work on it since, taking out a lot of what I think you considered resume-like material and adding many references/citations. I'd be grateful if you'd take another look and share your thoughts. Thanks so much!

Request on 21:18:10, 17 September 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by Philandrews04


Hi Theroadislong, thank you for your review of my proposed page called Origins Science, since your review I have rewritten it completely so that it reads more like a wikipedia information page. If you could review it again that would be great. Thank you, Phil

Philandrews04 (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Dada Group

thank you for your comments! I believe I addressed them but please let me know of any additional feedback. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dada_Group

Your draft does not appear to have a single reliable independent source, so it has zero chance of being accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 16:52, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

My sources now include a legal F-1 filing, a major news outlet (CNBC), and Crunchbase - hopefully these are all considered reliable/third party. I defined a reference as I cited it multiple times. I also tried to remove all language that could be perceived as marketing language to keep it as objective as possible. Please let me know if this resolves your concerns. Thank you!

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong/Archive_60&oldid=982596791"