User talk:Truco/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 20 |
I think I've fixed your concerns there, could you please take another look? Thanks—Chris! ct 04:14, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
All of your concerns have been addressed. -- iMatthew T.C. 00:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
I was wondering if you want to review this featured list nomination. -- K. Annoyomous24 04:14, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
FLC
 |
Thanks for reviewing the first part of the article. I have made the changes you requested. Please come take a look and review the second part of ORH. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab 17:10, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Sonics relocation GAN
Thanks for the good review and for giving me a chance to address the issues. I do have one question that I left on the nomination page, if you don't mind. Thanks again. Okiefromokla questions? 19:25, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I took care of the issues you raised. Check it out and see what you think. Okiefromokla questions? 15:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again for reviewing. Okiefromokla questions? 03:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, my RfA closed today, so I'm still in my first 24 hours of adminship. But of course, I will always help in any way that I can. Just drop me a line. Okiefromokla questions? 03:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks again for reviewing. Okiefromokla questions? 03:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Re:
I've completed your requested at Cyber Sunday's review. Cheers, -- iMatthew T.C. 02:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- You busy with anything? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what's going on anymore, I'm not being kept in the loop, but would you mind writing just 2 matches for Taboo Tuesday '04, just 2. If you can or not. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry about the Bash, there's no plan to get the article finished soon. ;) Just, take your time and don't make it your priority. Alright, I just want you too write those 2 matches.... that's it. And, I appreciate you helping me out. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't know what's going on anymore, I'm not being kept in the loop, but would you mind writing just 2 matches for Taboo Tuesday '04, just 2. If you can or not. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Its good, but with the whole controversy of writing the jargon out, I think it should have a chance at passing, but not sure. You should ask PW of what they think, if you haven't done so. But to me, I'd say go for it, its a well-written PPV. :) Question: I want to get HBK's article to FA and the "real names" have to be included in the article, ex: Edge (Adam Copeland)? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's what I was gonna do, wait until you or LAX [or] (you and LAX) nominated SS to FA and I was gonna see how that panned out. I guess, I'll have to wait on you. ;) I'm just kidding. :P Hey, are you interested in expanding a video game article with me or.... -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- I just hope you don't get pressured on, with SS. I'll try to help out during the FA, see I got your back, like you've got mine. :) Um, the article is Batman Begins. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do you want to start now? Hey, I've asked RKOrton to help us, you don't mind right? It failed? What happened? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's weird, are you gonna re-nominate it? Um, do you think you can write the Gameplay? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's a good idea, but I don't understand that no one voted, though. Still confused. Alright, I'll try to get the Reception section, but if your good with another section, please work on that. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's weird, are you gonna re-nominate it? Um, do you think you can write the Gameplay? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Do you want to start now? Hey, I've asked RKOrton to help us, you don't mind right? It failed? What happened? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:29, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- I just hope you don't get pressured on, with SS. I'll try to help out during the FA, see I got your back, like you've got mine. :) Um, the article is Batman Begins. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 00:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
You want to work on SVR '08? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:23, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, what type of list? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:30, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm confused, in the NFS page, it says that the games were developed in 1992, but the first game that was released came out in 1994. So, which one is correct? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, so should the sentence, for the lead, read The original series was produced from 1992 through 2002? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:33, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- IDK, that's why I was confused on when the actual series was produced. What do you think, you're the expert in this. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, you are; you got List of WWE SmackDown video game titles to FL, that's where I'm copying the lead from. Well, this is hard, but I know I'll get it someway. :p Here's some part of the lead. Give me some feedback, cause I need it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:52, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- IDK, that's why I was confused on when the actual series was produced. What do you think, you're the expert in this. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
I found this, but not sure if it mentions it being the longest game ever. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 21:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, but I was having trouble looking for that info. on it being the longest racing game ever. Do you think you can find anything? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
OMG, if you can help me write that out, I would appreciate it a whole lot. ;) Yeah, I'll try to cut down the feuds in the BG and yeah fix up the jargon, thanks for the feedback. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw the PR for SS and basically feedback was given to you by users who know the whole FA strategy. But, I'm gonna have to write the gross the event brought in for SS '04. Question: How would I write that Motor City Online (2001) was part/or not of NFS? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, e-mail me the grossing info. Alright, I wasn't sure, since the page said it was a spin-off. Hey, I added this ---> "Initially, the series was exclusive to the fifth generation consoles", but not sure if its indeed true. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was reading and basically the games were available under that system, but I'll continue with adding the other systems that followed. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I added some info. but if more is needed, I'll add it. Hey, do you think Madden NFL would be a good list to work on? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- I've added the "lead" into the sandbox. Hey, how 'bout if we switch? You work on lead, I work on what you are working on. Well, the only reason I asked is since I looked at the highest selling game series and I thought maybe it would be a good list to work, after we're done with NFS. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:32, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I added some info. but if more is needed, I'll add it. Hey, do you think Madden NFL would be a good list to work on? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:18, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was reading and basically the games were available under that system, but I'll continue with adding the other systems that followed. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:16, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, e-mail me the grossing info. Alright, I wasn't sure, since the page said it was a spin-off. Hey, I added this ---> "Initially, the series was exclusive to the fifth generation consoles", but not sure if its indeed true. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Alright, cool. ;) Yeah, I think we can have the list done by today. That's the reason I wanted to switch, cause you know more about the game than I do and we'd be done quick. Awesome, Madden is my forte. Um, just go to my page and click on "E-mail this user" on the left. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 22:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, well its thinkblue_d@yahoo.com -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:34, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, is MobyGames a reliable source? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 23:55, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
The last game is ProStreet and Undercover hasn't been released. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree. ;) Yeah, I think you should move it now. Yay, we're done. I hope. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:34, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- I know, I just added it to my watchlist. ;) Man, this so awesome. My first VG list. :P Alright, maybe later we can work on another list. :) Let's hope it gets a DYK. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome. I don't know, I think I should let you nominate it, I'm still fairly new to the whole list thing. But, if you want me too, give me some tips on what I should do. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- I know, I just added it to my watchlist. ;) Man, this so awesome. My first VG list. :P Alright, maybe later we can work on another list. :) Let's hope it gets a DYK. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of 1000 Connecticut Avenue
I have nominated 1000 Connecticut Avenue, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1000 Connecticut Avenue. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 21:52, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
Pardon the intrusion but I note that you commented on the AfD discussion for Daphne Civic Center. I have subsequently expanded this article and provided a number of references to reliable third-party sources. I humbly request that you give this article a second look and see if this is sufficient to change your !vote on this matter. Thank you for your time and consideration. - Dravecky (talk) 00:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
SvR 2009
Where was the consensus formed about not adding the roster, per this edit? -- iMatthew T.C. 02:10, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of 1430 K Street
I have nominated 1430 K Street, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1430 K Street. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Guy (Help!) 10:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
GA Review of Punch-up in Piestany
Hi! Thanks for the review. I hope I have addressed your concerns. If there are any further issues, I will attempt to correct them when I am next online on Tuesday. Thanks! Resolute 21:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
limits on noms
Won't get involved in the project discussion (I saw it while looking at something else), and totally my own view here, but in response to your query, WikiProjects (which are informal by definition) do not run Wikipedia, policy does. If your editing is quality and sufficient enough that it's likely to pass the high standards there (objective grounds for such an argument such as past successes are useful here) then it is up to the wider community to evaluate and decide. We want as many high quality good articles, featured articles and featured lists as possible and anything stopping that from occurring should be safely ignored. Just my two cents. Orderinchaos 10:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Re: Summer slam 2003
I only took a quick look at the article. I would say that it is better than a lot of what is put up for FA review. The language looks OK (which is a big deal for FA reviewers), the article is well referenced, and the references are high quality. The images are appropriate and illustrative, but I didn't look at the copyright/license issues (I don't know enough about that crap to comment on it.). But be sure check it against WP:FACR to make sure it complies. I'd say it's worth throwing it to the dogs of the FAC review process. Lwnf360 (talk) 15:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Not as of yet. I have been busy working on other PPVs (you know, writing them in-universe :P). Once I get some free time, however, I plan on working on it. If I need any (which I probably will), I would appreciate your help. –LAX 16:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Vue Harbor East
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vue Harbor East, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. KnightLago (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Wyndham Baltimore South Tower
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Wyndham Baltimore South Tower, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. KnightLago (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Minor League Baseball Players for deletion.
Hello,
You recently voted to delete several articles relating to minor league players, where the nominator cited that every player fails Wikipedia:WPBB#Players. Please note that James Tomlin, Kelley Gulledge, and Jeff Carter (baseball infielder), ALL in fact PASS, as they have either played a full season of AAA baseball or have been selected for a minor league baseball All-star game.
- From Wikipedia:WPBB#Players:
- Have played in at least a whole season in AAA baseball, played in the All-Star Futures Game, won a notable Minor League Baseball award, or been selected for any minor league baseball All-star game in the affiliated minor leagues.
You may wish to revisit the discussions at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Tomlin, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelley Gulledge, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Carter (baseball infielder). Thank you. SashaNein (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
symbols
We use little colored symbols to keep track of checkuser requests and in some other places, but not at Articles for deletion. You will notice nobody else uses them there, and it could conceivably be interpreted a little like trying for added prominence--not of course that it really does.. Bold face like the rest of us is helpful enough; I'msure you'll understand DGG (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. What, exactly, is wrong? I don't really feel like reading right now. :P --LAX 15:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- That's one of the reasons I've held off on SS '07: I've been waiting to see the outcome of SS '03. I'll go through the article and give it a quick copyedit to fix some grammatical issues. --LAX 15:23, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
R.E good work
Hey thanks sorry for late reply internet not working and even now its a bit slow! Would it be ok if i put u on my friends list? Adster95 (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
SS 03
I know I'm not for the big the out of universe thing, but if you want I'll try to help you out with SummerSlam (2003).--WillC 21:48, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, My name is DH and I've seen that you like to work on wrestling article's, well I kinda know some stuff about wrestling anything I can do to help you? DHMichaels 00:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Well I've finally found the time to work on SummerSlam with you but I guess you have already got all the issues fixed, from what I've seen. If anymore show up I'll help you out. I'll be working on Sacrifice because I finally got a peer review on it.--WillC 02:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
The Kat
I don't know if you saw my note or not, but I left you a message at Talk:Stacy Carter. Nikki311 02:04, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. :) Nikki311 02:22, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey.
Hey SRX, do you have a yahoo. If you do can you tell me what it is. Cheers.- Cimmo (talk) 2:12, 1 August (UTC)
Dude, I would but I don't know if I'll spot anything considering 8 people have reviewed the article, and I'm not even sure what the freakin criteria for any ppv article is anymore. The so much discussion, and people constantly arguing over it and whatnot, that I've been avoided WT:PW, so I haven't got a clue of what to expect/what should be in the article. I'll give this one a miss. Sorry, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Well, reading the lead, it reads very different from other the other ppv articles, but I guess that's the idea. I'll take a look later, and let ya know. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 23:33, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
SummerSlam (2003): FAC or not FAC?
You asked me for an opinion on this. There don't seem to be any Pro-wrestling articles already at FA, at least, none that I could recognise as such. So, if you send SummerSlam (2003) there, it looks like you'll be in new territory.
As to its chances of success, well (to quote Hillary Clinton) you won't know until you try. In my opinion, if you think it meets all the FA criteria (especially the one dealing with prose standard), then nominate it. It may well fail first time, but if it does you should get feedback that will clearly identify weaknesses, enabling you to improve and renominate with a greater chance of success. Treat the first nomination as a learning experience, don't be downhearted by initial failure. If at first you don't succeed...etc. Good luck, whatever you decide to do. Brianboulton (talk) 23:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Re:Hey, another?
That would be great! Any lists in mind? We could go international and work on List of tallest buildings in Frankfurt, as that list is already fairly close to being an FLC. Cheers, Rai•me 01:25, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- You might also consider improving List of tallest structures in Paris back to FL-status, as it was delisted from FL due to referencing and other issues. Cheers. Trance addict - Armin van Buuren - Oceanlab
- Yeah, Paris would be a good. Cheers, Rai•me 16:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- I think so; there was also support for the formatting of British lists like List of tallest buildings and structures in Manchester, but then again List of tallest buildings and structures in London was recently reformatted away from this style at FLRC to look more like American, Canadian, and Chinese lists (save for the colored rows). IMO, we should probably try to be internationally consistent and just use the "normal" default colors and column organization as in our past lists, thereby leaving the British lists as the only exceptions. Cheers, Rai•me 16:28, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, Paris would be a good. Cheers, Rai•me 16:14, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
List
Oh, well thank you for replacing them. ;) Um, I would say Cyber Sunday, since all the PPV's are expanded. IDK, do you know a topic? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:23, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Cyber Sunday '07 is GA. I want to get Taboo Tuesday '04 to GA and Taboo Tuesday '05 is on the GA waiting list. Cyber Sunday '06 and '08 is up and stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- You know, try to work on '06 and '08 to get to GA. ;) And, I have asked a question in the e-mail. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, my computer is running hella slow. I have responded to the e-mail and I'm keeping my fingers crossed that SS'03 passes FA. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll keep that in mind. :P Yeah, I've added NFS and SS'03 to my watchlist. Sure, I'd love to help with a building list, but not right now, since my computer is having a problem. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- I have bought a new computer. ;) Um, well it was running slow, but I installed a virus protector on it. Now, its running normal. What type of building did you have in mind? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll keep that in mind. :P Yeah, I've added NFS and SS'03 to my watchlist. Sure, I'd love to help with a building list, but not right now, since my computer is having a problem. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:59, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delay, my computer is running hella slow. I have responded to the e-mail and I'm keeping my fingers crossed that SS'03 passes FA. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:49, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- You know, try to work on '06 and '08 to get to GA. ;) And, I have asked a question in the e-mail. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
I was just wondering, but never mind, I "fixed" the problem. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:36, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm listening. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:40, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright. What should I do, since I'm new to this whole list of buildings thing. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done. So, 411mania is not a reliable source, huh? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, well I thought you told me to search it on Google, but whatever. :P Well, I guess I'm gonna have to replace the refs., Damn it. Um, you wanna do it by the actual article? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, fine let's create it in your sandbox. :) Yeah, for HBK. Damn, now I gotta look for the PWI magazines and cite them to replace the 411 refs. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Didn't find anything, but I don't think I would say this, but thank god Randy Orton is in the cover of the new PWI 500 magazine and that helps me a lot. ;) Alright, what happens next? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, fine let's create it in your sandbox. :) Yeah, for HBK. Damn, now I gotta look for the PWI magazines and cite them to replace the 411 refs. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:01, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, well I thought you told me to search it on Google, but whatever. :P Well, I guess I'm gonna have to replace the refs., Damn it. Um, you wanna do it by the actual article? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:50, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Done. So, 411mania is not a reliable source, huh? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright. What should I do, since I'm new to this whole list of buildings thing. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I'm still looking for more articles on the web, but I need an article from here, so I can know what to add and stuff. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll go with those examples. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- You do that. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm so lost with this, but, I did add something. Does it work? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- Now, you tell me. ;) A little sarcasm. Alright, so do we basically have to "summarize" the act? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:16, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm so lost with this, but, I did add something. Does it work? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- You do that. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Alright, cool. ;) How's SS going? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- That's good, I guess people have realized that this has FA potential. So, since no one is criticizing about ---> Ex: Edge (Adam Copeland), do you think its wise to start adding it to HBK's article? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know its suppose to be added once, just like "World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)". Yup, to explain that they don't go by their "real names". ;) I'll add it in a little while, thanks for the feedback. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, is this a good start? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Hey, do you think you can do me a favor? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 18:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, is this a good start? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:45, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, I know its suppose to be added once, just like "World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE)". Yup, to explain that they don't go by their "real names". ;) I'll add it in a little while, thanks for the feedback. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I guess you're right. I'll add it tomorrow, I gotta log off. Again, thanks. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, congrats on WWE Draft 2008 being FL. ;) Um, I'll do it, if you can give the easy tasks, since I really don't know anything on NFS. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, but I can't guarantee you that its gonna be all that great. :P -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 17:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey SRX, I was just wondering, when you do you think you will finish the Peer Review for that article? I really do appreciate your review. -- iMatthew T.C. 14:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
What do you think of [1]? Do you think it might be considered reliable? -- iMatthew T.C. 17:43, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
So when might you nominate SS 03 for FA? -- iMatthew T.C. 23:45, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'd say tonight, so the late night editors can see it as well as those who are on early in the morning. -- iMatthew T.C. 00:16, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- I know, thanks for the advice. I don't plan on nominating it for a while. I'm going to nominate it for GA on August 6th, the day before I leave with a note saying "please do not review until after August 13 (when I return)." After is (hopefully) passes it's GAN, I will make sure the FAC for SS 03 and SS O7 are completed, and then nominate TGAB. Good luck with the FAC, and hopefully this will be used as a guide to writing more and more FA's. -- iMatthew T.C. 00:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm confident that SS 03, 07, 98 and TGAB 05 will all pass FAC within the next month or two, and will then be used as a definite template for the time being. -- iMatthew T.C. 00:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks man, that means a lot. Have you seen today's Motto of the Day!? -- iMatthew T.C. 01:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
It's not "ours" it's Wikipedia:Motto of the day. See my userpage. -- iMatthew T.C. 01:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
 | |
|---|---|
|
Project Updates
This Month in Wrestling History
Professional Wrestling Article Stats
|
Member News
Recent News
Collaboration of the Week
Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Articles for Deletion
From the Editors
Contributors to this Issue: |
Hi SRX. I was wondering whether you could give December to Dismember (2006) a major copy-edit, mainly changing the language of the prose to bring it out of universe, and up to date, like what you did with SummerSlam (2003). Don't remove or add any prose though, just reword things so it's out of universe. I'd be very greatful if you could. Thanks, D.M.N. (talk) 18:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. What I meant by adding "prose" was like adding more week-by-week events, or removing week-by-week events. D.M.N. (talk) 18:56, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
I believe I have addressed all of the issues you raised in your GA review of the above article. If there is anything else you believe should be done to improve the article, let me know.Cbl62 (talk) 04:42, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey
I have a request, that you can do (if you will) whenever you find time as long as it is done by next Wednesday. Lockdown is under GA review and I need to take it out of universe. I haven't had really any practice and I have no TNA articles to copy off of on that subject. So would you mind either teaching me to write out of universe or take it out of universe for me. Because I'll probably royally screw it up. Much thanks if you'll help.--WillC 04:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I won't be able to review SummerSlam (2003). Something has come up, and its restricting my editing time. Apologies, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 05:09, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
I think I'm more or less done. In any case, I've been very busy in RL of late, so I'm unlikely to get the opportunity to do more. Oldelpaso (talk) 14:48, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Billion Dollar Gravy
I thought music albums were notable if a notable artist created them. London Elektricity is more than qualified, having won several music awards and being a pioneer of live drum and bass (ask any junglist/drum n bass fan), who also founded Hospital Records, but if you want to delete it, that's okay. If you don't believe me, look at this. DubCrazy (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2008 (UTC)DubCrazy
Armageddon (2003)
Hey, does the reception section for Armageddon (2003) look alright to you? --LAX 18:29, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really think that should matter, as we spell out numbers for PPVs like the Royal Rumble (eg. Royal Rumble 2007 was the twentieth annual Royal Rumble...). I plan on nominating it for GA after I get a DYK out of it (or at least I hope). After that, I will probably work on getting it to FA (pending the outcome of SS '03). --LAX 18:51, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Reviews
I have also included four reviews of Billion Dollar Gravy, from magazines and internet sources. By the way, I didn't know you were Salvadoran, that's cool :)... Which city? DubCrazy (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2008 (UTC)DubCrazy
Vengeance 2002
Hey SRX I was expanding this in my sandbox just wanted to know what you think of it! here it is User:Adster95/sandbox —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adster95 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billion Dollar Gravy
Sources have been added to the article, and I just added a category and cover art. I'd say it meets WP:MUSIC#Albums quite easily now, given that a.) almost all albums by notable artists are notable as well, and b.) there are plenty of sources now. It might be a good idea to withdraw the nomination. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'll close it for you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 23:11, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Most AfD's i get involved in are borderline or require clarification or end in an argument for some reason or other. Thank you for being a sane and reasonable editor! --Kaini (talk) 23:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for understanding about my article, I understand your concerns. Have you been to Quetzaltepeque? DubCrazy (talk) 00:47, 5 August 2008 (UTC)DubCrazy
The WPVG Newsletter (August 2008)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Video Games Newsletter | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 22:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Reverts
I was unaware of the new format and was not in a edit war. I didnt realize I was being reverted I thought I had missed parts. I apologize for any confusion but I am not the edit war type. Usually I will just take it too the discussion.JakeDHS07 03:27, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
Your Idea
Please tell me your idea isn't to distribute notices about format/project changes the same way the newsletter is because that was what I was gonna suggest. lol.JakeDHS07 03:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
- No problem bro glad to help. :) Hopefully I gain so more good rep for that idea as I am considering running for adminship again.JakeDHS07 03:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
- Oh shit really? I thought it was 1,000 edits. I was excited because I was at 846. GG I be lucky if I reach 10,000 by the time I'm 30 lol.JakeDHS07 03:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
- I'll try but I work alot lol. BTW I noticed you have a users I'm cool with list. If it is not too intrusive I would love to be added as I am trying to build as good a reputation as possible. Also as a sidenote I noticed you have 13,000 edits are you a admin? Because if your not I just want you to know you've got my support.
- Dude one more question the I promise I'll leave you alone. I am trying to add a header like yours to my user page to make more eye appealing but I am having a problem. I can't remember for the life of me when I actually joined as a member. I believe it was in 2005 but do you know where I can check?
- I'll try but I work alot lol. BTW I noticed you have a users I'm cool with list. If it is not too intrusive I would love to be added as I am trying to build as good a reputation as possible. Also as a sidenote I noticed you have 13,000 edits are you a admin? Because if your not I just want you to know you've got my support.
- Oh shit really? I thought it was 1,000 edits. I was excited because I was at 846. GG I be lucky if I reach 10,000 by the time I'm 30 lol.JakeDHS07 03:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
The user page bar
Dude I need your help. I tried copying the formatting like you have it but it won't display properly. Can you fix it for me?JakeDHS07 04:45, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
- Thanks for the tips man. Yeah you'll get credit you didn't think I would leave that out did you? J/K.JakeDHS07 16:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)JakeDHS07
Hey
Hey SRX, would you mind to copyedit Lockdown so it is out of universe? So I have a TNA article to copy off of so that I can do it for the rest I'm doing. It would be really helpful since I'm not sure what should be out of universe. Also how are you doing?--WillC 06:55, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Okay, when you get time. It is just part of the GA review for it. I have everything else fixed on it, I just need it taken out of universe and I'm not sure what should be explained and what shouldn't. Glad to hear. Take care.--WillC 19:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Heights of Buildings Act of 1910 DYK nom
I'm not sure if the hook is accurate because, according to the article, the original act (passed in 1899), restricted buildings to less than the height of the Capitol and the amendment of 1910 restricted them to 20 ft higher than the width of the street they are on. Since the original act redirects to that page, I think we probably should come up with a different hook because, imho, the current one isn't entirely accurate. A suggestion would be: ... that the Heights of Buildings Act of 1910 restricts the height of buildings in Washington D.C. to 20 ft (6 m) taller than the width of the street they face? What do you think? Thingg⊕⊗ 00:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- I'm sure it will be ok as it satisfies all the criteria, but I don't think it would be a good idea for me to verify my own hook. ;) We can probably just leave it until "August 5" gets down to the bottom and if anyone raises some objections, we can
deal with himfix them then. Thingg⊕⊗ 01:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Surprise!
Look to the top right. D.M.N. (talk) 13:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
- Gimmebot hasn't updated it yet. It is a FL, The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) has promoted it. D.M.N. (talk) 14:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
mind re-visiting this? Another responder and I have some questions. Thanks! TravellingCari 18:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)