Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Jamiroquai/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Sarastro1 via FACBot (talk) 22:57, 13 January 2019 [1].


Jamiroquai[edit]

Nominator(s): 100cellsman (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I majorly expanded and edited the article about the British band Jamiroquai. I’m hoping that through consensus, this article will summarize the group's history, artistry and achievements as nicely as possible–as they are unfortunately overshadowed by the tabloid sensationalism that their front-man Jay Kay tends to have. After about a year of on-and-off meticulous work, it should meet the FA criteria. (if not almost)

I do want to opt for discussion about the sub header titles of whether or not they’re appropriately named and the fansite that is used as a reference for the section about Radio Silence. But any other pointers would be appreciated as well!

Thanks! 100cellsman (talk) 17:57, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The featured article process is generally for articles that are already considered to be perfectly written and may have gone through a peer review beforehand. This nomination reads like a request for peer review. Should it perhaps go through that before an FA nom? I've not read the article yet so I'm abstaining from supporting or opposing as of now.--NØ 13:39, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I did put this article up for peer review, but after a month later, I realized with me editing this article while it was up for PR (my mistake) that I kept finding problems myself so I didn't bother. But if what you mentioned is the case, I guess that would be most appropriate. 100cellsman (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

From the nominator: I decided its best to submit this article for a peer review again. Please archive this nomination. Thank you. 100cellsman (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.