Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 October 13

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< October 12 << Sep | October | Nov >> October 14 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


October 13[edit]

06:05:20, 13 October 2022 review of draft by Fakehair[edit]


Fakehair (talk) 06:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good morning;

Hope everyone is well. I know everyone is very busy reviewing many draft articles and you have your hans full. But, my article was denied a couple of times and with the guidance of the staff, believe I have lots of progress. Thanks to you. If anyone can ssist me in getting to the finish line, I would greatly appreciated the help...Hope to talk to someone soon..

Thank you

User :Fakehair

Hello, Fakehair. The references in your draft are bare URLs. This is suboptimal. I suggest that you expand your references by including full bibliographic details. This makes it much easier for reviewers to assess the reliability of the sources. Please read Referencing for beginners. Cullen328 (talk) 06:33, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, Fakehair, you included unreferenced content like While no one in his immediate family had musical talents, at the age of 12, Féquière started showing interest in playing guitar and singing which was a very difficult undertaking in his teenage years. The reason for this was very simple. In the 60's and the 70's most parents would not grant their children permission to become musicians. Musicians were stereotyped and falsely labeled as cheaters, womanizers and lazy minded individuals who despised work. This mentality pervaded and dominated the culture for decades and still today to a certain extent. But, by the time Féquière was 14 years of age, his father's decision to send him abroad to continue his studies pretty much open a new door for him to pursue his musical interests. You simply cannot include unreferenced opinionated commentary like this in an encyclopedia article. It is a violation of multiple Wikipedia policies such as Verifiability, the Neutral point of view and Biographies of living people. Cullen328 (talk) 06:41, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Cullen328 for your contribution. I Started working on referencing then got really tired. I will certainly get back to it...Thank you so much and have a wonderful day..... Fakehair (talk) 16:42, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Good afternoon Cullen328, Per your advice, i made the changes needed. At your convenience, please, take another look at the draft and contribute where necessary. Thank you for your assistance.. Fakehair (talk) 17:08, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:30:46, 13 October 2022 review of submission by Anujguptahmsc[edit]


Anujguptahmsc (talk) 09:30, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anujguptahmsc You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves or post their resume. Please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:25:29, 13 October 2022 review of submission by Ramsir ji[edit]


Ramsir ji (talk) 10:25, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ramsir ji You don't ask a question. As noted above to an unregistered user, the draft was rejected, and will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:28, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

10:58:49, 13 October 2022 review of draft by 2603:7080:2A42:2DF9:95BA:9730:51B8:7BEE[edit]


I would like to add the articles however failed at first attempt. Would appreciate advice while reviewing other versions. 2603:7080:2A42:2DF9:95BA:9730:51B8:7BEE (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, please log into your account.
Secondly, note that Wikipedia is not a marketing platform for a business to promote themselves.
Thirdly, the draft gives no reason to believe this website/whatever is notable, per WP:GNG or any other guideline. Not least, because the draft doesn't cite a single useful source. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:02, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:07:50, 13 October 2022 review of submission by Evie.rr[edit]


How do I request a second review if my original administrator has said they won't review my re-submission? Thanks.

Evie.rr (talk) 13:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Evie.rr: you can't; this draft has been rejected and won't be reviewed again. As explained on your user talk page, it's time to drop this one and find something else to write about. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]