Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Apple Inc./Archive 6

Archive 1

←

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Archive 8

October 2022 note: archive 6 is dedicated to the old Assessment talk page, now redirected to the main talk page.

I merged the talk pages on October 7, 2022, in order to centralize discussion around the main WikiProject talk page, since discussions will simply not get seen on other pages. DFlhb (talk) 18:44, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Assessment Request: plasq

I have done some major work on the plasq article and would like someone to assess it. Thank you. --Thekmc (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Thekmc (talk · contribs),  Done - Now start & low RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 22:36, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Request: Galeon

The article is extended and is no longer stub. BTW, why is it covered by WikiProject Apple? I found no evidence that it runs on MacOS. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 12:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Czarkoff,  Already done RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 22:37, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Re-assessment request

The article Apple Inc. litigation needs to be re-assessed, as it was last assessed 2 years ago and its content has changed significantly since then. Please also assess as a good article candidate. Sctechlaw (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

I have also listed the article for peer review. Sctechlaw (talk) 22:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Sctechlaw,  Already done RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 22:38, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Request: iPhone 3GS

I've unified and recreated the Features list, added a Critical Reception tab which displays the Reviews of the iPhone 3GS, and added the bootrom change that happened in September 2009 in the History tab. Just wanted to get it assessed. Justinxtreme (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Justinxtreme,  Not done - Does this still need doing? RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 18:20, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Request: Info-Mac

I've added much sourcing to the Info-Mac article, and tried to clean it up a fair amount. It needs both quality and importance scale ratings. Second opinions, please... Dpaanlka (talk) 07:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Dpaanlka,  Not done - Does this still need doing? RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 18:21, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Questionable B

Please review the B assessment of I Am Rich. Thank you. Rlsheehan (talk) 01:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Rlsheehan,  Overturned: Downgraded to C - needs re-review against B criteria. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 17:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Requerst: Dota 2

I've done some serious work on this Valve product since I created it immediately after its announcement in October. It is currently a C-class article for the video game task force, so I would like to see a similar rating for this task force. DarthBotto _talk•cont 23:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

DarthBotto,  Done to good article. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 18:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

@DarthBotto and RhinosF1: The game is completely disconnected from this project. While the game was released on OS X/macOS, that release is not notable and has only one mention in the entire article. We don't add WP Germany either just because the game was at Gamescom at some point. Lordtobi (✉) 18:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Lordtobi, Thanks for the insight. Feel free to revert me again. And place {{not done|Not within our remit}} or Simmilar on this thread. All help appreciated, RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 18:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

•  Not within our remit Outdated request made in 2011, in the intervening 8 years the page was removed from the Apple Inc. project. -- ferret (talk) 19:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Yeah... I have absolutely no memory of making this request and everything that needed to be cleared up was nearly a decade ago... @RhinosF1 and Lordtobi: I'm not sure why you're pinging me now. DÅRTHBØTTØ _(T•C) 19:23, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

@DarthBotto: See the Talk:Dota 2 page as for why. ~ Dissident93 ^(talk) 03:57, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

I see that something happened, but it's a disrespectful waste of my time for Lordtobi to explain to me like I'm a child about a change in rating for something that hasn't been a subject eight years. Talk about teaching grandmother to sick eggs. DÅRTHBØTTØ _(T•C) 19:15, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

DarthBotto, I'm used to Wikitalk page being archived away within a week or two, so I though that this request was maximally that old. Apologies if this came about the wrong way. Regards. Lordtobi (✉) 19:29, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Request: Feral Interactive

Feral Interactive is currently rated stub, but I've added citations to official sources (e.g. regarding its awards) and made significant updates (it now lists the entirety of the company's past and present games) and believe it qualifies for a higher rating. I'd also like to request an importance assessment for the article if possible. Eeeeeb (talk) 15:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Eeeeeb,  Upgraded to C and  rated as low. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 18:06, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Request: John Draper

Article has received a significant cleanup of sourcing and quality edits throughout. ahess247 (talk) 22:05, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Ahess247,  Not done - Please ensure it's fully cited RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 18:11, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Assessment Request: MacPorts

Updated a lot of the images and added more technical content. I'd be interested in hearing an outside opinion on it. Thanks for your help. PonyDuck21 (talk) 11:27, 12 August 2021 (UTC)