The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. Ifconsensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that are spoken on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Spoken WikipediaWikipedia:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaTemplate:WikiProject Spoken WikipediaSpoken Wikipedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
We do, and I don't know where you got the idea that we don't. Certainly not from any site guideline or other body of community consensus. We don't care about officialness, we care about representativeness and appropriateness—these simply happen to correspond with one another rather often for biographies. Remsense ‥ 论06:21, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H1216-0500-002, Adolf Hitler.jpg is the offical portrait. If you don't add it now remove "official portrait" from infobox and say "Hitler in 1938". DisneyGuy744 (talk) 06:33, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I agree broadly with Remsense, the best (clearest and best representative) photo of the subject is what we should use, cropped or otherwise. There is no good reason that I know of why we would either use (or label) the photo 'official'. In context, what does it even mean? This is a portrait by AH's official personal photographer, but I doubt if it is the only officially used portrait from his time as leader. BTW, the photo is retouched anyway to remove scratches, so any notion that it is (or should be) in an unaltered form is 'for the birds' really.Pincrete (talk) 07:26, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok join the conversation, let's talk. Why do you think the new image is bad. And if there was an image you liked better than the one that's on now would you be willing to change it? DisneyGuy744 (talk) 14:46, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Decisions of this type are not up to one or two people but would be decided in the usual way: consensus among interested editors. Here is an example of a previous infobox image discussion: Talk:Adolf Hitler/Archive 55#Photograph dispute. As you can see, people get fairly specific about the merits and flaws of the available images. We have a limited selection of compatibly-licensed images and several of them have served as the infobox portrait in the past. They all have their pluses and minuses, and none of them are particularly good by today's standards. Diannaa (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's not true, I checked the way back machine. only 3 images have been used as the infobox image. A crappy one in like 2003 that doesn't even look like a real photo of hitler, one that zooms into his face and doesn't show his body, kinda like the one similar to the current Mussolini page, and the modern one that's been here for like 8 or 9 years. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 16:04, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
thats not my ip address lol. It makes sense why people are saying the George w Bush first paragraph is too long, I called it. But I swear that's not my ip address. And I am here to build an encyclopedia, that's why I'm making edits I think's best and discussing them, and instead of joining the discussion it looks like you're just trying to get me banned for no reason lol. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 21:49, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Btw I didn't change the image 3 times. It was the same image you wanted to keep, just different cropped versions. And how am I getting out of hand with the George w Bush talk page, haven't been there in like a day or two. That ip wasn't mine. You ignored me asking for you to participate in the talk page discussion. I need consensus from you since other editors didn't care to revert. How am I supposed to get consensus from you if you ignore me for hours and only reply to try and get me banned? DisneyGuy744 (talk) 22:03, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I am not surprised that nobody showed up to talk about this while the Superbowl was on TV, where I come from, a Super bowl is something made by Spode where a Sloane Ranger might keep fruit! But seriously, I have a slight preference for the (1938) pre-existing image and wouldn't object to it being cropped slightly more to head and shoulders. The newer (semi-profile) is OK, but I see no advantage to it. Both seem to show more of the tunic than the man, so slight cropping would work for me. Pincrete (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can we have File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882, Adolf Hitler retouched.jpg as there's no white mark on his face and it's cleaned up. Or crop the one we have right now? DisneyGuy744 (talk) 18:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The current one gives a full face pose without shadow, nor turned to the side, but as I wrote in 2013, I believe the photo (File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882), a/k/a Adolf Hitler (and using the improved retouched.jpg) is less of a propaganda pose than the current portrait photo of Hitler, circa 1938 a/k/a File: Hitler portrait crop.jpg. DisneyGuy744, my main point above was that you needed to obtain a consensus, which you did not have for a change of photo. With that said, I have stated my points as to each photo herein. Kierzek (talk) 22:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Boneless Pizza! what's wrong with File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882? you say i need consensus, yet you never came to discuss except when you wrote a message trying to get me banned for no reason. how am i supposed to get consensus from you? seems like 90% of editors on this discussion don't care. the other guy who said i need consensus, Kierzek, also doesn't care. he just said his problem with me changing the image yesterday was consensus. and the last guy who reverted my edit reverted a cropped version of the current image that doesn't show hitler's arms because he said it was low quality, but doesn't have a problem with File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882, only the cropped image of the current image. @Diannaa can i add File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882 or Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882 Adolf Hitler retouched.jpg to the infobox? i can't get consensus from boneless pizza because he doesn't wanna show up. pincrete says the new image i wanna add is ok. you said you personally don't care deeply which image we use. the other guy doesn't care, and the other guy just won't show up. i've got consenus from everyone except boneless pizza who won't show up and remsense who stopped participating after the first message. can i add the new image? i perfer that one because it just makes the page look nicer and got consensus from everyone editor participating now DisneyGuy744 (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't look like anybody is in favor of changing the image, so that means consensus is against a change at this time. I don't think it matters much which one we use; they all have their flaws.Diannaa (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
what do you mean we haven't reached consensus, Diannaa? the definition of consensus means "a general agreement", pincrete says the new image I wanna add is ok even though he prefers the 1938 image should be kept just cropped, he still said the 1937 image is ok too. you said you personally don't care and all images of hitler have flaws so i guess that means you think the image looks ok compared to the other one. Kierzek said there's flaws with both images so it looks like he doesn't care if we change it or not just like you. like i said from the beginning 90% of editors seem to care very little or not at all, the ones who seriously oppose refuses to communicate and join the discussion, so it looks like we've reached consensus. Kierzek said in his most recent message "my main point above was that you needed to obtain a consensus, which you did not have for a change of photo." did you catch that? he said "needed" not "need". he can also see we have enough of a general agreement and consensus now. the agreement being "both images have flaws, so it doesn't matter" except me i think the 1937 is way better and more professional looking, therefore it looks like if the editor that opposes doesn't join the discussion, well he isn't involved and we've reached an agreement where it doesn't matter if the image is changed or not so i can change it. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 01:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
DisneyGuy744:Please do not put words in my mouth. I said you need consensus, which you did not have and the fact is you still don’t have it. There is no difference in what I said. You needed it then and you need it now. If you keep disrupting and edit warring over this, you will face the possibility of being blocked. I see you’ve not been editing very long, I would suggest you read and follow WP:BRD. Kierzek (talk) 14:29, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
My suggestion is that since you got reverted four times when you did change it, that you shouldn't now change it unless you have consensus to do so. The fact that the person you were edit warring with decided to go away and do something more productive with his time does not mean it's now okay for you to change the image without agreement that it needs to be changed and which image to change it to. My opinion is that it doesn't need to be changed, since all the available images have their flaws. So I think we should keep the image that's there now. Diannaa (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I got reverted 4 times, 3 times from the editor who just disappeared, so since he's not discussing he's basically out of the conversation, and one time by another guy because I added a low quality image of the 1938 picture, but the guy who made the 4th revert didn't have a problem with the 1937 picture and didn't revert that. Also, Can you please tell me how the 1937 image has flaws. There's a clean image you showed earlier with no white Marks on Adolf's face. You think we should keep the image we have now. If you give me permission, we have a general agreement from everyone that "it doesn't matter" so I can do it. And remember the word "consensus" means a general agreement so I can change it if the consensus is "it doesn't matter". Can you please give me permission or give your reasons why the cropped 1937 image File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-S33882 is flawed. If you give permission or say you don't care, I will have full consensus. The current image just looks so unprofessional and it's been bothering me for the last 3 years. It's the reason I made a Wikipedia account 5 months ago in the first place. To reach 500 edits and change it. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 03:21, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, you are arguing as though we have to prove that your preference is wrong, otherwise you are entitled to change. It's the other way round, you have to convince that your preference is an improvement. I may have only a fairly marginal preference for the pre-existing image, and wouldn't get upset if the majority had the opposite opinion, but I still clearly defended the pre-existing image. At the moment It doesn't look like anybody is in favor of changing the image, so that means consensus is against a change, it doesn't mean that we haven't strongly opposed, so we should keep you happy by making a change that you obviously have strong feelings about. For myself, my opinion is based on a preference for a full-on-face portrait, mainly of the face/head/shoulders. Photographic quality, state of preservation, lighting, attire all seem much the same in both photos. Pincrete (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Pincrete, I'm not arguing as though you have to prove that my preference is wrong, I've been saying it looked like we had a "general agreement" (which is the definition of consensus) that "it does not matter if I change it because both images are flawed" even though i don't see how the 1937 image is flawed. in the 1938 image however, Adolf's left arm looks bigger than the other one, his big elbow makes his arm looked bent, and it looks like there's like a piece of paper in the middle of his arm, it just looks so unprofessional, like it doesn't even look like a real picture. I can't believe it is. Maybe that's why you even want to crop it, but when i tried to crop it after boneless pizza kept getting mad about the 1937 image (he still won't join the discussion but says i need consensus from him) an editor undid the cropped 1938 image you're suggesting. and that editor hasn't joined the discussion but i bet he'll revert again. my preference is an improvement. Why? if you had no idea who Hitler was, if he was just a random guy and not a dictator, or became a businessman instead, and if you were showed the 1938 photo and the 1937 photo, you can't deny you will say the 1937 image looks way more professional. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 13:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I just read your message that said so we should keep you happy by making a change that you obviously have strong feelings about. i completly read over that message. cool i'm changing the image right now. thanks, Pincrete. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. DisneyGuy744, don't ping me any more please. It's distacting, and the page is on my watchlist. I will come when I have time. Diannaa (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
well can i ask you, do you think the image is an improvement, do you hate the new image, do you not care, would you be willing to change the image if you don't like the 1937 picture but find a better one that you like. what's your opinon. because right now it seems most people don't care. and Picrete thinks cropping the 1938 image like i did is a good idea too. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the "official" portrait should stay as it seems that the picture has existed for a while without issue. Also I cannot speak for Picrete but I would be mindful of putting "words in their mouth" when supporting your argument. Yedaman54 (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Following up on what I said in the message above I am unsure if Pincrete actually gave you "permission" per say as he states "It doesn't look like anybody is in favor of changing the image, so that means consensus is against a change". Yedaman54 (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's not the "official" portrait. I don't know who put that there. And that's another reason why the image should be changed, it's been there forever. Some have tried to change it over the years but got reverted. If something's been on a page for 40 years, and there's no flaws with the new image, at least none you can point out, why does this talk page discussion even exist considering how only one person strongly opposes but refuses to join the discussion while the others don't care or lean towards the 1938 image just cropping it more like I did a few days ago DisneyGuy744 (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
In my personal opinion i think we should crop the 1938 image. I dont like the 1937 image. But I do agree with Nick or DisneyGuy that the 1938 image looks bad. I agree with Pincrete that cropping it more is the way forward HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I like the 1937 image, but cropping it is fine I guess. That would get rid of all the problems I have with the 1938 image, even though I like the 1937 better. So now we got a few votes for cropping it, count me in I guess. Dianaa, do you support cropping it? DisneyGuy744 (talk) 17:14, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok so Diannaa is out. 3 people have come to a general agreement that the 1938 image should be trimmed. Me, HumansRightsIsCool, and Pincrete. Remsense didn't participate. Boneless Pizza didn't participate, Yedaman said it should stay as is. Don't know if he's still in the conversation though. Dianaa officially left the conversation so it looks like her vote doesn't matter anymore. Kierzek said there's flaws with both images so it looks like he doesn't care if we change it or not. And the rest of the editors don't care. I'll give it another 12-24 hours to see if other editors also wanna give their thoughts. If not, it looks like we have a general agreement. Hahaha watch if I make the change because I have consensus now, and then an editor who wasn't involved in the discussion just says "I'll revert that because you don't have consensus from me", then the general agreement is just broken and the discussion restarts hahaha. Have that feeling but let's see. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 00:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding this edit, and the associated edit reason "Pincrete said we can change it". Firstly I am just one person and have no authority to give you permission. Secondly, I said no such thing, rather I fairly clearly said the opposite. My (slight perhaps) preference for the 1938 image is clear. You also selectively quote me twice in a way that indicates you either can't or aren't willing to understand fairly simple English. You seem determined to prove that you are either unable to understand, or you are simply trolling. Let me be even more explicit, I am NOT in favour of the change of image you propose. AFAI can see nor is anyone else. Like Diannaa, I don't intend to engage further, I have made my opinion clear and am unlikely to change it. Please don't misuse my name again to justify going against consensus.
Dianaa officially left the conversation so it looks like her vote doesn't matter anymore, isn't how it works. If you aren't able to understand why, you really shouldn't be here IMO! Pincrete (talk) 04:22, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Pincrete. First off how is discussing edits and doing what I think's best for the encyclopedia trolling. Second off sorry for misunderstanding your message giving me permission, it was morning and I was still trying to fully wake up and process everything. I apologize for acting extremely unprofessional. Third off I don't know why Diannaa left. I mean you guys leave and say this thread is a waste of time in response to me trying to end the thread as early as possible even though I do put some blame on myself for being a little too rushy. Now it's impossible to get her consensus because she took herself out of the conversation. Question. You said the current 1938 image should stay in your last message. Are you still in favor of cropping the current image? Because the people still participating all of us say the image should be cropped where it only shows Hitler's head and shoulders kinda like how the Mussolini and Eva Braun pages are. Even though I preferred the 1937 image, in case you don't know another guy joined in and said crop the 1938 image. So I guess I'm ok with that too. If you vote to crop it, all the people who participated who haven't tooken themselves out of the conversation have all came to the same agreement. If you vote no I guess I have to move on and I guess I wasted 5 months of trying to hit 500 edits for no reason since changing the image on this page is a major reason why I made this account. Since Diana left you make or break the consensus since your vote is unclear from your last message and everyone is saying crop it now. I know you said you weren't gonna reply, but I wanna make sure I got consensus from everybody or if I don't. Either way God bless you and thank you for spending your time here, I know you didn't want to do so god bless you and sorry for acting like a jerk earlier. even if you break the consensus I still appreciate your time and hope for the best. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 06:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
People don't have to continue to post in the thread for their opinions to be taken into account in the consensus-building process. A lot of times people will give their opinion and then move on to other activities. That doesn't mean they no longer get a voice or that their opinion doesn't matter just because they have not posted in response to your every thought or suggestion. Diannaa (talk) 00:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The current image is fine as is. The image that you wanted to replace it with was fine too, but Hitler wasn't facing the front direction, so that's subjectively a no for me. However, the current consensus seems to be cropped version of 1938 image, and I agree on that one too. Colorized version would be fine too imo maybe even better. Don't know if this image was in a discussion before.
Hey Diannaa, didn't expect you to come back. I had surgery and then slept all day so I was gone for a while, but yeah the painting looks nice, but Hitler is a modern political figure, for important political people who lived 500 years ago, like George Washington, paintings are a must, but Hitler is a modern figure and there's tons of real photos of him. If we're not using paintings for Joseph Stalin, Lenin, Trotsky, tsar Nicholas the second, Mussolini, Marx, FDR, or any other historical political figures from around the time Hitler Was alive, why use a painting for him. The 1937 image is the best image for this page, but since the current consensus is leaning towards cropping the 1938 image even more, I guess I vote for that too. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 03:49, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Bro I just realized Kazama16 said "However, the current consensus seems to be cropped version of 1938 image, and I agree with that one too". We officially have 4 or 5 votes for that now. Diannaa and the new guy who wants the painting seem to be the only ones participating who oppose. If the consensus keeps going in this direction and ultimately doesn't turn around, which Cropped Version are you guys suggesting, because there's multiple different cropped images of this portrait. The one currently on this page is a cropped version. Haha. Are you guys talking about cropping the image where it only shows Hitler's head and shoulders, like how the Eva Braun and Mussolini pages are, or are you saying crop it a little bit more but not a lot. I might be reading you wrong, because everyone is different and thinks differently so just asking in case. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 07:20, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. I'll wait for a day or two to see if the consensus changes. If not and more people vote for the cropped 1938 image, or if the number stays the same, I'll ask to change it. At that point the consensus is pretty clear to me but I don't wanna upset anyone again in case people wanna keep discussing for some reason. Hey new guy, if your still here, I know you want the painting, but would you rather have the cropped 1938 image or keep the page the same. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 08:50, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok so you and Diaanna are the only ones who oppose. I'm also kinda new so I don't know what to do if 4 or 5 people say crop it more and 2 people oppose. Do we keep it since some oppose, or do we change it since the majority say crop it. I'm going to check Wikipedia's rules to see if it mentions a situation like this. If it does but I can't find it let me know. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 18:33, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Wikipedia's rules state The quality of arguments is more important than whether it represents a minority or a majority view. I stated why I don't like the current image, one arm looks bigger than the other, Hitler's shoulder or elbow is so big it makes his arm look bent, and I don't know what's between Hitler's arms, is that a piece of paper or what. I explained how I think the portrait looks unprofessional. Can't really think of a quality argument the opposing side made. So it looks like it's going to get changed unless the opposing side comes up with a quality argument to keep it according to Wikipedia's guidelines. I'll give it about 24 hours. If nothing happens, I'll ask to change it since the consensus is clear at that point. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 18:45, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ive been thinking and I think that we should change it. I see no reason not to, and I don't think it has been changed in quite sometime. I also don't really see importance of this, but I am also a new user who doesn't understand yet. SpooklesMan (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
you're changing your vote? now SpooklesMan is on our side. I don't even have to ask to change it the consensus is super clear, but i'll wait for about 12 hours is case diannaa wants to add something since she's the only one who opposes now. if not, i'll change it. also, this thread really isn't that important to anyone except me. even though everyone's saying change it, it doesn't seem like people care as much as me, even though they're saying change it. So thanks for your time SpooklesMan even though you don't care that much. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Ok Diaanna's last edit on another page was about 2 hours ago, long after I wrote my last message seeing if she wants to add anything. Everyone else participating voted to crop the 1938 image (assuming Pincrete didn't change his vote) so I guess this thread is officially closed. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 00:50, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This images is of very low quality is there not one of better quality that's not all fuzzy and blurry for those of us with large monitors? Moxy🍁02:05, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We came to the consensus that we crop the 1938 image more, but only one suggested which cropped version we use. You're free to change it to which ever cropped version you want since we didn't really discuss that on this thread, but it can't be the one I just changed since we all came to the agreement to remove that one DisneyGuy744 (talk) 02:21, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I think about it, Moxy is right about the quality. If it is cleaned up, then I think it will be fine. I could probably clean it my self, but I am not going to work on it tonight because it is late where I live. SpooklesMan (talk) 02:29, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I do not see any consensus to use a cropped photo in the above discussion. My opposition to the cropped image can be added onto that of other editors above, since it is excessively blurry. Discussions like these need to be conducted with much less off-topic posting, haste, bludgeoning, and flawed vote counting. I suggest a simple RfC if this issue persists, since the above discussion is supremely unclear and hard-to-follow for the reasons mentioned. — Goszei (talk) 03:48, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
There is consensus to crop the 1938 image and what do you mean the voting was flawed? Before I closed this discussion I voted for it, HumansRightsIsCool voted for it, Pincrete voted for it, SpooklesMan voted for it, and kiezerak said he was ok with it. I know the image is blurry, can someone please clean it up or use a different cropped image that's not blurry since we didn't really discuss which Cropped image we should use just that we should definitely crop it more. Also before saying "there is no consensus" please read the previous messages closer even if it is long and confusing DisneyGuy744 (talk) 03:59, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You're not going to get a clear crop from that image; it's too small. It doesn't really look all that blurry until you add it to articlespace. Then it looks terrible. Unprofessional even. I am logging off now; it's late here and I have work in the morning. Diannaa (talk) 04:46, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Just cleaned this image up. What do you guys think?
One of the alternative crops shows enough tunic to make it clear he is wearing a be-medalled uniform. That gives context IMO, otherwise this cleaned-up head and shoulders looks OK to me, but I don't know how well it would look in article space (or why that's different). Pincrete (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@HumansRightsIsCool, Your licensing is wrong; the original was donated to us by the Bundesarchiv in 2008 and you have to use the same licensing. The original image is File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H1216-0500-002, Adolf Hitler.jpg. Please copy all the licensing and the infobox data from there. You need to note on File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H1216-0500-002, Adolf Hitler.jpg that you have created a new extracted image, and you need to note on your new image that it is extracted from File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H1216-0500-002, Adolf Hitler.jpg. You also should rename the image to a more descriptive name, assuming you have renaming rights at the Commons. If you don't, you should request a rename. Diannaa (talk) 05:16, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
To Goszei what did the new image do to his mustache and tie pin. To Pincrete I wish I could test the new image on this article but I got my extended confirmed edit privileges taken away months and months ago for gaming the system when I had no idea that was against Wikipedia rules. To Diaanna I thought you were asleep. And I don't know anything about licensing or copyright laws. I'm just trying to help find a solution to this conflict HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
His moustache looks sparse and unevenly cut. Compare that to how it looks in the uncropped portrait, or how it looks close up in File:Adolf Hitler cropped restored 3x4.jpg. That image also depicts his tie pin, which I think is also in the 1938 portrait, though it is hard to tell for sure; the AI obviously wasn't able to extrapolate that. AI upscaling is bad for the encyclopedia because it necessarily contains hallucinatory artifacts like this. — Goszei (talk) 05:31, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Your focusing on tiny details that don't matter, like how DisneyGuy744 was focusing on tiny details that bothered him. Instead of everyone focusing on tiny details, let's try to come up with a solution. HumansRightsIsCool (talk) 05:57, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What I pointed out are only the most articulatable manifestations of the problem with using AI upscales. This image is a fabrication that makes up significant parts of Hitler's face. That is enough not to use it. The evident solution here is to use the waist-up crop or find another image. — Goszei (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
we're not changing the image. we're keeping the 1938 one. people voted to crop it more, but now people are saying it's two blurry. what if we just uncrop the image. i'm tired of this. we're using File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-H1216-0500-002, Adolf Hitler.jpg. give me 12 hours or so. DisneyGuy744 (talk) 08:19, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 February 2025
level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
.svg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
