Talk:Barbara Reskin

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

This article was nominated for deletion on 3 December 2007. The result of the discussion was Nomination withdrawn/merge into new main bio.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

United States: Indiana / Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Indiana portal This article is supported by WikiProject Indiana (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Low-importance).

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

This article is not intended to advertise for any product or person by any means. It is an article about Barbara Reskin and the work she has done with job and labor queues. As a student in a sociology class I needed to have information about this theory that she had purposed and found that there is little to nothing about it on the internet or wikipedia. For an assignment I have added it so that others can find information about it.

I understand that I only have research from Reskin's work but I have not been able to find other research on this theory. This is for a class project at UNC and I do not feel that it is blatant advertising. Do I need to find sources that dispute this theory? Or that are are from other people besides Reskin? I was only intended to create a definition and source for the Reskin Theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krstn4 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please help me. That would be great. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krstn4 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zero Google hits. I don't see how this meets notability guidelines. Unless some notability references are provided, it will be deleted. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:08, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Google search for "Barbara Reskin" yields 3,850 hits, and Google Scholar yields 725 hits; both are impressive. Additionally, her book Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads Into Male Occupations has been cited 479 times, making it the most influential work on gender and occupational segregation. Finally, Reskin's election as president of the professional association of sociologists five years ago also demonstrates her importance to the entire field of sociology. 152.2.25.87 19:42, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Reskin Theory," etc.[edit]

Hi all,

I propose changing the section called "Reskin Theory" to a section called "Queuing Theory." The theory was not originally developed by Reskin, but she did elaborate greatly on the elements of the theory as well as show its applicability to gender segregation in the workplace. I can also provide more cites for queuing theory if needed.

Additionally, I'd like to ask if it would be useful to expand the page with some information about her current research projects or classes. I will check in again.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.95.71.121 (talk • contribs)

The suggested rename sounds perfectly reasonable to me...perhaps expanding the article on Queueing theory is something in which you would be interested?

Any expansion of the current article is most welcome--please add any information you may find. — Scientizzle 06:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Barbara Reskin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]